test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Class Forums› The Militia Barracks

Do GF and GWF need their own Forums?

sadus671sadus671 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 204 Arc User
edited June 2015 in The Militia Barracks
I noticed a specific forum was created for Paladin.

Seems silly to me that GF and GWF are the only classes that share a forum.

I attached Poll on this.. maybe folks don't care...

Thanks.
-= Primary Characters =-

- Forge (GF)
- Apocalypse - (DC)
- Sadus (OP)
- Fireball (GWF)
- Ixian (CW)

Thank you Loadouts for allowing my toons to be all the things... they ever wanted to be....
Post edited by Unknown User on

Comments

  • dreamhuntressxdreamhuntressx Member Posts: 453 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Yes. Its been long overdue.

    EDIT: btw, if that ever happens, the GF subforum should be named The Bastion.
    Leanan Sidhe (not "The Dresde Files" fairy!) - NW Legit Channel Moderator
    NW Legit Channel Rules | NW Legit Forum Rules
    NW Legit Leanan Rules
  • zvieriszvieris Member Posts: 1,261 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    GWF and GF have got separate forums for Xbox too... So this is bull****.
  • thestaggythestaggy Member Posts: 1,102 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2015
    No.

    They're both Fighters and they share paragons. Whether we like it or not, they are of the same blood.
    PSA: You don't need to grind Spinward Rise for your Elemental artifact main hand if you have some AD lying around. You can craft it via the Tyranny of Dragon's campaign screen.
  • setimoselosetimoselo Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 109 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Yes
    They also need their own paragons...

    (They might both be "fighters" in name but they play two completely different roles...)
    23uvq8m.png
  • rinat114rinat114 Member Posts: 913 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Lol and yet they make a complete different forum for Paladin, BUT HEY THEY WEAR GF CLOTHES HELLO
    r4zkC9t.png
    The Holy Crusaders guild leader     ♚ Mod 10 PVE Destroyer GWF guide ♚ Founding member of the Relentless Alliance
  • daalydaaly Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 84 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    Long overdue and needs to be done...as for the paragon sharing the 2 classes should never have shared...
  • zvieriszvieris Member Posts: 1,261 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    thestaggy wrote: »
    No.

    They're both Fighters and they share paragons. Whether we like it or not, they are of the same blood.

    That's a dumb excuse. The "fighter" word in the class names are the only things they share. They don't share weapons, armor, skills, mechanics. Yeah, you say they share paragons? Try comparing GF's Threatening rush with GWF's. Now tell me how ambiguous does a topic about threatening rush power sounds in these mixed forums?

    Besides, xbox version got separate forums already. I'm speechless as to how ignorant can the devs be.
  • theoddis1theoddis1 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 353 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    zvieris wrote: »
    That's a dumb excuse. The "fighter" word in the class names are the only things they share. They don't share weapons, armor, skills, mechanics. Yeah, you say they share paragons? Try comparing GF's Threatening rush with GWF's. Now tell me how ambiguous does a topic about threatening rush power sounds in these mixed forums?

    Besides, xbox version got separate forums already. I'm speechless as to how ignorant can the devs be.

    TROOF!

    man I been saying this for 4 mods
  • thestaggythestaggy Member Posts: 1,102 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2015
    setimoselo wrote: »
    (They might both be "fighters" in name but they play two completely different roles...)

    Then explain why a Sentinel has the tools to overlap with a GF? Not saying the Sentinel works(ed) as intended, but the intention is there nonetheless; generate and tank aggro. Just like a GF.

    The GWF has marking abilities. Just like the GF.
    zvieris wrote: »
    That's a dumb excuse. The "fighter" word in the class names are the only things they share. They don't share weapons, armor, skills, mechanics. Yeah, you say they share paragons? Try comparing GF's Threatening rush with GWF's. Now tell me how ambiguous does a topic about threatening rush power sounds in these mixed forums?

    Besides, xbox version got separate forums already. I'm speechless as to how ignorant can the devs be.

    You mention Threatening Rush? It was originally a copy and paste but was changed not because the Devs wanted to separate the Fighters but because GWFs in PVP were using it to stick to you like glue.

    Again, the GWF was given a tanking path, clearly indicating the intended overlap.
    PSA: You don't need to grind Spinward Rise for your Elemental artifact main hand if you have some AD lying around. You can craft it via the Tyranny of Dragon's campaign screen.
  • theoddis1theoddis1 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 353 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    thestaggy wrote: »
    Then explain why a Sentinel has the tools to overlap with a GF? Not saying the Sentinel works(ed) as intended, but the intention is there nonetheless; generate and tank aggro. Just like a GF.

    The GWF has marking abilities. Just like the GF.



    You mention Threatening Rush? It was originally a copy and paste but was changed not because the Devs wanted to separate the Fighters but because GWFs in PVP were using it to stick to you like glue.

    Again, the GWF was given a tanking path, clearly indicating the intended overlap.
    ok so the classes overlap.... we know this
    we arent dumb what we are saying is

    "ITS CONFUSING WHEN YOU SEE A THREAD ABOUT SWORDMASTER AND DONT FIND OUT TILL PAGE 3 THAT IS SWORDMASTER GWF VICE VERSA"

    I understand they are twin classes, cut from the same cloth, brothers from the same mother, both fighters. BUT it makes the forums unnecessarily complicated so regardless how much they are kin and you feel like they should be together

    they are not the same class. if it was seperate the SM from the IV GFs I would agree but they arent the same class they dont spec the same ... you cant throw a GF build on a GWF
  • koalazebraiikoalazebraii Member Posts: 108 Bounty Hunter
    edited April 2015
    thestaggy wrote: »
    No.

    They're both Fighters and they share paragons. Whether we like it or not, they are of the same blood.

    lmao the stupidest post in this thread.

    it needs a seperate forum BECAUSE the first step in receiving feedback is sorting them out.
  • damnaciousdamnacious Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 354 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    thestaggy wrote: »
    No.

    They're both Fighters and they share paragons. Whether we like it or not, they are of the same blood.

    I think they should have their own separate forums yet you are completely correct that they are of the same blood.

    If people were to read the 4th edition D&D then it's detailed that both GWF and GF are of the Fighter class.

    The Paladin however is not of the Fighter class.
  • zacazuzacazu Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,934 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    damnacious wrote: »
    I think they should have their own separate forums yet you are completely correct that they are of the same blood.

    If people were to read the 4th edition D&D then it's detailed that both GWF and GF are of the Fighter class.

    The Paladin however is not of the Fighter class.

    +1. but keep the same forum is just a lazy formality.
  • nezraalnezraal Member, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    they expect gwf to die first then gf to die. in that context, creating gf and gwf separate in forums is too much work. please don't waste time of the busy developers who are planning an early retirement or giving other job interviews.
    + PvP Sentinel Guide for Mod4, Mod5 Viable
    + CAGI Calcultator
    + Liquid Tear Website
  • runonnikerunonnike Member Posts: 337 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    I voted for "don't care" because OPs and more similar to GFs than GWFs, yet they have their own thread. Combining/separating these forums might be too confusing.

    However, my other worry is that if GFs got their own forum, there might be little to no posts.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • b3llist0rb3llist0r Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 191 Arc User
    edited April 2015
    thestaggy wrote: »
    No.
    They're both Fighters and they share paragons. Whether we like it or not, they are of the same blood.
    zvieris wrote: »
    That's a dumb excuse. The "fighter" word in the class names are the only things they share. They don't share weapons, armor, skills, mechanics. Yeah, you say they share paragons? Try comparing GF's Threatening rush with GWF's. Now tell me how ambiguous does a topic about threatening rush power sounds in these mixed forums?

    Besides, xbox version got separate forums already. I'm speechless as to how ignorant can the devs be.

    +1

    //Bellistor
  • zebularzebular Member, Neverwinter Moderator, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 15,270 Community Moderator
    edited June 2015
    This is done! The Barracks have been separated.

    Forum Reorganization

    Rejoice!

    Safe travels,
    Archmage Zebular of Mystryl
    PWE Community Moderator
    [ RoC | ToS | Support ]
    [ My Character Bios | Discord: Zebular#9524 | In Game: @zebular (PC) • @MtnDewFreak (XBOX) • @Terraseer (PS4) ]
    Zebular
    [ Support Center • Rules & Policies and Guidelines • ARC ToS • Guild Recruitment Guidelines | FR DM Since 1993 ]
This discussion has been closed.