primeval/savant stone animation ?
Sherekahn - Lost City
Posts: 114 Arc User
can anyone describe or post a screenshot of the animation your weapon gives off if you have two primeval or two savant stones in it?
or a ss of 4 in armor would be even more awesome, but i doubt there are any people that have that b:surrender
prove me wrong
or a ss of 4 in armor would be even more awesome, but i doubt there are any people that have that b:surrender
prove me wrong
Post edited by Sherekahn - Lost City on
0
Comments
-
Sherekahn - Lost City wrote: »can anyone describe or post a screenshot of the animation your weapon gives off if you have two primeval or two savant stones in it?
or a ss of 4 in armor would be even more awesome, but i doubt there are any people that have that b:surrender
prove me wrong
people definitely have it... but I dont think it has a special animationYoutube Channel: youtube.com/user/D2VeT/videos?flow=grid&view=0
Current gear: pwcalc.com/6ab2893fbfb080a8
[SIGPIC]http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=684hgk&s=5[/SIGPIC]0 -
Weapons have no animation.
4soc is just sparkle. Nothing big.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
oh look, i'm inactive again.
b> leviciti b:cry0 -
AinaMizuako - Sanctuary wrote: »Weapons have no animation.
WRONG.
if you socket TWO grade 7(?) or higher gems into the weapon, you get a rotating sprite (like a little glowing dust trail) around the hilt (where your hand is)[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »WRONG.
if you socket TWO grade 7(?) or higher gems into the weapon, you get a rotating sprite (like a little glowing dust trail) around the hilt (where your hand is)[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
advice to fledgling archers:
Going sage is like drunken sex, at first she may look good, but when you wake up the next morning; you'll look at her and go WHAT HAVE I DONE.0 -
Sherekahn - Lost City wrote: »can anyone describe or post a screenshot of the animation your weapon gives off if you have two primeval or two savant stones in it?
or a ss of 4 in armor would be even more awesome, but i doubt there are any people that have that b:surrender
prove me wrong
I have 4 in my chest, legs, and arms, and 3 in my boots. The effect is just sparkles, and as far as I can tell it's no different from 3 to 4 stones.0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »WRONG.
if you socket TWO grade 7(?) or higher gems into the weapon, you get a rotating sprite (like a little glowing dust trail) around the hilt (where your hand is)
no you're WRONG. dead WRONG. WRONGER than WRONG!
Oh man.. I never knew telling other people that they're wrong would feel so good! Now i feel better about myself knowing that I am more knowledgeable than you!
My friend has all 4 of those stones (same ones) in his armor and it just showed sparkles.0 -
ok.. so i'm getting that in armor they have a sparkle effect... but again i have to ask what about weapons, what colors, and plz post some screenshots0
-
HeadTrauma - Harshlands wrote: »I have 4 in my chest, legs, and arms, and 3 in my boots. The effect is just sparkles, and as far as I can tell it's no different from 3 to 4 stones.
Actually, there's no difference between 2, 3, or 4.Sherekahn - Lost City wrote: »ok.. so i'm getting that in armor they have a sparkle effect... but again i have to ask what about weapons, what colors, and plz post some screenshots
There are no effects for weapons. At all.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
♥ - 藤林 杏-様 - ♥
♥ Kyou Fujibayashi-sama ♥0 -
WaffleChan - Sanctuary wrote: »they were stating that primeval/savant do not give a weapon effect. they dont have a 'grade' like shards do. so in essence, you are the WRONG one lol.
read my post, then reply. kthxbai b:byeblindeyesniper wrote: »no you're WRONG. dead WRONG. WRONGER than WRONG!
Oh man.. I never knew telling other people that they're wrong would feel so good! Now i feel better about myself knowing that I am more knowledgeable than you!
My friend has all 4 of those stones (same ones) in his armor and it just showed sparkles.
i said nothing about armor b:cuteAccelerated - Sanctuary wrote: »There are no effects for weapons. At all.
wow, how much did you pay for your character? try socketing two g7 stones in your weap (non-elemental) and tell me then that there's no animation
do i really need to hijack a screenshot from the screenshots forum to prove you are all ignorant?[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »read my post, then reply. kthxbai b:bye
i said nothing about armor b:cute
wow, how much did you pay for your character? try socketing two g7 stones in your weap (non-elemental) and tell me then that there's no animation
do i really need to hijack a screenshot from the screenshots forum to prove you are all ignorant?
They were all obviously talking about the animations of primeval and savant stones. Learn to read.0 -
Jesus - Dreamweaver wrote: »They were all obviously talking about the animations of primeval and savant stones. Learn to read.
post on your main or GTFO b:bye
here, i'll be nice. my post specifically stated g7 stones, so them telling me i'm wrong is incorrect, because g7 or higher stones DO ADD AN ANIM b:thanks[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »post on your main or GTFO b:bye
here, i'll be nice. my post specifically stated g7 stones, so them telling me i'm wrong is incorrect, because g7 or higher stones DO ADD AN ANIM b:thanks
And the topic is about Primeval/Savant stones. NOT G7(+) stones. So basically, you admit that you were never trying to stay on topic. Kthxbai.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
♥ - 藤林 杏-様 - ♥
♥ Kyou Fujibayashi-sama ♥0 -
Accelerated - Sanctuary wrote: »And the topic is about Primeval/Savant stones. NOT G7(+) stones. So basically, you admit that you were never trying to stay on topic. Kthxbai.
read my post, then reply. the poster stated that "weapons have no animations", which is wrong b:cute[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »read my post, then reply. the poster stated that "weapons have no animations", which is wrong b:cute
Aina was referring to Primeval/Savant stones not giving any extra animations. She never said that nothing can give weapons any sort of extra animations. You were talking about G7(+) stones, no one else were.
And just so you know, elemental soul shards give off additional animation as well.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
♥ - 藤林 杏-様 - ♥
♥ Kyou Fujibayashi-sama ♥0 -
Accelerated - Sanctuary wrote: »Aina was referring to Primeval/Savant stones not giving any extra animations. She never said that nothing can give weapons any sort of extra animations. You were talking about G7(+) stones, no one else were.
And just so you know, elemental soul shards give off additional animation as well.
she did not specify, her statement was worded such that it could be interpreted as a "blanket statement". hence, i corrected it[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »she did not specify, her statement was worded such that it could be interpreted as a "blanket statement". hence, i corrected it
Because she was answering the OP's question directly..? From what I see, everyone was able to realize this, except you. What you're suggesting is like a scenario like this:
Someone asks: How old are you in Earth years?
Someone answers: 15.
You "correct" said person's answer and say: WRONG you're only 14 years old in X's years.
Someone else says: How does that factor into this topic?
You say: Because the person that answered the person's question didn't specify in which planet's years, so her answer was completely wrong.
X being another type of planet in another galaxy.
Yes, your information was correct, but did it have to do with the topic? No, it did not.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
♥ - 藤林 杏-様 - ♥
♥ Kyou Fujibayashi-sama ♥0 -
Accelerated - Sanctuary wrote: »-wall of text-
you obviously are dead-set stubborn on your own warpath b:sweat
/debate[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »I have nothing better to say.
/debate
That's quite ironic coming from a man that was defending about a completely different issue from what the topic was about.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
♥ - 藤林 杏-様 - ♥
♥ Kyou Fujibayashi-sama ♥0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »you obviously are dead-set stubborn on your own warpath b:sweat
/debate
Sounds like you.0 -
Jesus - Dreamweaver wrote: »Sounds like you.
says the person who is afraid to post on their main b:scorn[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »says the person who is afraid to post on their main b:scorn
Maybe my main was banned?
Does it make anything I say less valid?0 -
Jesus - Dreamweaver wrote: »Maybe my main was banned?
Does it make anything I say less valid?
both your points are mute now stfu
the answer to the original posters question is no it doesnt give any extra animation it will have the same as g7+ gems[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
ty Nowitsawn
Everything has its beginnings, but it doesn't start at one. It starts long before that... The world is born From zero. The moment zero becomes one is the moment the world springs to life. One becomes 2. 2 becomes 10. 10 becomes 100. taking it all back to one solves nothing. so long as zero remains... One.. Will eventually grow to 100 again.0 -
Jesus - Dreamweaver wrote: »Maybe my main was banned?
Does it make anything I say less valid?
doesnt make what you say less valid, so long as what you say in on the topic at hand...
but there's a very thin line between debate and trolling, and posting on an alt skews that line very far towards trolling b:cute[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
And you, Alexeno, posting self-admitted offtopic statements and replying to other people with what amounts to "OMG I'M STUBBORN UR WRONG LOL," are not a troll? That's a hilarious assumption.
Anyhow, Primeval/Savant stones in armor give sparkles, whether it be 2 or more stones. They do not provide new animations or other visuals when socketed on weapons.0 -
Nerithos - Sanctuary wrote: »And you, Alexeno, posting self-admitted offtopic statements and replying to other people with what amounts to "OMG I'M STUBBORN UR WRONG LOL," are not a troll? That's a hilarious assumption.
when did i say i'm not a troll?
i've stated on multiple threads that i'm a troll lol
i'm also highly helpful to those who need it, and my trolling is only on topics where people are being idiots :P[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
Would you say you were being helpful in this thread? You contributed nothing meaningful at all with respect to the OP's question.0
-
Nerithos - Sanctuary wrote: »Would you say you were being helpful in this thread? You contributed nothing meaningful at all with respect to the OP's question.
my participation in this thread was specifically to correct an incorrect statement. people decided to counter-debate my statement (which was pointless on their part, you can't argue against fact). i could have just ignored them, however i decided it would be best to prove both to them and to anyone observing the thread that they are wrong.
grade 7 or higher gemstones give an animation to weapons. simple fact[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »my participation in this thread was specifically to correct an incorrect statement. people decided to counter-debate my statement (which was pointless on their part, you can't argue against fact). i could have just ignored them, however i decided it would be best to prove both to them and to anyone observing the thread that they are wrong.
grade 7 or higher gemstones give an animation to weapons. simple fact
unless those shards(as they are called in this gameb:chuckle) are primeaval or savant stones... because primeaval and savant stones gives no effect on weapons0 -
Beatrixxx - Lost City wrote: »unless those shards(as they are called in this gameb:chuckle) are primeaval or savant stones... because primeaval and savant stones gives no effect on weapons
hence why i specifically mentioned grade b:sweat[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
"Hell hath no fury like Alexeno trying to prove his point" -Mizuoni0 -
Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »when did i say i'm not a troll?
i've stated on multiple threads that i'm a troll lol
Congratulations. You've just admitted that you're a hypocrite.Alexeno - Sanctuary wrote: »my participation in this thread was specifically to correct an incorrect statement. people decided to counter-debate my statement (which was pointless on their part, you can't argue against fact). i could have just ignored them, however i decided it would be best to prove both to them and to anyone observing the thread that they are wrong.
grade 7 or higher gemstones give an animation to weapons. simple fact
This still doesn't bypass the fact that it was still irrelevant to the topic and that you couldn't comprehend a very simple statement's meaning. And where has anyone in this entire thread did someone say that G7(+) soul shards did not give out any additional animation?Jesus - Dreamweaver wrote: »Learn to read.[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
♥ - 藤林 杏-様 - ♥
♥ Kyou Fujibayashi-sama ♥0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 181.9K PWI
- 697 Official Announcements
- 2 Rules of Conduct
- 264 Cabbage Patch Notes
- 61K General Discussion
- 1.5K Quality Corner
- 11.1K Suggestion Box
- 77.4K Archosaur City
- 3.5K Cash Shop Huddle
- 14.3K Server Symposium
- 18.1K Dungeons & Tactics
- 2K The Crafting Nook
- 4.9K Guild Banter
- 6.6K The Trading Post
- 28K Class Discussion
- 1.9K Arigora Colosseum
- 78 TW & Cross Server Battles
- 337 Nation Wars
- 8.2K Off-Topic Discussion
- 3.7K The Fanatics Forum
- 207 Screenshots and Videos
- 22.8K Support Desk