test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Will we EVER move past ... all we need is dps?

doriangreighdoriangreigh Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 707 Arc User
edited January 2015 in PvE Discussion
I think part of the model of the game (as is I believe any game and mmo) is that you can play what you want. However there are inevitably "support" classes that just don't do raw damage but are intended to help the raw damage deals do their job and dealing raw damage.

Even with class changes it seems that more often than not people still want all DPS classes in a run for just about anything. I think E LoL and E Shores are the only real runs that encourage having other support classes as those runs are far easier with a tank and DC in the group than 5 dps classes.

My understanding is that most games (MMO or otherwise) have players that just can't get past dealing damage. But this game seems to not only encourage that but seemingly has made it necessary.

With the new paladin class coming out one can only wonder what will happen, traditionally paladins off heal so to speak but still tank and apparently have a good amount of dps so will this be the new all in one class ... will the Neverwinter game population end up finally dropping all other classes in favor of the one? It would probably help PVP.

*edit*

DPS is suppposed to be squishy, if it attacks first without letting tanky classes get some threat they pretty much die or worse cause a party wipe from the ensuing chaos. In this game all the ranged DPS classes (HR in particular) are rather bad about jumping ahead of everyone and the less experienced ones tend to spread mobs all over the place making it difficult or impossible to get them under control.

VERY few DPS players (ranged ones at least) seem to have any desire to wait. So should't the game start making it so that if the tanky class doesn't run up and get aggro all the other classes get 1 shotted because of their egotistical cavalier attitude?
Post edited by doriangreigh on
«1

Comments

  • nickitysplitnickitysplit Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    100% Agreed. I remember my very first dungeon, 5 dps with no healer (everyone using cleric companion), it was more or less just an extended quest with tougher mobs...not what i was expecting at ALL.

    didnt mind at first, as that's what the first dungeons are usually like, players still getting used to their class, trigger-happy guns-a-blazing excitement etc, but nope, currently 43 now and its still the same, literally, came out of Grey Wolf Den just before maintenance today, that run must have taken over 30 mins, with 3 wipes on last boss lol....and we HAD a tank + healer...yeah lol

    Can't speak for anyone else but i ALWAYS make a point of staying behind/waiting for the tank (if there is one). Just doesn't seem right to me, i mean, why else would we have tank/cleric classes if there's no role for them?
    - Carpe diem -
  • charononuscharononus Member Posts: 5,715 Arc User
    edited January 2015

    DPS is suppposed to be squishy, if it attacks first without letting tanky classes get some threat they pretty much die or worse cause a party wipe from the ensuing chaos. In this game all the ranged DPS classes (HR in particular) are rather bad about jumping ahead of everyone and the less experienced ones tend to spread mobs all over the place making it difficult or impossible to get them under control.

    VERY few DPS players (ranged ones at least) seem to have any desire to wait. So should't the game start making it so that if the tanky class doesn't run up and get aggro all the other classes get 1 shotted because of their egotistical cavalier attitude?

    This is only true in trinity games. Neverwinter was designed to be a non-trinity game where you didn't need a tank or healer. The mind boggling part is that they included a tank etc when they're not designed to be needed.
  • wildwolf8wildwolf8 Member Posts: 161 Bounty Hunter
    edited January 2015
    I don't think it's as much of an egotistical attitude as it is that if you are able to do something, and it is fun, why wouldn't you do it?

    For example, I love trying to test myself out in mob heavy areas on my sw, by rushing in and just fighting and trying to avoid getting killed while killing. VT, for example, is a place where I can do this and survive quite nicely without a gf or dc in the group.

    However, when the situation says to me that I will die if I do that, I let the gf or tankier or control classes get started first, and then I lay on the damage. Elol and eshores would be examples of this type of situation for me. Though I still like to go ahead sometimes and start putting damage down on the golems, since they are very easy to avoid.

    So main thing is, I agree that it would be nice of the game to force us into requiring more tactical skill and teamwork. However, as the game currently stands, this is only necessary in a few instances for many players who are decently to well geared.

    Bottom line: I agree with your final statement. Let's hope for more types of content where teamwork is necessary in the upcoming mods. Though I don't feel that one shot is the answer. Something more like how the t2 dungeons USED to feel while leveling up. Back when people actually did t2 dungeons. Or how CN/VT feels until you are well geared. Biggest thing I guess I hope for in upcoming mod is a high gs requirement dungeon that is big, fun, and requires tactics.
  • ulvielulviel Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 741 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    The problem is, currently there really is no role for them, but that's because of power creep. Back in the days when max gs was about 14k things were different... And there is a (small) hope you'll need tanks/supporters again in mod 6 when they increase lvl cap.
  • suddenlyslowsuddenlyslow Member Posts: 818 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    I agree that something must be done to correct this at it truly only seems to be a game of damage with no need for tanks/healers and I don't even recall where this poor trend originated from. I understand power creep and gearflation but I have never seen it have such an impact in any other games and I am not sure if that is entirely the source here. I suspect lifesteal plays a large role in this as well but that it is not limited to that. It simply doesn't feel right that in the hardest skirmish or dungeon that I can charge ahead of everyone on my CW and dive into the middle of a pack of enemy without any fear at all and I think it would be funner if I had to be more cautious and wait for the others in my party and especially those designed to soak up damage.
  • grobb1grobb1 Member, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 34
    edited January 2015
    charononus wrote: »
    This is only true in trinity games. Neverwinter was designed to be a non-trinity game where you didn't need a tank or healer. The mind boggling part is that they included a tank etc when they're not designed to be needed.

    perfect example of the wrong people talking.
  • charononuscharononus Member Posts: 5,715 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    I agree that something must be done to correct this at it truly only seems to be a game of damage with no need for tanks/healers and I don't even recall where this poor trend originated from. I understand power creep and gearflation but I have never seen it have such an impact in any other games and I am not sure if that is entirely the source here. I suspect lifesteal plays a large role in this as well but that it is not limited to that. It simply doesn't feel right that in the hardest skirmish or dungeon that I can charge ahead of everyone on my CW and dive into the middle of a pack of enemy without any fear at all and I think it would be funner if I had to be more cautious and wait for the others in my party and especially those designed to soak up damage.

    The design comes from how in trinity mmo's healers and tanks are in very very short supply typically. Because of that and not wanting to have to deal with the problems that that causes they went to an everyone can heal and tank it philosophy.
  • katbozejziemikatbozejziemi Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 856 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    The "holy trinity" is an awful design concept and the further we move away from it the better.

    I also find it very amusing how Neverwinter inadvertently did a better job of getting away from it than a certain other MMO that was boasting about "abandoning the trinity" and yet actually failed to achieve that goal.
  • onecoolscatcatonecoolscatcat Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 575 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    So long as Neverwinter's ONE stat curve shared by every class is optimized for DPS, DPS builds will be inherently more efficient than any other. Stat curves are the foundations upon which all else is built. Give every class (and paragon path) it's OWN stat curve and we'll see more variety. McGuyvering powers and feats in the name of class balance simply doesn't work.
  • herundrionherundrion Member Posts: 238 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    The easiest solution is to reduce offensive stat scaling by 50%. It will leave most lower geared people (and GFs) around the same , while reducing the power creep at higher gearscores.
    This will effectively make most mobs "tankier" and provide a better RoI for defensive stats.

    Won't solve all problems, but it will improve the status quo.
    Next step will be changing lifesteal (the Devs did promise that - but how soon?).
    Co-Founder of -Valor-
    vih2r9.png
  • katbozejziemikatbozejziemi Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 856 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    Don't forget adding DR to power.
  • p4rtp4rt Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 0
    edited January 2015
    The "holy trinity" is an awful design concept and the further we move away from it the better.

    I also find it very amusing how Neverwinter inadvertently did a better job of getting away from it than a certain other MMO that was boasting about "abandoning the trinity" and yet actually failed to achieve that goal.

    Why is the holy trinity horrible?
  • katbozejziemikatbozejziemi Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 856 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    Because it puts all content related design on rails. If you give players freedom of customizing their characters and play style even though there is only one correct way of playing their class then you have failed in design.
    It also creates annoying entitled ****s among players.

    It's an awful relict of the MMO past, just like lock-on targeting combat and fetch quests (though those aren't as old).
  • ucanthandleucanthandle Member Posts: 211 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    You cant say that they do not want the trinity in this game. If they did, they would not require a GF/DC to be in every group queue for dungeons. Its good to have things like skirmishes that do not require tanks/healers. Dungeons should require them though. That would give people who just want to get in something quickly (skirmish) something to do as a group. If people wanted to spend time actually building a group and have time to do something challenging (dungeon), they would also have an option. Having dps, cc, heals, and tanking classes make things interesting. If they just wanted the game to be dps why not just make one class and have everyone play it.
  • thefabricantthefabricant Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 5,248 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    wildwolf8 wrote: »
    I don't think it's as much of an egotistical attitude as it is that if you are able to do something, and it is fun, why wouldn't you do it?

    For example, I love trying to test myself out in mob heavy areas on my sw, by rushing in and just fighting and trying to avoid getting killed while killing. VT, for example, is a place where I can do this and survive quite nicely without a gf or dc in the group.

    However, when the situation says to me that I will die if I do that, I let the gf or tankier or control classes get started first, and then I lay on the damage. Elol and eshores would be examples of this type of situation for me. Though I still like to go ahead sometimes and start putting damage down on the golems, since they are very easy to avoid.

    So main thing is, I agree that it would be nice of the game to force us into requiring more tactical skill and teamwork. However, as the game currently stands, this is only necessary in a few instances for many players who are decently to well geared.

    Bottom line: I agree with your final statement. Let's hope for more types of content where teamwork is necessary in the upcoming mods. Though I don't feel that one shot is the answer. Something more like how the t2 dungeons USED to feel while leveling up. Back when people actually did t2 dungeons. Or how CN/VT feels until you are well geared. Biggest thing I guess I hope for in upcoming mod is a high gs requirement dungeon that is big, fun, and requires tactics.
    How CN feels until you well geared is entirely class dependant, unlike VT :p A 9k gs TR is already a full party in the base game dungeons, with the exception of ToS, there is no teamwork required :p
  • rashylewizzrashylewizz Member Posts: 4,265 Bounty Hunter
    edited January 2015
    When we get challenging content, it will self-correct and protector GFs and DCs and life-steal Warlocks will all be needed more
  • katbozejziemikatbozejziemi Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 856 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    You cant say that they do not want the trinity in this game. If they did, they would not require a GF/DC to be in every group queue for dungeons.
    That doesn't mean anything except the fact that the queue system is poorly implemented. GWF was supposed to be a hybrid DPS/tank and yet you cannot queue as tank. Those limitations are a PITA, have no relevance anymore, and should be removed just like they were from skirmishes.
    Same goes for needing full group to enter through queue and the inability to invite people while in a dungeon.
    If they just wanted the game to be dps why not just make one class and have everyone play it.
    CW already exists.
  • edited January 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • herundrionherundrion Member Posts: 238 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    Problem with that "new trinity" is that control = why tank?
    and lifesteal = why tank?

    It's not a trinity anymore.
    Co-Founder of -Valor-
    vih2r9.png
  • zacazuzacazu Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,934 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    lifesteal today is the smallest of the problems. would have been of some help 3 modules ago+overnerf for cw. today only will ruin more the poor gwf or any new poor dps-defender

    nerf cw, now, is irrelevant-redundant too.... so...
  • query523query523 Member Posts: 1,515 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    When we get challenging content, it will self-correct and protector GFs and DCs and life-steal Warlocks will all be needed more

    ^^^^ Something really hard. Something experienced players will wipe at. Don't even complainthat this is disheartening to new players. What's bad for new players is coming into a game where you run out of challenges in a month.
  • rashylewizzrashylewizz Member Posts: 4,265 Bounty Hunter
    edited January 2015
    Introducing challenging content can solve parts of this issue.

    Imagine the diversity in builds and the need for synergy. Defensive Control Wizards, GWFs, HRs and TRs will riise. Suddenly, you want to bring a variety of builds just because you need them to help the party survive. Or
  • tonyswutonyswu Member Posts: 223 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    starbigamo wrote: »
    everyone should be capable of doing good DPS, and giving something ELSE on top of it.

    The classic triad of DPS/healer/tank is long gone cause players showed over and over that all want to play DPS and that DPS is all that is truly needed to overcome challenges.

    A more modern aproach and one that neverwinter takes most of the time is the NEW trinity. Control, heal and tanking with EVERYONE adding to the DPS.

    And thats how Neverwinter works most of the time with notable exception of the guardian fighter that for some reason have no way to deliver REAL damage.

    I am a conqueror with every single feat point put toward making damage and still i can't do a proper amount of damage what is frustrating.

    Thankfully pally is comming and Victor Stormhunter will retire for good since i am SURE that paladins will make more damage than GF and while side healing! lol :)


    1. I disagree with your statement that players all want to play DPS, and that DPS is the answer to all. If that's the case, i'll just go buy a pillow, name it NeverPillow, and beat on it all day.

    2. Your 3rd paragraph is a trinity itself.
  • edited January 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • edited January 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • zacazuzacazu Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,934 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    starbigamo wrote: »
    And Life steal makes the healer not necessary, your CW is almost dead? No problem a single OFENSIVE skill and you are again at full HP. lol

    Whats better a GF with 15% life steal or a CW with 5% life steal? :(

    "Problematics" classes with lifesteal are those with active damage - dots - without the necessity of direct contact.

    So the basic problem here are two.

    1 - Much of the danger stems from a continuous damage MELEE and burst damage melee of monsters.

    2- explaining with an example: if you try to "Off tank" an opponent, the lifesteal will be the average of how much damage you take VS how much life you can steal.

    A damage of the dot type functions like a "pool" of lifesteal. The damage will be active, and take life as you take damage if you take damage.
    So the main problem here is the emphasis of the melee damage of monsters + this new dot+range-radius +control (control-range vary, but aways have A or B).

    Briefly: is the m4/m5 "rework".

    the problem of the old cw is a bizarre oneshot burst thanks to a lot of broken things. the m2 gwf, bleed... a dot HAMSTER.l:rolleyes:

    ps: the old bleed is dot in a off tank.,, so... yeah.
  • charononuscharononus Member Posts: 5,715 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    Great now this thread has put a parody of all you need is love in my head.

    All you need is dps
    All you need is dps
    All you need is dps, dps
    dps is all you need


    My brain is a messed up place.


    Anyways Zacazu, I think that besides that it's the dot classes that get massively hurt by things like AS lag as they get hit with the fact that they get more attacks in. It's the only reason I can think of why AS still slows me down to a laggy mess every single time and others claim to never get it. So dots may be even more problematic than you think.
  • zacazuzacazu Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,934 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    well... another reason to dont rework nothing to fix a previous rework.
  • colonelwingcolonelwing Member Posts: 1,448 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    herundrion wrote: »
    The easiest solution is to reduce offensive stat scaling by 50%. It will leave most lower geared people (and GFs) around the same , while reducing the power creep at higher gearscores.
    This will effectively make most mobs "tankier" and provide a better RoI for defensive stats.

    Won't solve all problems, but it will improve the status quo.
    Next step will be changing lifesteal (the Devs did promise that - but how soon?).


    Errr.., Excuse me? GF doesn't mean it has to be a protector. Conqueror is a BURST damage spec. I am certain most Conquerors would not be too amazed by getting their already nerfed damage cut in half. No clue where the "a GF must be a tank" mentality has emerged from, but GF are better DD's than they are tanks. (fact)

    Have a good day.

  • tonyswutonyswu Member Posts: 223 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    Errr.., Excuse me? GF doesn't mean it has to be a protector. Conqueror is a BURST damage spec. I am certain most Conquerors would not be too amazed by getting their already nerfed damage cut in half. No clue where the "a GF must be a tank" mentality has emerged from, but GF are better DD's than they are tanks. (fact)

    Have a good day.

    This was confirmed by one of the devs. When asked why conqueror GF's damage wasn't / won't be raised to the level of other striker class such as CW or GWF, the dev's answer was "because it's supposed to be a tank".

    There you go.
Sign In or Register to comment.