test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

We have escorts, destroyers, battle ships and crusiers....

jamesdaxjamesdax Member Posts: 159 Arc User
edited October 2013 in Federation Discussion
Now how 'bout that carrier? Seriously, we are at war on two fronts involving both space and ground combat. You can't tell me Star Fleet wouldn't develop a proper carrier.
Post edited by jamesdax on
«1

Comments

  • mustafatennickmustafatennick Member Posts: 868 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Canon wise no they wouldn't

    STO wise they already have, I mean the atrox is AMAZING

    It isn't starfleets own carrier but it's a federation ship
    ----=====This is my opinion you don't have to listen and no one else has to read them these "OPINIONS" are based on my exploits and my learning other people will have their opinions and that's fine just don't knock my way of doing things thanks=====---- :cool:
  • elandarkskyelandarksky Member Posts: 1,013 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    jamesdax wrote: »
    Now how 'bout that carrier? Seriously, we are at war on two fronts involving both space and ground combat. You can't tell me Star Fleet wouldn't develop a proper carrier.

    sending people in tiny ships to do gnats size damage to a big old cruiser where the most ikely outcome is blowing up when the fighter is hit, doesnt feel very starfleet to me,

    As for shuttles they are auxillary craft, for away missions etc (again, just what i think)

    But then again most people always point to DS9 because of the peregrine raider-y fighters, but my reasoning is.. its ds9, dont pay attention to it :D

    Come to think of it we should blame ds9 for how sto is at the moment where escorts often reign supreme XD *shakes fist* curse you defiant with your cannons!
    [Combat (Self)] Your Bite deals 2378 (1475) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother.
  • whamhammer1whamhammer1 Member Posts: 2,290 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Honestly, making a carrier for space isn't that hard, convert a large freighter and toss fighters out alongside the rest of a task force before an engagements and then warp away.
  • whamhammer1whamhammer1 Member Posts: 2,290 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    sending people in tiny ships to do gnats size damage to a big old cruiser where the most ikely outcome is blowing up when the fighter is hit, doesnt feel very starfleet to me,

    As for shuttles they are auxillary craft, for away missions etc (again, just what i think)

    But then again most people always point to DS9 because of the peregrine raider-y fighters, but my reasoning is.. its ds9, dont pay attention to it :D

    Come to think of it we should blame ds9 for how sto is at the moment where escorts often reign supreme XD *shakes fist* curse you defiant with your cannons!

    To be fair, we have to blame TNG for Wesley Crusher AND footie-pajamas for uniforms.
  • baelogventurebaelogventure Member Posts: 1,002 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Battleship? *Looks around* I don't see a playable Federation Battleship.

    Typhoon for Federation Battleship in 2014.
  • nebbiosadonzellanebbiosadonzella Member Posts: 14 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Given highly advanced computers, holodecks, and holo-people I would expect Starfleet to either use drones, holo-pilots, or control the fighters remotely from on-board holodecks.

    It is generally believed that if we ever get actual starships they will have at most a token crew to deal with hard choices and the unexpected, the rest being taken care by computers that are far more efficient that people at routine stuff. The problem is not 'why do they have starfighters if they love people so much?' but more like 'Why do they need four thousand dudes in a starship to begin with?'

    Maybe other than the bridge officers they are all holodudes. O.O
  • nebbiosadonzellanebbiosadonzella Member Posts: 14 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    People can survive EMP. Their ships don't. What purpose serves a live pilot on a dead fighter? He is not shooting anyone? He may as well be dead. Oh, and now you have to actually retrieve him before he dies for realz instead of just whenever you have the time.

    Also, closed systems can't be TRIBBLE outside of 'space magic.' Why would a starship in combat not have all their systems completely closed? By which I mean 'Disconected from the space net.' Would a starship in battle be running bluetooth or something? Drones are autonomous: The purpose of a controller ship is not to direct them but to set them up, launch them, and let them do their own thing. Then you recover them when the other dude is dead. If he's not dead you can just leave them behind and run.

    In any kind of realistic space combat humans are the weakest link. They are slower at processing information than computers are (their one advantage would be in target rich enviroments, which space is not), they can't deal with acceleration nearly as much as a drone can, and without their computers they are useless at the distances and speeds in which space combat would take place. Sure, you can ECM a drone. And you can ECM the computer the dude is using just as well. Good luck aiming that lazor gun at the bad guy 300.000 kms away by eye.

    And yes, I am sure those four thousand guys will be a great invasion force when INVADING A PLANET. :rolleyes:
  • nyniknynik Member Posts: 1,628 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Would a starship in battle be running bluetooth or something?

    :D Such a good comment right there.
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Hm... Let's see... The Heavy Escort Carrier... The Vesta with it's hangar bay... oh wait, what about the ATROX?? I'm sorry, especially considering the fleet Atrox is coming out, how can you even comment that feds don't have a carrier? I mean seriously?

    Feds weren't supposed to have carriers to begin with, that was supposed to be KDF only. However, after much BMWing, feds got their carrier, and they even got an ESCORT CARRIER and then a SCIENCE CARRIER. I fail to see what grounds there are to complain with.

    If anything, the Romulan players should be complaining they don't have a true carrier.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Why are people so against carriers, also cannon wise the Curry/Shelby class could be a carrier. so sorry guys the fed would make them.
  • timezargtimezarg Member Posts: 1,268
    edited October 2013
    Hm... Let's see... The Heavy Escort Carrier... The Vesta with it's hangar bay... oh wait, what about the ATROX?? I'm sorry, especially considering the fleet Atrox is coming out, how can you even comment that feds don't have a carrier? I mean seriously?

    Feds weren't supposed to have carriers to begin with, that was supposed to be KDF only. However, after much BMWing, feds got their carrier, and they even got an ESCORT CARRIER and then a SCIENCE CARRIER. I fail to see what grounds there are to complain with.

    If anything, the Romulan players should be complaining they don't have a true carrier.

    No, no, no, don't you get it? The Atrox isn't overpowered enough for them, so it's not a 'proper carrier'. Despite the fact that it's equivalent to the Vo'Quv. Maybe they have issues with having to fork over Zen for a carrier they have no business having. . .probably think they should have it 'free'.

    No matter how many new toys they get, Feddies are never happy. Always 'suggesting' new stuff or outright demanding it.
    tIqIpqu' 'ej nom tIqIp
  • khayuungkhayuung Member Posts: 1,876 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Give me a fleet dreadnought cruiser and I'll show you a Starfleet counter-incursion vessel.


    "Last Engage! Magical Girl Origami-san" is in print! Now with three times more rainbows.

    Support the "Armored Unicorn" vehicle initiative today!

    Thanks for Harajuku. Now let's get a real "Magical Girl" costume!
  • nebbiosadonzellanebbiosadonzella Member Posts: 14 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    skollulfr wrote: »
    your 'space fighter' will be 747 size at minimum. meaning fried parts could be replaced.
    (starwars and galactica, are completly wrong in their depictions.)

    Yes, I did my homework in theoretical Hard Sci-Fi space warfare. Which is exactly the point of drones: A drone is an engine, a computing system, and a gun. When most people thinks 'fighters' they think wrong, the idea with space warfare drones are weapons platforms.

    And how will a damaged system be repaired in the middle of space combat? Are you going to hide? You can't. Will they dodge? Lasers hit instantly up to 300.000 kms, faster than a human can react up to 600.000 km or even more. Missiles at that distance are pretty much drones: An engine, a computing system, and a payload. Will they out maneuver a missile that does not have to worry about G-Forces and that can compute trajectories faster that they can punch them in?

    The entire point of 'fighters' being drones is that realistic space combat would be incredibly lethal. There's no 'warships in space', there are Napoleonic era encounters with two forces shooting at each other with no cover, no stealth, and barely any dogding. The one who burns the other guy's gun first wins.

    And that can be done better by drones than by humans. They react faster, they move faster, they are more accurate, they don't have to deal with G-Forces, and if they blow up you just make another one. At those distances and speeds any of the measures that can invalidate a drone can invalidate a human crew because without electronics they are worthless.
    skollulfr wrote: »
    cant have closed systems and iff.
    drones arent autonamous in the way you think, more that they just have auto pilot. and they can and have been TRIBBLE.

    We are talking about theoretical hard sci-fi space warfare. If computing is at modern day level battles would be two starships facing each other and shooting until one of them goes badaboom. There are no 'tricks.' No space invisibility, no surprise attacks, barely any maneuvering: Either the guns hit you before you can react or they give you more than enough time to move out of the way, moment in which you can shoot them down with your own insta-hit lazors. If computing is at a level that permites more than that then it is at a level where drones can be more than an 'auto-pilot', simply because most of the work would be done by computers, with human dudes just saying 'shoot this first', 'don't shoot this, it's ours', 'let's run the hell out of there.'
    skollulfr wrote: »
    fight between 2 ai the fight is decided by the hardware running the ai, the best hardwear wins.
    an organic mind is harder to predict, this levels the playing field.

    At the speeds and distances on which theoretical hard sci-fi space combat would take place? Good one. So your organic mind decides to maneuver in a completely unexpected manner. Just, oops, you did flare your thrusters and everyone who is not light-hours away knows exactly what you are doing and aiming exactly at where you will be in the light-time it takes for the pew to reach you.

    Are you going to ambush them? Just, oops, everyone in the system knows exactly what you are doing, and the information will arrive to them long before YOU do, as the light from your thrusters does travel faster than YOU do. There are not even 'decoys' in space: The brightness from the thrusters will betray any decoy. The only way to make a decoy is to create a ship the same size, the same mass, the same thrust. And if you do that, uhm... Just slap some guns on it and you have another starship.

    And if you can see them, they can see you. If you can shoot a lazor, they can shoot a lazor. If their lazor takes enough time to reach you that your organic brain can dodge then your lazor takes long enough to reach them that then can dodge. If the lazors doesn't, then his doesn't. O.O

    So it's pretty much two ships standing there and going 'pewpewpew' on each other. The first one to fry the enemy's guns wins.

    Let the drones do it.

    The human element is negligible either way, if not counterproductive.
    skollulfr wrote: »
    if you understand the role they would play would be one of capturing key facilities, along with the people from the tens if not hundreds of other ships and orbital starships, not getting into trench warfare. then yes they will be.

    Problem is either you are going full pew on their planet, which does remove the need of an invading force, or you are not going full pew on their planet, which means your starships in orbit are sitting ducks. THERE IS NO HIDING IN SPACE. They saw your fleet coming since the very moment your fleet did flare it's engines, and they did shoot to where your fleet would be long before they did even reach the system. Did you maneuver? Oh, hey, the light will reach them long before you do. Did you slow down? Oh, hey, the light will reach them long before you do. In hard sci fi space you are one big sitting duck. Everyone sees you. Hell, the aliens from Zeta Reticuli will know you are going to invade Zeta Reticuli as soon as the lights from your fleet's thrusters reaches them, which is going to be long before your fleet does.

    And they will be shooting you long before you can shoot them. O.O Except if you go full pew on their planet, but then... What do you need an invasion force for? Build a bunch of really big missiles (an engine, a computing system, a big payload - A drone!) aim them to where their planet will be when the missiles arrive, and off they go. If they can shoot the missiles down they can shoot your fleet down, if they don't, well, you probably don't even need an invasion force. They will think your dudes are gods and make you a religion.



    Edit: And we kind of went totally off-topic with this. O.O So let's continue it some other day, in some other place where it is not totally off-topic.
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    timezarg wrote: »
    No, no, no, don't you get it? The Atrox isn't overpowered enough for them, so it's not a 'proper carrier'. Despite the fact that it's equivalent to the Vo'Quv. Maybe they have issues with having to fork over Zen for a carrier they have no business having. . .probably think they should have it 'free'.

    No matter how many new toys they get, Feddies are never happy. Always 'suggesting' new stuff or outright demanding it.

    Hm... good point.

    But feds still have access to the highest DPS PvE carriers in the game. They have access to the JHDC and TRC. The Jem Carrier has it's own vast DPS capabilities and the JHAS pets (now that they FINALLY fixed them) do insane damage. Even if you can't use the JHAS pets, you can still use Elite Scorpion Fighters, which do quite a lot of damage. The Recluse has Elite Mesh Weavers. With APB3. The PERFECT PvE weapon. And they stack.

    So feds can get access to the highest PvE damage from pets in the game. They have NOTHING to complain about. Period. END. OF. STORY.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • skyranger1414skyranger1414 Member Posts: 1,785 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Canon wise no they wouldn't

    Canon wise, they're the only ones we know use fighters at all!
  • rylanadionysisrylanadionysis Member Posts: 3,359 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    We really dont need another ship. We have 89, including mirrors and refits.

    Now go tell me how many ships the KDF or Roms have.

    We do not need any more, at all.

    Edit: KDF has 64. Roms have 35. 13 Cross faction/neutral ships.

    We need nothing.
    Gold.jpg
    Fleet Admiral Rylana - Fed Tac - U.S.S Wild Card - Tactical Miracle Worker Cruiser
    Lifetime Subscriber since 2012 == 17,200 Accolades = RIP PvP and Vice Squad
    Chief of Starfleet Intelligence Service == Praise Cheesus
  • capnshadow27capnshadow27 Member Posts: 1,731 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    skollulfr wrote: »
    your 'space fighter' will be 747 size at minimum. meaning fried parts could be replaced.
    (starwars and galactica, are completly wrong in their depictions.)

    Who are you? The almighty god of Sci-Fi and all things there-in? Seriously. Technology wise you are looking at technologies you cannot even pretend to understand. The space shuttle, you know that thing we currently use to get into space? Not the size of a747, about half its size little more, and thats with extra stuff and cargo space. In theory its all quite plausible, while maybe improbable it's never impossible.
    skollulfr wrote: »
    cant have closed systems and iff.
    drones arent autonamous in the way you think, more that they just have auto pilot.

    Automation and "free thinking" are two massivley different things. Automated is a preprogrammed set of commands, where-as the "free thinking" versions start anywhere from a preprogrammed set of variables and responses to calcuating a response under certain circumstances. I.E. Cylons, Data, Droids, the list goes on.
    Inertia just means you can do Powerslides in you carrier!
    I am Il Shadow and i approve these Shennanigans!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • sevmragesevmrage Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Minor points, the Space Shuttle has been retired for a couple years. Also, to back your arguement, the shuttle was carried on the back of a specially modified 747.

    However, the shuttle didn;t really carry enough fuel for an extended solo flight, not if it wanted to carry anything else, at that.
    Weyland-Yutani Joint Space Venture - Always open to new members!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    My name is Rage, and I too support a revised Galaxy family.
    khayuung wrote: »
    Firstly, be proud! You're part of the few, the stubborn, the Federation Dreadnought Captains.
  • capnshadow27capnshadow27 Member Posts: 1,731 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    sevmrage wrote: »
    Minor points, the Space Shuttle has been retired for a couple years. Also, to back your arguement, the shuttle was carried on the back of a specially modified 747.

    However, the shuttle didn;t really carry enough fuel for an extended solo flight, not if it wanted to carry anything else, at that.

    Very true but they arew always trying to build newer, smaller ones though
    Inertia just means you can do Powerslides in you carrier!
    I am Il Shadow and i approve these Shennanigans!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • talzerotwotalzerotwo Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    jamesdax wrote: »
    Now how 'bout that carrier? Seriously, we are at war on two fronts involving both space and ground combat. You can't tell me Star Fleet wouldn't develop a proper carrier.

    Heeeeeeelk no. Star Fleet wouldn't develop a proper carrier. Besides, theyre coming out with the fleet atrox.
    [SIGPIC]http://tinyurl.com/msywqm5[/SIGPIC]
    Chillax. No Ego. No Drama.

    Like my alien? Watch THE VIDEO
    Need custom graphics for you or your fleet? Click HERE
  • matchstick606matchstick606 Member Posts: 233 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    why not just let every fed ship in the game launch a type 8 shuttle for the pew pew action.......... lol joking, but come on why does everything need fighters? really the last thing i would want to see is an stf flooded with little fighters buzzing around. I don't always say this but lets throw the KDF a bone and let them have the carriers and larger combat pets like the B'rel.
  • tabzentabzen Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Yet another fed post asking for MOOOARRRRR! ships ..

    when will this stop ?
  • capnshadow27capnshadow27 Member Posts: 1,731 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    tabzen wrote: »
    Yet another fed post asking for MOOOARRRRR! ships ..

    when will this stop ?

    Never. Proper human nature to always want and need more. If the KDF where the ones always getting they would want more too....
    Inertia just means you can do Powerslides in you carrier!
    I am Il Shadow and i approve these Shennanigans!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • tabzentabzen Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Never. Proper human nature to always want and need more. If the KDF where the ones always getting they would want more too....

    Problem is the KDF aren't getting anything but the feds are .. as usual.
    I generally don't mind people getting one thing or another but the feds just got the Avenger ship and now want a carrier and a few other ships.

    This is getting stupid and out of hand.
  • reynoldsxdreynoldsxd Member Posts: 977 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    jamesdax wrote: »
    Now how 'bout that carrier? Seriously, we are at war on two fronts involving both space and ground combat. You can't tell me Star Fleet wouldn't develop a proper carrier.

    no they would review the tech that allows people to summon holo battleships.
    Because after the dominion war starfleet has realized that fighters are deathtraps.

    so starflet would develope holo fighter wing projectors instead of hangars. you know, applied tech instead of putting more people into deathtraps.
  • capnshadow27capnshadow27 Member Posts: 1,731 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    tabzen wrote: »
    Problem is the KDF aren't getting anything but the feds are .. as usual.
    I generally don't mind people getting one thing or another but the feds just got the Avenger ship and now want a carrier and a few other ships.

    This is getting stupid and out of hand.

    Point still stands human nature to want.

    The primary difference between the FED and KDF asking for ships is we often get them, whereas you dont.

    So don't hate on the fact that FED gets when KDF doesnt, and FED asks for more. Hate on the DEV's that don't make anything for you. Dont hate on us because we ask and want.
    Inertia just means you can do Powerslides in you carrier!
    I am Il Shadow and i approve these Shennanigans!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • sevmragesevmrage Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Having spent some time recently on my Rommie toon, I have to admit, the Feds really do have it good. Ship selection for the Rommies is terrible, and I assume the KDF is just as bad. I might play that one more, but all the red really gets on my nerves.
    Weyland-Yutani Joint Space Venture - Always open to new members!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    My name is Rage, and I too support a revised Galaxy family.
    khayuung wrote: »
    Firstly, be proud! You're part of the few, the stubborn, the Federation Dreadnought Captains.
  • talzerotwotalzerotwo Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    True enough. As a primarily fed player... there has always been just one thing I've wanted from the KDF. Your fireplace in your kdf starbase O_O. All your Cozy are Belong to US!
    [SIGPIC]http://tinyurl.com/msywqm5[/SIGPIC]
    Chillax. No Ego. No Drama.

    Like my alien? Watch THE VIDEO
    Need custom graphics for you or your fleet? Click HERE
  • proteus22proteus22 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    there were carrers in ds9 but not the way you think. the akira class ships were designed to carry fighters and remember on the galaxy class that big main shuttle bay and the 2 smaller ones on back of its neck. those 2 ship classes were probably used to ferry the perigrine fighter raiders between battles
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    sevmrage wrote: »
    Having spent some time recently on my Rommie toon, I have to admit, the Feds really do have it good. Ship selection for the Rommies is terrible, and I assume the KDF is just as bad. I might play that one more, but all the red really gets on my nerves.

    Wait... Rommie ship choice is terrible... when you have that little monster, the Fleet T'varo, the crazy little killer, the Fleet Dhelan, the tanky as hell destroyer, the Fleet Mogai, the fast and nimble and great murderer, the Fleet Ha'feh... and the coup de grace, that monstrous damage dealing leviathan, the Scimitar?

    Explain to me why that's bad.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
Sign In or Register to comment.