test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

#1.2 "get off my node" – Discussion Thread

nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
edited May 2015 in PvP Discussion
fzgmULR.jpg

Hey PVP-Community!

Anything you want to discuss about upcoming GOMN #1.2? Drop your opinions, questions, suggestions or feedback in here!

Everything is very welcome and I'll try to provide as many answers as I can to clear any confusions. Based on your questions we will also update the FAQ continually. The more questions you have the better so to say. (:

This might be also helpful: Tournament Information and FAQ
The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
Post edited by Unknown User on
«1

Comments

  • jayrad8jayrad8 Member Posts: 210 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Hehe I remember this from last year/summer and I appreciate the player-driven effort to create something for the pvp community -- few questions/concerns that you may or may not want to update the OP/FAQ with.
    nuudlz wrote: »
    Dear PVP-community,
    sick of running premades and fighting in/against pug-groups all day? Or sick of running into premades? Well this is your chance to prove yourself in the "first" GOMN Domination Tournament in Neverwinter!
    nuudlz wrote: »
    • There will be only one bracket

    Will there be any match-up dependency based on individual IL, average team IL, etc.? iirc you were previously going to do multiple brackets based on gear score in M3. But in any case, if a 2-3k IL team registers and then gets matched versus 4.8k+ monsters first round, it doesn't sound like it will alleviate the "sick of running into premades as pugs" or "sick of running into pugs as premade" ordeal. Something like 4K+ and below 4K, or additional tiers, might encourage more participants. Hosting matches on the test server could be one of many options to alleviate gear discrepancies.

    To be frank, veteran players do not need a tournament or prize to participate in premades or organized pvp, and I would go as far as to say that if they really are invested in making the pvp community better, they should not participate or should be confined to their own bracket, and I would encourage them to volunteer to mentor or back-up other teams instead. In my opinion, a community tournament should be centered as much as possible around inspiring competition from new talent, new pvp community members, new guilds, etc.

    As it stands, this scenario may very well happen:
    1. Known top tier pvp guild or players post their registration here
    2. New guilds and pvp community members remember these guilds or players, being stomped, etc.
    3. New guilds and pvp community members see they will be in the same bracket as these guilds/players
    4. New guilds and pvp community members decide against registering
    5. Tournament becomes nothing but a public ego boost for the winner
    nuudlz wrote: »
    • Only rainbow teams are allowed

    Is this:

    A. Matched comp rainbows
    ie. Team 1 has TR/SW/DC/OP/CW so Team 2 must also field/match this comp.
    or

    B. Any rainbow vs. Any rainbow
    ie. Team 1 and Team 2 have unannouced rainbow comps (element of surprise?), they que up, and so long as it is in fact rainbow vs rainbow, the match proceeds/counts.

    That said, I would be happy to help you with this event if you want :cool:
    Ezra@jayrad8 | M4 CW Class Advocate
    twitch.tv/ezracw | absolutegaming.guildportal.com
    #BringBackShard | M5 CW Bug List | My M3 PvP Gameplay
    PpkM0MK.png

  • nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    jayrad8 wrote: »
    ...

    Hey Ezra!
    I really appriciate your constructive questions. Lemme catch the answers for you (and put them into the FAQ):
    Will there be any match-up dependency based on individual IL
    Base on our experience from the last try in 2013 we can't put up multiple brackets yet (based on player numbers). It is also very hard to control since there are alot of new players playing this game. Back in mod3 we were mostly able to see who's "cheating" with GS and who's not based on their @-handles. Nowadays... we lost track.

    That's the reason why we only run a single bracket. But further GOMN will maybe a multiple bracket tournament.
    A. Matched comp rainbows
    ie. Team 1 has TR/SW/DC/OP/CW so Team 2 must also field/match this comp.

    That's the reason why we allowed every team 3 backup players. There are 8 classes out there and it is hard to match comps right now. But we still want to keep it as fair as possible. But I will leave the discussion open for the facing teams. There are some groups out there that can't provide a SW for example.
    B. Any rainbow vs. Any rainbow
    ie. Team 1 and Team 2 have unannouced rainbow comps (element of surprise?), they que up, and so long as it is in fact rainbow vs rainbow, the match proceeds/counts.

    Nonono - only the match the teams scheduled to face each other will count. Friendly matches or anything else won't count.
    The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

    We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
  • quspivquspiv Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,087 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    First off, thank you for the effort as well as rewards. It would be nice if you'd ban all the armor and weapon enchants (some of them are bugged while others are simply broken OP) Creating Max Item lvl might also help creating more balance fights, though im sure there would be people who would try to abuse it, but with banned enchants it would be a lot harder.
  • nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    quspiv wrote: »
    First off, thank you for the effort as well as rewards.

    Hi & thank you!
    It would be nice if you'd ban all the armor and weapon enchants (some of them are bugged while others are simply broken OP) Creating Max Item lvl might also help creating more balance fights, though im sure there would be people who would try to abuse it, but with banned enchants it would be a lot harder.

    I like your idea but sadly we are unable to control it. People may switch out their gear and stuff. Even with ACT we can't provide a match with your rules. That's the reason why decided to allow every piece of item.

    I hope you can understand or decision.

    Greetings!
    The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

    We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
  • delfeluguedelfelugue Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 24 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    hi,
    thank for the effort to do a tournament.
    i have some question.
    you do only bracket like play tennis tournament ? there is no preliminary round ?

    i think it's better to do some preliminary round or a double elmination bracket because the team have just 1 match.
    or we can do a BO3 single bracket.

    if i come with my team and loose the match the tournament are end.... this not a very good experience and competitivty tournament.

    second question is about rainbow team : this mean only 1 class per team ? and the backup player are the same ?

    exemple : rainbow team = CW/DC/HR/TR/OP and backup player SW/GF/GWF
    or we can have rainbow team GWF/DC/HR/TR/ CW and backup player CW/TR/DC.

    for players who said this a P2W tournament, with this configuration of bracket yes.... but if you do preliminary round with seeded or a BO3 or a double elimations bracket, perhaps is better for low team.
  • vasdamasvasdamas Member Posts: 2,461 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Alright, how are you going to regulate players using different broken things that multiproc or work in some questionable and arguably broken way? I saw that "It's up to cryptic to fix bugs" note but you also mention ACT and logs that you could use if one thinks there was something wrong in a match which totally leads me to confusion. Not to mention for some people running ACT causes FPS drop. Is it all out of war or idk
  • martianmnhuntermartianmnhunter Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 236 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    This should be ran on the preview server because:

    1. It eliminates gear gap.
    2. You can control which enchant/artifact to ban (feytouched, lifedrinker, wheel are all broken on certain classes atm).
  • nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    delfelugue wrote: »
    hi

    Hey.
    i think it's better to do some preliminary round or a double elmination bracket because the team have just 1 match.
    or we can do a BO3 single bracket.
    I fully agree with you and Double Elimination would be alot better but based on the experience from the last (and only) pvp tournament (Fistful of Zen) the double elimination had the problem that teams couldn't get their match sync'd and running.

    For the start of the series we decided to run SE to test out how the match scheduling will work. If we are kinda successful we might switch to DSE for the next one.
    this not a very good experience and competitivty tournament.
    Actually there is /NO/ experience at all in this tournament because it's our first one.
    second question is about rainbow team : this mean only 1 class per team ?
    Yes, per match.
    and the backup player are the same ?
    The idea of having backup players is to provide the possibility to match compositions with the facing enemy every time. But that's only the idea and not a must-have.
    exemple : rainbow team = CW/DC/HR/TR/OP and backup player SW/GF/GWF
    or we can have rainbow team GWF/DC/HR/TR/ CW and backup player CW/TR/DC.
    Both.
    vasdamas wrote: »
    ...

    Hi.
    Alright, how are you going to regulate players using different broken things that multiproc or work in some questionable and arguably broken way?

    We can't decide what's broken and what's not in general. For example: Right now Shadow Opportunity is broken by multiproccing. But people already used before it was bugged. Can we force them to not use it then? No. It would be a huge disadvantage for the whole Sabo build. But facing teams are allowed to talk to each other before the match. So they can regulate such things on their own.
    I saw that "It's up to cryptic to fix bugs" note but you also mention ACT and logs that you could use if one thinks there was something wrong in a match

    The ACT log is only to check if someone used Elixir of Life or if someone broke a rule the two teams set up before their match (for example: SW bug is not allowed, both teams agreed on it).
    Not to mention for some people running ACT causes FPS drop.
    It is easier to just run battlelog=1 and import it later into ACT to prevent FPS drop. If you still can't run it, let another teammember run it.
    ...

    Hi.
    This should be ran on the preview server because:

    1. It eliminates gear gap.
    2. You can control which enchant/artifact to ban (feytouched, lifedrinker, wheel are all broken on certain classes atm).

    Preview server is a good idea but up to the facing teams. Sometimes the PTR isn't up or even more laggy than the live one. We will put this into the rules.

    //
    Please remember that this is a player driven event. We can only work with the tools we have and our administration/moderation possibilities are very limited.
    The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

    We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
  • venomous10venomous10 Member Posts: 33 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    cool idea. the preview server is pretty much the only viable way to do this tbh considering the massive gear gap between everyone.
  • rustlordrustlord Member Posts: 1,454 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    This would have been more fun if it was a 1v1 or tag-team tournament. Aren't we all bored out of our heads with Domination since...idk two modules ago? Preview IWD would totally make organizing such small matches more convenient, albeit the issues of lag.

    With regards to the P2W issue, it makes sense to hand out free R10 and Perfect enchants to everyone participating if it was on Preview cuz, boo yah, items there got no real value.

    PS: See, I have a Preview stash enough for 3 ppl. Oh yeah, there's my team! And everyone can do the same.
  • ralexinorralexinor Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 576 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    If one team doesn't have or doesn't want to play with classes like OP or TR for example, will the other team match it? No offense, but matches are more fun when you have no TR/OP because it allows for rotations.
  • rustlordrustlord Member Posts: 1,454 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    ralexinor wrote: »
    If one team doesn't have or doesn't want to play with classes like OP or TR for example, will the other team match it? No offense, but matches are more fun when you have no TR/OP because it allows for rotations.

    If it were smaller teams of 2 or 3, maybe easier to have separate brackets. All classes are equally broken in one aspect or another, but what exactly would you hope to accomplish by leaving out the biggest population of PvP? It's hard enough to say that tournaments like this get willing participants to begin with.
  • nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    ralexinor wrote: »
    If one team doesn't have or doesn't want to play with classes like OP or TR for example, will the other team match it?

    Hey -
    this decision really depends on the facing teams. I actually can't think of a rule that would be fair for both. That's the problem of too many classes :/. And on top of this not every team might be able to have enough players without a TR or OP (3 backup players is not a must-have).

    This is only for the "doesn't want to play with/against" part. For the "doesn't have" one we've to figure something out to match comps. The problem is still the same tho' - too many classes.

    Also this "my first time" so I have no idea how rainbowish the teams are going to be. You can see this as an experiment for further events.
    No offense, but matches are more fun when you have no TR/OP because it allows for rotations.

    None taken. (:
    The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

    We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
  • vasdamasvasdamas Member Posts: 2,461 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    nuudlz wrote: »
    The ACT log is only to check if someone used Elixir of Life or if someone broke a rule the two teams set up before their match (for example: SW bug is not allowed, both teams agreed on it).
    Oh yes...bug...ignorance is bliss. Thanks anyway ^^
  • nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    vasdamas wrote: »
    Oh yes...bug...ignorance is bliss. Thanks anyway ^^

    Well if it's not bugged and actually WAI then please excuse me. I'm not a SW expert and barely know the feats. (But that's not what this thread is about.)

    It's not my intention to fingerpoint any class. I just wanted to give you an example for your question about the ACT logs. You can replace it with

    -- Bugged Feytouch
    -- Multiproccing SO
    -- Multiproccing SS

    and so on.
    The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

    We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
  • edited May 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    metalldjt wrote: »
    with the class and players you sign up, thats how you will finish the tournament.
    So you are saying that matching comps doesn't matter at all? I'm pretty sure we can discuss this idea in here.
    and maybe you can set up a rule as all participants will use rank7 and perfects.
    Sure - just tell me how to provide this rule? How will you control that someone is not using r12 and trans during the match?
    or no broken enchants.
    We have no idea which enchantment will still be broken when the tournament is going to start.
    lets see someth nice with this Noodle PVP TOURNAMENT.
    Yes - that's what are we trying to do. And everybody who's willing to contribute is very welcome.
    The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

    We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
  • edited May 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    metalldjt wrote: »
    gwf/tr/dc/pala/cw against sw/tr/dc/pala/hr

    i dont see a reason why this wouldn't be balanced or why would you have to change.

    But SW/HR/GF/GWF/CW vs. TR/GWF/OP/DC/CW seems pretty rough to me.
    but what you would like to set a rule is not having dc and pala in the same team, or tr/pala in the same team.

    We are not allowed to set a rule (banning class combinations) like this by the ToS:
    For player run events, it must be free to participate and open to the public. We cannot allow events to be posted that have any type of cover or admission charge. As for in-game prizes, that is not against the rules to do. You can freely give away in-game prizes and such for events or giveaways. As I said though, there just cannot be any fee for participation and it cannot be exclusive - meaning it has to be able to be participated in by anyone in game. E.G. it cannot be only for guilds, specific class, etc. Real world (physical) prized are not allowed however.

    . . . The only issue I see here at the moment is the part about Fees. We cannot allow that unfortunately. However, you can put in a line saying that you are accepting donations, you just cannot specify what that donation has to be or that the donation is mandatory.

    . . . As this is a work in progress, I'll leave the threads open for now but if this isn't remedied soon, I'll need to shut this down.

    Safe travels,
    Archmage Zebular of Mystryl

    You can find the original post here.
    The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

    We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
  • vvergvverg Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 199 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    We can't decide what's broken and what's not in general. For example: Right now Shadow Opportunity is broken by multiproccing. But people already used before it was bugged. Can we force them to not use it then? No. It would be a huge disadvantage for the whole Sabo build. But facing teams are allowed to talk to each other before the match. So they can regulate such things on their own.

    Only broken cause of multi proccing? I think that Shadow Oppurtunity is broken in general and you as CS member know that, since your guild (like the other 3 known PvP guilds) are abusing it like crazy together with Lostmauth set. Or don't you notice the very easy kills by just spamming CoS? At least Lifedrinker got fixed cause your guild also liked that Enchant a lot.

    Funny that you mention SW as a bug but pretty much allow a broken path as Sab (and the excuse for saying using it before mod 6 is also bs, since most of the PvP TR's were Exec TR's in mod 5). Cause I can also mention that a Fury Hellbring SW simply can't evade using Hand of Blight simply cause it's the only Necrotic At-Will (next to Spiral which is more like a buff than a DPS At-Will). So saying Sab is allowed and let the SW stuff be judged when the match starts is very hypocritical. Next to that, also a OP can get this "0 damage" thing and TR's in lesser degree.

    But anyways probably just few guilds that will join this tournament simply cause allowing these several PvP Guilds known for the WAI stuff play in this and most simply don't want to spend any time in this (like me). PvP should be about teamplay and skills, not who ever abuses the most bugged or overpowered stuff. It's nothing personal and I know few people in PvP Guilds try to evade WAI stuff but from my own experience + the forum topics it's known that a lot of players have seen this and that simply gives these guilds a bad reputation.

    As long all these bugs are in the game, a tournament is a bad idea. If I have to bring up a team full of people specced for WAI stuff I simply won't enjoy it. Also the person that will be the "judge" should be someone that has simply has no connection with EoA, 7k, CS and Absolute, cause else its always biased even when you try to be neutral.

    Not to mention that the amount of ppl that have IL: 4k+ is not that large so competing against a premade with 4k+ ppl for a lot of people is simply an instant loss.
    signature-lili.png
  • nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    vverg wrote: »
    Only broken cause of multi proccing? I think that Shadow Oppurtunity is broken in general

    Broken because of multiproccing, yes. The rest is WAI - even tho' the feat itself is op.
    Funny that you mention SW as a bug but pretty much allow a broken path as Sab (and the excuse for saying using it before mod 6 is also bs, since most of the PvP TR's were Exec TR's in mod 5). Cause I can also mention that a Fury Hellbring SW simply can't evade using Hand of Blight simply cause it's the only Necrotic At-Will (next to Spiral which is more like a buff than a DPS At-Will). So saying Sab is allowed and let the SW stuff be judged when the match starts is very hypocritical. Next to that, also a OP can get this "0 damage" thing and TR's in lesser degree.
    It's not my intention to fingerpoint any class. I just wanted to give you an example for your question about the ACT logs. You can replace it with

    -- Bugged Feytouch
    -- Multiproccing SO
    -- Multiproccing SS

    and so on.

    And I can't force you to believe that most premade TRs played Sab in mod5 after the initial fix from Shadow Of Demise.
    But anyways probably just few guilds that will join this tournament
    Which would be start.
    most simply don't want to spend any time in this (like me).
    And that's absolutely fine. But I don't understand the difference between queueing up with your team in matchmaking or queueing up with your team against your tourney opponent. The tournament doesn't change the PvP ingame at all and the only thing you're going to miss is the chance of winning something.
    PvP should be about teamplay and skills
    Thats why we are trying to set up more Premades vs Premades with a tournament like this.
    not who ever abuses the most bugged or overpowered stuff.
    We can't fix bugs. We can't fix overpowered items/powers. We can't provide different PvP modes. What we can provide, or actually trying to provide is a base.
    As long all these bugs are in the game, a tournament is a bad idea.
    Maybe - maybe not. There always will be bugs in the game and always people using these bugs to their advantage. Of course it would be awesome if there were no bugs at all but I'm not responsible for that or players actions. I still want to try it out. And if it doesn't work at all I will atleast know it.
    Also the person that will be the "judge" should be someone that has simply has no connection with EoA, 7k, CS and Absolute, cause else its always biased even when you try to be neutral.

    1.) There won't be a judge at all. Facing teams are completly free to talk to each other and make up match rules.
    2.) Yes - maybe a neutral person would be better... but someone has at least to start a thing like this.
    Not to mention that the amount of ppl that have IL: 4k+ is not that large so competing against a premade with 4k+ ppl for a lot of people is simply an instant loss.

    The teams are allowed to play against each other on the PTR to odd out the gear gaps.
    The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

    We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
  • ninefingers222ninefingers222 Member Posts: 141 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    metalldjt wrote: »
    thats the thing, no backup players and u can't change classes.
    with the class and players you sign up, thats how you will finish the tournament.
    and maybe you can set up a rule as all participants will use rank7 and perfects. or no broken enchants.

    lets see someth nice with this Noodle PVP TOURNAMENT.


    That is like the stupidest idea ever, you of all people (a pvp'er) should know some classes take better advantage of having rank 7s than others, some classes in mod 6 actually have to be BiS or close to BiS to be a threat at all, GWF, HR, SW for example ...

    As for Broken enchants, what enchant is not broken? I am rocking a trans vorpal and I am debuffing myself FFS, hopefully by the 10th of July the devs will have pulled their thumbs out of their @sses and will have fixed PvP ...
    Essence of Aggression, OG PvP GWF
  • nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    metalldjt wrote: »
    again this tournament is presented as something that will show " PvE-rs that PvP-ers can do someth constructive", but by settin this unspoken rule ALOT OF PEOPLE WITH TRANS and RANK12, no one will want to attend, especially when you are using a prize of 6mil AD , meaning that it's not for FUN!

    I'm not really sure why the gear gap is still a thing since we made it pretty clear that facing teams can do their matches on the PTR to even it out and everybody can rock in BiS gear. \o/

    And about the tournament pot - if people really don't want any prize I'm down for that. I bet we can discuss this idea here.
    The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

    We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
  • bertrandxbertrandx Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 147 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    I probably won't participate but I just want to say that the 6mil in GMOP in prizes is a great incentive for decently-high-level-but-not-BiS players to be part of the tournament. I know I wouldn't be the least interested in it if it wasn't for the prizes, because what's the difference then between playing premade domination and be part of the tourney? and probably a lot of players think like me on this matter.
    Bert - Lv70 pathfinder trapper. How's sunny california?
  • vasdamasvasdamas Member Posts: 2,461 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    nuudlz wrote: »
    I'm not really sure why the gear gap is still a thing since we made it pretty clear that facing teams can do their matches on the PTR to even it out and everybody can rock in BiS gear. \o/
    I believe they just can't force themselves to refine all the stuff on PT or got noone to give them the enchantments so they could copy the chars on preview. In other words, even if it's a big prize - every one is lazy.
    As for me, I am not sure if I'd want to participate in this tournament since I am 99% sure there will be toxict enviroment during the match or after even though I could use some GMOPs. Besides I am a PvP SW, something that should probably never step into pvp at all and they broke a couple of our essential pvp powers recently like IS or HS, which makes me even less motivated.
  • nuudlznuudlz Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 285 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    vasdamas wrote: »
    I believe they just can't force themselves to refine all the stuff on PT or got noone to give them the enchantments so they could copy the chars on preview.

    Even that shouldn't be an issue because we can offer players R12s and Trans.-Enchantments on the PTR. Of course we can't give out full refined Artifact-Equip. due to the fact its BoP. But with the reworked refinment system and the possibility to refine stacks it won't take that long and isn't a huge pain in the ***.

    We can't help with everything but we can make things alot easier.

    Also it is easier to provide everyone with BiS gear on the PTR than trying to control that people only run with R7s and only perfects at maximum.

    We'll update the FAQ to make this more clear.
    The Zisters' Magazine - Subscribe now and you'll never run out of style.

    We are always looking for new models --- Borderline Fashiondolls ---
  • overdriver13overdriver13 Member Posts: 1,521 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    Unfortunately I am taking an involuntary leave of this game (pc down). I would love to see more player-created events.

    To be honest, this tourney will pretty much have to be a free for all in order to work. There is no way to enforce any kind of rules about what can be used during a match. You'll end up with sheer chaos and no one really knowing if matches were won via playing by the rules.

    PVP has always been about powergaming. You make your toon and playstyle as strong as you can given the resources everyone has access to. The whole legit/not legit thing is silly. PVP is out of control because the game is buggy as hell, period. As long as there is a good flow of information the playing field is even. I won't be on here any time soon to respond to this but really: everyone has access to the same classes, the same bugged powers, the same bugged enchants, everything. We can say it comes down to p2w. It doesn't. It is the same as always: you pay to buy in to the top tier of competition. Everything else (gear, bugs, everything) being the same- it is the better players who win.
  • userutf8userutf8 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 270 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    with all those problems, that are well-known, i still like the idea, but it's really hard to implement tho.
    Preview server seems like a nice idea to me.
    If you need any help with gearing people on preview, i think we (channel) may help a bit.
    ABSOLUTE
  • icyphishicyphish Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,255 Arc User
    edited May 2015
    You did it right, that's the purpose of Node 2 and Node 4, this is also why silly goose stays silly, and strong players stays strong:D
    morenthar wrote: »
    Is Midnight Express the PvP reject guild? Considering some of the gear I see them running around with, they aren't very good. I hate to paint with such a broad brush, I'm sure some of them are just fine. But seriously, I run into some that can't fight their way out of a paper bag.

    One of their TRs actually had the audacity to call me a coward for "hiding" among the NPCs on Node 4. Of course, he instantly ignored me after the PM. I thought strategy indicates that one should use the NPCs to your advantage? Silly me.
    icydrake%20avatar2_zpsg7rp0xti.jpg

    Author of GWF Speed Demon PvP Build (Mod 11) <- Click to reveal the Speedy Beast! >:)
  • bertrandxbertrandx Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 147 Arc User
    So uhhh, sorry for the 2months-necroing. Did this tournament take place after all ? I'm not finding any more posts related to it since this discussion derailed and got moderated back then. No news about it ?
    Bert - Lv70 pathfinder trapper. How's sunny california?
Sign In or Register to comment.