test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

Armor Penetration PvE

colluzioncolluzion Member Posts: 61
edited January 2014 in The Library
I'm having a hard time believing any armorpen is beneficial in comparison to other stats such as power or recovery in a pve situation. Due to the amount of debuffs and what seems to be a 'cap' on the amount of armor and damage mitigation that can be reduced, how is armor penetration useful in a competent group?

Basically what I want to see is a legitimate amount of proof that says stacking armor pen as opposed to power will give you more damage in a pve situation.

I've yet to be out damaged by another cw in any instance. I've seen crit stacked cw's, arpen capped cw's, etc. I've competed against cw's with higher power, but less crit or recovery, which makes a massive difference, but I'm mainly interested in armor pen.

http://vvcap.net/db/Pv5gQqTE4K6eZsgXmEmL.htp <--- Character Sheet

Speak up, arpen stackers!

Edit:

Controlled test with the first hit of Chilling Cloud (to ensure no debuff stacks, etc.). I tested 25 non-crit and 25 crit hits with stats listed on the spreadsheet. Most of the information is there. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AmsEnMQFwizUdFRlZ2syNnNFREpadFl3Z3V6dTg0RUE&usp=sharing

Also tested this in a dungeon with ACT, damage difference was approximately 9% (not a controlled test, only two runs, but thought it was enough information to include in the thread)

Enjoy
Post edited by colluzion on
«1

Comments

  • Options
    dodgododgo Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    yer i stacked Arpen to the 2500 recomended and even with 4k power/recovery and 2700 crit (P-Vorp/ HV, archon, ) i still get out DPS'd by power guys. I'm gonna try split dread/ malabog armor 2nite...
  • Options
    stoxforum1stoxforum1 Banned Users Posts: 265 Bounty Hunter
    edited January 2014
    Mobs have a hard cap of varying amounts, but up to 24% for bosses in PVE. Your debuffs will reduce this into negative values and therefore you will do even more damage. I run a ton of power, probably more than any other CW, but there is no way I'd run with less than 2000 arm pen minimum.
  • Options
    focusmanfocusman Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    I agree with your statement, i truly cant test the actual results of how much damage you get by getting enemies into negative for damage increase conpared to stacking power in combination with debuffs. My feeling says, it does help, but power gives more. But i cant test it, i have the same amount of power as you and 2500 armpen, 2600 crit.

    If someone did test it, plsss come foreward. I asked a similar question earlier about the 24% but real hard data saying if you have xxxx amount of amorpen pen will give you xxxx amount of extra damage. And also the stat for power, <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font> amount of power will give you xxxx amount of damage increase.
    Wizard of Oz

    Black Lotus

    http://nl.twitch.tv/wixardofoz
  • Options
    vorphiedvorphied Member Posts: 1,870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    dodgo wrote: »
    yer i stacked Arpen to the 2500 recomended and even with 4k power/recovery and 2700 crit (P-Vorp/ HV, archon, ) i still get out DPS'd by power guys. I'm gonna try split dread/ malabog armor 2nite...


    My experience is pretty much the opposite. I've doubled the damage of a comparably geared CW who stacked 7.5k Power compared to my 4k and ran a similar rotation. Power is a factor, but it's not the most important one. Without at least enough ArP to overcome trash and elite mob DR, overall damage is noticeably impacted.

    If you're going all-out for PvE, I'd look at stripping down defensive stats before taking away too much ArP. I run more of a hybrid, moderate defense/deflect + heavy regen build, so my Power rating isn't going to go sky-high without stripping Critical Strike and ArP to unacceptable lows. Slotting companions with Power bonuses is also an option, but the AD investment is rather dear for the payoff.
    Sacrilege - Warlock
    Contagion - Cleric
    Testament - Wizard
    Pestilence - Ranger
    Dominion - Paladin

    NIGHTSWATCH

  • Options
    vorphiedvorphied Member Posts: 1,870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    focusman wrote: »
    I agree with your statement, i truly cant test the actual results of how much damage you get by getting enemies into negative for damage increase conpared to stacking power in combination with debuffs. My feeling says, it does help, but power gives more. But i cant test it, i have the same amount of power as you and 2500 armpen, 2600 crit.

    If someone did test it, plsss come foreward. I asked a similar question earlier about the 24% but real hard data saying if you have xxxx amount of amorpen pen will give you xxxx amount of extra damage. And also the stat for power, <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font> amount of power will give you xxxx amount of damage increase.

    Armor Penetration is pretty easy to understand as a "resistance ignored" mechanic.

    Ex 1: You have 24% ArP and attack a target with 20% DR. Your attack deals 100% of its rolled damage, exclusive of whatever modifiers are in play. Target resists none of your damage. ArP beyond 20% grants no additional damage in this case.

    Ex 2: You have 10% ArP and attack a target with 20% DR. Your attack deals 90% of its rolled damage, exclusive of modifiers blah blah blah. You are dealing 10% less damage because your ArP did not fully overcome the target's resistance.

    I don't have the math, but it takes tons of Power to make tooltip numbers budge noticeably. You can test this by stacking Power on an augment pet and watching your tooltips as you summon/dismiss it. This is why most players will recommend stacking ArP to at least a certain point before thinking about stacking Power.
    Sacrilege - Warlock
    Contagion - Cleric
    Testament - Wizard
    Pestilence - Ranger
    Dominion - Paladin

    NIGHTSWATCH

  • Options
    colluzioncolluzion Member Posts: 61
    edited January 2014
    vorphied wrote: »
    My experience is pretty much the opposite. I've doubled the damage of a comparably geared CW who stacked 7.5k Power compared to my 4k and ran a similar rotation. Power is a factor, but it's not the most important one. Without at least enough ArP to overcome trash and elite mob DR, overall damage is noticeably impacted.

    If you're going all-out for PvE, I'd look at stripping down defensive stats before taking away too much ArP. I run more of a hybrid, moderate defense/deflect + heavy regen build, so my Power rating isn't going to go sky-high without stripping Critical Strike and ArP to unacceptable lows. Slotting companions with Power bonuses is also an option, but the AD investment is rather dear for the payoff.

    Damage is a direct derivative of power, armorpen affects the transfer of gross damage to net damage, your base damage obviously is your only damage multiplier until it hits the mob, at which point armorpen takes affect, but when you considering multiplied debuffs from a competent group, how useful does armorpen seem?

    For example, if you're in a group and you're clearing trash without any aoe debuffs, armorpen will benefit you, but that's not so for bosses, seeing how most classes have several debuffs that are applied.

    I've yet to see any proof that justifies stacking armorpen.
  • Options
    vorphiedvorphied Member Posts: 1,870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    colluzion wrote: »
    Damage is a direct derivative of power, armorpen affects the transfer of gross damage to net damage, your base damage obviously is your only damage multiplier until it hits the mob, at which point armorpen takes affect, but when you considering multiplied debuffs from a competent group, how useful does armorpen seem?

    For example, if you're in a group and you're clearing trash without any aoe debuffs, armorpen will benefit you, but that's not so for bosses, seeing how most classes have several debuffs that are applied.

    I've yet to see any proof that justifies stacking armorpen.

    Those debuffs don't substitute for Armor Penetration. There's a thread around here somewhere that explains this a bit more eloquently (fondlez, where are you? :), but debuffs like High Vizier, Bronzewood, Plaguefire, Commanding Shot, etc. etc. directly increase damage done to targets. Your ArP can reduce or completely eliminate the target's resistance, and those debuffs will cause the target to take even more damage beyond the loss of its mitigation.
    Sacrilege - Warlock
    Contagion - Cleric
    Testament - Wizard
    Pestilence - Ranger
    Dominion - Paladin

    NIGHTSWATCH

  • Options
    slushpsychoslushpsycho Member Posts: 657 Bounty Hunter
    edited January 2014
    Anything above 20% are starting to become a waste unless you simply have all rank9/10 then feel free to max out every single stat to the cap.

    Mob can not have higher than 22% DR which we all know, but the fact is most of them actually have only 20%. And boss is 24% but honestly for cw if you dodge a couple stuns or have better rotations you can simply get your self a couple % extra dps in chart. So I recommend aim for 2000 armpen then stop and focus power, crit is nice but no point going over 2000, 1500 seem like a decent stop point.
  • Options
    thorny911thorny911 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    colluzion wrote: »
    Damage is a direct derivative of power, armorpen affects the transfer of gross damage to net damage, your base damage obviously is your only damage multiplier until it hits the mob, at which point armorpen takes affect, but when you considering multiplied debuffs from a competent group, how useful does armorpen seem?

    For example, if you're in a group and you're clearing trash without any aoe debuffs, armorpen will benefit you, but that's not so for bosses, seeing how most classes have several debuffs that are applied.

    I've yet to see any proof that justifies stacking armorpen.

    Armor Pen is calculated first before debuffs. So if you have a mob with 20% DR and your ArP is 23% your attack will be full strength as the mobs DR will now be 0% (note it does not go below 0 with ArP). Now all your party debuffs come into effect taking the mobs DR into the negative.

    Recently they *fixed* several powers with ArP so it should be more effective than usual. You don't have to have max ArP (24%) but I'd aim for at least 20%.
  • Options
    verilosverilos Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 77
    edited January 2014
    Armor penetration is pretty much a direct dps % increase up to 20% then diminishing returns up to 24% and nothing afterward.

    Always remember that arp is calculated first, then debuffs. Absorb the implications of that.

    TL;DR: arp >> anything | up to 20% arp.
  • Options
    pers3phonepers3phone Banned Users, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    There's no diminishing return for ArP. There are just different mobs. Simply put, if you slotted 24% ArP for bosses, until you gonna reach the boss you will have wasted up to 11.2% slotted ArP.
    Bosses 24% mitigation
    Brutes 20% or 22% mitigation
    Strikers and Leaders 16.2% or 18% mitigation
    Minions 14.4% mitigation
    Controllers and Ranged Strikers 12.8% or 14% mitigation

    Anyway, to the OP, we explained about ArP before quite a few times. You can test it quite easily yourself, there's no need for somebody else to bring proof. Math doesn't lie.

    I you're a pure PvE player, I wouldn't bother to go above 22%. However if you also PvP, you will want to fill your offensive slots with darks, since people have so much mitigation.
  • Options
    dodgododgo Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    so do we think that the non arpen/ maxpower guys are showing more dps on charts but its actually not getting thru to monsters?
  • Options
    vorphiedvorphied Member Posts: 1,870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    dodgo wrote: »
    so do we think that the non arpen/ maxpower guys are showing more dps on charts but its actually not getting thru to monsters?

    We're not usually talking about "no ArP"; it's more like 2k or lower ArP with a very high Power rating, which performs optimally against the bulk of enemies in a dungeon. I've never tested the scoreboard for accuracy, but I don't have reason to doubt it (especially since it only counts as much damage as a target has HP remaining, which is fairly specific).

    It would be interesting to see an updated chart to illustrate the effect of Power on characters' damage scaling. I found some very old posts with a quick search, but don't want to necro any threads or repost information that I can't verify.
    Sacrilege - Warlock
    Contagion - Cleric
    Testament - Wizard
    Pestilence - Ranger
    Dominion - Paladin

    NIGHTSWATCH

  • Options
    dodgododgo Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    vorphied wrote: »
    We're not usually talking about "no ArP"; it's more like 2k or lower ArP with a very high Power rating, <SNIP>

    The PUGs I been runnin with have like 800 ArP and 6k power and they out DPS me by a few mill or so. (recall im 2500 Arp and 4k power). anyway im keepin my ArP but am grindin for my MC body armor (OMG that low seal rate drop...) n gonna try dread ring/ valindra armor split set...
  • Options
    l3xi55l3xi55 Member Posts: 29 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    I would be interested in running a dungeon w/ you just to see how our DPS compares. Message me some time. Lopendra@l3xi55.
  • Options
    dodgododgo Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    l3xi55 wrote: »
    I would be interested in running a dungeon w/ you just to see how our DPS compares. Message me some time. Lopendra@l3xi55.

    will do! mehpit@mehpit
  • Options
    hombrehombre Member Posts: 11 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    people seem to forget just because someone outdamages you, it is not solely based on the fact that their stats are better. I outdamage plenty of wizards with higher rating in most categories because I believe my build and rotation/combos are efficient. You'd be surprised how many high GS CW's don't know how to optimize damage, even with same build and spec.
  • Options
    dodgododgo Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    hombre wrote: »
    people seem to forget just because someone outdamages you, it is not solely based on the fact that their stats are better. I outdamage plenty of wizards with higher rating in most categories because I believe my build and rotation/combos are efficient. You'd be surprised how many high GS CW's don't know how to optimize damage, even with same build and spec.

    good point. im pretty comfortable with my RW CW setup. im runnin all the usual suspects (except entangle still in tab as i like it to line up mobs for SS. I do hear the guy that gets off his sing first gets way better DPS and often that guy isnt me.. but i am dropping my OF straight after so figure i still get alot of DPS from that.
  • Options
    vorphiedvorphied Member Posts: 1,870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    dodgo wrote: »
    good point. im pretty comfortable with my RW CW setup. im runnin all the usual suspects (except entangle still in tab as i like it to line up mobs for SS. I do hear the guy that gets off his sing first gets way better DPS and often that guy isnt me.. but i am dropping my OF straight after so figure i still get alot of DPS from that.

    4k vs. 6k Power isn't an enormous difference in my experience. The 800 ArP CW is outdamaging you for other reasons. If it's not engaging the mobs before you, it's build, encounter selection, and power rotation.

    For example, if you're using Entangling Force, you're sacrificing damage. Your party members (especially your fellow CW) probably appreciate your Tab EF and benefit from increased damage potential because you're helping to ensure that targets stay clustered, but you personally are losing damage because you're giving up an AoE damage slot for an AoE positioning tool while the other CW can keep a full damage rotation and still take advantage of your setups.

    Of course, none of the above is necessarily a bad thing; if it helps your runs go more smoothly, by all means keep going with it, but that is part of why your damage is not looking as sexy as that of the CW next to you.
    Sacrilege - Warlock
    Contagion - Cleric
    Testament - Wizard
    Pestilence - Ranger
    Dominion - Paladin

    NIGHTSWATCH

  • Options
    dodgododgo Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    vorphied wrote: »

    For example, if you're using Entangling Force, you're sacrificing damage. Your party members (especially your fellow CW) probably appreciate your Tab EF and benefit from increased damage potential because you're helping to ensure that targets stay clustered, but you personally are losing damage because you're giving up an AoE damage slot for an AoE positioning tool while the other CW can keep a full damage rotation and still take advantage of your setups.
    .

    I hear alot about tabbed CoI bein awesome but i noticed the same AP gain n damage as tab'd EF so I dont think im sacrificing much dmg...
  • Options
    hombrehombre Member Posts: 11 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    Sadly you are wrong, at least for the dmg part. COI produces alot more dmg over time than EF, especially if you are Thaum - which is the superior dps class at the moment. However like the previous person said, EF is great for additional control, and I absolutely love it when a fellow CW has EF on tab which makes my life as a Thaum mage so much easier and def increases my dmg output.
  • Options
    colluzioncolluzion Member Posts: 61
    edited January 2014
    Updated main post with a spreadsheet showing comparison between arpen and power.
  • Options
    pers3phonepers3phone Banned Users, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    colluzion wrote: »
    Updated main post with a spreadsheet showing comparison between arpen and power.

    What was the target that you hit? To test ArP, you need to hit targets that have DR. Dummies do not have DR.
  • Options
    nathyielnathyiel Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 340 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    I came from WoW and did a lot of TC for mage there. I can tell you that a test with 50 samples isn't enough at all. Even if there's a lot less Random in NW than in WoW.
    So if you want to do a serious test, you should consider doing 100 or 200 round of test, at least. (In WoW, the community have developed a simulator with a little help from dev).

    Did we have access to the number (base damage, power coef, etc) behind every ability?
    Or did we need to find a way to obtain them ?
  • Options
    krinamankrinaman Member Posts: 129 Bounty Hunter
    edited January 2014
    dodgo wrote: »
    good point. im pretty comfortable with my RW CW setup. im runnin all the usual suspects (except entangle still in tab as i like it to line up mobs for SS. I do hear the guy that gets off his sing first gets way better DPS and often that guy isnt me.. but i am dropping my OF straight after so figure i still get alot of DPS from that.

    Play style has a LOT to do with damage. The "zerg ahead" guy gets to hit all the squishy one shot mobs getting the kill buffs that go along with it. Yes, OF straight after isn't bad unless the sing killed all the squishies (which often occurs now).
  • Options
    colluzioncolluzion Member Posts: 61
    edited January 2014
    pers3phone wrote: »
    What was the target that you hit? To test ArP, you need to hit targets that have DR. Dummies do not have DR.

    Really? Enfeeble a target dummy and tell me if your damage increases.
    nathyiel wrote: »
    I came from WoW and did a lot of TC for mage there. I can tell you that a test with 50 samples isn't enough at all. Even if there's a lot less Random in NW than in WoW.
    So if you want to do a serious test, you should consider doing 100 or 200 round of test, at least. (In WoW, the community have developed a simulator with a little help from dev).

    Did we have access to the number (base damage, power coef, etc) behind every ability?
    Or did we need to find a way to obtain them ?

    So you're telling me that accurate averages between 25 of each type of hit isn't sufficient proof? The base damage is displayed in your tooltip, modified by your power in that number, my hits ranged between those numbers in both normal and crit.

    The numbers are accurate, not sure why you're trying to disvalue them.
  • Options
    vorphiedvorphied Member Posts: 1,870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    colluzion wrote: »
    Really? Enfeeble a target dummy and tell me if your damage increases.

    As I and others have stated before, debuffs and ArP work differently. Ray of Enfeeblement directly increases damage to the target; it doesn't ignore existing resistance.

    We aren't all crazy, I promise. At least not about this.
    Sacrilege - Warlock
    Contagion - Cleric
    Testament - Wizard
    Pestilence - Ranger
    Dominion - Paladin

    NIGHTSWATCH

  • Options
    midnightfang93midnightfang93 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    colluzion wrote: »
    Really? Enfeeble a target dummy and tell me if your damage increases.

    The dummies have 0% DR. Debuffs put the target's DR into the negative, increasing your damage. In this scenario, ArP is 100% useless since it has nothing to decrease to 0, since it cannot send a targets resistance into the negative, before the debuffs apply.



    So you're telling me that accurate averages between 25 of each type of hit isn't sufficient proof? The base damage is displayed in your tooltip, modified by your power in that number, my hits ranged between those numbers in both normal and crit.

    The numbers are accurate, not sure why you're trying to disvalue them.

    Any random sample requires a lot more than 25 to be considered valid by anyone. For example: I surveyed 25 students on a school campus and 10 of them said they liked vanilla ice cream over chocolate ice cream. So, I found that 40% of students on that campus like vanilla ice cream over chocolate ice cream, based on my results. Furthermore, if you are using the dummies, your results are null regardless simply because you cannot test the effectiveness of ArP on a target with no resistance.

    Anyways, at least try it on some mobs with resistance on them, if you didn't on that test.
  • Options
    vorphiedvorphied Member Posts: 1,870 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    Anyways, at least try it on some mobs with resistance on them, if you didn't on that test.

    I'm getting really confused as to why these questions keep popping up. It's simple enough to test for oneself, and while it's a good thing not to take at face value what people on the internet post as fact, it should occur to the poster that there could be something to this ArP and debuff business since we're all saying the same thing in slightly different ways.
    Sacrilege - Warlock
    Contagion - Cleric
    Testament - Wizard
    Pestilence - Ranger
    Dominion - Paladin

    NIGHTSWATCH

  • Options
    pers3phonepers3phone Banned Users, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited January 2014
    colluzion wrote: »
    Really? Enfeeble a target dummy and tell me if your damage increases.

    I'm sorry man, but you don't understand ArP and debuffs correctly yet. You shouldn't be so categorical in your finds and try to listen a bit to the others.

    Dummies have no DR for ArP to work on them at all. Only the debuffs or buffs to your damage work. You need a target with DR, so ArP is applied first. Then you can see how debuffs work FURTHER after ArP was applied.

    This is what makes ArP useful... it negates target damage resistance if you have enough of it. Then your damage is further improved through all kinds of debuffs to the target and self buffs.
Sign In or Register to comment.