test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› PvE Discussion

What is the definition of "set" in Neverwinter?

murmazmurmaz Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 13 Arc User
edited January 2015 in PvE Discussion
The slayer knights set 3/3 consists of: ring, waist, amulet - according to item description.

I had 2 rings and the belt (but no amulet) and the special effect still activated (i thought you had to have one of EACH?). Is this a bug or intentionally allowed?
Post edited by murmaz on

Comments

  • iambecks1iambecks1 Member Posts: 4,044 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    That is probably a bug , I tried the same thing with the Black ice accessory set and that won't allow you to mix and match the items you want.
    YourSecretsAreOurSecrets.gif
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited August 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • whoamireallywhoamireally Member Posts: 21 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    The item tooltip states
    "Part of set (0/3)

    Slayer Amulet of the Xvim
    Slayer Belt of the Xvim
    Slayer Ring of the Xvim

    3 of Set: When taking damage you have a chance to activate Might of the Slayer Knight. For 15 seconds, you deal 300 damage to 3 random foes within 20 feet every 3 seconds. Each time you deal damage to a foe with this you gain a stack of Slayer Knight's Boon. When Might of the Slayer Knight expires all stacks of Slayer Knight's Boon are consumed to restore 600 Hit Points per stack and grant 1% Action Points per stack."

    I fail to see why this would be classified as a bug. Nowhere does it state that you must have all the parts.
    magenubbie wrote: »
    The definition is "1 of each item that makes up the set".
    Where did you read that?
  • lucifron44lucifron44 Member Posts: 417 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    whoamireally wrote: »
    Nowhere does it state that you must have all the parts.

    Where did you read that?

    It states you must have three.
    Russian leaderboard first page. The proof.
  • beatannierbeatannier Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 692 Arc User
    edited January 2015
    magenubbie wrote: »
    The definition is "1 of each item that makes up the set".
    False. Example: Dragon artifacts set; It`s set of 5. You can`t have all of them (max is 3). So "set = all of…" or "complete…" does not meet the truth even if it is not intended for xvim to work with 2 rings.

    Topic
    While it`s 1+2 (vs 1+1+1), it is still 3/3 of set, so passes the requirements.
    .Suicide Squad.

    Master of Flame Renegade guide: Burn with me!
  • hefisdohefisdo Member Posts: 709 Bounty Hunter
    edited January 2015
    It's because it's too hard and there's too many difficulties to use ctrl+c and ctrl+v in a feature that they already have and put an "Unique-equipped" in the tooltip.

    You have no idea, it's like... a lot of effort.
    (´･ ω ･`)
Sign In or Register to comment.