TW'ing in multiple factions

Goldymarg - Heavens Tear wrote: »

<insert massive butthurt patch here>

Asmodiel - Heavens Tear wrote: »

You forgot to mention TheEmpire b:angry

MsEvilness - Heavens Tear wrote: »

wait, mia said something that made sense?
impossible

Nakhimov - Lost City wrote: »

Looks like QQ, Smells like QQ, must be QQ.

You're allowed to put your alts in whatever faction you want brah. Cry moar b:cry

Asmodiel - Heavens Tear wrote: »

is that a shout

or just short for "Random or Annoying Rubbish" o.o b:chuckle

Goldymarg - Heavens Tear wrote: »

Technically it falls under all 3 of these portions of the TOS(http://www.perfectworld.com/about/terms):11.

# (k) Cheat or utilize unauthorized exploits in connection with the Games or the Service;
# (l) Using or exploiting any bugs, errors, or design flaws to obtain unauthorized access to the Service or to gain an unfair advantage over other players,

(n) Take any action that disrupts the Service or that negatively affects or may prohibit other users from enjoying the Website, the Games or any other aspect of the Service.

It would mostly fall under the bolded parts highlighted.

They previously instituted bans for similar actions with the 11.(n) quoted as the primary reason.

My guild leader has characters who lead 5 different guilds at the moment, and has been specifically forbidden to bid with any of them besides his primary guild, unless he first leaves his primary guild of which I am a part.

Picture these scenarios:
1) Guild 1 has one attack to take land from a guild that should require approximately 60 members of that guild to be online. There are 140 online and available for war.
Guild 1 knows that at least 60 of its members have characters in 2 of the guilds that are simultaneously attacking what it views as its primary competition on the map. 140-60, still a full 80 housed for Guild 1's attack. Where do those 60 go, to attack the primary competition, if those 60 are not available the 2 attacks require guild 2 to send 20-36 members to defend, with those 60 available and in the attacks, guild 2 now has to send 40-60 members to each defense, removing 100 members from their other defense rather than 56.

2) Now lets assume those 2 defenses fall at the same date time as guild 1's attack on guild 2. The same 140 are available, guild 2 still has to send 80 to defend guild 1's 80 while their remaining 60 can still move to guild 3 and 4's attacks on guild 2. Both guild 3 and 4 have 30-60 members of their own in those battles that are not part of guild 1. Now instead of guild 2 defending against the 170 players they would have to defend against without guild 1's alt characters being swapped to, guild 2 now has to defend against 200-230 giving all 3 guilds an advantage in the attack against guild 2 they would not have otherwise.

Now my guild leader has been warned on previous occasions where ONE of our guild members played on a character in another war that synchronized with our guild's and informed that he had 24 hours to remove that player's character from our guild or force them to remove their other character from the other guild or be banned himself.

How is 60 allowed for one guild while ONE is not allowed for another?

Unfair advantage, absolutely.

Do I care? It's one hell of an obstacle to overcome, especially with account stash transfers and the rapid speed of leveling that is currently possible, you can effectively have to fight the same character in multiple wars, or at the very least that character's equivalent in another class played by the same individual.

Simply, scenario 1 occurred last night. With a total acknowledged added character count of 43 KNOWN alts of guild 1 fighting for guild 3 and 4. Additionally guild 4 attacked guild 2 with their alt/growth guild at another location of the same guild they attacked with their primary guild.

This is what I, the OP, am talking about.

Asmodiel - Heavens Tear wrote: »

is that a shout

or just short for "Random or Annoying Rubbish" o.o b:chuckle

Jhalil - Heavens Tear wrote: »

This is by far the most pathetic rant and butthurt topic I have seen. Seriously? What are you smoking?
Flaws in design? Unfair advantage?
God you must be dense. For someone to have 2 characters available to him/her that BOTH pose a threat in TW. That is NOT an unfair advantage:

- Both must be in their mid 90's range or higher
- Both must be decked out with highly refined gear and a good weapon with good refines
- He/she must have access to 2 computers if he's TWing on both at the "same" time.
- If any of his/her characters do not meet the first or second point, he/she is going to be 1 shot by mostly anyone.

You are just butthurt you lost in last night's TW. Good game, go cry to your mother. What you are saying makes no sense at all.
If someone wants to put in all the trouble to level 2 characters, gear them up and gain experience on them to TW in two different factions.
Well, then your mother really must have dropped you on your head for you to mistake "making an effort versus not making an effort" as "an unfair advantage"

Now, let's look at it from a PWI point of view. We've got person A who has 2 characters both lets say 100.
Both have +5 or higher gear, both have lunar weapons or TT99 gold/TT100 or Nirvana, both have a nice "event" tome and both have event rings, event cape, and event necklace.

Then, there's person B (you). Who has 1 character, TW's with 1 faction and that 1 character has probably put less than 20% of the money person A put in to the game.
Yes, marvelous idea. They'd totally support you, 'cause you are one of their main sources of their income (~_^)b

tl;dr

No rules broken, all was fair. Tao got buttraped, now members cry out foul. <= We're going to see that a lot more now that people are starting to notice that Tao is getting weak(er).

P.S

This should be in the HT section, would've saved you the embarrassment of having the whole game tell you you're a moron, rather than just the server you play on b:victory