test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

delta flyer??

SystemSystem Member, NoReporting Posts: 178,019 Arc User
ok i get that the delta flyer is fed but where is the varient version for kdf? im still waiting for a reason to buy cryptic points but as such i find none. you like to make money from both sides right and want to popualte both sides of the game.
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    Supply and demand.

    Theres a significantly smaller playerbase (and there has been from day one, so no, it is not somthing that has happen over time because people left the KDF. It has been like this all the way), and as such the demand for KDF C-Store items is heavily less than that for the Feds.

    Also, let's be honest here: There isn't that much reference material for the Klingons. If you look at it, Cryptic dosen't seem to capture the Klingon style when they use their own design, where they have tons and tonstons of reference material for the Feds.

    Basically what I am saying is: Since there aren't, and never will be as many klingon players as there are federation players, my best geuss is that the Klingon content is being pushed a little aside, to ensure that thoose who actually bring the money into development, the Feds, have a somewhat steady flow of extras (not to confuse with content... cause it is only an extra).
    At the same time you have to remember that seemingly the Klingons only had 1 shuttle (the one they "searched" in TNG) so a KDF shuttle would have to be designed from scratch... Wich takes time, if they want to capture the KDF spirit in the design.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    valid points but the fact that kdf stuff seems left behind its not exactly encouraging new players to the kdf side is it now. doing nothing will keep the status quo but doing something will improve the growth of kdf, and as kdf are now being taken seriously as a side with the ships that got pumped to rank 5's and the tutorial being created for kdf so players start as kdf stuff like this will promote kdf to not just the playerbase but people outside the playerbase.

    and as for from scratch, take inspiration from others.,

    http://www.artships.com/2007/sona-shuttle.jpg

    http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/File:Nausicaan_ship_above.jpg


    http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Orion_scout_ship

    and there are plenty of raiders that we use as pets that can be adapted as solo use shuttles.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    valid points but the fact that kdf stuff seems left behind its not exactly encouraging new players to the kdf side is it now. doing nothing will keep the status quo but doing something will improve the growth of kdf, and as kdf are now being taken seriously as a side with the ships that got pumped to rank 5's and the tutorial being created for kdf so players start as kdf stuff like this will promote kdf to not just the playerbase but people outside the playerbase.

    If you ask me (and I am no kidding here) They should take the KDF, and rip it out of STO (now now... hear me out)...

    Next they should sit down, and watch TNG and DS9, and then fully re-design the KDF from the bottom up.

    Why you may ask? Answer is simple: The KDF are Thieves, Thugs and bullies... not an honorable species with a strong sence of honor and justice.

    THAT is what Klingons are about, and that is what they impose on the people they conquer, so if they had in fact conqured the Gorn, Naussicans and joined forced with the Orions, they would impose that way of life upon them, not allow them to continue their way of life.

    I have a KDF char, but I rarely play it, because everytime i go there, I am reminded of the abuse they've made on the Klingon faction.
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    and as for from scratch, take inspiration from others.,

    http://www.artships.com/2007/sona-shuttle.jpg

    http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/File:Nausicaan_ship_above.jpg


    http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Orion_scout_ship

    and there are plenty of raiders that we use as pets that can be adapted as solo use shuttles.

    The first one is a discard. It is a Son'ar ship, and as such should be part of the True Way faction if anything.

    The rest I agree on... Good observation there.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    i can see the reason why u think the kdf should be discarded as such but on the other hand the side is perfect with the way its clobbered together, all the races in it are battle hardened warriors of one for or another, they all go down fighting an none rarly run from a fight.

    if they expanded on the lore via pve missions specifically to the other races and factions in the kdf and this is never going to happen but gave the kdf there own space to explore that the feds could not ever enter with there own chains the feds cannot do the kdf side would grow immensly. the feds have alot of fans but lets face it, kdf are the bad guys an everyone wants tobe the bad guy.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    Perhaps its cuz they have the Toron which has similar stats as the Runabout and Delta Flyer, sans the extra BO.

    And the payoff is too small. The amount of work for how much they are going to get may not be high enough.
    They are prolly thinking, it is only for the smaller percentage of players on the KDF side and the small percentage of that small percentage that will buy it.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    but in turn the smaller payout at min might be due to the fact there is less of a pull to play kdf, if they did make equivilant things for the kdf like uniforms stuff like that you wouldnt only be thinking in the realms active kdf playerbase and new people you could bring to sto but also with more choice how many feds would activily use a kdf char more for it being a pve alternative or a rp gameplay.

    its a cat in a box situation until they actually try it.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    but in turn the smaller payout at min might be due to the fact there is less of a pull to play kdf, if they did make equivilant things for the kdf like uniforms stuff like that you wouldnt only be thinking in the realms active kdf playerbase and new people you could bring to sto but also with more choice how many feds would activily use a kdf char more for it being a pve alternative or a rp gameplay.

    its a cat in a box situation until they actually try it.

    A couple more uniforms and a shuttle are not going to bring people to the KDF.

    Until the PVE really gets brought up, it won't have these things. It's unfortunate but true :(
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    A couple more uniforms and a shuttle are not going to bring people to the KDF.

    Until the PVE really gets brought up, it won't have these things. It's unfortunate but true :(

    the point is would it hurt
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    anazonda wrote: »
    If you ask me (and I am no kidding here) They should take the KDF, and rip it out of STO (now now... hear me out)...

    Next they should sit down, and watch TNG and DS9, and then fully re-design the KDF from the bottom up.

    Why you may ask? Answer is simple: The KDF are Thieves, Thugs and bullies... not an honorable species with a strong sence of honor and justice.

    THAT is what Klingons are about, and that is what they impose on the people they conquer, so if they had in fact conqured the Gorn, Naussicans and joined forced with the Orions, they would impose that way of life upon them, not allow them to continue their way of life.

    I have a KDF char, but I rarely play it, because everytime i go there, I am reminded of the abuse they've made on the Klingon faction.



    The first one is a discard. It is a Son'ar ship, and as such should be part of the True Way faction if anything.

    The rest I agree on... Good observation there.

    ow just re read this, have to point one thing out, the only people that the klingons have conquered is the gorn, and that was after the war to clear the undine out of there race who were hiding in the council after the undine were cleared the klingons allowed self rule back to the gorn in exchange for an allience, the nausicaans fought with the gorn against the kdf but were never beaten and the kdf never came close to beating them, it was the gorn who organised treaty talks between the kdf and nausicaans and the nausicaans agreed to join the kdf to fight the federation and undine threat. the orions were never conquered by the kdf either. not a clue about lethens.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    the point is would it hurt

    No, but look at it his way.

    (these are all made up numbers, but is probably why they aren't doing it.)

    Total Fed Players: 250 (10% willing to buy stuff)
    Total KDF Players: 50 (10% willing to buy stuff)

    They can either devote time to make an item for the KDF or FED side that is $2. They make more profit from the FED item so they'll devote time to it.

    They can either make $10 on the KDF or $50 on the Fed side with just the base number of players.

    In a slightly different scenario, they get some more players by adding th item.

    In the most favorable situation for the KDF, they got the item, and they ger 10 players read to buy it. They make $20 when they could make $50 on the Fed side with just the base characters.

    Firstly, I think the real numbers are even more skewed in favor of the FEDs so it logistically makes no sense to do the KDF rather than the FED.

    So, in closing, even if it brought a few new players in ,it still prolly won't offset the profit loss had they done it on the Fed side.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    or when they create neutral things they would get 70% from 100% of the entire playerbase. and with things like shuttles aka the delta flyer creating the stats an stuff on them then creating 2 skins for it one for fed and one for kdf, even importing a skin from something within the kdf used npc used small ships would do and then making it one sale item so u buy it and u can then use it on the fed aka the delta flyer or on kdf the kdf varient.

    btw i never said instead of fed, i said stop TRIBBLE over the kdf playerbase, would be great to see how many of the fed playerbase plays kdf too to the full extent of its limited content and how many feds would play kdf instead if there were more content to them.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    or when they create neutral things they would get 70% from 100% of the entire playerbase. and with things like shuttles aka the delta flyer creating the stats an stuff on them then creating 2 skins for it one for fed and one for kdf, even importing a skin from something within the kdf used npc used small ships would do and then making it one sale item so u buy it and u can then use it on the fed aka the delta flyer or on kdf the kdf varient.

    btw i never said instead of fed, i said stop TRIBBLE over the kdf playerbase, would be great to see how many of the fed playerbase plays kdf too to the full extent of its limited content and how many feds would play kdf instead if there were more content to them.

    Yeah, but I'm just saying, if they would make money doing it, they would. Since they are not doing it, it is logical to assume they are not making profit off of it.

    Making the KDF variant might be too much work, or why wouldn't they have already done it?

    It's not like they sit around going, "How can we tick off a ton of players for no reason at all and make less money?"

    Sorry, but saying they'd get 70% to 100% of the player base is a little ridiculous. There are a lot of players who don't use the C-Store or used it vary rarely. Maybe 50%, but any more seems overly optimistic.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    they already make money from people who are soley kdf players subs and we paid towards the development of diplomatic, reworking of esd, memory alpha redo. god knows how many fed ships compared to the kdf ships, the money we spent actually buying the game in the 1st place and the money we put in buying cryptic points. we arnt asking for the earth, we are asking to be treated like paying customers not idiots, if they make 1 dollar profit for a c store kdf item they done there job.

    and how many kdf at this moment u think buy anything of the c store, because in all honesty what is there for us to buy except a ship or 2 an when we bought one we need not buy another because it is unlocked to our account.

    btw it isnt logical to assume because they dont an never have done that they wont make money from it, thats like putiing a cat in a lead box walking away then finding a strainger and asking them is the cat alive or dead, its pure guesswork an there is no way of knowing until u try and find out.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    they already make money from people who are soley kdf players subs and we paid towards the development of diplomatic, reworking of esd, memory alpha redo. god knows how many fed ships compared to the kdf ships, the money we spent actually buying the game in the 1st place and the money we put in buying cryptic points. we arnt asking for the earth, we are asking to be treated like paying customers not idiots, if they make 1 dollar profit for a c store kdf item they done there job.

    I agree, I want them to finish the KDF, I'm just saying that they aren't going to as long as they get more profit from the other side.
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    and how many kdf at this moment u think buy anything of the c store, because in all honesty what is there for us to buy except a ship or 2 an when we bought one we need not buy another because it is unlocked to our account.

    I don't think many do. I don;t think an item or two will really make a big difference.
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    btw it isnt logical to assume because they dont an never have done that they wont make money from it, thats like putiing a cat in a lead box walking away then finding a strainger and asking them is the cat alive or dead, its pure guesswork an there is no way of knowing until u try and find out.

    First off, your cat comment doesn't fit the situation.

    It is logical because, say I am developers.

    I've got two sides, side B needs fixing. Side B is losing players and shriveling.
    What possible reason would I have to not work side B over side A, unless I made more money working on side A?
    Why would I be willing to slowly kill off subscribers and let money disappear from the game if It wasn't more profitable to work on the other parts as compared to fixing this part?

    If you can answer those questions, I will admit you are right. That they are choosing to not work on something to make less money for the game that is currently funding their lives.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    so your saying cryptic are purposly not putting as much effort into kdf (side B) content ingame an c-store in the full knowldege that it is slowly killing the kdf side and simply eggin the kdf along with promise after promise with little things done and a few ships slammed through c-store that if the kdf faction ever folds they can simply throw over to side A (feds)?

    and the cat in a box fits perfectly, the bar minimum has been done to kdf since release an next to nothing on c store created for them. so they have no idea what a real content update would do to the kdf an adding items usable to the kdf that the playerbase wants.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited February 2011
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    so your saying cryptic are purposly not putting as much effort into kdf (side B) content ingame an c-store in the full knowldege that it is slowly killing the kdf side and simply eggin the kdf along with promise after promise with little things done and a few ships slammed through c-store that if the kdf faction ever folds they can simply throw over to side A (feds)?
    .

    I'm saying they are slowly developing less Klingon Content than they are Fed Content, because Fed content makes em more money.

    And you didn't answer my question, name a situtation where Cryptic would be doing either of those things. :D
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited March 2011
    I'm saying they are slowly developing less Klingon Content than they are Fed Content, because Fed content makes em more money.

    And you didn't answer my question, name a situtation where Cryptic would be doing either of those things. :D

    the fact that if play A is only federation and player B is only KDF. the fact is that both pay subs and both have equal rights to game content no matter how many are on either side. by giving the option to be one side or the other or both means that neither side should be held back for the other sides advancment be it via cosmetic,equipment or game changing content via missions or content.

    there is already an inbalance within the game from launch with missions content and gameplay area but since then there has been further inbalance via ships, diplomatic content and development of passed content being reworked.

    so as both players pay the same amount per month to play and towards content it matter not that one side has more paying customers then the other as both players pay towards the future content, reworking of old content and upkeep of the game. c-store itself is not within the realms of subscription but the fact of channeling all develpment of c-store into one side is in a sense racist towards the other side as even though there are fewer on the kdf side the money generated from c-store for specific items would cover the cost of dev as the kdf ships and costumes have shown.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited March 2011
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    the fact that if play A is only federation and player B is only KDF. the fact is that both pay subs and both have equal rights to game content no matter how many are on either side. by giving the option to be one side or the other or both means that neither side should be held back for the other sides advancment be it via cosmetic,equipment or game changing content via missions or content.

    there is already an inbalance within the game from launch with missions content and gameplay area but since then there has been further inbalance via ships, diplomatic content and development of passed content being reworked.

    so as both players pay the same amount per month to play and towards content it matter not that one side has more paying customers then the other as both players pay towards the future content, reworking of old content and upkeep of the game. c-store itself is not within the realms of subscription but the fact of channeling all develpment of c-store into one side is in a sense racist towards the other side as even though there are fewer on the kdf side the money generated from c-store for specific items would cover the cost of dev as the kdf ships and costumes have shown.

    So, what your saying is the KDF has the right for the Dev's to make stuff AND they would make more money. And yet, they still are not doing it. Either A) You are wrong or B) The company is choosing to lose money. Gee, I wonder which seems more likely.

    I would like to say that I'm in favor of KDF expansion, I have 2 Klingons, but I'm just pointing out WHY they aren't doing it.

    And you still didn't answer my questions. :)
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited March 2011
    So, what your saying is the KDF has the right for the Dev's to make stuff AND they would make more money. And yet, they still are not doing it. Either A) You are wrong or B) The company is choosing to lose money. Gee, I wonder which seems more likely.

    I would like to say that I'm in favor of KDF expansion, I have 2 Klingons, but I'm just pointing out WHY they aren't doing it.

    And you still didn't answer my questions. :)

    im saying that as KDF player who pays subs we have the right to equal development, and im not saying they are chosing to not lose money by not developing kdf content ingame and c-store an neither making extra money by not producing kdf c-store items at the same rate as federation with cross factional c-store items like formal wear and merc sets.

    But are you stating that they are chosing to not put as much development time into the kdf and only into the federation with core game systems like diplomatic and c-store items for the fact that they think it will lose money?

    And as such that as a subscriber in only the kdf i am not getting the same ammount of service for my subscriptions as a federation based subscriber and as such should not have to pay as much subscriptions for this game or maybe actually pay subscription to a game that either has 1 side or gives equal content rights to both sides.


    please answer me that.

    and you shall find i did answer your question.:cool:
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited March 2011
    i think you two lovebirds should take this somewhere private :P
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited March 2011
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    im saying that as KDF player who pays subs we have the right to equal development, and im not saying they are chosing to not lose money by not developing kdf content ingame and c-store an neither making extra money by not producing kdf c-store items at the same rate as federation with cross factional c-store items like formal wear and merc sets.

    Think you could use any more negatives in a single statement?
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    But are you stating that they are chosing to not put as much development time into the kdf and only into the federation with core game systems like diplomatic and c-store items for the fact that they think it will lose money?

    I'm theorizing that they are not putting as much effort into the KDF as the Fed side because the Fed side makes more money.

    The company exists to make money, they do what will make the most revenue. The only way they will do equal content is if it will make the same or more money. The fact that they are not making equal content means that the Fed side gains them more revenue and /or the Klingon side makes less revenue.

    Sh1ngara wrote:
    And as such that as a subscriber in only the kdf i am not getting the same ammount of service for my subscriptions as a federation based subscriber and as such should not have to pay as much subscriptions for this game or maybe actually pay subscription to a game that either has 1 side or gives equal content rights to both sides.

    I'm not saying its right, in fact I disagree, but it is the only logical explanation that fits the current situation. :)
    Sh1ngara wrote:
    please answer me that.

    and you shall find i did answer your question.:cool:

    Nice, meaningless double talk to avoid the actual question. ;)

    I asked "'ve got two sides, side B needs fixing. Side B is losing players and shriveling.
    What possible reason would I have to not work side B over side A, unless I made more money working on side A?
    Why would I be willing to slowly kill off subscribers and let money disappear from the game if It wasn't more profitable to work on the other parts as compared to fixing this part?"

    You have yet to give a situation in which that makes any sense at all.
  • Archived PostArchived Post Member Posts: 2,264,498 Arc User
    edited March 2011
    i did answer, i said that there is no reason to.its you that is stating there is a reason for them doing it with your theorizing, but if i were to state why i would say its because the fed playerbase is alot louder with the begging and crying then kdf side as most kdf have given up asking or expecting. we just sit back, chew the grass an wait for season 4 like we waited for season 2 in the hope that season 4 actually delivers.

    and its you that stated they wouldnt make money from it, i said they would make some if it was the same ship with 2 skins one for fed one for kdf. and they can change a skin easy, prime example reman shield.
Sign In or Register to comment.