Someone in chat was saying that Clerics are pretty much unnecessary now with some doo-dad that came in the expansion. Anyone able to disavow or explain why this is?
They're talking about a new artifact that heals over time upon use and has a 3-minute cooldown. Considering a DC can do a burst-heal + heal over time + buff + do it all over again in less than a minute, they're wrong.
Pirate King, Frozen Heart, Spellplague, Karrundax can be easily done without a DC on vanilla nw given that your party was fairly deck out. With the introduction of Mod1+2 it just made things even easier.
bioshrikeMember, NW M9 PlaytestPosts: 4,729Arc User
edited December 2013
I'd put it like this - a group of players with a lot of experience under their belts and high-end gear can probably make *any* combination of classes work. If everyone on a team is only focused on maximizing DPS and killing things ultra fast, then they may perceive a cleric as slowing them down. From the perspective of a "normal" team, a cleric is very helpful and highly regarded. I wouldn't worry too much about what top-end players think, and instead focus on what you or the average player needs/wants...
<::::::::::::::)xxxo <::::::::::::::)xxxo <::::::::::::)xxxxxxxx(:::::::::::> oxxx(::::::::::::::> oxxx(::::::::::::::> "Is it better to be feared or respected? I say, is it too much to ask for both?" -Tony Stark Official NW_Legit_Community Forums
Yeah a lot of 'elite' players come out with stuff like this but the funny thing is that when you actually call them out and ask to see video proof of them running full CN or MC runs with only 2 or 3 players no exploits and no cleric then the majority will never come up with the goods.
Yeah a lot of 'elite' players come out with stuff like this but the funny thing is that when you actually call them out and ask to see video proof of them running full CN or MC runs with only 2 or 3 players no exploits and no cleric then the majority will never come up with the goods.
give me a party willing to full cn without exploits first lol
While no single class is necessary, its more benefitial (and, at least for me - more fun) to have a balanced party.
But whatever works for you is fine. If you find pleasure in running content without clerics - more power to you.
If you need a cleric is depending on what you want to do - and also about your teams total "experience".
As said, on some dungeons a cleric is not that needed like on others.
In general all dungeons should be doable in any party setup, just alternate the tactic.
On some dungeon(parts) I run very more offensive than on others.
So I may don't even got AShield equipped, while I change to "more" healing at bosses or complicated areas.
Let me give a really easy one as some demonstration, did a few MotH runs during last days.
The lowest "most heals" I did was about 230k, the highest was almost 1000k - both parties were random-queued, both parties had average gearscores of ~10.5k, both teams had 2CW and 2 melees next to me (DC).
How do you take a picture in game? Never bothered learning how. But, if the proof is in the pudding, at least I can have a picture to show you where, what, when, and How.
No where near elitist, I prefer to think I'm average w/ common sense...
Do not listen to those people who say that DC's aren't necessary anymore for healing in dungeons. If they claim that they can do T2 dungeons without DCs, then they are using exploits (with the possible exception of PK), OR their gear is *so* high-end that their experience is exceptionally abnormal, and not worth paying attention to.
How do you take a picture in game? Never bothered learning how. But, if the proof is in the pudding, at least I can have a picture to show you where, what, when, and How.
No where near elitist, I prefer to think I'm average w/ common sense...
Problem with healing in game is that lots of chars have stuff to heal or can use endless amounts of potions in no time.
I never understood why devs in MMOs gave tanks healing abilities to be honest. If it is not a Paladin no tank should be able to heal. The game should be focussed on teamwork and this means you need a healer to protect you. Also they could change the timer on potions. I play a healer and I see lots of people in dungeons that just spam their pots although I am there to heal them. Before I can throw them a heal over they just healed themselves up by potions.
While others heal all the time with abilities and items and pots a healer himself is gimped when it comes to damage. Also in dungeons, in most of the fights ppl don't really care about how to position and how to fight. Just pure DPS. Doesn't matter if the healer heals or has problem. In other MMOs I played the healer always was some kind of saint. He was the one that was protected by all means. If the healer had adds people got it off him, if the healer was beaten in PVP then people helped him, tanks taunted or used their def abilities and the DPS guys focussed the attacker because if the healer was down it meant the fail of the party. In Neverwinter in PVP no one cares if the healer is beaten and goes down. I have literally never seen that people stopped beating their target and switched to the guy that was beaten me, the healer.
And if you take GWFs the don't need healers at all what is also wrong in my opinion. This kind of tank should be a berserk type one. Meaning he can become enranged and deal more damage for the cost of sacrificing defense. But he is completely the opposite: More damage, more hitpoints, more def.
Also TRs can solo bosses without a healer. Just use ITC and all the immunities and stealth they have.
0
elewyndylMember, Neverwinter Beta UsersPosts: 0Arc User
What an elitist player says and does and what is true for the majority of people is quite different.
For example I love having a GF in my team. Elitists don't.
Can it be done? Sure. Is it ideal? Not in my opinion.
But people with top end gear can generally do any dungeon without any one single class.
First one thing to make it clear. Since some people do not know what Elitist means. Elistists have 2 aspects.
A. Best of the Best.
B. Look down on other none Elite people and feel supreme.
That is what a pure Elitist does. I usually tell people that I am both roleplayer(slightly not much) and partly Elitist since I admire A part above.
Now I have 2 Clerics and 1 Rogue currently. Even Gauntlgrym Dwarf King can be done without Cleric yes. However is it faster or better without Cleric? No absolutely not unless it is a really weak(not my 2 Clerics) Cleric or a pure TANK maxed DEX and maxed CON Cleric.
I have played with my Rogue together with a pure tank Cleric with good gs 13k and she sucked at healing miserable Cleric for PvE! I have also played with 10k+ Clerics who are excellent for most Tier 2 Dungeons including Dwarf King in Gauntlgrym
If I could choose yes I would take a Cleric with me at least as long as it is decent ant not 7k Cleric. However when in Gauntlgrym you have very little time to find people and if you do not have a Cleric I would que without Cleric for random Cleric or if group is strong without Cleric. Personally I think it is never better without Cleric unless the Cleric really sucks(compared to the challenge) I think.
As for Guardian Fighter. It is a known fact that Guardian Fighters and Great Weapon Fighters get about 2000 extra gearscore! Therefore a Guardian Fighter with 12000 gs is roughly as same as 10k Rogue, Wizard or Cleric. You don't need GF! However it is stupid to be GF racist they can do great if you remember the 2000 extra gs rule I mentioned. I have done even Castle Never 4/4 without GF, but I have also done Gauntlgrym sometimes with 2 GF in the same group.
I have never tried a suicide campaign like try Castle Never 4/4 without Cleric. IF that could be done theoretically that would not make it faster or really smooth run.
give me a party willing to full cn without exploits first lol
*Right here* Five of us done this Friday night and killed 3rd boss. Even better considering the l33t 15k GF quit on us and told us we wouldn't beat the first boss. We were willing to continue to boss 4 but after 2 hours we'd had enough.
PSA: You don't need to grind Spinward Rise for your Elemental artifact main hand if you have some AD lying around. You can craft it via the Tyranny of Dragon's campaign screen.
Comments
Kaylee Krankenwagen, level 60 GF | Tavandruil Wayfinder, level 49 GWF | Aldith Langley, level 51 HR
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= http://www.youtube.com/user/moegoodtime
For example I love having a GF in my team. Elitists don't.
Can it be done? Sure. Is it ideal? Not in my opinion.
But people with top end gear can generally do any dungeon without any one single class.
"Is it better to be feared or respected? I say, is it too much to ask for both?" -Tony Stark
Official NW_Legit_Community Forums
Isn't that an (anti-)elitist comment in itself.....
picture worth 1000 words
While no single class is necessary, its more benefitial (and, at least for me - more fun) to have a balanced party.
But whatever works for you is fine. If you find pleasure in running content without clerics - more power to you.
As said, on some dungeons a cleric is not that needed like on others.
In general all dungeons should be doable in any party setup, just alternate the tactic.
On some dungeon(parts) I run very more offensive than on others.
So I may don't even got AShield equipped, while I change to "more" healing at bosses or complicated areas.
Let me give a really easy one as some demonstration, did a few MotH runs during last days.
The lowest "most heals" I did was about 230k, the highest was almost 1000k - both parties were random-queued, both parties had average gearscores of ~10.5k, both teams had 2CW and 2 melees next to me (DC).
No where near elitist, I prefer to think I'm average w/ common sense...
ctrl+printrscreen
I never understood why devs in MMOs gave tanks healing abilities to be honest. If it is not a Paladin no tank should be able to heal. The game should be focussed on teamwork and this means you need a healer to protect you. Also they could change the timer on potions. I play a healer and I see lots of people in dungeons that just spam their pots although I am there to heal them. Before I can throw them a heal over they just healed themselves up by potions.
While others heal all the time with abilities and items and pots a healer himself is gimped when it comes to damage. Also in dungeons, in most of the fights ppl don't really care about how to position and how to fight. Just pure DPS. Doesn't matter if the healer heals or has problem. In other MMOs I played the healer always was some kind of saint. He was the one that was protected by all means. If the healer had adds people got it off him, if the healer was beaten in PVP then people helped him, tanks taunted or used their def abilities and the DPS guys focussed the attacker because if the healer was down it meant the fail of the party. In Neverwinter in PVP no one cares if the healer is beaten and goes down. I have literally never seen that people stopped beating their target and switched to the guy that was beaten me, the healer.
And if you take GWFs the don't need healers at all what is also wrong in my opinion. This kind of tank should be a berserk type one. Meaning he can become enranged and deal more damage for the cost of sacrificing defense. But he is completely the opposite: More damage, more hitpoints, more def.
Also TRs can solo bosses without a healer. Just use ITC and all the immunities and stealth they have.
First one thing to make it clear. Since some people do not know what Elitist means. Elistists have 2 aspects.
A. Best of the Best.
B. Look down on other none Elite people and feel supreme.
That is what a pure Elitist does. I usually tell people that I am both roleplayer(slightly not much) and partly Elitist since I admire A part above.
Now I have 2 Clerics and 1 Rogue currently. Even Gauntlgrym Dwarf King can be done without Cleric yes. However is it faster or better without Cleric? No absolutely not unless it is a really weak(not my 2 Clerics) Cleric or a pure TANK maxed DEX and maxed CON Cleric.
I have played with my Rogue together with a pure tank Cleric with good gs 13k and she sucked at healing miserable Cleric for PvE! I have also played with 10k+ Clerics who are excellent for most Tier 2 Dungeons including Dwarf King in Gauntlgrym
If I could choose yes I would take a Cleric with me at least as long as it is decent ant not 7k Cleric. However when in Gauntlgrym you have very little time to find people and if you do not have a Cleric I would que without Cleric for random Cleric or if group is strong without Cleric. Personally I think it is never better without Cleric unless the Cleric really sucks(compared to the challenge) I think.
As for Guardian Fighter. It is a known fact that Guardian Fighters and Great Weapon Fighters get about 2000 extra gearscore! Therefore a Guardian Fighter with 12000 gs is roughly as same as 10k Rogue, Wizard or Cleric. You don't need GF! However it is stupid to be GF racist they can do great if you remember the 2000 extra gs rule I mentioned. I have done even Castle Never 4/4 without GF, but I have also done Gauntlgrym sometimes with 2 GF in the same group.
I have never tried a suicide campaign like try Castle Never 4/4 without Cleric. IF that could be done theoretically that would not make it faster or really smooth run.
*Right here* Five of us done this Friday night and killed 3rd boss. Even better considering the l33t 15k GF quit on us and told us we wouldn't beat the first boss. We were willing to continue to boss 4 but after 2 hours we'd had enough.