test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Ambassador Class Thoughts

2»

Comments

  • rrincyrrincy Member Posts: 1,023
    edited November 2012
    raj011 wrote: »
    if they introduce a refit design for the ambassador class I think this design http://en.memory-alpha.org/wiki/File:USS_Enterprise-C_first_Probert_design.jpg would be awesome considering this is th original design.

    http://drexfiles.wordpress.com/2011/07/03/sotl-2012-1-of-5-tobias-richter/

    a much better version of the same design :p
    12th Fleet
    Rear Admiral , Engineering Division
    U.S.S. Sheffield N.C.C. 92016
  • azyurionazyurion Member Posts: 168 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Well, given that they've hinted at its release before season 8, we should be seeing a lot of them cruising the space lanes sooner than later. The only caveat is that if they make it a "free" ship, it will likely suck itself into immediate obsolescence.
  • misskoryamisskorya Member Posts: 65 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    Dan said in Ask Cryptic November, 2013.

    YAY! Ambassador!

    Three years later...
    Stormwarden Tessara Tharneth

    Hellbringer Mera Smoak

    Classes Wanted: Druid | Monk | Bard | Sorcerer | Barbarian
    Races Wanted: Half-Orc | Gnome | Warforged
  • cidstormcidstorm Member Posts: 1,220 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    I think the Amb class is the perfect size and covered with enough shiny bits to be the sci heavy cruiser.
  • jellico1jellico1 Member Posts: 2,719
    edited November 2012
    My thoughts are these

    The cryptic holy trinity I'n this game is a failure
    They know it

    We have escorts upon escorts, many new science
    Choices

    Cryptic knows pvp is a finical unbalanced failure
    I'n There game

    The one thing we don't have is a cruiser with
    Teeth a battleship

    We have thousands of cruiser players wanting a
    Tactical cruiser

    If they want to make money that's what it will be
    If it's another Eng cruiser sales will be avg/poor to
    What they could be a vanity ship like the galaxy

    This would out sell any other c-store ship I bet

    A cruiser with escort firepower
    Escort healing limited engineering
    Slow like a cruiser turn like a cruiser
    Lots of armor and resistances

    It's what isn't I'n the game
    And what a LOT of people want

    And yes I'm running 3 escorts and no a ship like
    That doesn't threaten me
    Jellico....Engineer ground.....Da'val Romulan space Sci
    Saphire.. Science ground......Ko'el Romulan space Tac
    Leva........Tactical ground.....Koj Romulan space Eng

    JJ-Verse will never be Canon or considered Lore...It will always be JJ-Verse
  • uss917019uss917019 Member Posts: 182 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    misterde3 wrote: »
    When Cryptic and CBS held the "Design the next Enterprise" contest CBS made it clear that as a ship that held the name U.S.S. Enterprise, it must be a cruiser.
    This would also apply to the Ambassador class so she can't be a destroyer.

    Uh didnt the NX 01 was a Tactical ship not a cruiser??????
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • baelogventurebaelogventure Member Posts: 1,002 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    I could see the Ambassador being the first Cruiser with a dedicated LTC Sci station, with more shielding then the Galaxy and more Hull then the Nebula, and manuverability somewhere between, without being too extreme.
  • misterde3misterde3 Member Posts: 4,195 Arc User
    edited November 2012
    uss917019 wrote: »
    Uh didnt the NX 01 was a Tactical ship not a cruiser??????

    That's right, but you missed something:

    CBS said "U.S.S. Enteprise", like I wrote in the post you quoted.
    The NX-01 was not called "U.S.S. Enteprise", only "Enterprise".
Sign In or Register to comment.