FC Glitch Update

Tsukyini - Raging Tide wrote: »

Do you really have a purple butt?

I dunno if her butt is purple but it does seems to be hurting b:chuckle

Seeing as this page is now to 190 pages or somewhere in there, I'd like to put in my two cents.

First off Leave the message board mods and GMs alone. They have no real power unless it's on these boards. They can only do so much.

Second, The rest of you may not realize how difficult coding is. So here. Let me post some random coding for you to understand how hard it is to write/read.

Maze

#include
#include
#include "maze.h"


// =============================> Maze Objects <====================
// Maze object data members:
// int _max_row;
// int _max_col;
// char _map[MAX_MAZE_DIM+1][MAX_MAZE_DIM+1];

// ============================> report_err <=======================
static void report_err(const char* message)
{
cout << "FATAL ERROR (Maze): " << message << endl;
exit(1);
}

// ========================> member functions <=====================

// ========================> Constructors <==================
Maze::Maze()
{
*this = Maze(7,7);
}

Maze::Maze(int rows, int cols)
{
if (rows > MAX_MAZE_DIM || cols > MAX_MAZE_DIM)
report_err("Attempted to create overly large Maze");
_max_row = rows;
_max_col = cols;
for(int row = 1; row <= rows; row++)
for(int col = 1; col <= cols; col++)
_map[row][col] = '.';
}

// =======================> max_row <========================
int Maze::max_row() const
{ return _max_row;
}

// ======================> max_col <=========================
int Maze::max_col() const
{ return _max_col;
}

// =====================> is_open <==========================
int Maze::is_open(int i, int j) const
// PRE: VALID_POS(i, j)
// POST: FCTVAL == position (i, j) of this maze is open (contains a '.')
{
if (i < 1 || i > _max_row)
report_err("Attempted to check cell row outside of maze dimensions");

if (j < 1 || j > _max_col)
report_err("Attempted to check cell column outside of maze dimensions");

if (_map[j] == '.') // if current spot in maze is passible
return (1); // return 1 ==> TRUE
else
return (0);
}

// ====================> mark <==============================
void Maze::mark(int row, int col, char marker)
{
if (!is_open(row,col))
report_err("Attempt to mark an non-open Maze cell");
_map[row][col] = marker;
}

// ===================> unmark <=============================
void Maze::unmark(int row, int col)
// PRE: VALID_POS(row, col) &&
// _map[row][col] != '*'
// POST: is_open(row, col)
{
if (_map[row][col] != '*')
_map[row][col] = '.'; // reset current spot in maze to passible

return;
}

// ===================> stream output <======================
ostream& operator<<(ostream& stream, Maze m)
{
for(int row = 1; row <= m._max_row; row++)
{
for(int col = 1; col <= m._max_col; col++)
stream.put(m._map[row][col]);
stream << endl;
}
stream << flush;
return stream;
}

// ==================> stream input <=======================
istream& operator>>(istream& stream, Maze& m)
{ char ch;

for(int row = 1; row <= m._max_row; row++)
{
for(int col = 1; col <= m._max_col; col++)
{
stream.get(ch);
if (ch == '.' || ch == ' ')
m._map[row][col] = '.';
else
m._map[row][col] = '*';
}
stream.ignore(50,'\n');
}
return stream;
}


Mind you the above is a simple game, coded correctly, and in an order that's legable, not to mention in a language that's common (c++) where as this game is probably written in ruby or some other random, backward-*** language, and in chinese to boot.

Next, I'd like to say if they banned everyone perminently for abusing a glitch, then those who noticed that the heroic chest deliveries were glitched and kept buying them would be banned right now, along with those who glitched fc, those who glitched SP, those who glitched TT, and those who glitched cube. Yes all of those areas either have an active glitched that's known to be abused, or used to.

Banning people perminently is not a good idea, as PWE functions off of stock holder revenue and money brought in through the cash shop. If you eliminate the people putting the money on the game, you are losing revenue, and that hurts your bottom line.


Finally, if you're leaving the game, don't say anything. Just go. PWE will get the message when you suddenly stop putting real money into a game for virtual items.

+10 post count.

BerserkBeast - Sanctuary wrote: »

Yay again this thread *adds more post count*

Keep +1 posting

Since they won't lock the thread :P

KawaiiJen - Heavens Tear wrote: »

Keep +1 posting

Since they won't lock the thread :P

b:laugh

BerserkBeast - Sanctuary wrote: »

I like mayonese

I don't.

Do you like Waffles? Ya we like Waffles.

gogo lets make this have over 9000! posts.

KawaiiJen - Heavens Tear wrote: »

gogo lets make this have over 9000! posts.

So then we can abuse an internet meme and post vids of it hitting 9000 on youtube?

i don't watch MLP and duh old over used memes are the cool thing to do.

I don't known what's a derph pony b:avoid

I think at one point at doing this earlier I got a mod to join us on the +1 partaking :O

Krisnda wrote: »

If the opposite of open is closed, then is the opposite of QQ, RR?

KawaiiJen - Heavens Tear wrote: »

I don't get it.

and another +1 post count to this useless thread

Krisnda wrote: »

Your not supposed to, just making convo xD.

only 7114 posts to go >.>

BerserkBeast - Sanctuary wrote: »

Soooo rookie -- ****,that's all

No, it's an anal evacuation. Gwa ha ha ha ha.

Update: The glitch is back.




































































Now let's see how many players run off to check, just b/c i put a doubt in their head.