test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Fleet K'Vort

adon333adon333 Member Posts: 304
edited November 2013 in Klingon Discussion
It's high time we got another KDF ship... and it's high time we get an actual escort ship...
If you notice KDF does not have a single true escort ship, bops are NOT escorts, not in the sense of the fed tac escorts, and neither are Raptors, Raptors are in fact, so borked and nerfed that no one even uses them. I think it is time for the KDF to get it's first, true escort ship... and I think that ship should be the K'Vort.

http://images3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20130420204621/memoryalpha/en/images/5/58/Federation-Romulan-Klingon_stand-off.jpg
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]


Yeah, that's right.
Post edited by adon333 on
«1345

Comments

  • quarauqquarauq Member Posts: 2 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    adon333 wrote: »
    It's high time we got another KDF ship... and it's high time we get an actual escort ship...
    If you notice KDF does not have a single true escort ship, bops are NOT escorts, not in the sense of the fed tac escorts, and neither are Raptors, Raptors are in fact, so borked and nerfed that no one even uses them. I think it is time for the KDF to get it's first, true escort ship... and I think that ship should be the K'Vort.

    I don't have a problem whooping TRIBBLE with a free Raptor in PvP same as my Fleet Advanced Escort on the Fed side.
  • marc8219marc8219 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    raptors are escorts, but the only good endgame one is the fleet somraw. As for a regular non cloaking escort there is the Guramba and Fleet Scourge.
    Tala -KDF Tac- House of Beautiful Orions
  • artfulmerkageartfulmerkage Member Posts: 294 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    There is a problem: K'Vort is virtually identical to the B'rel.

    I'm all for a Fleet K'vort, but the design would have to be tweaked.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Valdus | Charn | Costello | Typhus | Thyran
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    There is a problem: K'Vort is virtually identical to the B'rel.

    I'm all for a Fleet K'vort, but the design would have to be tweaked.

    The K'Vort is basically a giant B'Rel.

    But honestly, I don't think the KDF playerbase will complain. It's something that has actually been asked for as far back as just after STO went live. Hell, I was one of those guys asking for it back then.

    An alternate, non-canon skin for a future K'Vort like BOP would be nice for the same ship, just as we have for the Vor'Cha and Negh'Vars.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • artfulmerkageartfulmerkage Member Posts: 294 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    The K'Vort is basically a giant B'Rel.

    But honestly, I don't think the KDF playerbase will complain. It's something that has actually been asked for as far back as just after STO went live. Hell, I was one of those guys asking for it back then.

    An alternate, non-canon skin for a future K'Vort like BOP would be nice for the same ship, just as we have for the Vor'Cha and Negh'Vars.

    I do agree. I have a Tac KDF that is crying out for a ship of this nature.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

    Valdus | Charn | Costello | Typhus | Thyran
  • oakland4lifeoakland4life Member Posts: 545 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    adon333 wrote: »
    It's high time we got another KDF ship... and it's high time we get an actual escort ship...
    If you notice KDF does not have a single true escort ship, bops are NOT escorts, not in the sense of the fed tac escorts, and neither are Raptors, Raptors are in fact, so borked and nerfed that no one even uses them. I think it is time for the KDF to get it's first, true escort ship... and I think that ship should be the K'Vort.

    In the TV series the K'vort class is a enlarged B'rel classified as a Battle Cruiser in TNG.

    But i would luv to see the K'vort come out on the C-store with different unique variant skins to make itself different than the B'rel.

    As for escorts like ships, The Raptors are the Escorts of the KDF. The reason the Raptors are so broke and nerfed is because Cryptic did not further devolope them at all, same as the BoP classes.

    what needs to be to make Raptors competitive is release more Fleet versions with 5 TAC consoles and a few on the C-store with some with 5 Fore Weapons... after all the Raptors suppose to be the best offensive KDF class as Escorts is to the Feds.

    Also Raptors needs buff starting with fixing the broken basic cloaking mechanics, adding buff to the Shield Mod. so it can take more punishment due to it slightly inferior turn rate compare to it's Escorts counterparts.
  • lordmalak1lordmalak1 Member Posts: 4,681 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    quarauq wrote: »
    I don't have a problem whooping TRIBBLE with a free Raptor in PvP same as my Fleet Advanced Escort on the Fed side.

    Word !

    The raptor isn't the carebear ship the cruiser is, so those without skillz get pwnd in them. I can already hear the crys of the giant BOP drivers getting their butt's handed to them because it turns like a truck. Instead of wasting what little dev time the KDF gets on a TNG effects guy's mistake, lets demand something we can really use, a fleet Pach and a fleet Tactical Kamarag or non 1k vet Peghqu' or fleet/c-store Krenn.
    KBF Lord MalaK
    Awoken Dead
    giphy.gif

    Now shaddup about the queues, it's a BUG
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    In the TV series the K'vort class is a enlarged B'rel classified as a Battle Cruiser in TNG.

    Actually it wasn't. The B'rel (in the sense that the class was named) only appeared in the episode "Rascals" where it was reused footage from "Yesterday's Enterprise". So actually the two ships are identical in size and look.
    That the B'rel is the smaller ship is actually a retcon that first appeared in the "Encyclopedia" and has since been carried on by other sources.
    However in the shows they were actually the same. The only canon hint we have about their difference is that the Ferengi talk like the ships were outdated so perhaps the B'rel is actually an older version of the design.
    Just FYI.;)
  • bitemepwebitemepwe Member Posts: 6,760 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I would like to see it with a Universal Commander slot so the ship could be the larger cousin to the BOP line.
    Leonard Nimoy, Spock.....:(

    R.I.P
  • oakland4lifeoakland4life Member Posts: 545 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    misterde3 wrote: »
    Actually it wasn't. The B'rel (in the sense that the class was named) only appeared in the episode "Rascals" where it was reused footage from "Yesterday's Enterprise". So actually the two ships are identical in size and look.
    That the B'rel is the smaller ship is actually a retcon that first appeared in the "Encyclopedia" and has since been carried on by other sources.
    However in the shows they were actually the same. The only canon hint we have about their difference is that the Ferengi talk like the ships were outdated so perhaps the B'rel is actually an older version of the design.
    Just FYI.;)

    In Star Trek canon in these type of ships were refer mostly just BoP's by the main characters.

    As u said the ''smaller'' B'rel were recon/raiders appeared in the ''Encyclopedia'', but there are also other different offical named versions with is the D-12 class from ST ''Generations'' which is used by the Duras sisters and describe by worf outdated, and other being the K'vort class which is shown and mention as a cruiser almost as large as the Vorcha in many TNG Worf's Klingon based episodes and ''Yesterday's Enterpirse''.

    In Star Trek shows, Footage and Models is no doubt being used and reused as a cost effective way to produce them. just because in ''Rascal's'' was called a B'rel and in ''Yesterday Enterprise'' called K'vort does not mean it's the same ship just becuase the producers just want to go a cost effective way to display.

    Would u called the ST: Enterprise Klingon Battlecruiser (which looks exactly the same as the K't'inga) from the episode ''Unexpected'' as a D7's or K't'inga classes even though they did not existed in the 22nd Century. or how about different Alien Ship models reused over and over again on species that is not even have contacted or even related with each other?

    the fact is the B'rel, D12 and K'vort canon describe as being different, even though it been shown to be like the same on screen... it's no different when the early DS9 Mirror Universe episodes with Alliance ships have cloaking devices, then later they shown at the last DS9 mirrior universe episode with the Ferengi in, that the Alliance all of the sudden have no cloaking devices is the reason they kidnad the grand nagus for quark and rom to bring a cloaking device.
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    In Star Trek canon in these type of ships were refer mostly just BoP's by the main characters.

    As u said the ''smaller'' B'rel were recon/raiders appeared in the ''Encyclopedia'', but there are also other different offical named versions with is the D-12 class from ST ''Generations'' which is used by the Duras sisters and describe by worf outdated, and other being the K'vort class which is shown and mention as a cruiser almost as large as the Vorcha in many TNG Worf's Klingon based episodes and ''Yesterday's Enterpirse''.

    In Star Trek shows, Footage and Models is no doubt being used and reused as a cost effective way to produce them. just because in ''Rascal's'' was called a B'rel and in ''Yesterday Enterprise'' called K'vort does not mean it's the same ship just becuase the producers just want to go a cost effective way to display.

    Would u called the ST: Enterprise Klingon Battlecruiser (which looks exactly the same as the K't'inga) from the episode ''Unexpected'' as a D7's or K't'inga classes even though they did not existed in the 22nd Century. or how about different Alien Ship models reused over and over again on species that is not even have contacted or even related with each other?

    the fact is the B'rel, D12 and K'vort canon describe as being different, even though it been shown to be like the same on screen... it's no different when the early DS9 Mirror Universe episodes with Alliance ships have cloaking devices, then later they shown at the last DS9 mirrior universe episode with the Ferengi in, that the Alliance all of the sudden have no cloaking devices is the reason they kidnad the grand nagus for quark and rom to bring a cloaking device.

    Let's look at what you wrote originally:
    "In the TV series the K'vort class is a enlarged B'rel".

    You specifically referred to what was in the shows.
    I mentioned what was in the shows, which was precisely the same footage as used for the K'vort. Why the heck are you going on such a rant now?
  • oakland4lifeoakland4life Member Posts: 545 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    misterde3 wrote: »
    Let's look at what you wrote originally:
    "In the TV series the K'vort class is a enlarged B'rel".

    You specifically referred to what was in the shows.
    I mentioned what was in the shows, which was precisely the same footage as used for the K'vort. Why the heck are you going on such a rant now?

    Then why are u ranting about the same footage then, TOS, TNG and DS9 series reused scenes all the time... that's nothing new.

    In my other post i'm basically putting it that the B'rel and K'vort are not the same class despite having same design, but the difference is in the size and roles they fill.
  • senatorvreenaksenatorvreenak Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Canonicly the B'rel and K'vort are of the exact same size.
  • oakland4lifeoakland4life Member Posts: 545 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Canonicly the B'rel and K'vort are of the exact same size.

    Canonicly the B'rel have the size of 110 m, While the K'vort is more Vague with the DS9TM says it's as long as 685 m
    http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/bop-size.htm
  • marshalericdavidmarshalericdavid Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    K'Vort should be very similar to the B'Rel

    B'Rel

    + Enhanced Battle Cloak
    + Speed and Maneuverability
    4 Engineer 3 Science and 3 Tactical consoles

    K'Vort

    + Shields and Hull
    + A Universal Ensign Bridge Officer slot added
    + A additional Weapon slot added
    3 Engineer 3 Science and 4 Tactical consoles
  • adon333adon333 Member Posts: 304
    edited October 2013
    lordmalak1 wrote: »
    Word !

    The raptor isn't the carebear ship the cruiser is, so those without skillz get pwnd in them. I can already hear the crys of the giant BOP drivers getting their butt's handed to them because it turns like a truck. Instead of wasting what little dev time the KDF gets on a TNG effects guy's mistake, lets demand something we can really use, a fleet Pach and a fleet Tactical Kamarag or non 1k vet Peghqu' or fleet/c-store Krenn.

    First off.. Raptor is inferior to fed scorts.. thats a fact. Second.. cruisers arent carebear ships.. the Torkaht is the best KDF ship in the roster. Third- you can have plenty of skill and still pop in an inferior ship. Point four- the K'Vort is not a " TNG effects guy's mistake" it is a legitimate Klingon ship, look it up if you don't want to take my word for it. AND finally- the devs have plenty of time... <see the new fed ship coming out already regardless of Season 8 work> to make ships.. they just don't make Klingon ships.

    I want the K'Vort.... I've wanted it since before the game went live.. it's been my fav. ship since I was a kid and I fly it in every ST game I play ..except of course for this one. All I'm asking for is a nice mebbe 5 fore ship like the feds just got only with mebbe 2 aft weapons and only four tac consoles with a fleet option and a Battle Cloak. Although all the things you suggested would be nice as well, in addition.

    Excerpt from Wiki-

    "Although several variants are seen throughout the franchise, design notes state that the Bird of Prey has two main classes: the B'rel-class and the K'Vort-class. Both classes used the same studio model, with unofficial sources claiming they differ in sizes in proportion to other starships depending on variant. The B'rel-class is a scout vessel, used for espionage, skirmishes and raids, while the K'Vort-class is a light cruiser. Both classes are armed with disruptor cannons mounted on the tips of the wings and a forward torpedo launcher. Likewise, both classes are equipped with cloaking devices and are capable of impulse and warp speeds. Non-canonical sources claim that with a crew of only 12 and a length of 160 meters, the B'rel-class is far smaller than the K'Vort-class, which measures 320 meters and possesses a crew of 300+."
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]


    Yeah, that's right.
  • davidwforddavidwford Member Posts: 1,836 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    K'Vort should be very similar to the B'Rel

    B'Rel

    + Enhanced Battle Cloak
    + Speed and Maneuverability
    4 Engineer 3 Science and 3 Tactical consoles

    K'Vort

    + Shields and Hull
    + A Universal Ensign Bridge Officer slot added
    + A additional Weapon slot added
    3 Engineer 3 Science and 4 Tactical consoles

    I like that idea. The K'Vort should be one of the biggest BOPs, either same size or larger than the Hegh'ta/Haj. And as such, with a larger size and larger crew, it should have a slower turn rate, one more comparable to a raptor escort.
  • lordmalak1lordmalak1 Member Posts: 4,681 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    adon333 wrote: »
    First off.. Raptor is inferior to fed scorts.. thats a fact. Second.. cruisers arent carebear ships.. the Torkaht is the best KDF ship in the roster. Third- you can have plenty of skill and still pop in an inferior ship. Point four- the K'Vort is not a " TNG effects guy's mistake" it is a legitimate Klingon ship, look it up if you don't want to take my word for it. AND finally- the devs have plenty of time... <see the new fed ship coming out already regardless of Season 8 work> to make ships.. they just don't make Klingon ships.

    I want the K'Vort.... I've wanted it since before the game went live.. it's been my fav. ship since I was a kid and I fly it in every ST game I play ..except of course for this one. All I'm asking for is a nice mebbe 5 fore ship like the feds just got only with mebbe 2 aft weapons and only four tac consoles with a fleet option and a Battle Cloak. Although all the things you suggested would be nice as well, in addition.

    Excerpt from Wiki-

    "Although several variants are seen throughout the franchise, design notes state that the Bird of Prey has two main classes: the B'rel-class and the K'Vort-class. Both classes used the same studio model, with unofficial sources claiming they differ in sizes in proportion to other starships depending on variant. The B'rel-class is a scout vessel, used for espionage, skirmishes and raids, while the K'Vort-class is a light cruiser. Both classes are armed with disruptor cannons mounted on the tips of the wings and a forward torpedo launcher. Likewise, both classes are equipped with cloaking devices and are capable of impulse and warp speeds. Non-canonical sources claim that with a crew of only 12 and a length of 160 meters, the B'rel-class is far smaller than the K'Vort-class, which measures 320 meters and possesses a crew of 300+."

    Blah Blah Bla bla blah bla....

    No need for me to add to this gem from Memory beta concerning the K'vort:
    The K'vort-class (or K'Vort-class) was a type of Klingon Bird-of-Prey light cruiser starship in Imperial Defense Force service in the 24th century.

    The K'Vort was similarly used as a patrol and pursuit craft in the mirror universe, by the Klingon-Cardassian Alliance. By the 2370s, the K'Vort was one of the most common and expendable vessels in Regent Worf's fleet.

    A disposable light cruiser is what a K'Vort is, your imagining it to be an invincible escort isn't going to make it magically jump to the top of the devs 'to-do list', and neither are all the posts requesting it.
    KBF Lord MalaK
    Awoken Dead
    giphy.gif

    Now shaddup about the queues, it's a BUG
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Canonicly the B'rel have the size of 110 m, While the K'vort is more Vague with the DS9TM says it's as long as 685 m
    http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/bop-size.htm

    Actually the K'vort should be closer to 350 meters in length. http://www.suricatafx.com/?p=274
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • senatorvreenaksenatorvreenak Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    Canonicly the B'rel have the size of 110 m, While the K'vort is more Vague with the DS9TM says it's as long as 685 m
    http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/bop-size.htm

    You really don't know what canon is, do you? :rolleyes:

    The B'rel has only been referred to by name on-screen one time in all of Star Trek.
    And that happened to be a re-use of the K'vort footage.

    Thus the B'rel is firmly established as a retired ship class being the same size of the K'vort.
    Backstage and third-party sources are NOT canon.
  • macroniusmacronius Member Posts: 2,526
    edited October 2013
    K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ...
    "With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censored, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."

    - Judge Aaron Satie
  • kjwashingtonkjwashington Member Posts: 2,529 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    macronius wrote: »
    K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ...

    ... This? ^^^^ :D
    FaW%20meme_zpsbkzfjonz.jpg
    Support 90 degree arc limitation on BFaW! Save our ships from looking like flying disco balls of dumb!
  • adon333adon333 Member Posts: 304
    edited October 2013
    lordmalak1 wrote: »
    Blah Blah Bla bla blah bla....

    No need for me to add to this gem from Memory beta concerning the K'vort:


    A disposable light cruiser is what a K'Vort is, your imagining it to be an invincible escort isn't going to make it magically jump to the top of the devs 'to-do list', and neither are all the posts requesting it.

    I dont why you are hatin' so hard on the K'Vort, man, what did it ever do to you? Ofc the K'Vort isn't going to be invincible, it's a KDF ship.. they can never be as good as anything else the feds or rommies might have. BUT What's wrong with having another Klingon ship,one of the most shown klingon ships in all Trek in this game? Every other ST game has a K'Vort or other named variant in them.. why not this one?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]


    Yeah, that's right.
  • lordmalak1lordmalak1 Member Posts: 4,681 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    adon333 wrote: »
    I dont why you are hatin' so hard on the K'Vort, man, what did it ever do to you? Ofc the K'Vort isn't going to be invincible, it's a KDF ship.. they can never be as good as anything else the feds or rommies might have. BUT What's wrong with having another Klingon ship,one of the most shown klingon ships in all Trek in this game? Every other ST game has a K'Vort or other named variant in them.. why not this one?

    There's just something VERY wrong with a BOP that's almost 3 times larger than a K'Tinga. And sorry to disappoint you but every ST game does NOT have a K'Vort (D15) in it as the ship is a new creation ala TNG (yesterdays Enterprise IIRC), and I haven't played many post TNG based games so I've never heard of this ship till SFC3 and later.
    KBF Lord MalaK
    Awoken Dead
    giphy.gif

    Now shaddup about the queues, it's a BUG
  • crappyturbocrappyturbo Member Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    In Yesterday's Enterprise they are listed as K'vort class battlecruisers so why not have them in the game? Is it because the ship is an upscale of a ship already in the game or is it because the Klingons would get another ship?
  • crappyturbocrappyturbo Member Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    I have 5 lvl 50 characters and only one of them is a fed the rest are Klingon or Romulan with another 2 or 3 of each Klingon or Romulan on the way for peoples info.
  • reginamala78reginamala78 Member Posts: 4,593 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    macronius wrote: »
    K'vort ... K'vort ... K'vort ...

    And now I've got an image of the Swedish Chef with rubber ridges glued to his forehead.
  • crappyturbocrappyturbo Member Posts: 201 Arc User
    edited October 2013
    nice one reginamala78 I have the same image in my head now
  • ddemlongddemlong Member Posts: 294
    edited October 2013
    Heck, I would just like any new ship at this point. I have posted a dozen times or so on their FB page since the avenger release. Not a single response! They are more than happy to answer any and every single question about the Feds and their new projects though!
    I use to do 100K DPS, but then I took an arrow to the knee.


    Your Ramming Speed III deals 242658 (243540) Kinetic Damage (Critical) to you.
  • edited October 2013
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.