test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Tier 5 Constitution With New Movie Skin Please.

13»

Comments

  • psycoticvulcanpsycoticvulcan Member Posts: 4,160 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    I really REALLY hope we get the JJ Connie in game, not just because that ship is awesome, but because of how many people it would irritate the f*** out of.:D

    This./10chars
    NJ9oXSO.png
    "Critics who say that the optimistic utopia Star Trek depicted is now outmoded forget the cultural context that gave birth to it: Star Trek was not a manifestation of optimism when optimism was easy. Star Trek declared a hope for a future that nobody stuck in the present could believe in. For all our struggles today, we haven’t outgrown the need for stories like Star Trek. We need tales of optimism, of heroes, of courage and goodness now as much as we’ve ever needed them."
    -Thomas Marrone
  • ironclad321ironclad321 Member Posts: 13 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    I think that it would be nice to see the original enterprise ship which you can buy for 500 zen. i think that you could change from the original and the 2009 version because i think that the newer version looks better. :)
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    possibly a Lost or Alias reference,

    Don't tell this thread what it can't do!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • jam3s1701jam3s1701 Member Posts: 1,825 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Epic GALACTIC FACE PALM

    IF we get a T5 connie I demand a T5 Shuttle

    Even thou I'm joking this is how these treads seem to me a job load of jokes
    JtaDmwW.png
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    jam3s1701 wrote: »
    Epic GALACTIC FACE PALM

    IF we get a T5 connie I demand a T5 Shuttle

    Even thou I'm joking this is how these treads seem to me a job load of jokes

    But the Constitution class vessel has its own shuttles?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • edited August 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • lordkasulordkasu Member Posts: 118 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    I'm thankful that we won't be seeing a jjprise.
  • jorantomalakjorantomalak Member Posts: 7,133 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    i dont understand why people keep bringing this up CBS has already said no to a t-5 connie so its not going to happen no matter how many times you whine about it.
  • edited August 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Hell no No JJprise.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    i dont understand why people keep bringing this up CBS has already said no to a t-5 connie so its not going to happen no matter how many times you whine about it.

    Do not mistake coincidence for fate.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    i dont understand why people keep bringing this up CBS has already said no to a t-5 connie so its not going to happen no matter how many times you whine about it.

    No they didn't...hence my signature
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    A correction to the OP:

    The new movies' Enterprise is not a Constitution-class. It is it's own thing: JJ-Prise.

    THIS is a Constutition-class of Star Trek (1, 2) :cool:
    XzRTofz.gif
  • mewmaster101mewmaster101 Member Posts: 1,239 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    A correction to the OP:

    The new movies' Enterprise is not a Constitution-class. It is it's own thing: JJ-Prise.

    THIS is a Constutition-class of Star Trek (1, 2) :cool:

    http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Constitution_class_(alternate_reality)

    correction to you good sir, It IS a connie

    As for the thread, CBS said NO, the faster you accept that, the more you enjoy the game as it is without it.
  • hanoverhanover Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    The "JJprise" is bigger than a Sovereign, and that would look ridiculous. The Vengeance was bigger still.

    Probably the biggest failure of JJ trek is the inability to grasp size, scale, and distance.
    Does Arc install a root kit? Ask a Dev today!
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Constitution_class_(alternate_reality)

    correction to you good sir, It IS a connie

    As for the thread, CBS said NO, the faster you accept that, the more you enjoy the game as it is without it.

    no they did not
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/Constitution_class_(alternate_reality)

    correction to you good sir, It IS a connie

    As for the thread, CBS said NO, the faster you accept that, the more you enjoy the game as it is without it.

    No, it is a JJ-prise, and NOT a Constitution-class of TOS / TMP shows and movies.

    Try harder.

    The JJ-prise, even if it somehow gets labelled as a "Constitution" bastardization, still does not approach to the originals' looks and popularity. Let me know when the JJ-prise gets lots of game appearances, more movie appearances, toys, model kits, FAN-MADE model kits, fan-made video tributes, etc.

    Again, even if the JJ-prise were to be thrown a sticker that says "Constitution" it never, ever will be as famed and as popular as the original Connies.

    Let me know when the JJ-prise gets the love and attention, and quantity Star Trek fans have given the Connie. 1, 2, 3, or how the loss was a damn big deal for the franchise.

    The JJ-prise just will never approach the originals. NEVER. The faster you accept the inferiority, the better for you.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Let me know when the JJ-prise gets the love and attention, and quantity Star Trek fans have given the Connie.

    What fans? The Constitution class is universally LOATHED on these forums and in STO.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    What fans? The Constitution class is universally LOATHED on these forums and in STO.


    Only because she's old and shouldn't be in OTHER then a zen ship. IF this was TMP or TOS era game. THEN it's another story.

    If I see a JJprise in this game, I'm gonna find 32 other guys with Scimitars and triple thalron pulse it.
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    I want this ship just to follow you around in it
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Only because she's old and shouldn't be in OTHER then a zen ship. IF this was TMP or TOS era game. THEN it's another story.

    If I see a JJprise in this game, I'm gonna find 32 other guys with Scimitars and triple thalron pulse it.

    Well you know what I always say ... Live Together Die Alone.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • beritpandionberitpandion Member Posts: 199 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    For those that say that it's ok with the timeline. One question, Is Vulcan still there? No JJprise and I did LIKE the movie BUT the ship has no business in the STO Timeline. And for those with the Tholian angle ummm we fixed that timeline in the ambassador mission so NO JJprise there either.

    As to a T5 connie I grew up on the MPs and TNG (was too young for OST TV) and while I liked and have respect for the originals to me I always loved the evolution and new ships. So I'm quite happy with the Sovereigns and my Oddy.

    Personally I'd like to see Executor added to the game. :D /duck
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    For those that say that it's ok with the timeline. One question, Is Vulcan still there? No JJprise and I did LIKE the movie BUT the ship has no business in the STO Timeline. And for those with the Tholian angle ummm we fixed that timeline in the ambassador mission so NO JJprise there either.

    As to a T5 connie I grew up on the MPs and TNG (was too young for OST TV) and while I liked and have respect for the originals to me I always loved the evolution and new ships. So I'm quite happy with the Sovereigns and my Oddy.

    Personally I'd like to see Executor added to the game. :D /duck

    and yet the Tholians are still at it because they added the new Rom temporal ships. So the Tholian angle is still there.
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    For those that say that it's ok with the timeline. One question, Is Vulcan still there?

    Spocke turned the frozen wheel and moved the planet.

    So it's not still there, but is still there.

    It's why he has to get back. To the planet.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Spocke turned the frozen wheel and moved the planet.

    So it's not still there, but is still there.

    It's why he has to get back. To the planet.

    Which is why John Locke commands the ENT-D
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    For those that say that it's ok with the timeline. One question, Is Vulcan still there? No JJprise and I did LIKE the movie BUT the ship has no business in the STO Timeline. And for those with the Tholian angle ummm we fixed that timeline in the ambassador mission so NO JJprise there either.

    As to a T5 connie I grew up on the MPs and TNG (was too young for OST TV) and while I liked and have respect for the originals to me I always loved the evolution and new ships. So I'm quite happy with the Sovereigns and my Oddy.

    Personally I'd like to see Executor added to the game. :D /duck

    the sad part is I'll take the Executor over the JJprise.
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    khan5000 wrote: »
    Which is why John Locke commands the ENT-D

    Captain Locke: Set course for the Dharma system Mr. Eko. Warp 4.8, mark 151623.42. Engage.

    :)
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • age03age03 Member Posts: 1,664 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    If I see a JJ Enterprise, I'll kindly blow that vile monstrosity of a ship out of the stars for free. It's ugly

    You and me both.JJ get out Trek.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]Age StarTrek-Gamers Administrator
    USS WARRIOR NCC 1720 Commanding Officer
    Star Trek Gamers
  • astro2244astro2244 Member Posts: 623 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Instead of trying to pollute the timeline anymore then it has been. (i'm looking at you tholians and lobi consortium) There is really no canon reason for those ships mentioned above from said beings to be used by Starfleet/Kdf (or kdf fed epohh rommies :P) . so why in the world would a alternate reality ship be canon in this timeline.



    The real solution would be making another shard the devs had mentioned the possibility of making a mirror universe shard. So it would be possible to make a alternate universe shard though it goes back to cbs, and cbs says no they get that final say.




    Or you could start a petition to make a different mmo trek set in said universe.



    But I just see a slippery slope here, bring in the jj prise and pretty soon people would want more ships from that universe. Then for existing ships to have a j.j. makeover then to blow up Vulcan in this game then to change this games timeline to the alternate reality.
    [SIGPIC]583px-Romulan_Star_Empire_logo%2C_2379.svg.png
    [/SIGPIC]
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    astro2244 wrote: »
    so why in the world would a alternate reality ship be canon in this timeline.

    That's easy to answer. After Captain Spocke turned the frozen wheel, it became unstuck in time, brother!

    The USS Desmond is my constant!
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sign In or Register to comment.