test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Tier 5 Constitution Class

catstarstocatstarsto Member Posts: 2,149 Arc User
edited July 2013 in Federation Discussion
If anyones followed my submissions lately, you know I have been asking Cryptic regularly for a Tier 5 Constitution Class ship. But the reasons for it are for my one toon Adventure Cat, if you have kept up with my work on my website, watched my youtube channel or seen me ingame, you know why :3

This just makes sence to have Tier one ships available that has no level, like some of the guns do from Lobi store.

Others may even want to have the Miranda class one, but heres my proposal. Make it eather a Lobi, Fleet or C-Store ship, have its powers grow like you do for devices/powers like you do in Champions Online Example: (Armored suit/Become werewolf/destroyer/etc) With each level you can upgrade your ship with a purchase from your fleets stores to add in its next tier, making it a light cruiser. For the Constitution class, you should have just one set of retro phasers that still level up, and no more then 3 weapon slots per side, in "A mirror Darkly" the Constitution they found had both forward and reverse torps, along with the phasers, plus the mirror universe also had turrets on thiers, so those extra 2 slots for those are nessisary for that theme or if you want more torp firepower. Also, a super weapon gimmick being its tier 5, in the movie "Of Gods and Men" the Constitution in the alternate timeline had a super weapon that could destroy a planet, thos would be a good chance to give that Borg super plasma ball to players ( you know the instakill one) only this one should have the effects of the torp from the movie. We used to be able to color our hull for these ships too, how about also adding in the color scheme from, "Of Gods and Men"

To see this movie and also my Enterprise reference, check out my clips at http://catstarsto.com/star-trek-clips

If you like this idea, please share your support, maybe we can get this added with enough people who agree with it.
Post edited by catstarsto on
«134

Comments

  • sfc#5932 sfc Member Posts: 992 Bug Hunter
    edited April 2013
    Why is this in ten forward?
  • catstarstocatstarsto Member Posts: 2,149 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Because its for casual discussion, if I put it in any other section, someone would ask why its not in Ten Forward, or some other section for some reason or another...lol

    Ouch, removed...Ill take that as a big no.
  • sirokksirokk Member Posts: 990 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I'd like to see this as at least Tier 4... better yet as a kit-bash ship so that it can be configured as a TOS Dreadnought, Constitution, whatever the single-nacelled models (could not find a reference to a class name) are and other ships that appear in the reference manuals.

    This would also allow for more interesting TOS style Foundery missions as well.
    Star Trek Battles Channel - Play Star Trek like they did in the series!Avatar: pinterest-com/pin/14003448816884219Are you sure it isn't time for a "colorful metaphor"? --Spock in 'The Voyage Home'
    SCE ADVISORY NOTICE: Improper Impulse Engine maintenance can result in REAR THRUSTER LEAKAGE. ALWAYS have your work inspected by another qualified officer.
  • thegreendragoon1thegreendragoon1 Member Posts: 1,872 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    So the reason that there is no Tier 5 Constitution and never will be, is that CBS kiboshed it. Cryptic literally CAN'T give it to you and not amount of forum posts or requests will change it.
  • jam3s1701jam3s1701 Member Posts: 1,825 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Really another post about something we can't have

    Just gear out your T2
    JtaDmwW.png
  • catstarstocatstarsto Member Posts: 2,149 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I wonder why they would do this?
  • contrarydecisioncontrarydecision Member Posts: 274 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Yes why don't we have a tier 5 version of a ship that was mothballed over a century ago in-canon. Why not indeed.
  • catstarstocatstarsto Member Posts: 2,149 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Yes why don't we have a tier 5 version of a ship that was mothballed over a century ago in-canon. Why not indeed.

    Thats an easy question, because one of my toons is TOS themed and sometimes I like to play that out. The customer is always right! We come here to play out this reality in a game, why not get to enjoy all of it? I have a TNG setup too, I like having at my disposal what ever I maybe in the mood for available when I login. A Marquis ship would be a neat idea too, but I have plans to film a small series of videos using Adventure Cat (James T Cat) and in order to do this games missions in that ship, it needs an upgrade..not to mention it would just be fun to use.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Yes why don't we have a tier 5 version of a ship that was mothballed over a century ago in-canon. Why not indeed.

    Yes, I see your point. But then again, we still have Mirandas operating, which is canon. The Klingons still use the Bird of Prey's basic structure, again originating from Kirk's timeframe. The Klingons also still use the D-7 / K'T'Inga cruiser frames also during the Dominion War.

    We have in this game Andorian ships that should have been far, far, FAR obsolete. They are from ENT timeframe. Same thing with the other ships from ENT timeframe.

    Even though we see no movie / TV reference of the Constitution classes being used ever since TNG, I think Cryptic can bend the rules.

    1. There already IS an existing Constitution model in the game for low tier use. There is also the modernized skins to go with it (Exeter, for instance).

    2. If the Miranda is still being used, why not the Constitution? The Connies were every bit superior to the Mirandas, as well as bigger and could afford more upgrades (space for them).

    3. The KDF faction has access to the D-7 / K'T'Inga / Koritinga frame and models at low tiers and even into T5. It's more of a light cruiser. Fully updated equipment slots for the tier, better handling than regular cruisers / battlecruisers, but weaker hull.

    4. The Excelsiors, which are the immediate successors to the Connies, are in this game equal to or better than any other Cruiser the Federation fields. Is it that much more of a stretch for a Connie to be useful at endgame?

    IMO, the old, former heavy cruisers of the factions can still function as light cruisers / destroyers. Better handling than the new, larger cruisers, but can be more fragile, like less hull, which the Fleet K'T'Inga does. Things can be done to make them viable, fun to use at endgame, while still not quite the same standing power of the more modern cruisers.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • gralerongraleron Member Posts: 221 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I've got a couple of theories as to why we can't have a T5 Constitution. One more serious, one not so much.

    The more serious theory is around the idea that the image of Kirk's Enterprise is being kept deliberately low-profile in the game due to a desire to keep audience minds concentrated on the reboot films.

    Less seriously -- it's against Cryptic's policy to give the Federation a Starfleet cruiser with a turn rate greater than 8 :P
    Vice Admiral Elaron, USS Hard Light
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Okay, some ask why the Miranda and D7 are still around. well that's because canon wise the class is still in service while the Connie was retired about 2300 being fully replaced by the Excel. So there should be a T5 connie and note the NX is not T 5 in the game. Also they have more important stuff to do like fixing bugs and fixing the gal retro. I like the connie but there's no reason for a T5 version heck the comm Excel and the connie should be switched. the Connies should not be a free ship.
  • khan5000khan5000 Member Posts: 3,008 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    graleron wrote: »

    The more serious theory is around the idea that the image of Kirk's Enterprise is being kept deliberately low-profile in the game due to a desire to keep audience minds concentrated on the reboot films.

    This doesn't make sense...this game have very little to do with the reboot universe other than a starting point....we can fly around Defiants and Galaxys from the other series....Leonard Nimoy recorded all the zone intros...and quite a few missions take us back to that era of Star Trek.
    Your pain runs deep.
    Let us explore it... together. Each man hides a secret pain. It must be exposed and reckoned with. It must be dragged from the darkness and forced into the light. Share your pain. Share your pain with me... and gain strength from the sharing.
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Tier 5 ships are supposed to be the best ships in the fleet. They are supposed to be awe inspiring to the people that fly and encounter the ship. A ship from 150 years ago is none of these things. A Tier 1 Constitution class works fine, but not Tier 5. Tier 1 ships should never have Tier 5 versions. According to Branflakes, the T'Varo Retrofit can't use the T'Liss skin (Tier 1 Romulan ship) due to it having the same problem as a Tier 5 Constitution. Although he was not completely sure about it.
  • thegreendragoon1thegreendragoon1 Member Posts: 1,872 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The reason CBS doesn't allow the Connie as max level (and this may also be why it doesn't show up in the TNG shows/movies) is that they felt that the Connie was too iconic to pass as a generic older ship. The Miranda and Excelsior are less iconic and there for allowed. I suspect that the only reason they originally allowed it into the game at all is that it was originally a pre-order bonus.

    I'm fairly confident that it has nothing to do with the J.J. movies.
  • catstarstocatstarsto Member Posts: 2,149 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The reason CBS doesn't allow the Connie as max level (and this may also be why it doesn't show up in the TNG shows/movies) is that they felt that the Connie was too iconic to pass as a generic older ship. The Miranda and Excelsior are less iconic and there for allowed. I suspect that the only reason they originally allowed it into the game at all is that it was originally a pre-order bonus.

    I'm fairly confident that it has nothing to do with the J.J. movies.

    I guess I can buy that. But the Miranda is very Iconic, when you see one you know there will be a battle or something that causes its destruction, its kinda like Krillin from Dragonball Z, when they are in the story, its only a matter of time before they get destroyed. They are Star Treks official cannon fodder, just like the BoP is for KDF.
  • dareaudareau Member Posts: 2,390 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The reason CBS doesn't allow the Connie as max level (and this may also be why it doesn't show up in the TNG shows/movies) is that they felt that the Connie was too iconic to pass as a generic older ship. The Miranda and Excelsior are less iconic and there for allowed. I suspect that the only reason they originally allowed it into the game at all is that it was originally a pre-order bonus.

    I'm fairly confident that it has nothing to do with the J.J. movies.

    Aren't there some Connie Refits in one or two of the Borg graveyards (Wolf 359?) during TNG? Or are those "Exeter" class ships (the alt skin of the Connie-refit)?

    Meant to evoke the concept of "these guys are so bad we're throwing everything we can at them and it's getting mulched"...

    Look. I'm all for the Connie /= Oddessy crowd. Which is why I keep putting forth (and carry in my sig) a T5 Constitution class as a Science vessel proposal... ;)

    On a side note, KDF gets to fly their ToS/TMP Refit D7/K'Tinga as a 5+2 (fleet) ship, and the Rommie T'Liss (at least it's T'Varo refit that brings it to TMP-levels / looks) as a 5+1. Only thing holding up having a late game ToS representative for the Federation is this "claim" by CBS...

    For those who may not know / remember, there was a big stink during the release of Starfleet Command as to why all the ships in that game were TMP era even though it's source (Starfleet Battles) was set in ToS. CBS representative at the time said the decision was made to tie into the "recognizable" look of the movies, as the last representation of TOS era. While I may not "like" it (as I want the whole kit-and-kaboodle 60's look ToS Constitution) I can "live" with a TMP-ized version as a T5 ship of some sorts...
    Detecting big-time "anti-old-school" bias here. NX? Lobi. TOS/TMP Connie? Super-promotion-box. (aka the two hardest ways to get ships) Excelsior & all 3 TNG "big hero" ships? C-Store. Please Equalize...

    To rob a line: [quote: Mariemaia Kushrenada] Forum Posting is much like an endless waltz. The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever. However, opinions will change upon the reading of my post.[/quote]
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    dareau wrote: »
    Aren't there some Connie Refits in one or two of the Borg graveyards (Wolf 359?) during TNG? Or are those "Exeter" class ships (the alt skin of the Connie-refit)?

    Meant to evoke the concept of "these guys are so bad we're throwing everything we can at them and it's getting mulched"...

    Look. I'm all for the Connie /= Oddessy crowd. Which is why I keep putting forth (and carry in my sig) a T5 Constitution class as a Science vessel proposal... ;)

    On a side note, KDF gets to fly their ToS/TMP Refit D7/K'Tinga as a 5+2 (fleet) ship, and the Rommie T'Liss (at least it's T'Varo refit that brings it to TMP-levels / looks) as a 5+1. Only thing holding up having a late game ToS representative for the Federation is this "claim" by CBS...

    For those who may not know / remember, there was a big stink during the release of Starfleet Command as to why all the ships in that game were TMP era even though it's source (Starfleet Battles) was set in ToS. CBS representative at the time said the decision was made to tie into the "recognizable" look of the movies, as the last representation of TOS era. While I may not "like" it (as I want the whole kit-and-kaboodle 60's look ToS Constitution) I can "live" with a TMP-ized version as a T5 ship of some sorts...

    You do see connie engineering hulls but many believe their remains of Federation class starships, a beefer cousin to the Connie
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    and never will be

    Dan asked them a couple years ago. They said no. A couple years ago. They didn't say never ever. They just said no back then.

    People keep adding all these modifiers to what was actually said. Stuff that was not said. Compounding the problem. It's like that prison grapevine scene in Johnny Dangerously, only nowhere near as funny.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • snoggymack22snoggymack22 Member Posts: 7,084 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    starkaos wrote: »
    Tier 5 ships are supposed to be the best ships in the fleet.
    The Nova. The Saber. The Cheyenne. The Olympic. These are all Tier 5 Fleet ships. Not awe inspiring in the least.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The Nova. The Saber. The Cheyenne. The Olympic. These are all Tier 5 Fleet ships. Not awe inspiring in the least.

    Indeed.

    As for a T5 Connie, I repeatedly bring up the idea of a light cruiser / destroyer.

    Better handling
    Updated equipment slots
    Less hull to "newer" cruisers
    Maybe even less shield mod for the sake of more multimission capability

    Things can be done with stats & mods to make the old ships viable, fun to play with while still adhering to the concept that the Galaxies and Sovereigns are that much more powerful and sturdier as newer, BIGGER ships.

    A Miranda could adopt sci/support type of template of a Nebula, but make the same compromise the Nebula did with its cousin, the Galaxy (Connie in the Miranda's instance). But stats and mods can be twisted around to still fill that mold while not making it as sturdy as the Nebula.

    If the Klingons can still belt out service with the venerable D7 and Bird of Prey frames, I'm sure Starfleet can do something with Mirandas and Constitutions.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • catstarstocatstarsto Member Posts: 2,149 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    graleron wrote: »
    I've got a couple of theories as to why we can't have a T5 Constitution. One more serious, one not so much.

    The more serious theory is around the idea that the image of Kirk's Enterprise is being kept deliberately low-profile in the game due to a desire to keep audience minds concentrated on the reboot films.

    Less seriously -- it's against Cryptic's policy to give the Federation a Starfleet cruiser with a turn rate greater than 8 :P

    Not so much Kirks vessel, but look how many shows use the original Constitution design, the videos I mentioned at the beginning use them, I admit the alt universe star fleet had an extra pod beneith it for the super weapon, but it was the traditional connie in all other respects. The slow moving super weapon, a couple more bridge officer powers, maybe 2 for each category (tact/eng/sci) and at least 2 more weapon slots isnt that hard to add. Im not asking for an overpowered vessel, just one that can survive a normal episode mission battle for a VA.

    Im glad this debate has picked up :D
  • ascaladarascaladar Member Posts: 186 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The Constitution class is an iconic design but it belongs to an earlier era. Personally I dislike even the Excelsior as a T5 because the Hull design was basically at the end of life.

    So no 150 year old hulls please.
  • cidstormcidstorm Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I was doing some research last night, the difference in size between the Akira class and jem bug is bigger than the difference between a Galaxy and Connie refit. Saying it's too small is definitely not aplicable in any way.

    Other than that, ships in STO are completely modular, everything in the Connie refit is already compatible with modern ships as shown in the cruiser class stats. The Akira, Odyssey, Luna, and Sovereign have almost identical pylons. The Ambassador has a nearly identical saucer, neck, and hull. The Saber Ushaan varient has nearly identical Nacelles. Saying it can't be tier 5 is a position that can't be validated by any universal facts. There are older and smaller ships in the game.
  • edited April 2013
    This content has been removed.
  • rexmercerrexmercer Member Posts: 24 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Indeed.

    As for a T5 Connie, I repeatedly bring up the idea of a light cruiser / destroyer.

    Better handling
    Updated equipment slots
    Less hull to "newer" cruisers
    Maybe even less shield mod for the sake of more multimission capability

    Things can be done with stats & mods to make the old ships viable, fun to play with while still adhering to the concept that the Galaxies and Sovereigns are that much more powerful and sturdier as newer, BIGGER ships.

    A Miranda could adopt sci/support type of template of a Nebula, but make the same compromise the Nebula did with its cousin, the Galaxy (Connie in the Miranda's instance). But stats and mods can be twisted around to still fill that mold while not making it as sturdy as the Nebula.

    If the Klingons can still belt out service with the venerable D7 and Bird of Prey frames, I'm sure Starfleet can do something with Mirandas and Constitutions.


    I agree if they can make these ships T5 there's no reason they can't make a T5 Connie
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    The Nova. The Saber. The Cheyenne. The Olympic. These are all Tier 5 Fleet ships. Not awe inspiring in the least.

    Agreed. People wanted Tier 5 versions of lower tier ships and Cryptic gave them to us for $20 per ship. But as far as most of the other Tier 5 ships go, they are awe inspiring or at least belong as a Tier 5 ship.
  • dareaudareau Member Posts: 2,390 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    You do see connie engineering hulls but many believe their remains of Federation class starships, a beefer cousin to the Connie

    Would said cousin be the Federation class dreadnought from the old-school TOS Tech Manual by Franz Joseph?
    Detecting big-time "anti-old-school" bias here. NX? Lobi. TOS/TMP Connie? Super-promotion-box. (aka the two hardest ways to get ships) Excelsior & all 3 TNG "big hero" ships? C-Store. Please Equalize...

    To rob a line: [quote: Mariemaia Kushrenada] Forum Posting is much like an endless waltz. The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever. However, opinions will change upon the reading of my post.[/quote]
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    dareau wrote: »
    Would said cousin be the Federation class dreadnought from the old-school TOS Tech Manual by Franz Joseph?

    yes, it is very liekly that it went through the refit as well and wasa in service during the 24th century. Hanson was liukely scraping the barrel for ships to fight the borg and the Federation was availible
  • khayuungkhayuung Member Posts: 1,876 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    I don't care if it has the letter E, D, C, B, A, no letter, or a bag of cotton balls. NO to Fleet Constituition.

    YES however to the Fleet Exeter!


    "Last Engage! Magical Girl Origami-san" is in print! Now with three times more rainbows.

    Support the "Armored Unicorn" vehicle initiative today!

    Thanks for Harajuku. Now let's get a real "Magical Girl" costume!
  • wraithxiiwraithxii Member Posts: 30 Arc User
    edited April 2013
    Yes to Tier 5 anything! The Klingons and Romulans have T 5 versions of lower level ships. Why can't the Federation? They will be replicas that have the look of the past with the technology of the future. We already have StarFleet captains with Breen, Ferengi, Cardassian, Dominion and Tholian ships. It doesn't matter what tier anything is anymore. Canon went out of the proverbial window long ago.
Sign In or Register to comment.