They haven't even completed the existing classes and you want more?
I would ask they put the existing classes on hold and roll out whatever they have for the Ranger and work on that first cause its what we all want to play.
I would ask they put the existing classes on hold and roll out whatever they have for the Ranger and work on that first cause its what we all want to play.
Uh. No.
I dont give two ****s about ranger,
I want a functioning Fighter class or a Druid.
I dont give two ****s that you want to play legolas.
I have to wonder how they are going to handle this, because we are going to be getting the Two blade ranger first, but I also know plenty of people who play rogues who want to use a bow as well, a good compromise is to make the bow a ranged option for certain classes instead of a specific paragon path, that way our two bladed ranger could also use a bow (which is an option in 4e) thus giving us that classic ranger feel. Personally my rangers have all used quarterstaff's...I really wish we had that option as well.
I have to wonder how they are going to handle this, because we are going to be getting the Two blade ranger first, but I also know plenty of people who play rogues who want to use a bow as well, a good compromise is to make the bow a ranged option for certain classes instead of a specific paragon path, that way our two bladed ranger could also use a bow (which is an option in 4e) thus giving us that classic ranger feel. Personally my rangers have all used quarterstaff's...I really wish we had that option as well.
Unlikely as hell though given fighters apparently cant comprehend non-sword weapons, clerics dont have any idea how to use maces or hammers, and wizards have no idea how to use a staff.
Unlikely as hell though given fighters apparently cant comprehend non-sword weapons, clerics dont have any idea how to use maces or hammers, and wizards have no idea how to use a staff.
You do know that they're not referring to the Scourge Warlock from WoW, right? They're referring to the Scourge Warlock from D&D. The one that will in all likelihood be implemented soon, considering players regularly looted gear designated to the "Scourge Warlock" class.
Comments
All we got so far is wizard, cleric, and rogue.
Yeah, why not Lich king too?
Yeah again why not Lich King?
(insert funny pic to represent logical thinking)
They haven't even completed the existing classes and you want more?
I would ask they put the existing classes on hold and roll out whatever they have for the Ranger and work on that first cause its what we all want to play.
Uh. No.
I dont give two ****s about ranger,
I want a functioning Fighter class or a Druid.
I dont give two ****s that you want to play legolas.
Unlikely as hell though given fighters apparently cant comprehend non-sword weapons, clerics dont have any idea how to use maces or hammers, and wizards have no idea how to use a staff.
Whatever treebeard
Actually what I would really like is the option to have your character come from the shadowfell...a lot of options that way.
hey, Treebeard destroyed an entire fort :P
You're looking at paragon paths only.
No, I'm looking at how the classes so far are designed to only use one weapon.
In game right, but the option is there for the 4e rule sets, would not be a big deal to adopt it.
I agree. But they wont.
this this this this
You do know that they're not referring to the Scourge Warlock from WoW, right? They're referring to the Scourge Warlock from D&D. The one that will in all likelihood be implemented soon, considering players regularly looted gear designated to the "Scourge Warlock" class.