On each of the companions is the following bonus:
"Each equipped Companion of the Hall player bonus increases the non combined rating bonuses by 25% of their own bonus"
Can someone put this in plain English for me? Mathematically would it be: .25x + y, where x = their own player bonus | y = the non combined rating bonus (not sure what this refers to)?
What are people seeing especially if the comps are different upgrade levels (purple/ orange/ teal)?
0
Comments
There may be other reasons to buy these, Salvatore fans, Regis seems good on AOE damage summoned, but the bonus is kind of deceptive.
Cryptic has no problem letting items out the door which preform nicely at first. Not saying these comps will perform nicely but everything is subject to bait and switch around here. Doesn't matter once they have your money ( or time invested).
So maybe the question should be: if what the comps do is a good thing for your respective class or playstyle, are they worth the risk of purchase?
Apologies for the high jack. Just my thoughts on the matter.
Regis :
Deflect/Deflect Severity is extremely good for tanks. The fact that this is a bundle exclusive forces all tanks to buy all five companions to get the 2 that I would consider useable in current form. These stats are “wasted” on a DPS/Healer.
Bruenor Battlehammer :
Defense/Awareness is even better than Regis for tanks.
Both stats are good for DPS/Healers.
Catti-brie:
Both stats wasted for all paragons. Should have had stats that would benefit all classes/paragons. Changing to single stat Forte would make this very good for all roles/paragons.
Wulfgar :
Combat Advantage is awesome for DPS, OK for tanks and not needed for healers. The stat distribution could be nice if paired with a stat that all paragons need (Power for example).
Drizzt:
Critical Strike/Critical Severity. Awesome for both DPS and healers, wasted for tanks.
As I see it, the only way to make the Companions of the Hall even worth considering is by replacing accuracy on Wulfgar (Power instead?) and giving Catti-brie stats that make sense for all roles (Forte/?). This would make the set have 1 “wasted” companion , 2 OK companions and 2 extremely good companions for all roles.
@cryptic39#8917
2 heroes equipped gives (x1.25) 4.75% to each
3 heroes equipped gives (x1.50) 5.7%...
4 heroes equipped gives (x1.75) 6.65%...
5 heroes equipped gives (x2.00) 7.5% ...
And as @pitshade pointed out most people won't be using more than 2 because of the odd stat pairings.
Thanks all for your contributions and help in clearing up my confusion!
- Regis is +3% Recharge
- Bruenor is +3% DR
- Wulfgar is +3% AP Gain
- Drizzt is
- Kattie is
I'll ammend this once I'm back in game...Control bonus as it is is not very useful (in PvE) due to mobs dying quickly/most bosses being CC immune and movement speed is already more than covered by various sources such as insignias, DEX, and/or passives.
Single stat Forte would be a decent jack of all trades to any setup, while also being a unique bonus in general, since Forte sources are basically nonexistent.
If Cattie is forced to have two stats, I'd change her bonus to Power/Forte, such that it is generically okay for all roles, but not particularly specialized for any specific role.
Do you have further / other experience, yet?
That being said, I still picked up 4 sets since I had zen sitting. Bound one, gave away 2, sold 1 and placed the zen orders back up.
> So from your perspective because they are expensive they should be BIS? Not everyone could buy them and this would look like a big P2W in their face. And yes, I still think balanced and usable as I mentioned, much more than the 4 archons were for example.
I never said they should be best in slot. There is a difference between absolutely useless and useable. Slotting 5 of the Companions of the Hall for the maximum potential of the set bonus is wasting companion slots for all roles.
Cryptic haven't mastered the art of balancing price vs volume.
Xael De Armadeon: DC
Xane De Armadeon: CW
Zen De Armadeon: OP
Zohar De Armadeon: TR
Chrion De Armadeon: SW
Gosti Big Belly: GWF
Barney McRustbucket: GF
Lt. Thackeray: HR
Lucius De Armadeon: BD
Member of Casual Dailies - XBox
> I don't think they're bad but I do think they are overpriced. 1k Zen would be more appropriate and would probably encourage more take-up.
>
> Cryptic haven't mastered the art of balancing price vs volume.
Can you give 1 example where slotting all 5 companions for the maximum boost is good?
Am I right in thinking that they just need to be in your stable to receive the bonus boost?
Xael De Armadeon: DC
Xane De Armadeon: CW
Zen De Armadeon: OP
Zohar De Armadeon: TR
Chrion De Armadeon: SW
Gosti Big Belly: GWF
Barney McRustbucket: GF
Lt. Thackeray: HR
Lucius De Armadeon: BD
Member of Casual Dailies - XBox
> Noooo... but having 1 ranked to mythic with stats that work for you then having those stats boosted by having a couple of the others in the stable but not ranking them up should boost that 1 companion to a more useful 5.5%'ish? Or if anyone is feeling rich enough to have all 5 just to slot the useful one to 7.5% per stat should be the stat equivalent of having an extra companion slot (two stats at 7.5% instead of one). Unless I'm not understanding how they work?
>
> Am I right in thinking that they just need to be in your stable to receive the bonus boost?
You have to have all 5 equipped for the max bonus.
Xael De Armadeon: DC
Xane De Armadeon: CW
Zen De Armadeon: OP
Zohar De Armadeon: TR
Chrion De Armadeon: SW
Gosti Big Belly: GWF
Barney McRustbucket: GF
Lt. Thackeray: HR
Lucius De Armadeon: BD
Member of Casual Dailies - XBox
> Equipped as in having their bonuses slotted? Ah well in that case, yeah totally not worth it!
Exactly. As it is now it may be worth slotting 1 or 2 of them, but the full set is just wasted companion slots.
As I see it, the only fix would be to change stats on Catti-Brie and maybe Wulfgar or by adding Guenhwyvar to provide alternative stats.
This exact companion bonus makes the whole set undesirable for tanks who cannot cap other def stats without companions... which is roughly all of them.
Otherwise, I see the week point of this set in having the stats spread into all directions. For dps, it is surely nice to have 3 of them (crit/crit sev, accu/CA, defence/awe) as in summary those 3 slots give you equivalent of 3 offensive companions and as a bonus 1,5 with defensive characteristic. The downside is you most likely do not need to invest stats in accuracy or crit/crit severity if you have forte boosting it already - so it usually does not lead to the most effective stat distribution.
On the other hand, I would not fight against the Catti-Brie... for dps chars. If you slot all 5 from the set, you get equivalent of 4 offensive comp, 4 def and 2 funny ones. It is not that bad kind of a deal. Surely not the best, as it surely does not boost exactly what you want - and you are sacrificing type bonuses (for example Cold Iron Warrior or Batiri), but you get an universally versatile char.
For the tanks and healers any part of the set does not bring any benefit though. It is just not for them at all.
I know exactly how deflect/deflect severity works, and at what point they surpass critical avoidance in usefulness for tanks. Paladin (deflect severity forte) should always prioritize deflect/deflect severity as they easily can surpass the “breakpoint” where deflect/deflect severity becomes better than critical avoidance. On Fighter and Barbarian it requires a bit of thinking when allocating stats, but is perfectly doable.
Maybe *I* have a bug? Else I must be blind, so please help :P
I changed that comment to "." (because I could not find delete) - but read the fine print... unlike the others - can not be claimed by every char