1.6. you may add 5 team members + 3 reserve players
1.7. you can always nominate new players and add them to your team however you may not use a player from a participating team and have more than 8 players
Just interested, what purpose does the "max 3 reserves"-rule have?
Oh, and am I understanding this correctly?
> You may not remove a player from the team and add a new one.
> But you can nominate a new player at any time as long as there's still a spot left on the team.
.The Spanish Inquisition. TSI -- Star Trek Online PvP Vidoes (Youtube) /channel_join OrganizedPVP If you are interested in learning PVP, looking for a team, or a private match.
- if you loose some members due to any problems ( real life, kicked from the team ),
you may delete those and add new players who do not belong to another team. Always make sure though to not have more then 8 players total. That will be possible through out the tournament.
Nova Aurora Polaris
- Nova Aurora Polaris - @pascalb1
- if you loose some members due to any problems ( real life, kicked from the team ),
you may delete those and add new players who do not belong to another team. Always make sure though to not have more then 8 players total. That will be possible through out the tournament.
Thank you, and a follow up question.
Would it be exploiting this rule if we were to remove players so that we can play with diffrent teams depending on who's available.
Example:
>Week1 PlayerA plays with the rest of the team
>Week2 PlayerA is removed from the team PlayerB is added. PlayerB plays with the team this week.
>Week3 PlayerB is removed from the team PlayerA is added back on. PlayerA plays with the team this week.
And one more thing, how long can we expect the tournament to go on? (Is my example, with weeks included, too long of a time span?)
.The Spanish Inquisition. TSI -- Star Trek Online PvP Vidoes (Youtube) /channel_join OrganizedPVP If you are interested in learning PVP, looking for a team, or a private match.
No unfortunatelly not. If the person has been member of 1 team and leaves than he/she isn't allowed to play any more in this tournament.
So think twice before you leave a team.
What is the point of limiting teams to 5+3 anyway? Isn't it enough to make sure that nobody plays for two teams during the tournament?
I'm fairly certain that the rules meeting came to the conclusion that "sign up as many as you like, just make sure nobody plays for two teams" was the way to go. Your rule "1.3. you may add as many members as you like ( fleet + @handle )" even shows that intent, but then rule 1.6 contradicts this.
What is the point of limiting teams to 5+3 anyway? Isn't it enough to make sure that nobody plays for two teams during the tournament?
I'm fairly certain that the rules meeting came to the conclusion that "sign up as many as you like, just make sure nobody plays for two teams" was the way to go. Your rule "1.3. you may add as many members as you like ( fleet + @handle )" even shows that intent, but then rule 1.6 contradicts this.
What is the point of limiting teams to 5+3 anyway? Isn't it enough to make sure that nobody plays for two teams during the tournament?
I'm fairly certain that the rules meeting came to the conclusion that "sign up as many as you like, just make sure nobody plays for two teams" was the way to go. Your rule "1.3. you may add as many members as you like ( fleet + @handle )" even shows that intent, but then rule 1.6 contradicts this.
This was actually what I wondered in my original question.
.The Spanish Inquisition. TSI -- Star Trek Online PvP Vidoes (Youtube) /channel_join OrganizedPVP If you are interested in learning PVP, looking for a team, or a private match.
What is the point of limiting teams to 5+3 anyway? Isn't it enough to make sure that nobody plays for two teams during the tournament?
I'm fairly certain that the rules meeting came to the conclusion that "sign up as many as you like, just make sure nobody plays for two teams" was the way to go.
I don't really remember what was exactly said regarding the roster size during the rules meeting.
But I remember Pascal saying something along the lines that all rules and the whole tournament framework in general required some form of approval from Cryptic. If no approval then no official support of Cryptic for this enterprise.
I believe the reason for limiting roster size is simply this: There are 8 Prices for the winners, so just 8 members in each team. But I'm just guessing here....
I ask that the organisers postpone the tournament until the additional rules added (Red rules) are fully agreed by all fleets. Many people have come to me from various fleets regarding this issue.
Lets try to make this tournament fair for everyone and without any perceived biases put in place to favour one team over another leading to controversy.
I ask that the organisers postpone the tournament until the additional rules added (Red rules) are fully agreed by all fleets. Many people have come to me from various fleets to regarding this issue.
Lets try to make this tournament fair for everyone and without any perceived biases put in place to favour one team over another.
i second this motion, the red rules need to be reviewed.
I ask that the organisers postpone the tournament until the additional rules added (Red rules) are fully agreed by all fleets. Many people have come to me from various fleets regarding this issue.
Lets try to make this tournament fair for everyone and without any perceived biases put in place to favour one team over another.
Just get it together *EDITED* people *EDITED* we all agreed to the rules and now it seems like your trying to hold up the match because you don't like the fact a person can play both ground AND space? Its the rules of the tourny, if you can't play by the rules, then don't OR change your build to match it.
I ask that the organisers postpone the tournament until the additional rules added (Red rules) are fully agreed by all fleets. Many people have come to me from various fleets regarding this issue.
Lets try to make this tournament fair for everyone and without any perceived biases put in place to favour one team over another leading to controversy.
really people need to get over themselves and either go foward or move on. the rules so far are fair and if people have a problem then they can drop out.
Join Date: Dec 2007Originally Posted by BROKEN1981
really people need to get over themselves and either go foward or move on. the rules so far are fair and if people have a problem then they can drop out.
the issue if you care to read properly, additional rules were added without consulting ALL the fleets.
Im sick of hearing everyone agreed to the rules any rule in red was changed after the meeting. Without any say so from the people in the meeting so no the rules in red were not agreed to by all.
Comments
Fleet: Ad Infinitum (Ad Inf)
Timezone: CET
Space 5vs5
@matija
@pavec
@tannatozz
@krome7
@drugdraz
@aw3s0me1701
@blaja
@ursus_arctos
If you need to contact us PM @matija
@matija
Team: The Spanish Inquisition
Players:
No substitutes yet. (But we are working on bringing back the rock monster! :eek:)
We will confirm the following lineup tonight based on internal voting.
Team: The Saddest Pandas
Players:
@USSenterpiseZ
@hurleybird
@marctraider
@voidsiren
@bwemo
@naldoran
@4monkeys
@naz1911
Just interested, what purpose does the "max 3 reserves"-rule have?
Oh, and am I understanding this correctly?
> You may not remove a player from the team and add a new one.
> But you can nominate a new player at any time as long as there's still a spot left on the team.
TSI -- Star Trek Online PvP Vidoes (Youtube)
/channel_join OrganizedPVP If you are interested in learning PVP, looking for a team, or a private match.
Explaination:
- you may have 8 members max
- if you loose some members due to any problems ( real life, kicked from the team ),
you may delete those and add new players who do not belong to another team. Always make sure though to not have more then 8 players total. That will be possible through out the tournament.
- Nova Aurora Polaris -
@pascalb1
Fleet: Turkish RP Heroes (TRPH)
Timezone: International
Space 5v5
TEAM 1: "The Turkish Delights"
@Minitrckin08
@Tick0
@Jam0
@s7ike
@as7ray
@Rand Al Thor
@shimmerless
@Sabrefyre
TEAM 2: "The Unsolved Mysteries"
@PaxOttomana
@infiniteliberty
@Failostirion
@CarbonBlack
@Chorkswalds
@Aternal99
@steve5734
@keysee1990
@f4tamy | Sad Pandas
Would it be exploiting this rule if we were to remove players so that we can play with diffrent teams depending on who's available.
Example:
>Week1
PlayerA plays with the rest of the team
>Week2
PlayerA is removed from the team PlayerB is added. PlayerB plays with the team this week.
>Week3
PlayerB is removed from the team PlayerA is added back on. PlayerA plays with the team this week.
And one more thing, how long can we expect the tournament to go on? (Is my example, with weeks included, too long of a time span?)
TSI -- Star Trek Online PvP Vidoes (Youtube)
/channel_join OrganizedPVP If you are interested in learning PVP, looking for a team, or a private match.
So think twice before you leave a team.
- Nova Aurora Polaris -
@pascalb1
@bmr1580
@gallileos
@bethshepard
@anathosion
@ite12sd
@jason.rico
@cptpyr8
@superphat
Looking Forward To Seeing You Inside The Tournament
I Will Be An Impartial Referee
- Nova Aurora Polaris -
@pascalb1
I'm fairly certain that the rules meeting came to the conclusion that "sign up as many as you like, just make sure nobody plays for two teams" was the way to go. Your rule "1.3. you may add as many members as you like ( fleet + @handle )" even shows that intent, but then rule 1.6 contradicts this.
This^^
This was actually what I wondered in my original question.
TSI -- Star Trek Online PvP Vidoes (Youtube)
/channel_join OrganizedPVP If you are interested in learning PVP, looking for a team, or a private match.
Space 5v5
@Soveliss-Sovair
@PapaBlood
@Gogo992
@TonyJohnminter
@smatty1
@DBH-Chaos
@jarrett885
@Healie
More May come or list subject to change. Any questions please contact me.
This information being posted is in reference of Page 3 when i did a open team / fleet registration without haven the details worked out.
You might have missed te deadline
Do you even Science Bro?
I don't really remember what was exactly said regarding the roster size during the rules meeting.
But I remember Pascal saying something along the lines that all rules and the whole tournament framework in general required some form of approval from Cryptic. If no approval then no official support of Cryptic for this enterprise.
I believe the reason for limiting roster size is simply this: There are 8 Prices for the winners, so just 8 members in each team. But I'm just guessing here....
Lets try to make this tournament fair for everyone and without any perceived biases put in place to favour one team over another leading to controversy.
i second this motion, the red rules need to be reviewed.
Do you even Science Bro?
I would third this as well.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Please check for new thread ( rules meeting )
- Nova Aurora Polaris -
@pascalb1
Fleet: 58. Geschwader / Yan Isleth
Timezone: CET
Space 5vs5
@Motzi
@laphonsox
@losmartines
@Adma
@JohnConner
@deraltewikinger
@iceman
=/\= Vice Admiral |□|□|□| Andreas@Motzi =/\=
=/\= Yan Isleth - yo' 'ai =/\=
=/\= Lieutenant General |₳|₳|₳| K'ratak@Motzi =/\=
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
really people need to get over themselves and either go foward or move on. the rules so far are fair and if people have a problem then they can drop out.
the issue if you care to read properly, additional rules were added without consulting ALL the fleets.
Please learn to read.
Cheers,
Brandon =/\=