test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

No love for Vulcan?

ghyudtghyudt Member Posts: 1,112 Arc User
I was just wondering why there aren't more Vulcan ships in this game? It touches briefly on Vulcan in the first few missions, but you never see any Vulcan battleships or cruisers anywhere. The only one available in the store is the D'Kyr science vessel, and it kind of seems like there shuld be more support ships for it. Or perhaps it should be supporting bigger, tactically based cruisers. I just find it hard to believe that the coolest ships from the show aren't even given a fair shake in this game. At least give us a Surak class cruiser. (Yes, I'm a cruiser captain, and yes, I like huge ships).
Post edited by ghyudt on
«1

Comments

  • assimilatedktarassimilatedktar Member Posts: 1,708 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    You mean the coolest ships from the worst show?:D
    FKA K-Tar, grumpy Klingon/El-Aurian hybrid. Now assimilated by PWE.
    Sometimes, if you want to bury the hatchet with a Klingon, it has to be in his skull. - Captain K'Tar of the USS Danu about J'mpok.
  • flash525flash525 Member Posts: 5,441 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    You mean the coolest ships from the worst show?
    Hey, Enterprise wasn't the worst show. The reason it failed was because of all the fans who didn't like change and were stuck in the dark ages. :P
    attachment.php?attachmentid=42556&d=1518094222
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    The vulcans are part of the federation... it would be very illogical for them to devote large amounts of resources to Combat ship development...

    If they have anything, its a small defensive force, some sci ships and transports.
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    The obvious reason you don't see any Vulcan battleships in the 25th century is that Vulcans don't have warships any more.
    They changed quite a lot in the two centures after the "Kir Shara" incident.

    Fron TNG:"Unification" part 2

    RIKER: We're investigating the disappearance of a Vulcan ship.
    OMAG: Well you've got the wrong Ferengi. I never trade in Vulcan ships.
    RIKER: We know that you're involved.
    OMAG: Who would want a Vulcan ship? Vulcans are pacifists. I deal in warships. Can somebody get me a napkin?

    And if there's one thing we can say about a Ferengi, it's that they know their merchandise.
  • assimilatedktarassimilatedktar Member Posts: 1,708 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    flash525 wrote: »
    Hey, Enterprise wasn't the worst show. The reason it failed was because of all the fans who didn't like change and were stuck in the dark ages. :P

    The reason it failed was because you could see that the writers were at best casual Star Trek viewers, and that it constantly had to reference the other shows to remind people that it was STAR TREK!!!!:eek: And did it extremely poorly. Sure, the Enterprise NX-01 makes first contact with the Ferengi. And then for 200 friggin years while they expand the Federation never runs into Ferengis. Or the Organians. Sure, they had to meet them before Kirk, and they almost ran into the Cardassians too. All with a warp 5 engine. Never get me started on that show, the best thing about it was the theme song (okay, and the ship designs, even though they don't fit into the progression from TOS at all). The only worse Star Trek is Abrams-TRIBBLE.
    FKA K-Tar, grumpy Klingon/El-Aurian hybrid. Now assimilated by PWE.
    Sometimes, if you want to bury the hatchet with a Klingon, it has to be in his skull. - Captain K'Tar of the USS Danu about J'mpok.
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    flash525 wrote: »
    Hey, Enterprise wasn't the worst show. The reason it failed was because of all the fans who didn't like change and were stuck in the dark ages. :P

    It was actually the producers who feared change.
    That's why it was precisely like the 24th century but with word combinations that didn't make any sense in the show's context. "Hull plating offline" was the prime example. They reused the same phrase they would have used for shields but put "plating" in its place.
    It's armor. If it's offline it's BROKEN and must be replaced, you can't bring it back online because it's GONE.

    Also, we know from "The Cage" that in the earlier 23rd century Starfleet still used lasers.
    Would it not have been more interesting had the crew of "Enterprise" been forced to rely on other methods to stun people than "Phase Pistols" which were another case of "just use the same as always and stick another name on it"? Tranc darts that have a "surprise" effect depending on what kind of physiology they hit wold've been more creative and an actual change. Depending on who they hit they could've accidentally killed, or freaked the other guy out LSD-style, done nothing or actually done their job on occasion. It would've made things interesting, would've more low-tech and would've been an actual change to the show.

    They way B&B approached the matter, the would've made a show about Napoleon and given him tanks, machine guns and cruise missiles. The only "change" would be that tanks would be called "tank pods", the machine guns would be "mach-cannons" and the cruise missiles would be called "cruisic missiles".
  • kojirohellfirekojirohellfire Member Posts: 1,606 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Continuity errors aside, the writing on Enterprise was rather poor. They rehashed a lot of stock plots from prior Star Trek series, the characters felt even more flat than Voyager's (at least on Voyager, I found two characters I liked, I couldn't even find one on Enterprise), and it seemed like they really had no clue where they were taking that Temporal Cold War BS. Or the Xindi, for that matter. I gave up on it someway halfway in season 3.

    The guy who made this site sums up a few of my thoughts rather well and brings up a lot of other excellent points: http://www.firsttvdrama.com/enterprise/
  • ficrficr Member Posts: 235 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    The reason it failed was because you could see that the writers were at best casual Star Trek viewers, and that it constantly had to reference the other shows to remind people that it was STAR TREK!!!!:eek: And did it extremely poorly. Sure, the Enterprise NX-01 makes first contact with the Ferengi. And then for 200 friggin years while they expand the Federation never runs into Ferengis. Or the Organians. Sure, they had to meet them before Kirk, and they almost ran into the Cardassians too. All with a warp 5 engine. Never get me started on that show, the best thing about it was the theme song (okay, and the ship designs, even though they don't fit into the progression from TOS at all). The only worse Star Trek is Abrams-TRIBBLE.

    The reason Voyager, Enterprise, and the 2nd reboot failed for me is that they abandoned their premise. Voyager should have looked more like "The Year of Hell". Enterprise had lots of potential to show the introduction of technologies from Zefram Cochrane to Kirk (Dilithium Crystals, Transporters, Replicators etc). The 2nd reboot wasn't original at all.

    Not that the first reboot didn't leave me with a lot of questions. A mining ship (not a military ship) from the near future makes short work of a Federation Fleet?

    Ex-CoH players, Please add the chat channel "CoX STO"
  • starswordcstarswordc Member Posts: 10,965 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    ficr wrote: »
    Not that the first reboot didn't leave me with a lot of questions. A mining ship (not a military ship) from the near future makes short work of a Federation Fleet?

    According to STO Nero's ship was modified with Borg tech, but I don't think they even needed that. One bit of reasoning I saw was that Nero's ship was simply 150 years newer and built with better tech. Those same weapons that slaughtered a 2250s Federation fleet would have been laughed at by a contemporary ship such as the Enterprise-E.
    "Great War! / And I cannot take more! / Great tour! / I keep on marching on / I play the great score / There will be no encore / Great War! / The War to End All Wars"
    — Sabaton, "Great War"
    VZ9ASdg.png

    Check out https://unitedfederationofpla.net/s/
  • turbomagnusturbomagnus Member Posts: 3,479 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Honestly, let's face it, Enterprise was only really worth watching for three, maybe four characters;

    Tucker, Soval and Shran, sometimes Reed.
    "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." -- Q, TNG: "Q-Who?"
    ^Words that every player should keep in mind, especially whenever there's a problem with the game...
  • anazondaanazonda Member Posts: 8,399 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Honestly, let's face it, Enterprise was only really worth watching for three, maybe four characters;

    Tucker, Soval and Shran, sometimes Reed.

    Thats a matter of opinion... I think Enterprise was well worth watching... The only Star Trek I really got bored by, was Voyager.
    Don't look silly... Don't call it the "Z-Store/Zen Store"...
    Let me put the rumors to rest: it's definitely still the C-Store (Cryptic Store) It just takes ZEN.
    Like Duty Officers? Support effords to gather ideas
  • bernatkbernatk Member Posts: 1,089 Bug Hunter
    edited October 2013
    ficr wrote: »
    Not that the first reboot didn't leave me with a lot of questions. A mining ship (not a military ship) from the near future makes short work of a Federation Fleet?

    Nope. Check out Countdown comics part 3 page 12.

    Nero's ship Narada got outfitted w/ borg nanotechnology on a secret Romulan military base. Probably w/ nanoprobes that adapt and learn and gain in mass as they advance.

    And good for you, I have hundreds of questions about the first reboot film... :P
    Tck7dQ2.jpg
    Dahar Master Mary Sue                                               Fleet Admiral Bloody Mary
  • shpoksshpoks Member Posts: 6,967 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    flash525 wrote: »
    Hey, Enterprise wasn't the worst show. The reason it failed was because of all the fans who didn't like change and were stuck in the dark ages. :P

    I concur. I quite enjoyed Enterprise myself. Never understood why that particular show gets so much bashing.
    HQroeLu.jpg
  • turbomagnusturbomagnus Member Posts: 3,479 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Never said the show itself was bad, as a show it wasn't bad at all. Just that I didn't particularly care for the way that the majority of the characters came across. The show itself had some of the best storylines of any of the series; The Expanse, the Augments, the Vulcan-Andorian conflicts, the Vulcan Reformation...
    "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." -- Q, TNG: "Q-Who?"
    ^Words that every player should keep in mind, especially whenever there's a problem with the game...
  • marshalericdavidmarshalericdavid Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Star Trek Enterprise might of been a good T.V. show but was it a good STAR TREK show?

    Me I liked it but even liking it some it was by far my least favorite Star Trek show even Star Trek The Animated Series I like a ton more.
  • denizenvidenizenvi Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    misterde3 wrote: »
    "Hull plating offline" was the prime example. They reused the same phrase they would have used for shields but put "plating" in its place.
    It's armor. If it's offline it's BROKEN and must be replaced, you can't bring it back online because it's GONE.

    Hull plating gets more hate than it deserves. Though they didn't really make it clear, the hull plating was supposed to 'harden' when exposed to an electric current or something. Similar principle to how starship hull members could be energized with the structural integrity field so they could handle more stress. The hull plates were always there, but after taking a beating, they lost the capability to be as tough, and so were vulnerable to being pierced or broken.
    Take a look at my Foundry missions!

    Conjoined
    , Re-emergence, and . . .

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • timezargtimezarg Member Posts: 1,268
    edited October 2013
    Returning to the subject at hand. . .I don't think Vulcans need another ship in-game, even if the 'pacifist' argument didn't apply. I'm looking at it from the perspective of equal representation within the Federation arsenal. The Federation faction now has a Vulcan ship, an Andorian ship (two, if you count the T1 light escort), and a Caitian ship. If they add another 'Federation species' ship into the mix, it should be Tellarite or something.

    In all honesty, it makes more sense for the KDF to have such ships, at least in this game. They come across as more the type to take control and then utilize the captured technology and ships in its original form along with adding it onto their ships. As long as the technology is on par with the current ships, it works well enough. Especially with STO having the KDF be an Empire that has its subject species serving extensively on military vessels. It's not the canon Klingon Empire, but then again. . .we're not working within the guidelines of strict canon.
    tIqIpqu' 'ej nom tIqIp
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    denizenvi wrote: »
    Hull plating gets more hate than it deserves. Though they didn't really make it clear, the hull plating was supposed to 'harden' when exposed to an electric current or something. Similar principle to how starship hull members could be energized with the structural integrity field so they could handle more stress. The hull plates were always there, but after taking a beating, they lost the capability to be as tough, and so were vulnerable to being pierced or broken.

    It was supposedly based on a RL ceramic that gets stronger when an electric current is put through it. Fine, that means energy weapons can't penetrate it so easily.
    So it takes a bigger shot to get through than without polarization.
    Think about it for a minute: it's like putting current through a light bulb which then glows.
    When you beat the light bulb, the bulb gets damaged and eventually breaks, NOT the power socket/power source. But that's the kind of reverse thinking those...producers applied.
    When you put more power into it, it suddenly glows again?
    Or are you telling me the shooting supposedly interrupted the current without actually damagin the plating? How's that supposed to work? The plating is there to protect what's BEHIND it, not the other way around.
    And even if it did interrupt the current, you can't get a severed link to work again by putting more power through it, it's still BROKEN.
  • adverberoadverbero Member Posts: 2,045 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    misterde3 wrote: »
    It was supposedly based on a RL ceramic that gets stronger when an electric current is put through it. Fine, that means energy weapons can't penetrate it so easily.
    So it takes a bigger shot to get through than without polarization.
    Think about it for a minute: it's like putting current through a light bulb which then glows.
    When you beat the light bulb, the bulb gets damaged and eventually breaks, NOT the power socket/power source. But that's the kind of reverse thinking those...producers applied.
    When you put more power into it, it suddenly glows again?
    Or are you telling me the shooting supposedly interrupted the current without actually damagin the plating? How's that supposed to work? The plating is there to protect what's BEHIND it, not the other way around.
    And even if it did interrupt the current, you can't get a severed link to work again by putting more power through it, it's still BROKEN.

    wait a sec, your gonna bash polarised plating , which is not fully accurate, but pretty close to potential reality , and your talking about the same show that has Transporters? can you explain how those work in detail? Or maybe how exactly Posotronic Brains work?

    No because they are made up, and very little information is supplied, the whole shows premise of warp travel isn't even that realistic, i for one will forgive a bit of iffy hull plating




    Back on topic to vulcan ships, I like them, some of the ring drive designs i LOVE , but i can see how they would be tactically out dated , even obselete by 2409
    I would perhaps like to see something like the 'Jellyfish' with a specific scientific purpose maybe , since that is there main area of expertese

    I would also argue that some Vulcan Ships belong in the hands of players more than say a Galor class , or the Chel Grett , the Temporal Ships and the Monbosh Plus others that have little or no explination for being under the command of Starfleet Captains as COMMISSIONED Starfleet Vessels ( admititly i think i saw in the patch notes that theres an option to drop the prefix now )
    solar_approach_by_chaos_sandwhich-d74kjft.png


    These are the Voyages on the STO forum, the final frontier. Our continuing mission: to explore Pretentious Posts, to seek out new Overreactions and Misinformation , to boldly experience Cynicism like no man has before.......
  • zipagatzipagat Member Posts: 1,204 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    shpoks wrote: »
    I concur. I quite enjoyed Enterprise myself. Never understood why that particular show gets so much bashing.

    Too many episodes like "A night in sickbay'' and not enough like what was shown in S4.

    Plus the only person who apparently is not a complete moron who doesn't throw caution is Reid who gets told he is paranoid ect when he uses common sense.
  • assimilatedktarassimilatedktar Member Posts: 1,708 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    The show itself had some of the best storylines of any of the series;

    :eek:
    The Expanse

    Part of the horrible, stupid, temporal cold war.
    the Augments

    And of course they had to connect Data to augments, because hell, nothing independent happens in the universe. Still, could have been worse.
    the Vulcan-Andorian conflicts, the Vulcan Reformation...

    One of the worst parts. Because clearly, just 100 years later everyone believes that Vulcans are actually freaking INCAPABLE OF LYING. Okay, I see how stupid humans are everytime when elections are, but come on, that's stretching it.

    Back to topic. I like the Vulcan ship designs and that show actually implies that Vulcan will build ships in the future.. I wouldn't have a problem with Cryptic introducing more. However, I would be more interested in finally getting a fleet cruiser retrofit (Exeter/Excalibur).
    FKA K-Tar, grumpy Klingon/El-Aurian hybrid. Now assimilated by PWE.
    Sometimes, if you want to bury the hatchet with a Klingon, it has to be in his skull. - Captain K'Tar of the USS Danu about J'mpok.
  • adverberoadverbero Member Posts: 2,045 Arc User
    edited October 2013



    Back to topic. I like the Vulcan ship designs and that show actually implies that Vulcan will build ships in the future.. I wouldn't have a problem with Cryptic introducing more. However, I would be more interested in finally getting a fleet cruiser retrofit (Exeter/Excalibur).

    Interesting commision date on that ship, quite far off, the three ring is one of my fave looks, hope they bring in something similar in game

    Also it says Dorsal Carrier? perhaps a good ship to base as a flight deck cruiser in game?
    solar_approach_by_chaos_sandwhich-d74kjft.png


    These are the Voyages on the STO forum, the final frontier. Our continuing mission: to explore Pretentious Posts, to seek out new Overreactions and Misinformation , to boldly experience Cynicism like no man has before.......
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    adverbero wrote: »
    Interesting commision date on that ship, quite far off, the three ring is one of my fave looks, hope they bring in something similar in game

    Also it says Dorsal Carrier? perhaps a good ship to base as a flight deck cruiser in game?

    The big question is whether the "carrier" part is actually meant for the Vulcan ship or the thing in the (from our persepctive) lower right corner.
    The whole thing is an overall "collage" of ships (at one point it even shows the Mir space station) and it's a bit tricky to know for sure what is meant for what.

    Oh, BTW Daniels was from an "alternate" future that didn't even have the whole Xindi War as part of its own history. In fact at a point "after" (for lack of a better term) this episode, the time "resets" itself as Daniels himself tells us.
    So we can't even be sure whether this ship is from this timeline's future to begin with.;)
  • turbomagnusturbomagnus Member Posts: 3,479 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    But the same can be said for plenty of ships; the Galaxy-X and Negh'var, especially - they had their first appearance in the 'Anti-time Future' from "All Good Things...", the Rhode Island-class (Science Vessel Refit) appeared first in an alternate future in "Endgame"...
    "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." -- Q, TNG: "Q-Who?"
    ^Words that every player should keep in mind, especially whenever there's a problem with the game...
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    But the same can be said for plenty of ships; the Galaxy-X and Negh'var, especially - they had their first appearance in the 'Anti-time Future' from "All Good Things...", the Rhode Island-class (Science Vessel Refit) appeared first in an alternate future in "Endgame"...

    At least their futures don't start to differ from this one as early as the mid 22nd century, which means they even beat JJ Trek by 80 years in terms of divergence point.;)
    And we know in some cases (like AGT, where the Fed and Klings are not on friendly terms any more) that the situation is at least similar enough to warrant similar approaches to starship construction.
  • adverberoadverbero Member Posts: 2,045 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    i would say alternate universe ships can have a place in prime universe, say if they scrapped it in prime but went back to the drawing board later for some reason
    solar_approach_by_chaos_sandwhich-d74kjft.png


    These are the Voyages on the STO forum, the final frontier. Our continuing mission: to explore Pretentious Posts, to seek out new Overreactions and Misinformation , to boldly experience Cynicism like no man has before.......
  • turbomagnusturbomagnus Member Posts: 3,479 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    You mean like scrapping a certain design as an anti-Borg vessel because it's engines were 'too powerful' for its hull, then pulling it out of mothballs, modifying and mass-producing it to fight the Dominion?
    "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." -- Q, TNG: "Q-Who?"
    ^Words that every player should keep in mind, especially whenever there's a problem with the game...
  • adverberoadverbero Member Posts: 2,045 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    You mean like scrapping a certain design as an anti-Borg vessel because it's engines were 'too powerful' for its hull, then pulling it out of mothballs, modifying and mass-producing it to fight the Dominion?

    yeah something along those lines, But knowing STO with more Cannons :P
    solar_approach_by_chaos_sandwhich-d74kjft.png


    These are the Voyages on the STO forum, the final frontier. Our continuing mission: to explore Pretentious Posts, to seek out new Overreactions and Misinformation , to boldly experience Cynicism like no man has before.......
  • redz4twredz4tw Member Posts: 3
    edited October 2013
    ficr wrote: »
    The reason Voyager, Enterprise, and the 2nd reboot failed for me is that they abandoned their premise. Voyager should have looked more like "The Year of Hell". Enterprise had lots of potential to show the introduction of technologies from Zefram Cochrane to Kirk (Dilithium Crystals, Transporters, Replicators etc). The 2nd reboot wasn't original at all.

    Not that the first reboot didn't leave me with a lot of questions. A mining ship (not a military ship) from the near future makes short work of a Federation Fleet?
    It was refitted with Borg technology.
  • turbomagnusturbomagnus Member Posts: 3,479 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    adverbero wrote: »
    yeah something along those lines, But knowing STO with more Cannons :P

    Reminds me of something I once said when, as a fanfic author, I got tired of someone constantly complaining that 'this didn't happen in canon'...

    I took a picture of a Civil War cannon and captioned it "Cannon - For when you just don't care about canon".
    "If you can't take a little bloody nose, maybe you ought to go back home and crawl under your bed. It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires both subtle and gross; but it's not for the timid." -- Q, TNG: "Q-Who?"
    ^Words that every player should keep in mind, especially whenever there's a problem with the game...
Sign In or Register to comment.