Archer vs Archer (in a 1v1)

Geckofreak - Sanctuary wrote: »

Also, i find in an archer v archer fight, sage to be more deadly. take aim from max range, the demon is helpless.

Oh for god's sake... not this again. Some people are born idiots... some people are just wannabe idiots.

Archer v archer depends on who the RNG happens to benefit more in regards to procs for crit and procs for evasion dodge.

Stupidly high crit rates and evasion numbers (I am looking at you condor) make it even more ridiculous.

Demon QS is basically GG. Similarly if someone manages to get stunned its basically GG.

It ends up mostly being antistun and luck. Very boring.

On topic: Yes, Horosho you are right.

OPKossy wrote: »

Can't the demon just... you know... move forward two steps and stun... or use grace to dodge... or use shell to laugh at the hit.... or holy path/leap back enough that the skill interrupts (or forward to force damage penalty).... or use condor... etc etc?

Thats just way too complicated. Now what you gotta do when sage take aim you at 34 meters is to leep 20 meters to the right (or left)... hence making the total distance between the two to be 39.5. The sage archer would then proceed to make a 30 degreee turn from his organial orientation and move 3.5 toward you to get in to his passive range of 34. With that you would counter leap back to your organial location... thus making the total distance between you and the sage to be 29.5. With that you channel an instance alacrity and proceed to follow it with an 1.6 quickshot. Allow an extra .5 for the optional quickshot follow shot to release. Follow that with a 2.1 stun arrow. Chase the stun arrow with an additional quickshot for a .75 chance of increase speed. Follow with regular shot for a .8 chance of kill.. otherwise stleath away.

Facerolled - Raging Tide wrote: »

zomg paper PvP returns once again

Scissors pvp beats paper pvp b:victory

OPKossy wrote: »

And Scissors PvP also happens to beat rock PvP!

but rock pvp has purify.

Facerolled - Raging Tide wrote: »

wtf qq only cuz they oped casters up with r9r2 so ez to get

although in normal 1v1s , it's not that op unless you are fighting noob aps sins.

Yea i was just thinking about the old before more and leaps stuff. aim low and u dont get sealed/stunned by it. leap/stealth.

However in NW, ive been finding i have lots of good 1 v1 fights with other r9/g16 archers because of the automatic defensive and hp buffs. When they purge you though, you die moment you get stunned or quickshottedb:chuckle

I believe that who ever lands the first Stunning arrow has the highest chance of winning...

Asterelle - Sanctuary wrote: »

You're not supposed to use 'whomever' when it's the subject of its clause. I know it's tempting to use it to sound more educated but that backfires when you use it incorrectly.

This is a game lol...lighten up, I've seen worser grammar then that ingame and on forums. And yes I know I should use worse, not worser but example of this being the internet and being able to talk however you want.

As for on topic, I been looking at the sage skills I been getting and I conclude that it comes down to a few things:

Most sage or demon skills?
Top key sage/demon skills acquired?
Gear grade/refinement/Sharding?(being g16 bow vs xbow vs slingshot all hit pretty damn hard)

You can speak however you want in reality too, but you'll be judged accordingly. Why would it be any different on an online forum? The fact that it's a game forum has no bearing on requiring proper grammar, diction, and syntax.

Also, I fixed it for you, Astypoo:

Geckofreak - Sanctuary wrote: »

The victory goes to whomever misses less!

And thus, the archer forums became known as the math AND English section.

Vindis - Dreamweaver wrote: »

At least it shows that our class strives towards a higher education.

Or just bored and anal

Asterelle - Sanctuary wrote: »

Unfortunately no. The object of the verb "goes" is the entire noun clause "whoever misses less". "Whoever" is still the subject of that clause.

You'd have to change that clause to something like.
The victory goes to whomever the random number generator favors.

Bah, you're totally right. As a rule of thumb, I always replace the clause with a pronoun, which I didn't in this case. That's my litmus test for proper usage.

Sounds like you do have a good grandma. b:laugh

Dun ban me for the horrible pun. ;_;