test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Neverwinter Discussion › General Discussion (PC)
Options

Release Archer Ranger and we will call it even.

leefordleeford Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users Posts: 157 Bounty Hunter
edited May 2013 in General Discussion (PC)
Archer Ranger is the only compensation I need. :)
Post edited by leeford on
«1

Comments

  • Options
    balthezorebalthezore Member Posts: 12 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    I'd like to play ranger aswel
  • Options
    wingofbenuwingofbenu Member Posts: 20 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    I'd like a fighter class. That'd be nice.

    All we got so far is wizard, cleric, and rogue.
  • Options
    balthezorebalthezore Member Posts: 12 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    shahualing wrote: »
    No, Scourge Warlock!

    Yeah, why not Lich king too?
  • Options
    muceasmuceas Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    Who gives a sh*t about Archer Ranger when this game is such a mess.
  • Options
    balthezorebalthezore Member Posts: 12 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    shahualing wrote: »
    I will totally quit unless they release Scourge Warlock first!

    images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTs2TTI4j5S9i-7QCJUd-CBx0E-wxH9eZul9-GUMQzo01xtToVb

    Yeah again why not Lich King?
  • Options
    weak77weak77 Member Posts: 3 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    Yea release classes now without any checks and balances to the first set of classes so we can complain more!



    (insert funny pic to represent logical thinking)
  • Options
    askopdkapokaskopdkapok Member Posts: 648 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    leeford wrote: »
    Archer Ranger is the only compensation I need. :)

    They haven't even completed the existing classes and you want more?
  • Options
    leefordleeford Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users Posts: 157 Bounty Hunter
    edited May 2013
    askopdkapok wrote: »
    They haven't even completed the existing classes and you want more?

    I would ask they put the existing classes on hold and roll out whatever they have for the Ranger and work on that first cause its what we all want to play.
  • Options
    wingofbenuwingofbenu Member Posts: 20 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    leeford wrote: »
    I would ask they put the existing classes on hold and roll out whatever they have for the Ranger and work on that first cause its what we all want to play.

    Uh. No.

    I dont give two ****s about ranger,

    I want a functioning Fighter class or a Druid.

    I dont give two ****s that you want to play legolas.
  • Options
    reilz1981reilz1981 Member Posts: 512 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    my prediction new area or 2 drow race probally another and classes: warlock 2 weapon ranger and druid
    Actual Join date: Dec 2007
  • Options
    stormdrag0nstormdrag0n Member Posts: 3,222 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    I have to wonder how they are going to handle this, because we are going to be getting the Two blade ranger first, but I also know plenty of people who play rogues who want to use a bow as well, a good compromise is to make the bow a ranged option for certain classes instead of a specific paragon path, that way our two bladed ranger could also use a bow (which is an option in 4e) thus giving us that classic ranger feel. Personally my rangers have all used quarterstaff's...I really wish we had that option as well.
    PWI Handle:@storm_dragon| Follow me on Google+
    Always Looking for mature laidback players/rpers for Dungeon Delves!
  • Options
    nectarprimenectarprime Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    Dreadknight/Paladin.
  • Options
    ahrimavizxahrimavizx Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    Agreed! Release two-blade Ranger!
  • Options
    wingofbenuwingofbenu Member Posts: 20 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    stormdrag0n wrote: »
    I have to wonder how they are going to handle this, because we are going to be getting the Two blade ranger first, but I also know plenty of people who play rogues who want to use a bow as well, a good compromise is to make the bow a ranged option for certain classes instead of a specific paragon path, that way our two bladed ranger could also use a bow (which is an option in 4e) thus giving us that classic ranger feel. Personally my rangers have all used quarterstaff's...I really wish we had that option as well.

    Unlikely as hell though given fighters apparently cant comprehend non-sword weapons, clerics dont have any idea how to use maces or hammers, and wizards have no idea how to use a staff.
  • Options
    leefordleeford Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users Posts: 157 Bounty Hunter
    edited May 2013
    wingofbenu wrote: »
    Uh. No.

    I dont give two ****s about ranger,

    I want a functioning Fighter class or a Druid.

    I dont give two ****s that you want to play legolas.


    Whatever treebeard :)
  • Options
    stormdrag0nstormdrag0n Member Posts: 3,222 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    nectarprime wrote: »
    Dreadknight/Paladin.
    YES PLEASE!
    Actually what I would really like is the option to have your character come from the shadowfell...a lot of options that way.
    PWI Handle:@storm_dragon| Follow me on Google+
    Always Looking for mature laidback players/rpers for Dungeon Delves!
  • Options
    wingofbenuwingofbenu Member Posts: 20 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    leeford wrote: »
    Whatever treebeard :)

    hey, Treebeard destroyed an entire fort :P
  • Options
    stormdrag0nstormdrag0n Member Posts: 3,222 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    wingofbenu wrote: »
    Unlikely as hell though given fighters apparently cant comprehend non-sword weapons, clerics dont have any idea how to use maces or hammers, and wizards have no idea how to use a staff.

    You're looking at paragon paths only.
    PWI Handle:@storm_dragon| Follow me on Google+
    Always Looking for mature laidback players/rpers for Dungeon Delves!
  • Options
    wingofbenuwingofbenu Member Posts: 20 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    stormdrag0n wrote: »
    You're looking at paragon paths only.

    No, I'm looking at how the classes so far are designed to only use one weapon.
  • Options
    stormdrag0nstormdrag0n Member Posts: 3,222 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    wingofbenu wrote: »
    No, I'm looking at how the classes so far are designed to only use one weapon.

    In game right, but the option is there for the 4e rule sets, would not be a big deal to adopt it.
    PWI Handle:@storm_dragon| Follow me on Google+
    Always Looking for mature laidback players/rpers for Dungeon Delves!
  • Options
    wingofbenuwingofbenu Member Posts: 20 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    stormdrag0n wrote: »
    In game right, but the option is there for the 4e rule sets, would not be a big deal to adopt it.

    I agree. But they wont.
  • Options
    lemordetulemordetu Member Posts: 9 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    muceas wrote: »
    who gives a sh*t about archer ranger when this game is such a mess.

    this this this this
  • Options
    krystar2009krystar2009 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    I'd like to see some kind of tanking class that can hold aggro, or some kind of warrior/fighter 2-hander class that can do damage.
  • Options
    saamarsaamar Member Posts: 31 Arc User
    edited May 2013
    balthezore wrote: »
    Yeah again why not Lich King?

    You do know that they're not referring to the Scourge Warlock from WoW, right? They're referring to the Scourge Warlock from D&D. The one that will in all likelihood be implemented soon, considering players regularly looted gear designated to the "Scourge Warlock" class.
  • Options
    atlanticx1atlanticx1 Member Posts: 45
    edited May 2013
    38012438.jpg
  • Options
    cosmiqueonecosmiqueone Member Posts: 30
    edited May 2013
    I want a PONY!
    "Note to self, when magic fails attempt science".
Sign In or Register to comment.