test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Neverwinter Discussion › General Discussion (PC)

The Real Numbers

vikoonvikoon Member Posts: 165 Arc User
edited March 2013 in General Discussion (PC)
I am curious what the damage numbers are from the point of view of any Beta Testers and anyone else who may have any insight on Neverwinter. I watched the video that was released today and it was showing numbers in excess of 15000+ damage on hits. I posted in another thread about my concern on what the numbers actually are but I was hoping to get some information from the community.

I personally hope that numbers over 10,000 per hit don't make it to live but I have a feeling that they will. What are other peoples thoughts on this?

Thanks for any replies,

Vik.
Post edited by vikoon on
«1

Comments

  • arythorarythor Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 315 Bounty Hunter
    edited March 2013
    I find how large the numbers are to be largely irrelevant. What matters is time-to-kill (TTK), and that is independent of how large HP pools are. In short, whether enemies take 10 hits of 10 damage to kill, or 10 hits of 10,000 damage to kill, I do not care. All I want is fun, balanced combat.
  • bedroomjesusbedroomjesus Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users Posts: 0
    edited March 2013
    In the class trailers, the level 50 characters are doing around 2000 damage if I remember correctly. To me though, they are just numbers. 20,000 or 2000. It really has no affect on gameplay anyways.
  • vikoonvikoon Member Posts: 165 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Number inflation is a dangerous game to play from my point of view. Even Blizzard has been quoted as saying that it is a bad idea for numbers to reach insane levels. If this game is to expand then the numbers will have to expand to insane levels to accomodate, and hitting for 100,000 damage is just ridiculous to me.

    I want the same thing you want arythor, but I personally think that numbers like 10,000 have no place in a D&D based game. But that is me.
  • ranncoreranncore Member, Moderators, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 2,508
    edited March 2013
    Number inflation is kind of a necessary evil for balancing content. If you are only working with a damage roll of a d10, you cannot alter the damage by any less than 10% intervals. Working with 10d20 adds a lot of ways to balance the roll.
  • kalvorakkalvorak Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 45
    edited March 2013
    That's true, but you don't need numbers to be reaching the thousands to balance them effectively. I think Blizzard regret the insane amounts of number inflation they've got. A level 60 has several thousand health. a level 90 has several hundred thousand, maybe half a million.

    You need to think long term really and if it's already a case of players hitting for 10k at a time then additional expansions and levels are just going to make things even worse. I prefer dealing with smaller numbers personally, I feel like a 1k crit should be a really big deal.
  • arythorarythor Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 315 Bounty Hunter
    edited March 2013
    I should clarify that while I feel large numbers are largely irrelevant, they can be cumbersome, and I certainly agree that the numbers do not need to be that high. As ranncore wisely points out, a larger scale does allow for more granular balancing, so it does make a fair bit of sense to have larger numbers for that purpose, but doing thousands of damage at 60 with an attack is not necessary to achieve that.

    You could theoretically have a system where the defensive power of enemies scales perfectly with the offensive power of players, and vice versa, and keep damage quite static and in the 0-100 range. That would still provide enough granularity, but the problem is that it does not show any progress. Players like to see the numbers grow, so there must be some inflation for the sense of progression to exist.

    Of course, dealing 5,000 damage at level 60, for example, only means that additional content that expands the offensive potential of characters down the road, whether from gear or some other advancement like levels, will need to see that number go to perhaps 6,000. And then it needs to go to 7,000. And then to 8,000. And one day to 10,000. This sort of inflation is inevitable but by inflating it more slowly early on, it does not need to grow so large, so fast.

    Anyway, like I said, it is not the biggest deal but I can see why it would some sense to pull it back a bit. I'd be content doing 10 damage on average at level 1 and 500 damage on average at level 60, for example, which still is a massive increase but not so much that the game would need to crack the quadruple or even quintuple digits any time soon. It would take more than 7 increases of 10% to turn 500 into 1,000, so if each expansion of power stuck to an increase of 10%, it would be years until it got that high.
  • feuygarfeuygar Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Silverstars Posts: 102 Bounty Hunter
    edited March 2013
    I'd be happy if they divided all the damage done by a factor of 10. (Before someone jumps on me, yes, the mobs hit points would also be reduced by the same factor).

    I don't think anyone over a very young age enjoys hitting for 2000 rather than for 20 if it takes the same time to kill the beast.

    It would also be truer to D&D's roots if I hit for 1d6+1 rather than for 45 or 450 or 4500.
  • lanessar13lanessar13 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Silverstars Posts: 8 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    True, as a trickster I was regularly doing 10K or so at level 12 with an opener. That's a bit high for "starting levels" (what I consider to be prior to level 20).

    What I was really puzzled about is how little your STR made a difference in damage. Those stats might not have existed, for all the difference made in TTK.
  • korbanhodkorbanhod Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 51
    edited March 2013
    Damage should be lower, way lower.

    It would be nice to see the numbers be more like actual 4th edition numbers. doing +100 dmg is quite insane even for late game characters in the books.
  • krubarkrubar Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Silverstars Posts: 841 Bounty Hunter
    edited March 2013
    If Str doesnt matter. My dwarf cleric, dual-wielding warhammers, will have a str of 12 so he can carry a decent amount of stuff. And I will try to max out dex, con, and wisdom on character generation. As I level, I will max out dex so I can get improved two weapon fighting and greater improved two weapon fighting. Also, the increase in saves from dex, con, and wis will be great.
    Guild of Commerce
  • krubarkrubar Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Silverstars Posts: 841 Bounty Hunter
    edited March 2013
    Would be nice to know if the str modifier increases damage by 100 or 500 or 1000. Say you have 14 str. You have a modifier of 2. So, would you do 1000 more damage compared to someone who has 10 str?
    Guild of Commerce
  • zagemoggazagemogga Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    lanessar13 wrote: »
    True, as a trickster I was regularly doing 10K or so at level 12 with an opener. That's a bit high for "starting levels" (what I consider to be prior to level 20).

    What I was really puzzled about is how little your STR made a difference in damage. Those stats might not have existed, for all the difference made in TTK.
    Atributes like Str/Dex/Con/Int/Cha are quite unimportant in 4e.

    Your overall hitpoints are calculated similar to: lvl*4+Con
    So at level 60 with 16 Constitution you have 60*4+16 = 256 maximum hitpoints

    Then you tell me you do 10k damage at level 12, please tell me I am wrong :)

    p.s. I cannot remember the stats of my Guardian but he must have had ~20k hitpoints at level 20+ then, since an Ogre could not onehit me :D
  • elveelve Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 336
    edited March 2013
    Dunno if this will help but at lvl 30 some of my skills were hitting for about 1.5k damage, 3k for critical strikes. I was pretty well geared though.
  • krubarkrubar Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Silverstars Posts: 841 Bounty Hunter
    edited March 2013
    That sucks. Why even have the numbers if they mean nothing. :(
    Guild of Commerce
  • krubarkrubar Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Silverstars Posts: 841 Bounty Hunter
    edited March 2013
    So, as a spell caster will you still need 10 + the spell's level to cast a spell? 10+9 intelligence for a mage to cast 9th lvl spells.
    Guild of Commerce
  • elveelve Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 336
    edited March 2013
    krubar wrote: »
    So, as a spell caster will you still need 10 + the spell's level to cast a spell? 10+9 intelligence for a mage to cast 9th lvl spells.

    No. You need to be an adequate level, the damage is calculated based on a bunch of stats including your primary ability scores, the equipment damage, the attack power you've accumulated and so on. Cannot be complete. Neverwinter works very differently from what you would come to expect from D&D.
  • thrynsystthrynsyst Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    krubar wrote: »
    If Str doesnt matter. My dwarf cleric, dual-wielding warhammers, will have a str of 12 so he can carry a decent amount of stuff. And I will try to max out dex, con, and wisdom on character generation. As I level, I will max out dex so I can get improved two weapon fighting and greater improved two weapon fighting. Also, the increase in saves from dex, con, and wis will be great.

    Everything on your "wish list" is from 3rd Edition. This game doesn't even *use* 3rd Edition to start with, it uses 4th Edition as its basis. Not certain you could set your character up in this manner at all.
  • lanessar13lanessar13 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Silverstars Posts: 8 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    zagemogga wrote: »
    Atributes like Str/Dex/Con/Int/Cha are quite unimportant in 4e.

    Your overall hitpoints are calculated similar to: lvl*4+Con
    So at level 60 with 16 Constitution you have 60*4+16 = 256 maximum hitpoints

    Then you tell me you do 10k damage at level 12, please tell me I am wrong :)

    p.s. I cannot remember the stats of my Guardian but he must have had ~20k hitpoints at level 20+ then, since an Ogre could not onehit me :D

    I was definitely doing 10K damage out of stealth with a daily power on my trickster, on a crit. It was running at about 9,734 damage. I thought I saw an 11K in there, but I wasn't watching carefully.

    I'm not entirely sure about the "stats are unimportant" in 4ED bit. Playing a swordmage, my powers damage, etc. relied on it. With a longsword, up to 8 damage from that. Then another 4 damage from high Int on certain powers. That's up to a 50% increase in DPS if you have a high statistic modifier, unless I'm mistaken.

    I don't see that effect in game, at all.
  • vikinggamervikinggamer Member Posts: 26 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Keep in mind that right now you are not complaining about an actual problem. You are complaining about something that only MIGHT be a problem. Don't waste too much effort on theoretical problems. Relax, wait for the weekend, play the beta, if there is a problem report it.

    All die, so die well.
  • vikoonvikoon Member Posts: 165 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Well I am definitely disappointed with some of the numbers that seem to be obviously floating around and even at sub level 20. I will be playing in the Beta this weekend and I am interested to test some of the numbers for myself. Still hoping that they get scaled back a bit but I am doubtful.
  • devoneauxdevoneaux Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    ranncore wrote: »
    Number inflation is kind of a necessary evil for balancing content. If you are only working with a damage roll of a d10, you cannot alter the damage by any less than 10% intervals. Working with 10d20 adds a lot of ways to balance the roll.

    While true, this is usually a result of a game being expanded over several cycles (Ala WoW) it's not usually a concern right out of the gate.
  • devoneauxdevoneaux Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    arythor wrote: »
    I should clarify that while I feel large numbers are largely irrelevant, they can be cumbersome, and I certainly agree that the numbers do not need to be that high. As ranncore wisely points out, a larger scale does allow for more granular balancing, so it does make a fair bit of sense to have larger numbers for that purpose, but doing thousands of damage at 60 with an attack is not necessary to achieve that.

    You could theoretically have a system where the defensive power of enemies scales perfectly with the offensive power of players, and vice versa, and keep damage quite static and in the 0-100 range. That would still provide enough granularity, but the problem is that it does not show any progress. Players like to see the numbers grow, so there must be some inflation for the sense of progression to exist.

    Of course, dealing 5,000 damage at level 60, for example, only means that additional content that expands the offensive potential of characters down the road, whether from gear or some other advancement like levels, will need to see that number go to perhaps 6,000. And then it needs to go to 7,000. And then to 8,000. And one day to 10,000. This sort of inflation is inevitable but by inflating it more slowly early on, it does not need to grow so large, so fast.

    Anyway, like I said, it is not the biggest deal but I can see why it would some sense to pull it back a bit. I'd be content doing 10 damage on average at level 1 and 500 damage on average at level 60, for example, which still is a massive increase but not so much that the game would need to crack the quadruple or even quintuple digits any time soon. It would take more than 7 increases of 10% to turn 500 into 1,000, so if each expansion of power stuck to an increase of 10%, it would be years until it got that high.

    Actually you can counteract this effect rather easily, the problem becomes however that you do not notice your character becoming stronger. Personally, i'd think it as worth it. *shrug*
  • zagemoggazagemogga Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    Maybe an option in the settings to display every value divided by 1000 or something to get back to normal? :)
  • dagger2thugtrap7dagger2thugtrap7 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 1
    edited March 2013
    korbanhod wrote: »
    Damage should be lower, way lower.

    It would be nice to see the numbers be more like actual 4th edition numbers. doing +100 dmg is quite insane even for late game characters in the books.

    That depends whether the enemies how much resistance been enhanced spring up against you. If I could see well in videos most attacks can be avoidable by dodging or while the slow enemy's interaction that would being done and being beamed on the ground you are possible without stint again pushing through raids with skills off the reel!
  • elveelve Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 336
    edited March 2013
    The numbers do not really matter IMO as long as the combat speed is decent. Bigger numbers give greater accuracy when calculating damage but that is about it.
  • salomar23salomar23 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 16 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    zagemogga wrote: »
    Maybe an option in the settings to display every value divided by 1000 or something to get back to normal? :)

    Then youd be hitting mobs for 3.247 or 0.325 damage :P
  • devoneauxdevoneaux Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    salomar23 wrote: »
    Then youd be hitting mobs for 3.247 or 0.325 damage :P

    We could always just turn them off.
  • vikoonvikoon Member Posts: 165 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    devoneaux wrote: »
    We could always just turn them off.

    I would assume that would be an option, and if the numbers to get insane then I will turn them off. There will still be a damage total up at the end of some instances that will have some massive totals I imagine.
  • oziumozium Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 20
    edited March 2013
    or could just use percent numbers of damage to total HP of mob, ie 1.5 for 1.5 percent damage done. course might be disheartening to face boss and see .001 :p
  • elminbanelminban Member Posts: 187 Arc User
    edited March 2013
    I remember at the keep siege in NwN II I had sand with a 2h sword (I think Kopesh) and he crit for 56 dmg and I was very taken back. It was a lot of damage for Sand to be doing in melee with 10 STR. If you add four zeros to that damage and also add four zeros to the monster it does not change anything. However, seeing three digits or more seems wrong for DnD, I am sure we will see it however. MMOs can't seem to keep small numbers easily. Players want instant gratification and doing 50 damage at lvl 1 and 50000 at max lvl is better for that.
    2.jpg
Sign In or Register to comment.