Wow, this thread blew up. I think a lot of the QQers and general bads misunderstood the purpose of this thread. This isn't about concentrating on any one class. "GWF is OP!" "No, Rogue is OP!" "No, CW is OP!" Well maybe they're all OP in their own way and need to be adjusted? I sure as hell dont like this "I'm rock,…
It doesnt matter if their damage is lower if their opponent never gets to attack back. "Yeah sure, I can pretty much mitigate all incoming damage through stealth and pick and choose my fights without effort, but my damage is only okay." Yeah, but you're still theoretically freaking invulnerable. Stop trying to defend your…
You make a good point. I'd be fine with balanced teams, as long as there's some sense of fairness to the match. It just sucks so much when you get a full team of people fresh into 60 with their broker-bought blues and they have to get stomped over and over again before they can compete. Hell, balanced matches would also…
The only people defending rogues are, gasp, rogues. Yeah, you got nerfed, but I still have videos from post-nerf in which rogues are literally two shotting people with ease. Their damage is too high. You know what I think is more pathetic than how unbalanced rogues are? How many of the class-carried idiots playing them…
So instead of pretending to be strikers, you want us to pretend to be defenders? How about instead we have the capability to spec into either role? If my gear is all offense and no defense, there's no reason I shouldnt be able to do as much damage as a rogue. Well, rogues will be miffed that somebody has damage anywhere…
It'd be nice if you actually read the thread before trying to spew your nonsense. If you'd actually been paying attention, you'd have seen that none of us are actually getting to participate (Hint: Not being able to participate isnt "fun"). We talk in logic and numbers because they're what counts in the scheme of things.…
Well yeah, they are OP. Every trickster rogue will tell you otherwise, but when have FotM class-carried players ever actually told the truth about their class? If every other class agrees that they're overpowered, bad news for some rogues :P Its just a matter of time until the OP specs get pummeled into the ground (Looking…
Your solution is? What, remove the class? Leave it as a trap that people will fall into if they dont do enough research on the forums to figure out they aren't wanted endgame? Also, apparently reading comprehension is not a lot of you lot's strong point, so I'll clarify: 1. As is, there is no point in taking a GWF over any…
Total damage done doesnt really matter. It's more about effective damage. We'd always laugh back in the days of WoW when the rogue would jump in and fan of knives his way up to stupid damage done on the DPS charts. Didnt mean the mobs actually died any faster. Do 50 damage to 10 mobs and its gonna list you as doing 500…
See, this is the kind of input I was hoping for. If they want us to be AoE, and they want AoE to actually be desired, they need to make it necessary. As is, there is little point to us. Too many games these days are popping up with the idea that Warrior archetypes need to be AoE, but arent actually changing the traditional…
I speak for the majority of the seasoned mmo vets who are playing Neverwinter. You know, the ones who are /kicking GWFs in favor of TRs in endgame instances. Contribute or leave, otherwise I'm going to ignore anything you say in this thread.
If a class is able to one shot people, that class is too powerful and its damage needs to be toned down. Almost every rogue arguing against this is just being class-carried and doesnt want to rely on actually learning to pvp. When your ttk (time to kill) another class is 10 times faster than everyone else? You're OP and…
While I totally get your argument against stacking ARP, I'm confused about what ARP has to do with strength? Isn't strength simply 1% more damage per point above 10? Your point is valid, but it seems to negate stacking constitution, not stacking strength? Can you please verify?