Comments
-
Maybe there's so many "Wizards suck" threads because (get this...) they suck! And I've never understood the challenging/fun argument. Is it denial? You can still have fun playing an un-gimped class. For a challenge, play a barb -- it's tough, costs are high, you're slow to kill enemies without help...but you're very useful…
-
Definitely bugged, or the description is plain wrong. I had the opportunity to test it out on the fire boss in lvl2 territory, so only the frostblade is in effect. I have lvl 10 frostblade, and magic attack 3445-5013. I hit for 74 dmg each swipe! I tested on an 86 archer, she said she hit for 150-200 (not sure why the…
-
So again, you're level 89 saying you will be better sometime in the future -- 90 in this case. I've really given up on believing people in this matter. And if the reason we're better is because of gear, that only depresses me more. Magic veno's and clerics get to wear the same gear, so we're not relatively any better. I…
-
When I was level 5X, I was told "later on" was 60s. When I was 60s, "later on" was 70s. So when does it end? And what is it about later levels that will make us better? I've researched all the future skills...and besides Manifest Virtue at 100, they don't look like they're anything to write home about. I'm not willing to…
-
I highly recommend abandoning your wizard, and play your archer instead. Wizards are almost completely useless except for TW against barbs. And while a wizard's hit may be harder, archers can and do out-damage wizards when damage per second is taken into account. In fact, even though wizards are considered damage dealers,…
