Cleric stat help?
solomonbrown
Posts: 9
can anyone tell me a good pve stat build to lvl up with im about to start PWI for a second time and ima choose a cleric but i dont really know what stats to lvl up so if u can help id greatly appreciate it. Oh and what weapon should i use aswell didnt see much info on that and there is so many which is the best to go with ?
Post edited by Unknown User on
0
Comments
-
Did you check Serenity's Thread yet hun? click
Other than that most clerics go pure mag build which would be 9 mag 1 str every two levels and cut the strength as soon as you have reached enough for your end game gear which will be around 53 or 54 str depending on what gear you use. Pure mag means you'll have to do alot of kiting and be really careful though especially in the lower levels when questing on your own. You'll have really poor hp and pdef and shouldn't get to get hit or otherwise you'll die soon. If you want more survivability you can deceide to cut some mag in favor to put it on vit. That will give you a better survivability. You can always reset this points later on with a reset scroll.
As for weapons you'll obviously want to go for magic weapons, which means glaives, patakas, wands or magic swords. Go with what suits your level and your playstyle.
let me know if you want further info about anything. But the Guide I linked above pretty much covers alot that is to know0 -
hmm i did read a tad bit of the guide whoever made it didnt really tell me how much to put into the builds but im guessing 7 mag 2vit 1 str would be good every 2 lvls ? im guessing thats ok i dont really know xD im still very new to PWI i just want to really get into it. and yea weps i guess ill use w.e wep just gives me the best stats as i get them like i said im new ive only been playing for like 3 days lol.
I do have one question aswell tho... do u know a newbie friendly server for this game ? been on alot of games lately... not verry friendly to new players at all lol.0 -
You can add vit, but down the road you will want to restat that to mag. It effects not only damage but mag def. I have a cleric and never needed the vit stats and never put any in it.Marine - Marshall - Raging Tides - Retired
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
DEMHEALSMAN - Dreamweaver
Yes, because people really need 900+ dex or 1000+ magic just for the lulz0 -
ah really ok then sum guides made it seem like the game would be much harder without vit so thats why i asked in the first place0
-
It is not harder at all, physical mobs will be a pain at times, but be smart and you wont have problems. Make sure you use the best gear you come across from drops and such, the ones that drop in the fb's are pretty good. When you hit 60, then you will start making tt gear.Marine - Marshall - Raging Tides - Retired
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
DEMHEALSMAN - Dreamweaver
Yes, because people really need 900+ dex or 1000+ magic just for the lulz0 -
vit or no depends on your gear and play style.
My buddy and i made a cleric when we were still weak for farming TT and needed it. It wears G15 morai and 2 pieces G16LA. It also got some vit statted. At 10k HPs and some warding levels, its quite durable and can stand emperors bubbles nicely. Its healing is not top notch at about 12k average magic attack, but it really is plenty. Killing anything with it is a bit of a pain. Its just enough to defend fire in FW. It was perfect for us though. It doesnt need to do much killing since its always in the presence our barb and BM
If however you want to be killing things instead of just healing. If you are gonna have proper refined G16. If you dont care about surviving bubbles because your not gonna be doing emperor. You better have max magic.
If however you are a starting player who doesnt expect decent gear anytime soon. Vit is a good idea on any toon. And on a cleric much moreso than any other toon. You can change later when you rebirth.Salari - Raging Tide wrote: »You can add vit, but down the road you will want to restat that to mag. It effects not only damage but mag def. I have a cleric and never needed the vit stats and never put any in it.
defences are a reason to stat more vit imo rather than mag. Mag adds mres. vit adds both mres and pres. Pres is much lower and thus more significant.Everything i write is from PvE perspective unless mentioned otherwise.0 -
Yes vit can help, but it is not required. I made my cleric back in 2010~ and there were a lot more questing then and I never had a problem with a pure build, with any character actually. The more vit you add throughout leveling is just more coins (ever how insignificant) you have to spend later to restat back to pure as you will be loosing out on dmg and mdef ect.
I guess in the end, adding vit does not hurt, but is it by any means neededMarine - Marshall - Raging Tides - Retired
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
DEMHEALSMAN - Dreamweaver
Yes, because people really need 900+ dex or 1000+ magic just for the lulz0 -
It was never really required to have Vit at all, except in specific instances you might be running. For general play, I started as pure mag, leveled as pure mag, and had absolutely no issues healing in instances, soloing for my TT60 weapon, and doing AoE leveling. With today's hyper leveling, vit has even less need to happen. Though conversely, with the Reawakening situation it's not as much an issue either.
Everyone still apparently tries to use the same tired argument of Vit adding survivability for a cleric when leveling; but unless you are talking about spikes it does not. It actually reduces your survivability, outside of spike damage. Because less magic = less powerful heals. So common sense alone dictates higher magic has better survivability, since you have Ironheart to heal yourself while playing. Again, higher Vit for health ONLY helps when taking spike damage.
Also the barb is using bad logic for the using Vit with Def sharding, since it ignores the fact that DEF lvl essentially amps any and all healing done. Which would amplify the self-healing loss from normal healing spells when removing points from Magic to stat into Vit. For heals based on a different stat (soulforce with the UVD skills), this would of course not apply. So the introduction of UVD does take some of the weight for the better solo survivability of pure mag over vit/mag, anytime IHB is involved it will default to pure mag being better.0 -
If you're just going to pve, your build really doesn't matter.
For pvp, if you're not going to be end-game right away, which you won't be nowadays, I really really do suggest adding at least 100 or so vit.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"subtraction has the butt of an angel" - Paulrogers
I Subtraction.
/blatant sig copy is blatant
105/105/105 obtained! b:cute0 -
Sylvae - Sanctuary wrote: »It was never really required to have Vit at all, except in specific instances you might be running. For general play, I started as pure mag, leveled as pure mag, and had absolutely no issues healing in instances, soloing for my TT60 weapon, and doing AoE leveling. With today's hyper leveling, vit has even less need to happen. Though conversely, with the Reawakening situation it's not as much an issue either.
Everyone still apparently tries to use the same tired argument of Vit adding survivability for a cleric when leveling; but unless you are talking about spikes it does not. It actually reduces your survivability, outside of spike damage. Because less magic = less powerful heals. So common sense alone dictates higher magic has better survivability, since you have Ironheart to heal yourself while playing. Again, higher Vit for health ONLY helps when taking spike damage.
Also the barb is using bad logic for the using Vit with Def sharding, since it ignores the fact that DEF lvl essentially amps any and all healing done. Which would amplify the self-healing loss from normal healing spells when removing points from Magic to stat into Vit. For heals based on a different stat (soulforce with the UVD skills), this would of course not apply. So the introduction of UVD does take some of the weight for the better solo survivability of pure mag over vit/mag, anytime IHB is involved it will default to pure mag being better.
what def sharding ?
I am only stating that magic adds to mdef. I never mentioned any shards. Vit adds to pdef and mdef. Pdef is more important since you got less so adding some has a more significant effect.
Yes more magic is stronger heals. But usually you arent healing yourself, youre healing others. Also, healing isnt much about the magic attack that you have and thus the strength of your heals. Its about timing them, and casting the right ones in the right situation. I never really care what cleric is IHing me. Any clerics IH will be fine. And for BB i surely couldnt care less. Its all about the halved dmg.
I know everyone loves pure builds even if its just for the beautifull sound of it. "pure".
However, vit is vastly underrated. survivability is about spike dmg, because the small damages anyone can survive so those can be ignored. Survivability is about surving bubbles, about surviving the physical AOE from the UCH boss. Stuff like that.
Not saying that you are wrong to go for pure magic. If you are G16 medium refined you are indeed tough enough for anything in pve. If however you are new and anticipate on enterling level 100 instances in TT90 gear with either 3k HP full mag or 4.5k HP with 100 vit statted. Please stat vit.
And no money is wasted on restatting. You need to rebirth twice and quite possibly 3 times when the next update comes in 2 days.Everything i write is from PvE perspective unless mentioned otherwise.0 -
WannaBM - Archosaur wrote: »what def sharding ?
I am only stating that magic adds to mdef. I never mentioned any shards. Vit adds to pdef and mdef. Pdef is more important since you got less so adding some has a more significant effect.
Yes more magic is stronger heals. But usually you arent healing yourself, youre healing others. Also, healing isnt much about the magic attack that you have and thus the strength of your heals. Its about timing them, and casting the right ones in the right situation. I never really care what cleric is IHing me. Any clerics IH will be fine. And for BB i surely couldnt care less. Its all about the halved dmg.
I know everyone loves pure builds even if its just for the beautifull sound of it. "pure".
However, vit is vastly underrated. survivability is about spike dmg, because the small damages anyone can survive so those can be ignored. Survivability is about surving bubbles, about surviving the physical AOE from the UCH boss. Stuff like that.
Not saying that you are wrong to go for pure magic. If you are G16 medium refined you are indeed tough enough for anything in pve. If however you are new and anticipate on enterling level 100 instances in TT90 gear with either 3k HP full mag or 4.5k HP with 100 vit statted. Please stat vit.
And no money is wasted on restatting. You need to rebirth twice and quite possibly 3 times when the next update comes in 2 days.
That's why I said Reawakening changed the importance, due to that you can literally play both ways and change to what is needed on your final awakening with no cost.
As for spike, that basically is for PvE only as the game currently stands. You could bring up NW, but if so that ignores obvious glaring fallacy of the thought: this isn't 2008. Anyone using this and on their pre-awakening is not going to be mattering much in PvP for NW or other. Having a little extra health through vit, is basically like saying they want to lose more charm faster. You can't just assume they are meta-game, since by nature anyone relying on a guide is likely not even close to being end gamed gear.
And for PvE I leveled up to 80s in 2008 as a pure magic who leveled fastest on server thanks to flying AoE when I accidentally discovered it while trying to practice something else. And because of that, it sets the fact that pure mag is capable of leveling easily before all the easy ways available nowadays. You didn't have +5 or greater refines, TT markets, hypers, BHes, etc available at all back then. And since a pure magic could do it then, with the easier ways available there is simply no call for vit based at all; other than purely as preference.
However once you factor in Reawakening, that will involve considering the pokemon cards. And that further devalues the concept of Vit build, since it makes it even more a smaller component of their over-all health. The few points added in through vit, will not matter once you get even semi-decent pokemon cards along with meridian points.
For solo pure magic will basically always be better. In groups they are usually lopsided anyways, so as I stated, unless an instance run specifically requires them to have higher vit, there is no point to putting stats to it. They will be running with groups usually higher level, and most likely rushing to either farm certain instances (in which minimum values can be aimed for), or to reawaken and do it all over again.
The main argument for Vit is basically going to revolve around UVD skills in PvP. Those are based mostly on soulforce, and so reduce reliance on magic as the main source of damage; thereby mitigating the offensive power lost through going Vit. So until you have those, there really isn't a call for vit in a build at all. Heck, even first playthrough I noticed it was better to get mold gear as opposed to TT until you hit lvl 90.
And granted, prices were different before they changed them to be based on level, they likely are still better anyways. Easy to get, especially since mysterious chips are so cheap nowadays. And they can easily be resold and don't require long times to farm them. Which further reduces the reasoning for a cleric to go vit, just so someone else can outfit their character. ADS doesn't help a cleric in any way, shape, fashion, or form. They'd be better off focusing on leveling or getting high value farming to reawaken as fast as they can.0 -
Sylvae - Sanctuary wrote: »The main argument for Vit is basically going to revolve around UVD skills in PvP. Those are based mostly on soulforce, and so reduce reliance on magic as the main source of damage; thereby mitigating the offensive power lost through going Vit.
wait wut.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"subtraction has the butt of an angel" - Paulrogers
I Subtraction.
/blatant sig copy is blatant
105/105/105 obtained! b:cute0 -
OP. Veronicae pretty much covered it.
The reason that I didn't lay down a clean cookie cutter stat build per level in my guide is because that build is subjective to a persons playstyle and situation. You may find yourself needing that boost of vit, and so decide to stat a little extra at random points. When I first statted Serenity, I did not follow a clear 3 here, 2 there, 1 there, 4 there, etc. I statted it based upon my situation.
Biggest questions to consider while statting are these....
-Can I equip my necessary armor/weapon?
-Can I survive well enough to properly function as a cleric?
Please review the guide the guide that Veronicae linked. No point in me going through all of that effort in writing it if people won't read it. :-( Lol.
But seriously, look further into it. I went into great depth of different playstyles and different varieties of builds. I assure you that its worth the read. Granted, I know that its a long read, but its a read that will help you immensely.
Also, in the case of vitality....that's VERY subjective. Some people add more, others add less...and it tends to be done at different points in the game.
As long as you can have fun with it, properly equip your gear on level, and survive well enough to perform your squad duty as a cleric....that's what matters.
Hope that helps you. :-)"Male Player using female toon. Please don't flirt with me."
Need to see the cleric guide for questions, comments, or concerns? Just copy and paste the link.
"http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1246011"
(Ignore the quotation marks. URL isn't allowed, so I had to do it that way.)0 -
Regarding the argument pure vs la/ha/vit.
Let me give the reason why I support various builds...even ones that are unconventional....
What's the difference between a dead cleric and a living cleric?
The Answer: 1 hp point.
What heals better...regardless of build...A dead or a living cleric?
Its true that a pure magic will do more damage and have stronger heals in even gear. Its also true that a different type will likely have more survivability...and that counts for a lot more than people realize. A living cleric can still turn the tide of the battle. A dead cleric cannot. Just something to keep in mind.
"Male Player using female toon. Please don't flirt with me."
Need to see the cleric guide for questions, comments, or concerns? Just copy and paste the link.
"http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1246011"
(Ignore the quotation marks. URL isn't allowed, so I had to do it that way.)0 -
SerenityCNB - Dreamweaver wrote: »Regarding the argument pure vs la/ha/vit.
Let me give the reason why I support various builds...even ones that are unconventional....
What's the difference between a dead cleric and a living cleric?
The Answer: 1 hp point.
What heals better...regardless of build...A dead or a living cleric?
Its true that a pure magic will do more damage and have stronger heals in even gear. Its also true that a different type will likely have more survivability...and that counts for a lot more than people realize. A living cleric can still turn the tide of the battle. A dead cleric cannot. Just something to keep in mind.
Yes, but that was the debate back during vanilla PWI. Before anni packs, meridians, and pokemon cards. There was a lot of back and forth, and we even had +12 mirage sword HA clerics back then too. Unless it takes into account the current shifts brought about by the ever increasing exapansions, it will only basically be a condensation of threads gone over ad nauseum back in 2009/2010.
The fact is we have rank gear, recasts, nirvana, easier method of obtaining G16 necklace, upgrades, etc. that have rendered the by-gone age comparisons of which are better to play. Saying HA refines for better health, and therefore must have an appreciably higher health, when that was before pokemon et al, is not very genuine.
The more multiples they toss at the game, and the more they devalue placing stats elsewhere, adds a disincentive to doing the unconventional builds that could work back when lunar/TT100 was end game. And just offering what amounts to a direct rehash of that, without paying heed to the myriad changes since, is tantamount to just not getting it. Which is likely what is being pointed out.0 -
I'd actually argue that rebirth has made it more reasonable to do the easier, vit heavy or unconventional builds your first go around because it costs you absolutely nothing to change and allows you to use cheaper gear building up. Which you can in turn use to invest into levelling faster and buying higher quality gear later down the road. Especially now that yoru BH squad probably isn't going to be relying on you having something like pure builds even if they are morons for example, because the dreamchaser gear that comes from the caves and as the quests are ridiculously overpowered. With those quests for example everything up to 69 with the exception of those two bosses in 51 are now easily soloable for a cleric even if it isn't pure. So for what reason do you need the strongest heals. Might as well stat for like those oops moments in FC wherein you'd need say more than 5k hp or get one shotted. *Shrug*l0
-
oVenusArmanio wrote: »I'd actually argue that rebirth has made it more reasonable to do the easier, vit heavy or unconventional builds your first go around because it costs you absolutely nothing to change and allows you to use cheaper gear building up. Which you can in turn use to invest into levelling faster and buying higher quality gear later down the road. Especially now that yoru BH squad probably isn't going to be relying on you having something like pure builds even if they are morons for example, because the dreamchaser gear that comes from the caves and as the quests are ridiculously overpowered. With those quests for example everything up to 69 with the exception of those two bosses in 51 are now easily soloable for a cleric even if it isn't pure. So for what reason do you need the strongest heals. Might as well stat for like those oops moments in FC wherein you'd need say more than 5k hp or get one shotted. *Shrug*l
That is a great point! If you spend your time in fc,bh's and dailies and building up coins, you can very easily get by with extra vit till your 2nd rebirth or when you have decent gear and defenses. You really don't need top end gear to do any of the instances aside full warsong (mainly attack power to solo a pav).Marine - Marshall - Raging Tides - Retired
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
DEMHEALSMAN - Dreamweaver
Yes, because people really need 900+ dex or 1000+ magic just for the lulz0 -
oVenusArmanio wrote: »I'd actually argue that rebirth has made it more reasonable to do the easier, vit heavy or unconventional builds your first go around because it costs you absolutely nothing to change and allows you to use cheaper gear building up. Which you can in turn use to invest into levelling faster and buying higher quality gear later down the road. Especially now that yoru BH squad probably isn't going to be relying on you having something like pure builds even if they are morons for example, because the dreamchaser gear that comes from the caves and as the quests are ridiculously overpowered. With those quests for example everything up to 69 with the exception of those two bosses in 51 are now easily soloable for a cleric even if it isn't pure. So for what reason do you need the strongest heals. Might as well stat for like those oops moments in FC wherein you'd need say more than 5k hp or get one shotted. *Shrug*l
It actually argue both ways. The main reason for pure magic, is and always has been for solo leveling. If you're going with a group, it doesn't matter what you do, which argues against both. For solo AoE, the higher heals matter more than higher health, especially if you have dedicated farming gear made. Though PV has also made the extraneous.
In the end, it isn't so much that there is an argument for pure magic, as there needs to be one against going it. Why take lesser heals and lesser damage? Is there an instance that requires it? They are few are far between, especially when considered against how few health we get for each Vit point. And even bringing up FCC would be a matter of when, not if. Because the early levels are so much easier as pure magic compared to vit.
To give an example, my pure mag varming butterflies vs. the only cleric higher than me on the server at the time. They took almost 3 times as long to kill one, because they had to keep casting heals to survive. I'd guess hit 0-1 times, even 2 levels lower than them. Not from refines or anything, but because I used after cast canceling and was pure magic for maximum damage.
Those are the comparisons that should be used, for comparing the two. I noticed the cleric guide recommended didn't even cover after-cast canceling, which is key to maximizing cleric DPS early on. And that's 2008 junk.
So it's more a question of what would require weakening your character from solo play, that determines how, when, and how much to put into vit. Because I remember soloing FCC up until the 2nd boss at 82 as a pure magic (cleared 1st boss and all mobs, until that first damn dragonet) in the 2008 FCC no problem. Had no clue how to summon the 2nd boss, and being unable to kill the the dragonet kinda killed that venture off. But I do recall having around 3.8k or so health, maybe less. Which means even with higher Vit, I still would die.
Which is why pure magic should always be the norm deviated from, as long the person understands the reason for the deviation. Honestly a lot of the clerics nowadays read as very out of touch, since I just got done responding to someone offering 2009 advice on putting Vit stat for PvP, and that doesn't even come close to the reality of nowadays where even 200 vit doesn't matter for jack without proper gear. I ran the flag both times, and still came in last since the other people had better gear. No enemy appeared, it was just us existing. I checked other maps, and even people who AFK'ed and did nothing, earned more than my cleric healing, buffing, debuffing, and damaging in the fight.
So what good would vit do in such an instance, when it doesn't even matter as far as the game mechanics are concerned? And considering I have a +10 purify weapon, it's not as if I was running in naked. Too many high levels, giving advice that only works for high levels is what a lot of this boils down to.0 -
Lemme put it this way regarding build for mass pvp.
If you're not at least full r9rr +10 with +10 NW upgrades and maxed def passive and maxed spirit A cards, stat some vit in because no one gives a **** about your damage then and heal power really doesn't ****ing matter so much as being able to live as long as possible. Unless you have that sort of gear, you are a one or two shot period which does no one in your squad any good. May as well stat in that vit so that one-shot becomes a two-shot and so-on. And even with that sort of gear, I'd still say put some vit in since full +11/+12 and full S cards is just becoming more and more the norm nowadays.
Note that I'm not saying to go pure vit either because that's absolutely dumb since Plume Shell will just break in two hits and then you're screwed. Find a balance.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"subtraction has the butt of an angel" - Paulrogers
I Subtraction.
/blatant sig copy is blatant
105/105/105 obtained! b:cute0 -
Ok. To be honest, I've always had a solo playstyle. I have no faction, and never have had a faction. I squad for groups. I either duo'd quests, or I quested alone, or sometimes in small groups. When Istarted playing, I was a vitality cleric, with 20 base vit. Now of course, this isn't a lot. Its a 200 hp cushion. But that 200 hp cushion has saved me numerous times. I've literally seen my health drop to 1 hp before, but regardless, I was a living cleric.
Some people are better defensively. Others are better offensively. If a cleric can take a hit, and not die, and effectively heal their sqaud, that's what's important...regardless of whether they're pure, vitality, heavy armor, light armor, endgame, not endgame, citrine, or garnet.
It does not matter. What matters is can this cleric heal and get the job done. Solo mode, some mobs are tougher. Nothing is stopping that cleric from kiting, or using their cc skills though.
I absolutely agree that a pure cleric is going to hit harder than an unconventional one, and stronger heals, but whether G16, Morai, rank geared, or warsoul geared, as long as a person plays their toon how they want to, that's what matters. Have fun with it."Male Player using female toon. Please don't flirt with me."
Need to see the cleric guide for questions, comments, or concerns? Just copy and paste the link.
"http://pwi-forum.perfectworld.com/showthread.php?t=1246011"
(Ignore the quotation marks. URL isn't allowed, so I had to do it that way.)0 -
Eoria - Harshlands wrote: »Lemme put it this way regarding build for mass pvp.
If you're not at least full r9rr +10 with +10 NW upgrades and maxed def passive and maxed spirit A cards, stat some vit in because no one gives a **** about your damage then and heal power really doesn't ****ing matter so much as being able to live as long as possible. Unless you have that sort of gear, you are a one or two shot period which does no one in your squad any good. May as well stat in that vit so that one-shot becomes a two-shot and so-on. And even with that sort of gear, I'd still say put some vit in since full +11/+12 and full S cards is just becoming more and more the norm nowadays.
Note that I'm not saying to go pure vit either because that's absolutely dumb since Plume Shell will just break in two hits and then you're screwed. Find a balance.
And if you aren't that, putting points in VIT won't do a ****ing thing. Seriously, how is that not obvious? 1K health won't do **** to help you when you run into those people you mentioned, because you're one shot either way. It's just you will lose 1k more off your charm by putting points into VIT, as opposed to going pure. People will be having to reawaken, farm, et al during this period, and they will not survive against R9 regardless of what they do. You're not arguing against going pure VIT, you're arguing against not being end gamed.
Heck, I accidentally put points into VIT on reawaken when I first came back again thinking it was strength since I didn't pay attention. So on the plus side I can aver to how worthless it is. Yay, 500 extra health, sure does a lot when you get hit by a R9 with full A+ set and they crit for 25k. And it's not like it's that easy finding non-R9s, when the player base dwindled to such a degree.
But gimping yourself for survival, when it won't do that without some serious gear behind it to make it matter? That's not even based in reality, let alone game mechanics. I guess you could then argue to "gear up," but that's as good as arguing your original point anyways.
VIT doesn't do jack for survival in PvP, without high end gearing to make it matter. PvP no longer dictates stat placement as it did long ago, because it just doesn't matter. Even just thinking about the power difference in 2008/2009, when it was recommended on PvP servers to have vit stat, and then comparing it to the power difference to now. What would be enough for undergeared is ****ing obviously not going to be enough when the power difference has more than doubled.
I'm honestly not sure how the many different examples that are obvious aren't that obvious. My previous thing stands, VIT for specific PvE instances if needed; but for pvp, are you kidding me? Anyone with high enough gear to make use of that, would be a no talent CSer if they haven't figured out how to play by then.0 -
Sylvae - Sanctuary wrote: »And if you aren't that, putting points in VIT won't do a ****ing thing. Seriously, how is that not obvious? 1K health won't do **** to help you when you run into those people you mentioned, because you're one shot either way. It's just you will lose 1k more off your charm by putting points into VIT, as opposed to going pure. People will be having to reawaken, farm, et al during this period, and they will not survive against R9 regardless of what they do. You're not arguing against going pure VIT, you're arguing against not being end gamed.
Heck, I accidentally put points into VIT on reawaken when I first came back again thinking it was strength since I didn't pay attention. So on the plus side I can aver to how worthless it is. Yay, 500 extra health, sure does a lot when you get hit by a R9 with full A+ set and they crit for 25k. And it's not like it's that easy finding non-R9s, when the player base dwindled to such a degree.
But gimping yourself for survival, when it won't do that without some serious gear behind it to make it matter? That's not even based in reality, let alone game mechanics. I guess you could then argue to "gear up," but that's as good as arguing your original point anyways.
VIT doesn't do jack for survival in PvP, without high end gearing to make it matter. PvP no longer dictates stat placement as it did long ago, because it just doesn't matter. Even just thinking about the power difference in 2008/2009, when it was recommended on PvP servers to have vit stat, and then comparing it to the power difference to now. What would be enough for undergeared is ****ing obviously not going to be enough when the power difference has more than doubled.
I'm honestly not sure how the many different examples that are obvious aren't that obvious. My previous thing stands, VIT for specific PvE instances if needed; but for pvp, are you kidding me? Anyone with high enough gear to make use of that, would be a no talent CSer if they haven't figured out how to play by then.
My vit's pretty much the difference between surviving some random 15k+ zerk crits from end-game r9rr sins so I can kite from them and not atm. Even just being able to take one more hit so you can then immune pot or pop one of your shields is a godsend. Being able to do that will allow your squad to (hopefully) take care of them so you can continue on with your role as a cleric.
If that vit helps someone become a two shot vs. being a one-shot and thus able to help their squad more, then I see no reason to not stat vit.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"subtraction has the butt of an angel" - Paulrogers
I Subtraction.
/blatant sig copy is blatant
105/105/105 obtained! b:cute0 -
For pvp i think it depens on whom you play for. For yourself or for your squad.
While indeed extra vit always helps regardless of your equipment level. (you might be a one **** to only 50% of the enemies instead of 70% of them for example) I do think indeed for yourself offence is more usefull than defence in mass pvp. Its not like being able to take twice the damage is gonna allow you to survive twice as long and thus deal twice the amount of damage. It will only allow you to survive marginally longer, espescially if you are playing for yourself and there is no squad to save you.
If you are in a squad however and you are there to heal them. Vit seems obvious to me. Surviving even a little longer will give them the time to save you and it doesnt really matter that much how strong your heals are.
So i think:
low gear pve: vit
advanced gear pve: mag
solo mass pvp: mag
team mass pvp: vit
1v1: the better your gear, the less incentive for vit. (mag scales with gear, vit does not)Everything i write is from PvE perspective unless mentioned otherwise.0 -
You two are slightly missing the point. If that extra vit is able to make a one shot into a two shot, then sure. But you are ignoring that even a 25k crit, is still 12.5k on a regular hit. And for someone to have 11.5K (taking off the 1k from 100vit), they are not even on the lower side of highly geared. They are end game at that point, which is the whole point I've been making.
For the people looking for advice, they are not going to be your end game geared players. End gamers will have played through the game, and know what they need. So giving advice that will only work for end gamers, while generalizing it as if every new cleric runs around with 11k+ health, is insane.
Role doesn't even matter in those cases, as they will still be one shot when aimed at. And with the reduced server turn outs for NWs, it's much more lopsided than normal. Add in the Auroras not affecting those above 5 levels with the need to reawaken twice, and it further changes what roles you would take. And since my cleric was Reawakened and lvl 85 last NW, I spent my time switching forms to heal, buff, freeze, crit amp, and debuff where needed. Fun sure, but at no point did those extra vit points I placed into it by accident decide anything.
For Vit to matter, it has to actually do what people claim it does. It's pretty much that simple. Claiming it WILL make someone a two shot, in this hoped for example, doesn't the change the reality that it won't in most cases. And if you're rolling in a group, those cases are going to be taken by others. Since from what I noticed, the lowbies did not stick around to get beat up in small squad vs small squad. They took off to find a powerful group from their nation to leech off of. And the ones that don't, you'd have to try to get to them first before your group finishes them off. So even in your made up statistics, it will be skewed against the player due to that alone.
Again, the people who need advice on where to put stat points, are not going to be +10/+12 R93 gear, so using that as an example for advice given to the forum at large; well it's something, just not useful.0 -
I play nation wars exclusively on low level characters that have not been rebirthed. I found it the best cost for what I want out of it. I have since it began. I've done it on a pure cleric and a vit cleric, and the vit cleric survived better. Both got one shotted left and right by anyone highly geared. But that's not the enemy I try to survive. I tend to shrug them off and leave those battles if I'm really never gonna be able to leave my spawn. I was able to survive better against fellow lowbies and people are higher geared than me, but not enough to one shot me if I had vit. Which is a lot of people, although much much less than when nation wars first started. I was able to turn a one/two shot into a two/three shot. I found a bit vit better for group pvp personally on a lower level. All that stuff about cards doesn't apply to someone who is genuinely level 80 and not rebirthed. Which are the people who are probably gonna need stat advice. Would be kinda sad if someone still didn't have that figured out and looking at last rebirth.
Healing counts for only so much of your contribution f you're some low level that doesn't have a squad and you're either the kind that leeches by following around big squads. Or you're like me and focus on smaller size battles where having you in to play support actually helps, even though you're DD is fairly negligible. The amount you get to DD, and the amount of damage you're going to be doing is gonna be pretty low. A lot of your points if you're that type of player, is damage received. And while you're genuinely low level and low geared, you're just not going to be putting out much damage. You can increase the amount of damage received though simply by surviving a bit longer and thus dragging out the fight. If you're a three-four shot to someone in g15 thanks to your lowbie buffs and vit, rather than a two-three shot, that's gonna make a difference.
In addition, solo grinding isn't really a good source of income anymore. JJ and Nation Wars will be your sources, and JJ only until 81. After that you're going to want to level up as fast as you can, so you can start the real game at this point. Low game is pretty dead. Anyway, the mobs that drop anything worth picking are mostly being botted. Most of the quests you'll be doing are extremely fast no matter your build because they were made easier. Who cares when all you gotta do is kill like 10 mobs.
Squad play, most people are in dreamchaser gear. You can solo a lot of the BH stuff in dreamchaser gear. You can solo many of your own FBs. Not BH, FBs. So the main instances you gotta worry about is 69, 79, and FC in terms of healing really. And that's assuming you can even get a squad that needs you and you're aren't just staring at some high level's backside as they zip you through everything. And 51 you gotta know how to purify, but purify is purify. It doesn't matter your build in there. Majority of things that are going to cause problems for you are physical.
Low game has been dumbed down a lot. Really don't matter which build you go. But if you want to experiment it's probably better to see what that's gonna do for you when it matters the least, which is the first go around since you're going to have rebirth twice anyway.
0 -
Sylvae - Sanctuary wrote: »You two are slightly missing the point. If that extra vit is able to make a one shot into a two shot, then sure. But you are ignoring that even a 25k crit, is still 12.5k on a regular hit.
No you are missing the point.
There are many enemies. some do 1k damage some do 25k dmg. Others do anything in between that range.
The more hitpoints you have, the bigger percentage of that range does not one shot you.
Hitpoints are usefull no matter where you stand, it is bull**** to reason that that "they will still one-shot you anyway".
Also it is not about 1k hitpoints. Surely an end game TW cleric can stat many more than 100 points and often he will be buffed. There should easilly be 400-500 points to play with.
More likely it is the difference between say 15k and 19k unbuffed, or 12k and 16k if hes lesser refined.
For a fresh level 100 cleric who would have 3k unbuffed full magic, there are 200-250 points to play with. That 3kHP can be 5k. This is significant. And it does make the difference in some level 100 instances.
I am trying to reason here. Trying to explain what motives and situations are pro vit and what are pro magic. All you are doing is using unreasonably arguing to hammer on your anti vit stance. So please try to be reasonable instead of making silly comments about 1k hp on an 11.5k cleric. Who knows you might be able to convince me to change my ideas. I am open for arguments you know. But not if youre being unreasonable.Everything i write is from PvE perspective unless mentioned otherwise.0 -
Sylvae - Sanctuary wrote: »You two are slightly missing the point. If that extra vit is able to make a one shot into a two shot, then sure. But you are ignoring that even a 25k crit, is still 12.5k on a regular hit. And for someone to have 11.5K (taking off the 1k from 100vit), they are not even on the lower side of highly geared. They are end game at that point, which is the whole point I've been making.
Stahp right there. Near end-game (talking full +10 refines with +10 NW upgrades and decent A cards) is 13k-14k HP unbuffed or so for an AA class now. Vit builds will take it up to 15k-17k. 11.5k unbuffed was end-game like what...two years ago now?
Between that and what you said about UVD earlier in the thread, I genuinely don't think you know what end-game is.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"subtraction has the butt of an angel" - Paulrogers
I Subtraction.
/blatant sig copy is blatant
105/105/105 obtained! b:cute0 -
Eoria - Harshlands wrote: »Stahp right there. Near end-game (talking full +10 refines with +10 NW upgrades and decent A cards) is 13k-14k HP unbuffed or so for an AA class now. Vit builds will take it up to 15k-17k. 11.5k unbuffed was end-game like what...two years ago now?
Between that and what you said about UVD earlier in the thread, I genuinely don't think you know what end-game is.
No they won't, or are we using made up numbers? 100 vit is 1000 health for a cleric. You made a difference of 2k - 3k health to try to make it more disparate I guess; but no one has mentioned a 205/305 vit build vs. a 5 vit yet, so it seems more exaggeration to make a point.
And for your main point about what constitutes end game health, you again are not paying any attention to the state of the game; which I have repeatedly mentioned as shifting things.
Rebirth 1, Rebirth 2, nuema, meridians, pokemon cards: all these affect over-all health, and some require rebirthing at least once to start building up. So does someone stay farming pre-rebirth, and lose out over-all trying to get some basic gear they will upgrade just to outgrow anyways; or do the smart thing and get enough to start rebuilding and hit the new dailies. Also, this would basically be advice guidance; the amount of time if someone actually PLAYS means they are less likely to need advice, unless they are an idiot. So it is more pointed towards people who are gear building and character building, which is why using 15k health would be dumb. They are months if not years away from that. Why on earth build for something that won't have anything to do with them for a while?
As is with 55 vit or so and the +1200 health from 2 R8r set bonus and some gear from +5-+7, I have 6762 health unmodified; even your vaunted vit build would only set it at 7262 over-all health. And that would drop to 6062 if someone went without R8R bonus. To get beyond that would require idiotic refinement levels for gear that would be ditched soon anyways.
I suppose a cleric could stupidly shard health instead of phys def, much like a mystic recently did in a full delta. They were T15 sharded health most likely to survive AoE hit in FCC, which really just reinforces hyper baby talentlessness. They were one-shotted over and over by the AoE of the 6th stage boss while fully buffed. Over and over, didn't matter. And it hit me for anywhere from 600 -2k damage, so most likely phys damage.
Translate that into NW, and all the classes hitting with phys damage would ravage a health sharded cleric. So where would this health come from to reach the numbers you illustrate, unless they stupidly waste money for no real gain? They won't keep it, not real good resale value, and the amount of refinement to reach your numbers is pretty frickin high; which would mean over-all loss from not rebirthing and releveling for the newer content.
All your examples stem from end game CS standpoint only; they address neither the leveling process, gear in between, or anything added into the game since inception outside what max level is. And people at max level end game gear should not need advice anyways, if they have half a clue what they are doing.
Granted I had fun stomping 2 clerics, a sin, and a bar solo in a crystal map last NW; but they were totally clueless. 585 extra health (barb buffed) wouldn't have changed that any. One cleric even had around 13k health, but they were just so terrible. It's like they thought having better gear trumped competence or something. Luckily they came on res, so as long as I murdered one before the next appeared, it was 1 v 1 over and over.
With the apparent recent desertion of playerbase, and people power-leveling alts, why does someone need extra vit vs. a similarly geared character? Clerics are the ultimate ******* lock class, while removing healing from a target. Harder to solo vs multiples, but if you're in a group they should be protecting against multiples anyways.
For 1 on 1, fighting over-geared melee is great; especially barbs. Constant sleep lock with multiple aurora stacking and MoW, to freeze, HP, repeat and slowly whittle them down. That's a ton of contribution while frustrating the **** out of them.
As for the UVD reference you mention, if you're talking about how UVD diminishes the importance of pure magic over vit, you might want to recall it was in dealing with healing. And the Auroras I talked about healed solely based off of soulforce. Educate yourself.0 -
Sylvae - Sanctuary wrote: »I suppose a cleric could stupidly shard health instead of phys def,
What stats to enter ?
Astrelles sharding calculator
Playing around a bit, but whenever kind of stats i enter, vit/HP beats garnets by a landslide and similarly Its quite possible that you can enter stats where they are closer, but nothing to warrant talking about "stupidly sharding vit".
some examples i tried. I aint too familiar with AA, hope the stats i made up are reasonable:
mediocre stats"ubuffed (really low pdef, norecast r9 ring yet, badly refined amulet. Should make garnets come out better....
Mediocre stats buffed
Mediorce stats lower grade gems
Better stats buffed
better stats unbuffedEverything i write is from PvE perspective unless mentioned otherwise.0 -
WannaBM - Archosaur wrote: »What stats to enter ?
Astrelles sharding calculator
Playing around a bit, but whenever kind of stats i enter, vit/HP beats garnets by a landslide and similarly Its quite possible that you can enter stats where they are closer, but nothing to warrant talking about "stupidly sharding vit".
some examples i tried. I aint too familiar with AA, hope the stats i made up are reasonable:
mediocre stats"ubuffed (really low pdef, norecast r9 ring yet, badly refined amulet. Should make garnets come out better....
Mediocre stats buffed
Mediorce stats lower grade gems
Better stats buffed
better stats unbuffed
Again, what part of people needing advice are generally not going to be R9r3? 50 DEF lvl and 14K pdef in your example? And that person needs advice on where to stat? Are you serious?
That is endgame gear, most likely with endgame refines if they are 14K pdef without pdef shards. Why do people keep bringing things like this into an area giving advice to new clerics? Did the game start handing out R9 to every newcomer that I wasn't aware of?
Try using a normal calculator without made-up values, it's a lot easier to see what I am talking about when saying the values you guys are tossing around are insane for someone leveling up and in need of advice.
And while you guys use made up numbers, I use actual looking at other people in the game for back-up evidence. I saw someone in T15 nirvana gear die over and over, 6 times, on one boss. They had all health sharding. (health, not vit. why bring Vit stones at all into a conversation that by its very nature would not be end game? That'd be dumb to shard Vit in non end-game gear.)
This same boss while one shotting the squishy left and right every time it AoE'ed did 2k at max damage to my character. The other squishy had 6k health. So that is over 3 times the damage I received as a minimum to the health sharded squishy.
So yeah, that is dumb. Deciding to take more than 3 times damage from all physical sources, to survive a bit better against magic damage sources, is pretty terrible decision making skills. Because our main weakness in straight up fights, is those same physical damage classes. Which is why it's so awful, and has always been advised against in cleric forums.
So here, use this and try and make something with non-imaginary-land numbers to show what you are talking about. And if you make another end-game set-up, will there really even be a point to making a post pointing out how pointless it is? When we are in a thread giving advice on how to allocate points; which by its very nature, would suggest not end game.
http://pwi.ecatomb.net/character.php0
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 699 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61.1K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk