Over the past few days there have been many foundry missions applied, which allows player to kill ogres and other creatures to gain fast and easy experience without the risk of being injured/killed.
Now those people are using the tools that you provided them to make these foundries and people are entering them to level up alt characters quickly. Recently there are some users appearing in these forums claiming they have been banned for going into those foundry missions and those who have created them. I can understand that you may want to make dummy accounts to try and scare people into not using them or people are just making things up to try and scare people into the risk of being banned (it happens in most MMOs out there).
Anyway I know many of us want an official response as to if we can use these foundry missions that are there and are within the tools you provided the community to make.
If you don't want people to use them, then say so. Don't just sit back saying nothing and if you are temp banning/full banning people without even informing the community as a whole to not use those missions if they don't want to be affected by possible suspensions.
Also dear volunteer moderator team, we understand you are wanting to help, but we can't rely on your personal opinion at this very moment in time, but we do appreciate the help you provide to the community.
Maybe they should just make a blanket announcement and say "use some common sense". It not that hard to realize if u are mass killing mobs taht cannot fight back then it is an exploit.
nah, this is a good post. Been wondering about that myself.
Good Post, and like to hear a answer on it. Maybe something about limitation in foundry concerning drops?
0
lucidp2kBanned Users, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian UsersPosts: 0Arc User
Maybe they should just make a blanket announcement and say "use some common sense". It not that hard to realize if u are mass killing mobs taht cannot fight back then it is an exploit.
While I agree that using the Foundry in this manner is cheap, and probably should be fixed... it is not in fact an "exploit". People are using the mechanics of the foundry in a manner that was not expected, but they are not breaking any of the mechanics themselves, thus, not an exploit. Now if they were in some way modifying the core code, or doing something along the lines of memory manipulation or packet injection, that'd be an exploit.
It'd behoove this community to understand the difference.
Spend less time complaining about shop prices and more time improving your salary.
Its common sense, if you are abusing the game against mobs that cant fight back you are doing something wrong... Go experience the game the way it was meant to be played, not shooting fish in a barrel.
ROFL , I been cheating but I need an official response to tell me I'm cheating .
Yes I have used some of those foundry missions to help boost up my Rogue a bit, but I don't regret it. If I get a suspension then I'll take it and avoid using them again. However; this thread is not about me, but a request to the developers to provide an official response to the situation as there is a lot of mixed reports and I unfortunately have a hard time believing the community who are confirming that they've been banned/suspended.
Over the past few days there have been many foundry missions applied, which allows player to kill ogres and other creatures to gain fast and easy experience without the risk of being injured/killed.
Now those people are using the tools that you provided them to make these foundries and people are entering them to level up alt characters quickly. Recently there are some users appearing in these forums claiming they have been banned for going into those foundry missions and those who have created them. I can understand that you may want to make dummy accounts to try and scare people into not using them or people are just making things up to try and scare people into the risk of being banned (it happens in most MMOs out there).
Anyway I know many of us want an official response as to if we can use these foundry missions that are there and are within the tools you provided the community to make.
If you don't want people to use them, then say so. Don't just sit back saying nothing and if you are temp banning/full banning people without even informing the community as a whole to not use those missions if they don't want to be affected by possible suspensions.
Also dear volunteer moderator team, we understand you are wanting to help, but we can't rely on your personal opinion at this very moment in time, but we do appreciate the help you provide to the community.
Regards,
Doowie
Na they would rather just secretly suspend you and then not send you a email or anything letting you know for how long..... This whole "suspend players for using something they put in the game" is the reason I will not be buying founders like I had planned on doing so today. My map wasn't even one like mentioned.... it was a giant field with 100 hulks in it that were able to attack you and not be held in by walls or anything, and I still got suspended with no email or anything.
While I agree that using the Foundry in this manner is cheap, and probably should be fixed... it is not in fact an "exploit". People are using the mechanics of the foundry in a manner that was not expected, but they are not breaking any of the mechanics themselves, thus, not an exploit. Now if they were in some way modifying the core code, or doing something along the lines of memory manipulation or packet injection, that'd be an exploit.
It'd behoove this community to understand the difference.
Are you on the 2 pit crew ? They decide what is an exploit not you . You honestly think making an dungeon where the mobs cant fight back is within the spirit of the game ?
0
cihuacoatlMember, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian UsersPosts: 1Arc User
While I agree that using the Foundry in this manner is cheap, and probably should be fixed... it is not in fact an "exploit". People are using the mechanics of the foundry in a manner that was not expected, but they are not breaking any of the mechanics themselves, thus, not an exploit. Now if they were in some way modifying the core code, or doing something along the lines of memory manipulation or packet injection, that'd be an exploit.
It'd behoove this community to understand the difference.
Who are you trying to kid here?
Of course these are exploits...Cheaters never win and do not cry when you get banned for it. Not that you honestly need too, i mean the level speed in this game already too fast. I am amazed the devs never increased the exp to level. I mean as it is if you do all the content at level and only do the story line you will still out level the quests, the seals, and still make 60 in a week before even coming close to finishing the story.
While I agree that using the Foundry in this manner is cheap, and probably should be fixed... it is not in fact an "exploit". People are using the mechanics of the foundry in a manner that was not expected, but they are not breaking any of the mechanics themselves, thus, not an exploit. Now if they were in some way modifying the core code, or doing something along the lines of memory manipulation or packet injection, that'd be an exploit.
It'd behoove this community to understand the difference.
Dead wrong. It's an exploit - players using the mechanics of the game to achieve unexpected results is an exploit.
"Participation in PVP-related activities is so low on an hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly basis that we could in fact just completely take it out of STO and it would not impact the overall number of people [who] log in to the game and play in any significant way." -Gozer, Cryptic PvP Dev
0
lucidp2kBanned Users, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian UsersPosts: 0Arc User
Dead wrong. It's an exploit - players using the mechanics of the game to achieve unexpected results is an exploit.
Actually, you are wrong. The definition of exploit is "to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage" )http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exploit) The maps that have the mobs roaming free like mine did, is not an exploit because there is nothing there but 100 mobs . The maps that have the mobs glitched out so they cant attack, that is an still not considered an exploit because for it to be an exploit, no one else would be able to benefit from it, thus why it says "for ones own". Everyone was able to use the maps, and they did.
0
stonedbillMember, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian UsersPosts: 0Arc User
I am amazed the devs never increased the exp to level. I mean as it is if you do all the content at level and only do the story line you will still out level the quests, the seals, and still make 60 in a week before even coming close to finishing the story.
It's because there is actually not a lot of content to dive in compared to other mmos. Level faster = less quests developers have to write
The maps that have the mobs glitched out so they cant attack, that is an still not considered an exploit because for it to be an exploit, no one else would be able to benefit from it, thus why it says "for ones own". Everyone was able to use the maps, and they did.
ROFL . Wrong is wrong , part of life is learning that. This morning I was reading about teenagers getting arrested for terrorism threats and I just couldn't figure out how the heck that could happen . Maybe we need to start teaching ethics in elementary school .
0
luciferstwinMember, Neverwinter Beta UsersPosts: 0Arc User
ROFL . Wrong is wrong , part of life is learning that. This morning I was reading about teenagers getting arrested for terrorism threats and I just couldn't figure out how the heck that could happen . Maybe we need to start teaching ethics in elementary school .
So your telling me that it would be ok for me to go out in the game world and gather up 20-30 mobs and aoe them down, but not make an easy accessible map to do the same thing? Sounds pretty hypocritical to me.
Actually, you are wrong. The definition of exploit is "to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage" )http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exploit) The maps that have the mobs roaming free like mine did, is not an exploit because there is nothing there but 100 mobs . The maps that have the mobs glitched out so they cant attack, that is an still not considered an exploit because for it to be an exploit, no one else would be able to benefit from it, thus why it says "for ones own". Everyone was able to use the maps, and they did.
Ooo, rules lawyer.
Exploit has a technical definition in the context of MMOs. But you knew that. So quoting an online dictionary means nothing.
"Participation in PVP-related activities is so low on an hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly basis that we could in fact just completely take it out of STO and it would not impact the overall number of people [who] log in to the game and play in any significant way." -Gozer, Cryptic PvP Dev
0
ranncoreMember, Moderators, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild UsersPosts: 2,508
edited May 2013
My advice: report anyone you see wearing the "Ogre Slayer" title for exploitation and ban.
0
luciferstwinMember, Neverwinter Beta UsersPosts: 0Arc User
Exploit has a technical definition in the context of MMOs. But you knew that. So quoting an online dictionary means nothing.
"An exploit, in video games, is the use of a bug or glitches, hit boxes, or speed, etc. by a player to their advantage in a manner not intended by the game's designers" Better? Still doesnt mean that Aoeing mobs that are freely able to attack you back is an exploit. So pretty much PWE is saying.... You can aoe mobs out in the game world, but if you make a map in foundry to do it, we will ban you...
So your telling me that it would be ok for me to go out in the game world and gather up 20-30 mobs and aoe them down, but not make an easy accessible map to do the same thing? Sounds pretty hypocritical to me.
That is NOT what they are doing . They are putting mobs behind traps and barrels so they cant move . Then they AoE them down .
While I agree that using the Foundry in this manner is cheap, and probably should be fixed... it is not in fact an "exploit". People are using the mechanics of the foundry in a manner that was not expected, but they are not breaking any of the mechanics themselves, thus, not an exploit. Now if they were in some way modifying the core code, or doing something along the lines of memory manipulation or packet injection, that'd be an exploit.
It'd behoove this community to understand the difference.
Keep telling yourself this. Once you get a clue as to what "Spirit of the Game" and "Sportsmanship" are, then we can further the discussion.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Still trying to find a reference to AD in my AD&D Manuals.
That is NOT what they are doing . They are putting mobs behind traps and barrels so they cant move . Then they AoE them down .
Yes, because everyone is the same right? You must have selective reading, because im pretty sure that I stated "The maps that have the mobs roaming free like mine did, is not an exploit because there is nothing there but 100 mobs". L2fullyreadbeforemakingyourselflookstupid
Well, I'm sure that's how you'll see it. From the view of network security professionals, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
I'll bet this is why we have so little respect and confidence in our field from the rest of the world. You empty the wastebaskets for Walmart's server techs? Any company knowingly employing you with your ethics subset couldn't possibly be pro.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Still trying to find a reference to AD in my AD&D Manuals.
Don't know about you guys, but I can definitely tell you I am one person that will be quitting the game if this doesn't get fixed. I don't play games where people cheat to get ahead. I like the sense of accomplishment that matters and makes me feel good when I play a game. If I don't feel that then the game is dead and I'll play a different game. I liked Torchlight 2 and Borderlands 2, but you could get items and duping through console commands so I quit. I'll quit this game game if it doesn't get fixed soon. Glad I saw this thread before I put 50 dollars down and will be telling my friends.
Well, I'm sure that's how you'll see it. From the view of network security professionals, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
PW has issued a post in another thread stating that the mechanic to "stack" was altered to allow more NPCs then usual and that it was an exploit. You can continue to disagree but you would be wrong
0
luciferstwinMember, Neverwinter Beta UsersPosts: 0Arc User
Don't know about you guys, but I can definitely tell you I am one person that will be quitting the game if this doesn't get fixed. I don't play games where people cheat to get ahead. I like the sense of accomplishment that matters and makes me feel good when I play a game. If I don't feel that then the game is dead and I'll play a different game. I liked Torchlight 2 and Borderlands 2, but you could get items and duping through console commands so I quit. I'll quit this game game if it doesn't get fixed soon. Glad I saw this thread before I put 50 dollars down and will be telling my friends.
Can I haz your stuff?
0
luciferstwinMember, Neverwinter Beta UsersPosts: 0Arc User
PW has issued a post in another thread stating that the mechanic to "stack" was altered to allow more NPCs then usual and that it was an exploit. You can continue to disagree but you would be wrong
Link to that thread so I can go yell at them for suspending me for not exploiting it?
While I agree that using the Foundry in this manner is cheap, and probably should be fixed... it is not in fact an "exploit". People are using the mechanics of the foundry in a manner that was not expected, but they are not breaking any of the mechanics themselves, thus, not an exploit. Now if they were in some way modifying the core code, or doing something along the lines of memory manipulation or packet injection, that'd be an exploit.
It'd behoove this community to understand the difference.
An exploit can also be, to use game mechanics in a manner not intended to make game content trivial.
Like say stacking up a bunch of mobs so that they can't move and won't evade and aoeing them down.
A similar example would be the WoW Leviathan exploit, in which 2 people placed just so would make the encounter trivial by keeping positions exactly out of range of the enemy boss, by abusing that its target swapping mechanic did not work properly with 2 enemies. A bunch of people got their loot taken away and their accounts banned for that exploit.
I'll bet this is why we have so little respect and confidence in our field from the rest of the world. You empty the wastebaskets for Walmart's server techs? Any company knowingly employing you with your ethics subset couldn't possibly be pro.
I was defining the difference, not condoning it. Though judging you from your response, I'll assume you're an administrator of some sort ( Be it server or network ). You're seething with holier than thou, as are most of your kind.
Spend less time complaining about shop prices and more time improving your salary.
Comments
Good Post, and like to hear a answer on it. Maybe something about limitation in foundry concerning drops?
While I agree that using the Foundry in this manner is cheap, and probably should be fixed... it is not in fact an "exploit". People are using the mechanics of the foundry in a manner that was not expected, but they are not breaking any of the mechanics themselves, thus, not an exploit. Now if they were in some way modifying the core code, or doing something along the lines of memory manipulation or packet injection, that'd be an exploit.
It'd behoove this community to understand the difference.
Griffeth - GW Fighter - Beholder Shard
Twitch - WoW and NWO Gameplay - YouTube Channel
GF/GWF Gameplay Highlights/Dungeon Runs
Yes I have used some of those foundry missions to help boost up my Rogue a bit, but I don't regret it. If I get a suspension then I'll take it and avoid using them again. However; this thread is not about me, but a request to the developers to provide an official response to the situation as there is a lot of mixed reports and I unfortunately have a hard time believing the community who are confirming that they've been banned/suspended.
60 Drow Trickster Rogue
11 Elf Control Wizard
Server: Beholder
Guild: Praetor Lupus
Guild Website: http://www.PraetorLupus.com
Hero of the North & Guardian of Neverwinter Founder.
Na they would rather just secretly suspend you and then not send you a email or anything letting you know for how long..... This whole "suspend players for using something they put in the game" is the reason I will not be buying founders like I had planned on doing so today. My map wasn't even one like mentioned.... it was a giant field with 100 hulks in it that were able to attack you and not be held in by walls or anything, and I still got suspended with no email or anything.
Are you on the 2 pit crew ? They decide what is an exploit not you . You honestly think making an dungeon where the mobs cant fight back is within the spirit of the game ?
Who are you trying to kid here?
Of course these are exploits...Cheaters never win and do not cry when you get banned for it. Not that you honestly need too, i mean the level speed in this game already too fast. I am amazed the devs never increased the exp to level. I mean as it is if you do all the content at level and only do the story line you will still out level the quests, the seals, and still make 60 in a week before even coming close to finishing the story.
Dead wrong. It's an exploit - players using the mechanics of the game to achieve unexpected results is an exploit.
Well, I'm sure that's how you'll see it. From the view of network security professionals, we'll just have to agree to disagree.
Actually, you are wrong. The definition of exploit is "to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage" )http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/exploit) The maps that have the mobs roaming free like mine did, is not an exploit because there is nothing there but 100 mobs . The maps that have the mobs glitched out so they cant attack, that is an still not considered an exploit because for it to be an exploit, no one else would be able to benefit from it, thus why it says "for ones own". Everyone was able to use the maps, and they did.
It's because there is actually not a lot of content to dive in compared to other mmos. Level faster = less quests developers have to write
Smoke@stonedbill - Mindflayer - 60 Rogue
ROFL . Wrong is wrong , part of life is learning that. This morning I was reading about teenagers getting arrested for terrorism threats and I just couldn't figure out how the heck that could happen . Maybe we need to start teaching ethics in elementary school .
So your telling me that it would be ok for me to go out in the game world and gather up 20-30 mobs and aoe them down, but not make an easy accessible map to do the same thing? Sounds pretty hypocritical to me.
Ooo, rules lawyer.
Exploit has a technical definition in the context of MMOs. But you knew that. So quoting an online dictionary means nothing.
"An exploit, in video games, is the use of a bug or glitches, hit boxes, or speed, etc. by a player to their advantage in a manner not intended by the game's designers" Better? Still doesnt mean that Aoeing mobs that are freely able to attack you back is an exploit. So pretty much PWE is saying.... You can aoe mobs out in the game world, but if you make a map in foundry to do it, we will ban you...
That is NOT what they are doing . They are putting mobs behind traps and barrels so they cant move . Then they AoE them down .
Keep telling yourself this. Once you get a clue as to what "Spirit of the Game" and "Sportsmanship" are, then we can further the discussion.
Yes, because everyone is the same right? You must have selective reading, because im pretty sure that I stated "The maps that have the mobs roaming free like mine did, is not an exploit because there is nothing there but 100 mobs". L2fullyreadbeforemakingyourselflookstupid
I'll bet this is why we have so little respect and confidence in our field from the rest of the world. You empty the wastebaskets for Walmart's server techs? Any company knowingly employing you with your ethics subset couldn't possibly be pro.
PW has issued a post in another thread stating that the mechanic to "stack" was altered to allow more NPCs then usual and that it was an exploit. You can continue to disagree but you would be wrong
Can I haz your stuff?
Link to that thread so I can go yell at them for suspending me for not exploiting it?
An exploit can also be, to use game mechanics in a manner not intended to make game content trivial.
Like say stacking up a bunch of mobs so that they can't move and won't evade and aoeing them down.
A similar example would be the WoW Leviathan exploit, in which 2 people placed just so would make the encounter trivial by keeping positions exactly out of range of the enemy boss, by abusing that its target swapping mechanic did not work properly with 2 enemies. A bunch of people got their loot taken away and their accounts banned for that exploit.
I was defining the difference, not condoning it. Though judging you from your response, I'll assume you're an administrator of some sort ( Be it server or network ). You're seething with holier than thou, as are most of your kind.