test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

return of Vger and the Nexus

124»

Comments

  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    New idea (less than two centuries)

    and it can't be both a wave and a particle

    its daft
    it either has mass (is matter) or it doesn't (is a property of the matter it passes through)
    Live long and Prosper
  • kyeto13kyeto13 Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    If they aren't matter then they can't exist (everything is made of matter energy is a property of matter) this is a law a lot older than the concept of the photon

    Photons... are not matter... they do not have matter.. they are matterless and massless. They are the mediation particle of electromagnetic propagation.

    They MUST exist in this state or the universe as we know it would fall apart at the seems.
    Live on Earth. Work in Space. Play with Dragons. Join the best add on to STO, the Neverwinter holodeck program! Only 14 GPL a month.
  • kyeto13kyeto13 Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    New idea (less than two centuries)

    and it can't be both a wave and a particle

    its daft
    it either has mass (is matter) or it doesn't (is a property of the matter it passes through)

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc

    Not only IS it both.. it HAS to be.

    And Photons do not have matter!!!
    Live on Earth. Work in Space. Play with Dragons. Join the best add on to STO, the Neverwinter holodeck program! Only 14 GPL a month.
  • syberghostsyberghost Member Posts: 1,711 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    If they aren't matter then they can't exist (everything is made of matter energy is a property of matter) this is a law a lot older than the concept of the photon

    Congratulations; you just made up your own brand of physics, that is not supported by any experiment or credible theory produced in the 20th or later centuries. :)

    :rolleyes:
    Former moderator of these forums. Lifetime sub since before launch. Been here since before public betas. Foundry author of "Franklin Drake Must Die".
  • syberghostsyberghost Member Posts: 1,711 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    New idea (less than two centuries)

    and it can't be both a wave and a particle

    its daft
    it either has mass (is matter) or it doesn't (is a property of the matter it passes through)

    So, you believe in Thermodynamics, but not Relativity. You were proven wrong on this a century ago. :)
    Former moderator of these forums. Lifetime sub since before launch. Been here since before public betas. Foundry author of "Franklin Drake Must Die".
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    I can say without fear of being proven wrong that if you had made your theorys known 500 years ago you would have been burned at the stake
    I on the other hand would be considered a tiny bit old fashioned but notably NOT burned at the stake


    and maybe in 500 years time people will sit in starships in the depths of space and laugh at the silly 21st century people who believed in Quantum mechanics

    We are probably ALL wrong
    but my theory is older and ill stick with it
    Live long and Prosper
  • tenkaritenkari Member Posts: 2,906 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    I can say without fear of being proven wrong that if you had made your theorys known 500 years ago you would have been burned at the stake
    I on the other hand would be considered a tiny bit old fashioned but notably NOT burned at the stake


    and maybe in 500 years time people will sit in starships in the depths of space and laugh at the silly 21st century people who believed in Quantum mechanics

    We are probably ALL wrong
    but my theory is older and ill stick with it

    so, have you run into the edge of the flat world then mr. 500 year old thinking?
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    You missed by several centuries there

    the earth is an ovate (its not a true sphere)
    We proved it was round long long long long ago

    But we currently have some people who believe in a flat universe
    Live long and Prosper
  • aegon1iceaegon1ice Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    Seven was NEVER alive to start with

    Janeway must be dead (she would be VERY old)
    and chakotay must still be in jail

    But Vger is not so tough
    send a ship back to before the launch of the original probe
    and put in a deep core override

    then when you see it in the present say "Command overide Life beats metal" and it explodes

    She is, read Needs of the Many. She led an exploration mission to find out what was really going on with the Hobus Incident. Jake Sisko interviewed her.

    Seven works at the Daystrom Insitute.
  • kyeto13kyeto13 Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    I can say without fear of being proven wrong that if you had made your theorys known 500 years ago you would have been burned at the stake
    I on the other hand would be considered a tiny bit old fashioned but notably NOT burned at the stake


    and maybe in 500 years time people will sit in starships in the depths of space and laugh at the silly 21st century people who believed in Quantum mechanics

    We are probably ALL wrong
    but my theory is older and ill stick with it


    ??? You do realize that it is via known Quantum Mechanics phenomena that your computer is working right now...

    This post has been edited to remove content which violates the Perfect World Entertainment Community Rules and Policies . ~syberghost
    Live on Earth. Work in Space. Play with Dragons. Join the best add on to STO, the Neverwinter holodeck program! Only 14 GPL a month.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    actually its by basic binary mathmatics (older than you might think) that computers work

    and you seem to have me mixed up with christians
    Fundementalists being very basic monos in most cases
    Live long and Prosper
  • baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    entertaining...please continue!:D

    the burning people part was most interesting...
    Go pro or go home
  • dood98998dood98998 Member Posts: 389
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    actually its by basic binary mathmatics (older than you might think) that computers work

    and you seem to have me mixed up with christians
    Fundementalists being very basic monos in most cases

    take your trolling somewhere else dude, this is nerd central and we will out yammer you when it comes to science EVERY DAY!
    When in doubt, (hehe) c4!
    This sig dedicated to the many random objects the Mythbusters crew has blow to smitherines :D
  • maddog0000doommaddog0000doom Member Posts: 1,017 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax maybe u should get a better understanding before u try to augue thories.

    but keep trying.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • dood98998dood98998 Member Posts: 389
    edited September 2012
    sollvax maybe u should get a better understanding before u try to augue thories.

    but keep trying.

    its quite amusing, actually.
    When in doubt, (hehe) c4!
    This sig dedicated to the many random objects the Mythbusters crew has blow to smitherines :D
  • kyeto13kyeto13 Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    baudl wrote: »
    entertaining...please continue!:D

    the burning people part was most interesting...

    I am rolling on the floor laughing at this. Lunacy comes with it's own brand of science now!
    Live on Earth. Work in Space. Play with Dragons. Join the best add on to STO, the Neverwinter holodeck program! Only 14 GPL a month.
  • lordfuzunlordfuzun Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    Please do not try to use "modern" science claims against proven trek science

    (an object moving faster than light IS a perfect weapon and a ship EMERGING from or Entering warp is a FTL projectile (see picard manuveer))

    As to actually reaching light speed requiring infinate energy not even close

    right now objects are being accelerated to this speed

    An FTL wapon is perfect if one doesn't have FTL sensors which all starships in Star Trek happen to have. And if you really understood the Special Relativity equations, you would obvious see that your can't travel at the speed of light in normal space/time. It. is. impossible. If you converted everything in the universe, save one electron, and put all of that energy into that one electron, if would not reach the speed of light. It would reach a very large faction of the PSL.
  • leviathan99#2867 leviathan99 Member Posts: 7,747 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    Aren't the laws of physics thrown out the window inside a warp bubble?

    Okay, things within a warp bubble routinely react relative to one another in a normal way. And things outside the bubble react normally.

    But what a warp bubble does is effectively create an alternate set of physical laws. Relative to other contents of the bubble, things seem normal but relative to the external universe, they're not normal.

    So, for example, a ship moving at warp would be seen by a third party observer to be BOTH moving faster than light AND not gaining mass and size as you would expect an object moving at that speed to do.

    So I'm not sure that a ship hitting an object at warp would damage an object any worse than a ship hitting an object at full impulse would. In general, in Trek, there's a reluctance to test this out. And if it did hit with that kind of impact, it should vaporize a target. And if it didn't vaporize a target, the debris from that target would travel at warp speed too.

    Beyond all of that, Trek physics is entirely based on what's dramatic and would be changed to make things more dramatic. Every shuttle being a super-weapon that can annihilate planets would kill dramatic scenarios. So if that is the consequence of Trek physics, I'd expect the writers to ignore that or write in a reason why that's not true. Because they wouldn't want it to happen and physics in Trek exists to prop up drama and make situations complicated, not solve problems or diminish the need for characters to show cleverness.
  • markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,236 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    That exactly right. The premise behind Warp travel is a way of bending the laws of physics we know into a pretzel.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • lordfuzunlordfuzun Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    Evolution is a very young idea
    and its not taught in all schools

    even the ones who Do teach it do not claim it has all the answers.

    Gravity is an observed fact but the causes of it are still theory

    its like millers law of toast (Toast will land butter side down in direct proportion to the value of your carpet)
    it sounds cool but its only an idea

    as to no rest mass they must have otherwise they have no mass at all (mass is a property of matter )
    ok it may be too small to detect but it must be there otherwise there would be no particle to carry the charge of light

    (again only a theory)
    if light is a wave instead then photons would not actually exist

    My brain hurts.

    Solivar your understand of science is very, very...flawed.

    Evolution is probably the most proven theory in science today. Proven even better then special and general relativity. Evolution is what drives research today. New drugs and treatment are being developed because of it.

    Photons always travel at the of light (of the medium). Always. That's why you see 'c' everywhere in equations. Because it's a constant. A photon not traveling at the speed of light is not a photon. So phtons must travel at the speed of light. So a photon must has a zero rest mass i.e. massless.

    And light is both a wave and a particle. Wave/particle duality is a fact in quantum physics. It's been demonstrated time and time again. With photons, electron, protons, hell even with a complex molecules. Crazy, huh?
  • voporakvoporak Member Posts: 5,621 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    syberghost wrote: »
    Congratulations; you just made up your own brand of physics, that is not supported by any experiment or credible theory produced in the 20th or later centuries. :)

    :rolleyes:

    What shall we call it? Sollvax physics? The place where photons have mass...

    :D this thread is getting quite entertaining.
    I ask nothing but that you remember me.
  • lordfuzunlordfuzun Member Posts: 54 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    actually its by basic binary mathmatics (older than you might think) that computers work

    and you seem to have me mixed up with christians
    Fundementalists being very basic monos in most cases

    He's talking about how the transistors work in the integrated circuits inside of your computer.
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    lordfuzun;5565701]My brain hurts
    .
    I would suggest Willowfine (Asprin) its reliable traditional and REAL

    Solivar your understand of science is very, very...flawed.

    Everyones is
    thats why science is what it is
    Nothing is proven and most of whats suspected is disputed by equally closed minded guys in equally white coats

    Evolution is probably the most proven theory in science today

    Except where it isn't

    Evolution is a theory which explains biological change over time
    But so does intelligent design (as long as you allow for an intelligence)
    Also so does "Random chaos"
    but that ones even less likely

    Evolution relys on humans being the best survivor which frankly we aren't
    in a purely evolutionary system we die out in the early stone age


    .
    Proven even better then special and general relativity

    which of course isn't proven at all
    The Cern stupidity and the recent claim of faster than light neutrios both damage this theory
    As does Little Alberts theory itself (C should actually be V)

    . Evolution is what drives research today. New drugs and treatment are being developed because of it.

    no
    thats "money" thats what drives research today
    Photons always travel at the of light (of the medium). Always. That's why you see 'c' everywhere in equations. Because it's a constant. A photon not traveling at the speed of light is not a photon. So phtons must travel at the speed of light. So a photon must has a zero rest mass i.e. massless.

    what do you want to call it before it accelerates ?
    how about a percy??
    and when it slows down due to the law of entropy ? perhaps a Fred

    So a percy at rest begins to accelerate from the imput of energy slowly accelerating to the speed of light (V) it then maintains that speed until entropy reduces speed and it becomes a fred
    Eventually it impacts a material it can't pierce and comes to rest becoming again a percy

    thus P+E/T = V
    V/T = E +F
    And light is both a wave and a particle. Wave/particle duality is a fact in quantum physics. It's been demonstrated time and time again. With photons, electron, protons, hell even with a complex molecules. Crazy, huh?
    [/QUOTE]

    Which of course can be used to disprove quantum theory entirely to a certain mind set
    in the binary universe things either Exist or don't
    are either on or off

    indecisive particles can't exist (unless you think that photons are intelligent)
    Live long and Prosper
  • baudlbaudl Member Posts: 4,060 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    sollvax wrote: »
    .
    I would suggest Willowfine...


    if you would get 1 cent for everything you are mistaken about...you would be a trillionare!

    your comments...i have no words.:eek:
    How is this even possible?
    Are you serious?
    Please tell us you are just trolling!:confused:
    Go pro or go home
  • sollvaxsollvax Member Posts: 4 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    If You had a cent for everything I am right about you could pay americas national debt
    Live long and Prosper
  • richandrewsrichandrews Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    aile41 wrote: »
    who would like to see the return of Vger and/ or the Nexus? i would!!!!

    Doesnt look like Vger, looks like a tholian ship, some of the tholians captured mirror universe ships hidden in asteroids.
    But that does kinda look like the nexus
  • captainmarvelushcaptainmarvelush Member Posts: 134 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    I thought this was a thread about V'Ger and the Nexxis, not an argument on different laws of physics and theoretical light speed and fictional weapons. Can we please get the posts back on topic? If you all wish to discuss what you obviously believe to be a fascinating topic of conversation, that has absolutely nothing to do with what the OP was talking about, could you take it to another thread please and let us who are interested in what the OP was talking about discuss that?
    Captain of the Thunder and the Lightning

    46cq7exrnlgb.jpg
  • voporakvoporak Member Posts: 5,621 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    I thought this was a thread about V'Ger and the Nexxis, not an argument on different laws of physics and theoretical light speed and fictional weapons. Can we please get the posts back on topic? If you all wish to discuss what you obviously believe to be a fascinating topic of conversation, that has absolutely nothing to do with what the OP was talking about, could you take it to another thread please and let us who are interested in what the OP was talking about discuss that?

    Good question, how did we end up on Sollvax physics?

    ...

    Oh right, sollvax wanted to send a ship at light speed through V'ger and vaporize it because it will -according to sollvax- have infinite mass at light speed.

    I guess I'll just go and make another thread where we'll carry our debate over. Now just which sub-forum to put it in...
    I ask nothing but that you remember me.
  • syberghostsyberghost Member Posts: 1,711 Arc User
    edited September 2012
    Hi,

    This thread has now most definitely run its course, and isn?t providing any constructive discussion, so due to this as well as the off-topic nature of the discussion I'm closing this thread down.


    1. For future reference please remember that it helps a great deal when posts which violate the PWE Community Rules and Policies are not responded to and are reported via submitting a Forums and Website Ticket (click here).

    2. If you think any of your posts within a thread have violated the PWE Community Rules and Policies, please edit your posts before a moderator takes action.

    3. If you feel you need to get in touch with PWE BranFlakes to discuss the actions taken by any Community Moderator, you can do so by submitting a Forums and Website ticket (click here).

    Cheers, :)

    syberghost
    Former moderator of these forums. Lifetime sub since before launch. Been here since before public betas. Foundry author of "Franklin Drake Must Die".
This discussion has been closed.