Regen is gonna take over
Comments
-
Slivaf - Dreamweaver wrote: »text.
Wait, one faction doesnt suck. Doughnuts. They have only ultimate overpowered players....so only me.
b:kiss
~lets talk about sex baby, lets talk about you and me, lets talk about all the good things!If i m trolling and spamming on forum...then i cant sleep and need a good laugh0 -
ColdSnow - Dreamweaver wrote: »Dont worry, i read everything so your post wasnt wasted. I agree and disagree xD but i got borred of this topic. Lets say all faction suck, i bet noone gonna say anything against it.
Wait, one faction doesnt suck. Doughnuts. They have only ultimate overpowered players....so only me.
b:kiss
~lets talk about sex baby, lets talk about you and me, lets talk about all the good things!
^^
That sounds like a good idea.
I gotta say the drama/discussion involving certain factions is rather... tiresome even if it's in one thread. =x So yea how about those them doughnuts?
sex ftw , now if only I knew what sex was... b:avoidAh, Mistakes are so easily made. ~ laura resnick
What kind of message are you sending when you insult my intelligence? ~ Me ~ 5/29/2015 (Yes it is possible someone said this before just no idea who/where.)0 -
Slivaf - Dreamweaver wrote: »^^
That sounds like a good idea.
sex ftw , now if only I knew what sex was... b:avoid
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4NfdQeKFN4
b:dirtyIf i m trolling and spamming on forum...then i cant sleep and need a good laugh0 -
Whoa just noticed this thread o.o
um, kay, Ima troll a bit here, but I'll be nice and site my work! : D
(July 1-3)http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1127711
(8-10)http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1133191
(15-17)http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1138851
(22-24)http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1144891
(29-31)http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1149861
July 1-3
20:12 - InTandem attacks BootyCamp, Silk Ridge - InTandem wins.
20:09 - Regenesis attacks InTandem, The White Ridge - Regenesis wins.
20:12 - Equinox attacks InTandem, King's Feast - Equinox loses.
Eq ganks IT with Regen
July 8-10
20:06 Equinox attacks , Dreamweaver Port-Equinox wins.
20:09 InTandem attacks BootyCamp, The Great Lake-InTandem wins.
20:09 Regenesis attacks InTandem, Lost City-Regenesis loses
EQ has a truce with IT
Regen and IT get a 1v1
July 15-17
20:09 Regenesis attacks InTandem-Silk Ridge- Regenesis wins.
20:06 Equinox attacks , Shining Tidewood-Equinox wins.
20:09 InTandem attacks Regenesis, Dragon Wilderness-InTandem loses.
EQ attacks again, not IT wtf
Regen and IT get 2 MORE 1v1s @_@
July 22-24
20:03 - InTandem attacks Regenesis, Dragon Wilderness - InTandem loses.
20:12 - Equinox attacks , Mount Lantern - Equinox wins.
20:03 - Regenesis attacks InTandem, King's Feast - Regenesis wins.
Whats this?! I count five, FIVE 1v1s so far. idk though, Im tired, someone double check?
July 29-31
20:00 - Dynasty attacks Equinox, Dreamweaver Port - Dynasty loses
20:03 - Regenesis attacks InTandem, The Great Lake - Regenesis wins
20:00 - InTandem attacks Equinox, Archosaur - InTandem wins.
20:03 - attacks Equinox, Mount Lantern - wins.
20:06 - Saviour attacks Equinox, Shining Tide Wood - Saviour loses.
20:00 - Equinox attacks Dynasty, Hidden Orchid - Equinox loses.
wait what o_o
IT had 3 WEEKS of 1v1 with Regen then took Arch from EQ? And EQ didnt even attack them or anything o.o
Face it IT, you had your 1v1's plenty of times. Blame EQ if you want, but we never wanted Regen to get the map either. You blew it, no one else. b:chuckle
/boredtrollingnerd0 -
Fexcad - Dreamweaver wrote: »text
o.o seems like i know a bit more about it than you fexypoo. I wont quote what happend back then when EQ gave IT few times a break, you should ask your Leader for more details.
Dont wont to spoil your fun :PIf i m trolling and spamming on forum...then i cant sleep and need a good laugh0 -
[QUOTE=Zaeh -Yes, we had our bad apples, but every faction does
I agree 100% with that statement0 -
damn coldsnow u talk too much... b:chuckle
like coldsnow said IT never fall apart b/c of the bad reputation it fall apart b/c most of our core members quit/don't give a **** anymore b:bye0 -
XCurse - Dreamweaver wrote: »damn coldsnow u talk too much... b:chuckle
like coldsnow said IT never fall apart b/c of the bad reputation it fall apart b/c most of our core members quit/don't give a **** anymore b:bye
b:sad i quit sims, i needed a new trolling game.If i m trolling and spamming on forum...then i cant sleep and need a good laugh0 -
ColdSnow - Dreamweaver wrote: »text text stuff i didnt read
I doubt Regen will have a problem with gank tomorrow anyway. They will lose max 1 Land. They will win one land today tho. What suprised me the most, that spades suddenly decided to go for Regen O_O
text text stuff i didnt read
inb4someonesaysspadesisregenaltfactionb:avoid[SIGPIC]www.spades.tw[/SIGPIC]
b:cute0 -
Berserker_ - Dreamweaver wrote: »1 answer to why Spades attacked Regen; Challenge, crystal bashes aren't always fun regardless of how much you dislike the versin faction.
inb4someonesaysspadesisregenaltfactionb:avoid
b:dirty Maybe if i apply to regen spades will take my alts b:dirty0 -
BaDumBopCha - Dreamweaver wrote: »b:dirty Maybe if i apply to regen spades will take my alts b:dirty
drats! thats a well thought plan! you evil evil manb:chuckle[SIGPIC]www.spades.tw[/SIGPIC]
b:cute0 -
Berserker_ - Dreamweaver wrote: »drats! thats a well thought plan! you evil evil manb:chuckle
b:sin You nabs will have to give in if i say im a regen alt b:cute0 -
BaDumBopCha - Dreamweaver wrote: »b:sin You nabs will have to give in if i say im a regen alt b:cute
b:shocked evil mastermindb:surrender[SIGPIC]www.spades.tw[/SIGPIC]
b:cute0 -
...dammit. When did I sign into my sin? I don't remember this.
But meh. Let last night show that Regenesis isn't impossible to beat. Look at EQ's shiny new land. Step up, grow some balls, and attack if you really don't want us to take over the map.0 -
BaDumBopCha - Dreamweaver wrote: »b:dirty Maybe if i apply to regen spades will take my alts b:dirty
Sorry. Regen is closed for douchebags, I filled their quota.
b:cute[sigpic][/sigpic]
We came, we saw, we painted it red.
10/10/10 Calamity0 -
If all of you put the same effort into trolling the forums and complaining as you did to actually doing something about it maybe this server might have a hope, but damn I hate to say this, I agree with Andre's signature.b:chuckle
Gratz EQ on taking a Regen land, made me laugh a little bit how excited everyone got about it. Personally I'd be in on those ganks (IT pride right, gankalankalicious), but after what EQ did to Tempest and then accordingly to IT I'm just sick of them lol, and as long as IT hold Lost I won't TW against Regen, it's a suicide mission, and I know alot of IT members feel the same.b:shutup
See, this is why I don't post on forums. It aggravates that little bit inside me that says "Natural selection would dictate your mother should have been clubbed to death on conception."b:angry0 -
Andres - Dreamweaver wrote: »Sorry. Regen is full of douchebags, I filled their quota.
b:cute
b:victory Quoted for truth.0 -
RedBaroness - Dreamweaver wrote: »If all of you put the same effort into trolling the forums and complaining as you did to actually doing something about it maybe this server might have a hope, but damn I hate to say this, I agree with Andre's signature.b:chuckle
Gratz EQ on taking a Regen land, made me laugh a little bit how excited everyone got about it. Personally I'd be in on those ganks (IT pride right, gankalankalicious), but after what EQ did to Tempest and then accordingly to IT I'm just sick of them lol, and as long as IT hold Lost I won't TW against Regen, it's a suicide mission, and I know alot of IT members feel the same.b:shutup
See, this is why I don't post on forums. It aggravates that little bit inside me that says "Natural selection would dictate your mother should have been clubbed to death on conception."b:angry
EQ _didnt_ **** off the whole server, organized ganks, and took a land from Regen.
But they should be ashamed of themselves for ever seeking an alliance against the cashing faction trying to wipe them from the map. Such hypocrites, I wish we'd ignored IT taking our land and focused on Regen b:angry0 -
Fexcad - Dreamweaver wrote: »EQ _didnt_ **** off the whole server, organized ganks, and took a land from Regen.
But they should be ashamed of themselves for ever seeking an alliance against the cashing faction trying to wipe them from the map. Such hypocrites, I wish we'd ignored IT taking our land and focused on Regen b:angry
O.o huh? ..no..wait..no..its stil..huh? Contact other leaders and ask them to gank..is not organized ganking?
And as for second thing..fexypoo-
IT attacked EQ only few times to show off their power and that they could have wiped EQ from the map, if they wanted to. Thats the reason EQ made few breaks ganking IT.
And the reason why IT didnt attack few times, was cause Aubree fell asleep or was in hospital, due her hand injury. Noone knew her new password back then, so noone could bid.
And why would they attack Regen every week, if they lost due ganking one more land. They needed to compensate the loss and win at least one land back.
Wonder why you complaining that IT didnt attack Regen back then, while EQ actually didnt do it either...instead they decided to work with them.
About Hypocrite much, i might as well quote your worldchat from back then: "Dont let Regen own the map, join EQ"..yet another gank on IT a week after..the third in a row.
IT never ever went for EQ for such a foolish reason as taking land especially of EQ (they didnt wipe them even tho they could). They went for ARCH not for EQ.If i m trolling and spamming on forum...then i cant sleep and need a good laugh0 -
Andres - Dreamweaver wrote: »Sorry. Regen is closed for douchebags, I filled their quota.
b:cuteBaDumBopCha - Dreamweaver wrote: »b:victory Quoted for truth.
Quoted for truth.
U DAMN NINJA I WANTED TO SAY THAT b:angryi like potato0 -
BaDumBopCha - Dreamweaver wrote: »b:victory Quoted for truth.
Stonk thinks im meanb:crylalalala Pokemon
[SIGPIC]http://th06.deviantart.net/fs71/200H/f/2011/187/1/b/dragonite_by_silver_noctis-d3l67zm.jpg[/SIGPIC]0 -
ColdSnow - Dreamweaver wrote: »stuff
reading comprehension fail <_<
IT hit EQ more times than EQ hit IT. And IT hit EQ waaaaaaaay more times than they hit Regen.
More excuses that dont even half explain the amount of fail on ITs part, plox b:bye0 -
Fexcad - Dreamweaver wrote: »reading comprehension fail <_<
IT hit EQ more times than EQ hit IT. And IT hit EQ waaaaaaaay more times than they hit Regen.
More excuses that dont even half explain the amount of fail on ITs part, plox b:bye
No one cares! This thread is now about Andres being a **** >:oProving that not only archers do math since 2009. b:victory
Current math challenge: pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1029711&page=45
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Any skills that can be used to kill you will interrupt BB when successful." -truekossy | "...Sage archers are kind of like Mac owners. They are proud of the weirdest and most unnecessary things." -Aesthor | "We ALL know Jesus doesn't play PWI. He may have suffered a lot for humanity, but he'd NEVER punish himself this way." -Abstractive | "I approve of bananas." -SashaGray0 -
Fexcad - Dreamweaver wrote: »reading comprehension fail <_<
IT hit EQ more times than EQ hit IT. And IT hit EQ waaaaaaaay more times than they hit Regen.
More excuses that dont even half explain the amount of fail on ITs part, plox b:bye
Whatever happened to the three strike policy? If you don't mind me asking. Doesn't seem to be in effect anymore. I blatantly remember it was mostly focused on world chat and forum drama starters.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[Graviora - 101;cleric].__.[Zaeh - 8X;psychic].__.[Diabelle - 100;sin]0 -
Fexcad - Dreamweaver wrote: »EQ _didnt_ **** off the whole server, organized ganks, and took a land from Regen.
But they should be ashamed of themselves for ever seeking an alliance against the cashing faction trying to wipe them from the map. Such hypocrites, I wish we'd ignored IT taking our land and focused on Regen b:angry
IT attacked EQ to try and get them off our balls after they ganked us for weeks in a row, not the other way around.
your problem is you just love to hate. you hate the "cashers" (yeah right like EQ doesn't have any of them), you hate the "gankers" (when EQ was the biggest offender of that during IT's glory days), you hate the "hypocrites" (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL)
i wish you'd just take responsibility for killing the server instead of trying to blame someone else xD0 -
RedBaroness - Dreamweaver wrote: »IT attacked EQ to try and get them off our balls after they ganked us for weeks in a row, not the other way around.
your problem is you just love to hate. you hate the "cashers" (yeah right like EQ doesn't have any of them), you hate the "gankers" (when EQ was the biggest offender of that during IT's glory days), you hate the "hypocrites" (LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL)
i wish you'd just take responsibility for killing the server instead of trying to blame someone else xD
lol Baron, I thought you were one of IT's more intelligent members, apparently I was very, very wrong b:shocked
Cashers - Goonz and the other 20 r9 DDs that left EQ. EQ had 5 r9 barbs and like 4-6 r9 clerics. Tell me how the faction with the only warsoul weapon on the server =/= cashers?
the gank and hypocrite part of my post was obvious sarcasm bringing attention to the fact that EQ was being hit by IT and then was ******* at for not helping IT
Pro logic xD
btw, go read my post a few pages back that plainly shows IT LOSING 4 out of 5 1v1s with Regen then turning around to hit EQ again. We had a truce, you got owned, and you proceeded to QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
If IT had tried to get allies to gank with, instead of pissing everyone off, Regen wouldnt have 2/3s of the map atm
And no, I dont hate anyone xD I just love trolling people that act stupid0 -
I can't believe I read through all this at a quarter to 3am and understood it. I have one thing to say about it...
Pie.Censorship is the bane of creativity. Censorship is the bane of personality. Most of all...censorship is the bane of identity.
My main is Ivy_. I'm better known as Destini. Also known as _Yvi. Yes, I have an identity crisis. b:chuckle
Looking for a signature for this character. Wanna make me one?0 -
Decus - Dreamweaver wrote: »No one cares! This thread is now about Andres being a **** >:o
lol
+1
b:surrender Andres0 -
Can someone call back the crabbs to finally wipe out regenesis b:chuckle
Actually it is really entertaining to read through all the assumptions about how and why certain factions reacted in the last TWs. But before you start blaming someone you should take a look at the way how the TW system is designed. There is already a logical description why in the end the map is likely to be owned by only 1 strong faction. I just want to add some thoughts here because I think the economic impacts on TW are underestimated.
So here are the reasons from a point of $ why it is so hard to beat the no1 faction:
a) every potential enemy starts out as a new faction resulting in a lot of expenses for lvling up the faction to a lvl 3 faction + obtaining a faction base .....
b) during this growth phase the faction can not participate in TWs and unleash their full TW potential because they are unlikely to win therefore it is hard for them to recruit members willing to join their forces and they wont have the funds to pay for mercenaries ( = all players who fight only for TW pay but not because they support their faction) +
there is the risk that people wont be patient enough to sit out this growth phase especially when the faction joins TW too early and gets defeated in a 1v1
c) the financing of the running TW costs --> bids , cat scrolls , towers, charms ...
can not be refinanced from land that has to be conquered first so every attempt that fails to gain land is a financial loss the factions and therefore the members have to bear which can be the reason for dissatisfaction inside of the faction causing instability
d)a real challenger faction also has to have a good class distribution + enough r9 members ( and I put r9 here on purpose because there is no compareable gear to that)to even have a chance and here it is a lot easier for the no1 faction members to improve their gear because more land = more income + r9 mats. Also recruiting r9 members who are not already in no1 faction involves a high risk of only getting those people who were not accepted to no1 faction for a good reason = higher risk for drama and instability
e) linked to d) without enough cash players / rich players in their rows it is useless to try
f)it is easier for no1 faction to keep moral up and time is an advantage so after some years on the map the amount of funds accumulated give the existing no1 faction a higher chance to survive weeks of struggle when you lose a land --> invest money -->win it back
So these are the points why it is so hard for a new challenger. IT tried well but got the problem d) followed by c). On the other hand EQ finds itself now facing e) and time still works for regenesis. Spades does a relatively good job even though they also seem to have the problem of e) and f) to become a real danger to regenesis.
So the only way of fighting off regenesis in the current situation would be an alliance or what some here call ganking sweaping reg off of the map and preventing them for a longer period to rejoin the map. But even this plan has 2 problems a) the alliance has to hold out for months + the factions forming the alliance should make a even distribution of lands b) regenesis has so many good equipped teams that they even will be able to fight 2 TWs at the same time without having to accept a decrease in numbers
greetz harm0wnie0 -
BaldwinBoy - Dreamweaver wrote: »lol
+1
b:surrender Andres
It's what I'm sayin' b:shutupProving that not only archers do math since 2009. b:victory
Current math challenge: pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1029711&page=45
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Any skills that can be used to kill you will interrupt BB when successful." -truekossy | "...Sage archers are kind of like Mac owners. They are proud of the weirdest and most unnecessary things." -Aesthor | "We ALL know Jesus doesn't play PWI. He may have suffered a lot for humanity, but he'd NEVER punish himself this way." -Abstractive | "I approve of bananas." -SashaGray0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61.1K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk