"Gs means nothing" is a flawed statement. What you're saying is that it would make zero difference if one team of 5 players with no items whatsoever fought 5 people wearing the very best gear possible - both teams having an equal chance. What you probably meant is "Gs isn't the be all and end all" which is true, but what…
Nothing, but you've missed the point that you've made the majority of games balanced leaving just a handful. Your attitude advocates suicide today, because you're going to die one day anyway, so might as well.
I know, but bots are less of a problem to me from my point of view. Your idea would work because there's no point kitting bots out, they're there to play 24hrs and lose every single match yet still gain enough glory to buys items for sale into AD. (At least that's my assumption, I guess Blizzard or someone might be behind…
I like the idea, as someone who didn't take advantage of AD exploits and has had a literal approach to the concept of free-to-play PvP is highly entertaining up until level 60 where it instantly turns into an exercise of pointless futility. I have no gripe against people with far better gear than me, good on them for being…
or the people who don't want to pay $30 for a virtual horse can leave and play another game. Which looking at the problems with PvP is looking likely to happen. The low gear bots standing there doing basic attacks are a problem, ruining teams giving severe handicaps to anyone lumbered with them. The general team balancing…