Philosophical question:
lets say we use the queue system.
Currently there are 6 people queued, A B C D E F
A-D are commoners, they have no one on their ignore list and are on no ignore lists.
E decided to put F on ignore because
* he Ninja'd last time
or
* he did not like that F had a higher DPS
(meaning, F being ignored by E does not necessarily imply that F has to be an anti social player, there are people out there that put you on ignore because you dared to question their opinion)
Who gets into the 5 player group as 5th player, E or F?
The one ignoring others or the ignored one, that may be on an ignore list for no reason at all?
Imaginary Friends are the best friends you can have!
0
bioshrikeMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 4,729Arc User
Philosophical question:
lets say we use the queue system.
Currently there are 6 people queued, A B C D E F
A-D are commoners, they have no one on their ignore list and are on no ignore lists.
E decided to put F on ignore because
* he Ninja'd last time
or
* he did not like that F had a higher DPS
(meaning, F being ignored by E does not necessarily imply that F has to be an anti social player, there are people out there that put you on ignore because you dared to question their opinion)
Who gets into the 5 player group as 5th player, E or F?
The one ignoring others or the ignored one, that may be on an ignore list for no reason at all?
You bring up an excellent point. To add to that, since one can ignore another for any reason or no reason, and that even with a reason, it doesn't have to be "proven", this system would just exacerbate things. If such a system were implemented, IMO, then the one who ignored the other should be shunted further down the list, simply because their reasons (or lack thereof) for ignoring others can't be proven...
<::::::::::::::)xxxo <::::::::::::::)xxxo <::::::::::::)xxxxxxxx(:::::::::::> oxxx(::::::::::::::> oxxx(::::::::::::::> "Is it better to be feared or respected? I say, is it too much to ask for both?" -Tony Stark Official NW_Legit_Community Forums
Comments
lets say we use the queue system.
Currently there are 6 people queued, A B C D E F
A-D are commoners, they have no one on their ignore list and are on no ignore lists.
E decided to put F on ignore because
* he Ninja'd last time
or
* he did not like that F had a higher DPS
(meaning, F being ignored by E does not necessarily imply that F has to be an anti social player, there are people out there that put you on ignore because you dared to question their opinion)
Who gets into the 5 player group as 5th player, E or F?
The one ignoring others or the ignored one, that may be on an ignore list for no reason at all?
You bring up an excellent point. To add to that, since one can ignore another for any reason or no reason, and that even with a reason, it doesn't have to be "proven", this system would just exacerbate things. If such a system were implemented, IMO, then the one who ignored the other should be shunted further down the list, simply because their reasons (or lack thereof) for ignoring others can't be proven...
"Is it better to be feared or respected? I say, is it too much to ask for both?" -Tony Stark
Official NW_Legit_Community Forums