How on earth can you (or anyone, not just you specifically) determine what the majority want when you yourself admit that those that didn't vote likely don't read the forums or don't have time for the forums? The truth of the matter is that there is no way to tell what they want, and as has been stated in numerous posts,…
That's a ridiculous assumption. I know plenty of gamers who don't read or post on the forums of the games they play because they feel that the time they have for games is best spent playing them, and they don't necessarily have a ton of time on their hands. As a matter of fact, one could make the argument that the players…
I have read the replies. Have you? Yes, you have some people who agree with you. And you have plenty who say that you do have a superior attitude. For example, the reply just below the one I am quoting from you. So, if you are saying that you're right about your points because there are people who agree with you, then by…
No, that is not another 1650 votes. First of all, the likelihood of having many of the votes in that poll being from the same people who voted in this one is quite high. Therefore, you cannot simply say it's 1650 more votes. But even more importantly, the options in the other poll you linked are distinctly different. So,…
And here is why your post is a waste of time. You come in with a superior attitude (just get someone with an unbiased point of view to tell you how the title of your thread comes off) and you use terms like "the way of thinking you all have." It's very easy to see that you're full of yourself and can only see things from…
This poll is meaningless. As of this post, there are fewer than 300 votes on it. It would be completely ridiculous to assume how the people who are not coming to the forums and reading this would vote, nor would it be smart to assume anything about what percent of the cash-shoppers do and don't read the forums. If I were…