test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Any chance for a change to the Manheim Device?

picardtheiiipicardtheiii Member Posts: 151 Arc User
edited December 2012 in Federation Discussion
Let me just preface this by saying I'm well aware that the temporal ships are great ships and this isn't a complaint about them in general.

The Manheim Device is just ridiculous however. Well known as the "Suicide Console" it is a much more effective way to kill yourself than self destruct. No matter how good the ship is, the console shouldn't be totally pointless.

Exacerbating the problem is the fact that for some reason the past version of yourself is king of aggro draw the instant you summon it... crazy.

There are a number of ways to fix this. The player should receive less of the damage that the past ship receives than it does currently. Although rare it is possible to survive the death of your past self, so any time travel purists can forget arguing the "story" of it. The starting hull of your past and future self could be less, thus meaning there was less damage to pass on before popping.

At the minimum the device should provide the ability to "unsummon" the ships if they are taking a beating and you want to survive.

If any change to increase the survivability of this console required a balancing nerf, I believe we would be more than fine with that. Reduced summoned damage, health, or increased cooldown would also be more than acceptable if it meant we actually got to summon the pets and use them.

Thanks.
Post edited by picardtheiii on
«1

Comments

  • bubblygumsworthbubblygumsworth Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Its hard to think about... too many paradoxes. Summon past and future ships to help, past ship gets blown up therefore blowing up present and future ships, but if the present ship did not exist then it would have not summoned the past and future ships in the first place therefore not exploding due to the destruction of the past ship... My brain hurts
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    I drink, I vote, and I PvP!
  • shar487ashar487a Member Posts: 1,292 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    I agree, the Manheim Device is more liability that usefulness in its present format. If the future an past ships actually used your existing weapons and BO-abilities, then the extra damage feedback would be appropriate, but this is not the case. As a result, both future and past ships should be have no damage transference since they come from divergent time-lines.
  • unangbangkayunangbangkay Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Sad to hear that the Manheim Device is kind of a wash. And I just bought a Temporal Destroyer!

    That said, it's still in the box, so I can resell it and trade for a Wells and its superior gimmick.

    Would you recommend that course of action? I picked the TD mainly because I'm more familiar with Escort Tactics, but I could easily switch to sweet science if it was worth it. I can only get one, though. It'll be a long while before I can afford both.

    What do you think?

    BTW, I'm an Engineer.
  • scurry5scurry5 Member Posts: 1,554 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Nah, the temporal destroyer is worth keeping for the ship alone, and is worth more than the Wells. I use one on my sci, and it's a nice balance between sci/eng abilities and damage. I removed the Mannheim, though, and saved up to get a Wells as well, so I could fit the Tippler Cylinder instead. The Wells is a good sci ship, but can be difficult to use well.

    As an engineer, you won't get the best out of either timeship, but they are both nice to have overall.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    ALL Temporal ships should be revoked
    Live long and Prosper
  • unangbangkayunangbangkay Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    ALL Temporal ships should be revoked

    Why? And please don't say "canon".
  • hereticknight085hereticknight085 Member Posts: 3,783 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    ALL Temporal ships should be revoked

    Wait... what? Why? Hell I don't even use them and this statement confuses me. That's like saying all Tholian ships, all Cardassian Ships, all bugs, all MU ships, and all D'koras should be removed.

    Why not just say that all lock box ships should be removed (revoked is the wrong word btw). Because you'd need to do that to justify removing the Temporal Science Vessels and Temporal Destroyers. And even then, there really isn't a reason to do that.
    It is said the best weapon is one that is never fired. I disagree. The best weapon is one you only have to fire... once. B)
  • unangbangkayunangbangkay Member Posts: 10 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Wait... what? Why? Hell I don't even use them and this statement confuses me. That's like saying all Tholian ships, all Cardassian Ships, all bugs, all MU ships, and all D'koras should be removed.

    Why not just say that all lock box ships should be removed (revoked is the wrong word btw). Because you'd need to do that to justify removing the Temporal Science Vessels and Temporal Destroyers. And even then, there really isn't a reason to do that.

    If canon nerds had their way the only playable ships available in the game would look like the Connie, the Galaxy, the Defiant, the Sovvy, and the Intrepid. Plus, of course, their own personal kitbash that they designed themselves because it's the only fan design that makes sense and fits in the story.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Revoked is the right word

    Removed is too limited

    Gone
    Obliterated
    Erased

    Because they are massively CHEATING

    As to the other non canon junk
    well starfleet are short of ships
    the least competent captains get issued captured alien junkers right??
    Live long and Prosper
  • ocp001ocp001 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    Revoked is the right word

    Removed is too limited

    Gone
    Obliterated
    Erased

    Because they are massively CHEATING

    As to the other non canon junk
    well starfleet are short of ships
    the least competent captains get issued captured alien junkers right??

    Do you do anything other than whine and complain? STFU.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Why don't you go and "uphold the law" or "serve the public trust"

    I spend most of my time being helpful and nice

    you on the other hand are SWEARING at people
    Live long and Prosper
  • ocp001ocp001 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    How is trolling this form being helpful and nice? Really explain that one. And I'll gladly say I was wrong.
  • fraghul2000fraghul2000 Member Posts: 1,590 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Wait... what? Why? Hell I don't even use them and this statement confuses me. That's like saying all Tholian ships, all Cardassian Ships, all bugs, all MU ships, and all D'koras should be removed.

    Why not just say that all lock box ships should be removed (revoked is the wrong word btw). Because you'd need to do that to justify removing the Temporal Science Vessels and Temporal Destroyers. And even then, there really isn't a reason to do that.

    Remember to follow Forum Rules Nr. 2: don't ever answer one of Sollvax's attempts to troll...
    Sad to hear that the Manheim Device is kind of a wash. And I just bought a Temporal Destroyer!

    That said, it's still in the box, so I can resell it and trade for a Wells and its superior gimmick.

    Would you recommend that course of action? I picked the TD mainly because I'm more familiar with Escort Tactics, but I could easily switch to sweet science if it was worth it. I can only get one, though. It'll be a long while before I can afford both.

    What do you think?

    BTW, I'm an Engineer.

    As someone else has mentioned, even though the console is horrible, it's a nice ship. 4 Tac consoles, decent hull, good shields and most importantly, it's an escort that doesn't come with that godforsaken Ensign Tac slot.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    ocp001 wrote: »
    How is trolling this form being helpful and nice? Really explain that one. And I'll gladly say I was wrong.

    Im not the one doing that

    you don't want to read what people have to say DON'T

    but the next time you call someone a troll think twice
    Live long and Prosper
  • ocp001ocp001 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    Im not the one doing that

    you don't want to read what people have to say DON'T

    but the next time you call someone a troll think twice

    Your lack of reading comprehension is as fail as your attempts to justify your position. Like a child debating with a God. I stand by my original assessment of you and your soapbox attention grabbing ranting. STFU and L2P.

    As for the Suicide console, the only redeeming feature it has is how it augments the tripler.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Stand down
    you are clearly defective
    seek repair


    I spent a lot of the last couple of days trying to help one of this boards nicest people with a foundry problem

    I spend a lot of time trying to promote honour , respect for women and proper standards of dress and canon

    you just abuse people

    The phrase "is as fai" incidentally marks you out as younger than me by at least two decades .
    Live long and Prosper
  • scrimpinionscrimpinion Member Posts: 76 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    The phrase "is as fai" incidentally marks you out as younger than me by at least two decades .

    ...and as we all know, the older you are, the smarter and more right you are. :cool:
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ocp001ocp001 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    Stand down
    you are clearly defective
    seek repair


    I spent a lot of the last couple of days trying to help one of this boards nicest people with a foundry problem

    I spend a lot of time trying to promote honour , respect for women and proper standards of dress and canon

    you just abuse people

    The phrase "is as fai" incidentally marks you out as younger than me by at least two decades .

    My mistake I'll clarify in verbiage and dialog befitting your decrepit state.

    You come here announce to everyone that all temporal ships should be "revoked." And it's not trolling.

    When I call you on your trolling (how dare I challenge your age old wisdom) I'm abusive.

    Your age is irrelevant you're wrong. So take your accusations of cheating and discontent and start a thread on it. I'm sure your particular mix logical fallacies and complaining will make it stand out amidst the sea of complaint threads.

    Your previous good works and generosity are all undone by your current actions. Your statements of how good you are, only further your ego like a pharisee.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    My mistake I'll clarify in verbiage and dialog befitting your decrepit state.

    why thank you
    You come here announce to everyone that all temporal ships should be "revoked." And it's not trolling.

    no its what we call an Opinion
    I feel that anything as badly broken and as abused as these needs to be removed
    #
    When I call you on it (how dare I challenge your age old wisdom) I'm abusive.

    you swore and blasphemed
    not a great start
    Your age is irrelevant you're wrong. So take your accusations of cheating and discontent and start a thread on it.

    My age is relevant when you call me a child and claim to be a ~God
    so take your attitude and pop along to Drozana or something


    Your previous good works and generosity are all undone by your current actions. Your statements of how good you are, only further your ego like a pharisee.
    Live long and Prosper
  • ocp001ocp001 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    I think you need to carefully Reread my posts and then do a quick exercise on the nature of an analogy.

    Unless analogies are also cheating. Like time ships.

    And unlike yourself I make no claims of goodness or purity in the temple of STO. I leave that to the Pharisees such as yourself.



    As for the m?bius console. It's an absolutely canon implementation of the Mannheim effect. However it's not a good thing for how STO is designed. If it functioned more like the shard of possibilities a lot of grief would be avoided.

    The m?bius destroyer is actually in my opinion the superior timeship.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    No you just claim to be a God

    and I made no claim of good works

    merely basic helping out

    good works includes things like spending a year in Africa building a school
    Curing cancer
    giving half your wages to children in need

    helping out someone you happen to like is not a good work
    Live long and Prosper
  • ocp001ocp001 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    No you just claim to be a God

    Well to be honest with you, when I have to be accosted with "people" like you, yeah I pretty much am. It's like disciplining your dog.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    So you freely admit to being a blasphemous bigheaded Edward?

    Well I can't be bothered with you right now

    im sure you will be back
    but right now im going to have something to eat

    Because we mortals get hungry (and pee)
    Live long and Prosper
  • flotahispanaflotahispana Member Posts: 78 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Manheim Device makes not sense, cause the two ships that summons are supposed to be "quantum" versions, not actual ships from the past and the future. It's like when you are using the ground "shard of possibilities", and being killed cause one of your quantum shadows has been killed... Ridiculous isnt it?

    Also, this is a game, and i cant imagine one single mechanic where the Manheim Device isnt more than a suicide console.


    Ridiculous.
  • ocp001ocp001 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Manheim Device makes not sense, cause the two ships that summons are supposed to be "quantum" versions, not actual ships from the past and the future. It's like when you are using the ground "shard of possibilities", and being killed cause one of your quantum shadows has been killed... Ridiculous isnt it?

    Also, this is a game, and i cant imagine one single mechanic where the Manheim Device isnt more than a suicide console.


    Ridiculous.

    ^^^ Truth right there.
  • bubblygumsworthbubblygumsworth Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Manheim Device makes not sense, cause the two ships that summons are supposed to be "quantum" versions, not actual ships from the past and the future. It's like when you are using the ground "shard of possibilities", and being killed cause one of your quantum shadows has been killed... Ridiculous isnt it?

    Also, this is a game, and i cant imagine one single mechanic where the Manheim Device isnt more than a suicide console.


    Ridiculous.

    Shard of Possibilities "Call upon two level __ Quantum Shadows from alternate universes."

    Manheim Device "The Manheim Device console can create quantum duplicates of yourself, one from your past and one from your future."

    Although they both create Quantum duplicates, the shard creates duplicates from alternate universes where as the Manheim Device summons ships from your immediate past and future. Two different things.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    I drink, I vote, and I PvP!
  • picardtheiiipicardtheiii Member Posts: 151 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Manheim Device makes not sense, cause the two ships that summons are supposed to be "quantum" versions, not actual ships from the past and the future. It's like when you are using the ground "shard of possibilities", and being killed cause one of your quantum shadows has been killed... Ridiculous isnt it?

    Also, this is a game, and i cant imagine one single mechanic where the Manheim Device isnt more than a suicide console.


    Ridiculous.

    Great points. Hopefully someone at PWE takes notice of this issue and really does something to address it because this is just silly.

    Frankly I'd just as soon remove the past version all together, simply have the device summon one future version with damage increased a small bit maybe 10 or 20%, that takes damage itself as well as the damage the present ship takes but also with heals passed on.
  • flotahispanaflotahispana Member Posts: 78 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Manheim Device summons ships from your immediate past and future. Two different things.

    No it doesnt:


    "The Manheim Device console can create quantum duplicates of yourself, one from your past and one from your future.


    Q-U-A-N-T-U-M, not actual ships.
  • bubblygumsworthbubblygumsworth Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    No it doesnt:


    "The Manheim Device console can create quantum duplicates of yourself, one from your past and one from your future.


    Q-U-A-N-T-U-M, not actual ships.

    Shard is quantum shadows where the device are quantum copies.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    I drink, I vote, and I PvP!
  • foundrelicfoundrelic Member Posts: 1,380 Arc User
    edited December 2012
    Shard of Possibilities "Call upon two level __ Quantum Shadows from alternate universes."

    Manheim Device "The Manheim Device console can create quantum duplicates of yourself, one from your past and one from your future."

    Although they both create Quantum duplicates, the shard creates duplicates from alternate universes where as the Manheim Device summons ships from your immediate past and future. Two different things.

    See there's some issues with that.


    One, I was never pulled into the past or the future to fight along two copies of myself.

    Two, I use better gear and know enough to get the **** away from a ship that's about to blow while cranking the shields that are facing the explosion if I'm still withing 2km.

    Three, have a competent bridge crew who are able to help make my ship a flying wedge of temporal death.


    Four, I don't have any damn tractor beams.





    They're not Temporally displaced versions of myself and my ship, not by a long shot.




    At the very least set it up so that if the past ship goes you just lose your systems (like Viral Matrix) for a short time, call it a Temporal shockwave or something.
Sign In or Register to comment.