test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

What's the big deal with wanting Dragons?

2

Comments

  • karitrkaritr Member Posts: 662 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    How about unlocking assets based on productivity then? That way, rare monsters can still be relatively rare, and everyone would still be playing on the same field.

    Numbers are rubbish and used for example purposes only :p
    • Create a second/higher tier enemy monster table for rare or more challenging monsters
    • Provide challenge ratings between 1 and 25
    • Link monsters to logical environments
    • After creating 3 Foundry quests that meet 'Daily' eligibility, author has access to one enemy type from this table, from a challenge rating between 1-10, per quest
    • After creating 5 Foundry quests that meet 'Daily' eligibility, author has access to two enemy types from this table, from a challenge rating between 1-20, per quest
    • After creating 8 Foundry quests that meet 'Daily' eligibility, author has access to three enemy types from this table, from a challenge rating of 1-25, per quest
  • koboldbard2koboldbard2 Banned Users Posts: 334 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    celantra wrote: »
    I really want to be nice when I say this, so imagine that your sweet old grandmother is telling you this, in her this is how you peel potatoes voice.

    Please stop comparing the Foundry to the NWN toolset. They have absolutely nothing to do with one another.
    Cryptic's CEO sat down for a NWN postcast less than two weeks ago comparing them. I'll side with him on whether it's ok to compare them.
  • celantracelantra Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Silverstars, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 465
    edited August 2013
    It doesn't matter you are right.
  • narayansinghnarayansingh Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users Posts: 243 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    Here's my reason: It's Dungeons & DRAGONS! Not Campaigns & Kobolds, or Feywild & Fomorians.


    Yes, and Neverwinter is not really Dungeons & Dragons either. It's an MMO not a P&P game.

    Narayan
    Sweet Water and Light Laughter Till Next We Meet.
    Narayan
  • koboldbard2koboldbard2 Banned Users Posts: 334 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    Here's my reason: It's Dungeons & DRAGONS! Not Campaigns & Kobolds, or Feywild & Fomorians.
    If it was Campaigns & Kobolds, it would be better.
  • apocrs1980apocrs1980 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Silverstars Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    I can already see this thread is starting to turn sour. The lead producer of the foundry already iterated this for those who did not watch the live stream: "we are working on bringing group content to the foundry, so I will take the blame for not having dragons available, I want to save them for when we do group content for the foundry."

    End of discussion.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The Cragsteep Crypt - BETA
    Ravenloft
    Look for@Apocrs1980 or visit the main page here or Ravenloft here
  • koboldbard2koboldbard2 Banned Users Posts: 334 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    I've played modules where the dragon is the one assigning the quest, in which case it makes sense to have a dragon in solo content.
  • ambisinisterrambisinisterr Member, Neverwinter Moderator Posts: 10,462 Community Moderator
    edited August 2013
    apocrs1980 wrote: »
    I can already see this thread is starting to turn sour. The lead producer of the foundry already iterated this for those who did not watch the live stream: "we are working on bringing group content to the foundry, so I will take the blame for not having dragons available, I want to save them for when we do group content for the foundry."

    End of discussion.

    -A fresh off the boat author should still never be given access to something as iconic as dragons. Some things should be restricted to more accomplished authors and that remains true of both group and solo player content This is completely different than cash gating which Craig did say is a bad idea. Some things players should have to prove they deserve to have!*

    -A single level four or five level fours. Doesn't matter to me. Level fours should die at the site of a dragon. A real dragon encounter should still require level 30+. There's a difference between dragon illusions and dragon bosses*
  • zahinderzahinder Member Posts: 897 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Earned?

    Given the utterly thankless task foundry creation is, tell you what -- I'll be happy 'earning' foundry pieces if I also earn visibility for my missions.
    Or stipends.

    Until then, I have very rude views toward the presumption that we have to prove ourselves worthy of spending hundreds of hours providing NW content. Isn't that what reviews are for?
    Campaign: The Fenwick Cycle NWS-DKR9GB7KH

    Wicks and Things: NW-DI4FMZRR4 : The Fenwick merchant family has lost a caravan! Can you help?

    Beggar's Hollow: NW-DR6YG4J2L : Someone, or something, has stolen away many of the Fenwicks' children! Can you find out what happened to them?

    Into the Fen Wood: NW-DL89DRG7B : Enter the heart of the forest. Can you discover the secret of the Fen Wood?
  • apocrs1980apocrs1980 Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Silverstars Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    -A fresh off the boat author should still never be given access to something as iconic as dragons. Some things should be restricted to more accomplished authors and that remains true of both group and solo player content This is completely different than cash gating which Craig did say is a bad idea. Some things players should have to prove they deserve to have!*

    -A single level four or five level fours. Doesn't matter to me. Level fours should die at the site of a dragon. A real dragon encounter should still require level 30+. There's a difference between dragon illusions and dragon bosses*

    What sort of system would you suggest?
    I thought a lot about this well, basically anyone can publish 2-3 quests and have them eligible in no time, even the exploit authors.
    If I were to take a stab at it I would think if your quest was featured it unlocks additional "rare" costumes, but the coding and designing of something like that would be a nightmare on top of the other bugs they are already trying to squash.
    Plus, it also kind of goes against what their initial stance was from the beginning, "not to restrict any author from any foundry content" so that they can tell their story how they want.

    Yes, there will be quests that come out like SUPER DRAGON GRIND XP IN A BOX 2013!!! But, we just do as we always have, report them and move on.
    The true authors that create iconic encounters with the said dragon in their quests will be the ones who stand out and have their audience in awe.

    As I see it, there really isn't any room for grey when it comes to the foundry...either it is or it isn't, and this being from an authors perspective, I would much rather have unlimited control over the content I create and just deal with the exploiters as they come.

    I personally think gimping the foundry to stop exploiters hurts us worse in the long run and puts severe limitations on what could be otherwise better content then any other MMO has. /rant
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    The Cragsteep Crypt - BETA
    Ravenloft
    Look for@Apocrs1980 or visit the main page here or Ravenloft here
  • ambisinisterrambisinisterr Member, Neverwinter Moderator Posts: 10,462 Community Moderator
    edited August 2013
    To me it's not about outright stopping the farms and the exploits but to ensure some measure of quality.

    Badbotlimit said he wanted to save something like dragons for boss fights and group content. I'm going to go off on a limb and say it's because these should be special, interesting and challenging content.

    That would mean nothing if every single person had access to dragons as soon as they reach level 15. Sure the exploiters will gain access to them no matter what; that's inevitable. I just don't feel any person should be able to use a dragon in their first 1-3 quests.

    It's nothing more than quality control so the one star horrible quest makers don't flood the game with one star horrible dragon quests just because dragons are really cool. I don't want to see the entire foundry filled with quests that read "A dragon attacked the town so go kill it!" and then you transition into a non-decorated single room cave and kill it as the only creature.

    I'm not requesting hard core authors only have access to dragons but Cryptic should limit dragons to people who at least have experience in The Foundry.
  • saerraelsaerrael Member, Neverwinter Beta Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    To me it's not about outright stopping the farms and the exploits but to ensure some measure of quality.

    Badbotlimit said he wanted to save something like dragons for boss fights and group content. I'm going to go off on a limb and say it's because these should be special, interesting and challenging content.

    That would mean nothing if every single person had access to dragons as soon as they reach level 15. Sure the exploiters will gain access to them no matter what; that's inevitable. I just don't feel any person should be able to use a dragon in their first 1-3 quests.

    It's nothing more than quality control so the one star horrible quest makers don't flood the game with one star horrible dragon quests just because dragons are really cool. I don't want to see the entire foundry filled with quests that read "A dragon attacked the town so go kill it!" and then you transition into a non-decorated single room cave and kill it as the only creature.

    I'm not requesting hard core authors only have access to dragons but Cryptic should limit dragons to people who at least have experience in The Foundry.


    Unlocked on achievement, maybe? If that is possible, of course.
  • zahinderzahinder Member Posts: 897 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Judge missions based on their own merits.

    Someone who hops through any hoops you set up could make a terrible mission with dragons. A new author could make awesome missions with dragons.

    If you don't think the current review system can adequately handle these cases, improve THAT.
    Campaign: The Fenwick Cycle NWS-DKR9GB7KH

    Wicks and Things: NW-DI4FMZRR4 : The Fenwick merchant family has lost a caravan! Can you help?

    Beggar's Hollow: NW-DR6YG4J2L : Someone, or something, has stolen away many of the Fenwicks' children! Can you find out what happened to them?

    Into the Fen Wood: NW-DL89DRG7B : Enter the heart of the forest. Can you discover the secret of the Fen Wood?
  • koboldsmell88koboldsmell88 Banned Users Posts: 196 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    I'm kind of disgusted by the people who say we shouldn't have dragons because of exploiters. This is the same reasoning that has costed us exp and decent Foundry rewards. Exploit quests are sitting on the Best list now, even without dragons. Why do you keep punishing legitimate Foundry authors, and rewarding exploiters?
  • ambisinisterrambisinisterr Member, Neverwinter Moderator Posts: 10,462 Community Moderator
    edited August 2013
    If they can make a good mission with a dragon...
    They can make a couple of other good ones first.

    If hoops prevent any horrible quests then it's mission accomplished IMO. If somebody really wants to make a good quality mission they shouldn't have a problem in making a few good quality missions beforehand. Diving into the foundry and making a dragon quest at level 15 is like trying to run before you can crawl.
    If you think there is anything other than the slimmest chance the quest will be anything but horrible the odds are definitely not in your favor.

    saerrael wrote: »
    Unlocked on achievement, maybe? If that is possible, of course.

    That's what I said I'd make it. And considering you can earn things other than titles from Foundry Achievements I don't see why it would be too hard to incorporate.
  • koboldsmell88koboldsmell88 Banned Users Posts: 196 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    If they can make a good mission with a dragon...
    They can make a couple of other good ones first.

    If hoops prevent any horrible quests then it's mission accomplished IMO. If somebody really wants to make a good quality mission they shouldn't have a problem in making a few good quality missions beforehand. Diving into the foundry and making a dragon quest at level 15 is like trying to run before you can crawl.
    If you think there is anything other than the slimmest chance the quest will be anything but horrible the odds are definitely not in your favor.




    That's what I said I'd make it. And considering you can earn things other than titles from Foundry Achievements I don't see why it would be too hard to incorporate.

    I disagree with your reasoning completely. You're punishing good authors because some authors are bad. What the heck, man?
  • zahinderzahinder Member Posts: 897 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Randomly deleting people's accounts when they try to open Foundry will prevent horrible quests.

    Doesn't mean it's a good idea.
    Campaign: The Fenwick Cycle NWS-DKR9GB7KH

    Wicks and Things: NW-DI4FMZRR4 : The Fenwick merchant family has lost a caravan! Can you help?

    Beggar's Hollow: NW-DR6YG4J2L : Someone, or something, has stolen away many of the Fenwicks' children! Can you find out what happened to them?

    Into the Fen Wood: NW-DL89DRG7B : Enter the heart of the forest. Can you discover the secret of the Fen Wood?
  • ambisinisterrambisinisterr Member, Neverwinter Moderator Posts: 10,462 Community Moderator
    edited August 2013
    I'm not punishing good authors.
    I'm asking them to prove they are good authors before they are given something truly iconic.

    If they deserve to use dragons...
    They should prove it.
  • zerkovaplayerzerkovaplayer Member Posts: 51 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    To me it's not about outright stopping the farms and the exploits but to ensure some measure of quality.

    Badbotlimit said he wanted to save something like dragons for boss fights and group content. I'm going to go off on a limb and say it's because these should be special, interesting and challenging content.

    That would mean nothing if every single person had access to dragons as soon as they reach level 15. Sure the exploiters will gain access to them no matter what; that's inevitable. I just don't feel any person should be able to use a dragon in their first 1-3 quests.

    It's nothing more than quality control so the one star horrible quest makers don't flood the game with one star horrible dragon quests just because dragons are really cool. I don't want to see the entire foundry filled with quests that read "A dragon attacked the town so go kill it!" and then you transition into a non-decorated single room cave and kill it as the only creature.

    I'm not requesting hard core authors only have access to dragons but Cryptic should limit dragons to people who at least have experience in The Foundry.
    There are two separate issues that are getting blurred together:

    1. Being able to use dragon skins beyond the dragonling, which seems to be of fixed size with zero animation.
    2. Being able to put in heavy-duty boss fights ("extra hard" encounter levels).

    Frankly, given the number of quests that are stacking or chaining multiple Hard-level encounters, there's a very real demand for boss fights.

    I don't think that people will actually treat dragons as a go-to boss unless they're the only boss we get to use. I don't think people will "abuse" dragon costume skins if they're available. HAMSTER quests will sink to the bottom, exploit quests will get reported, and if a lot of people don't like gratuitous dragons, then few people who don't deserve it will put dragons in quests that you see.
    Foundry Quest: Breaking the Chain NW-DELOGH4IH
    (Daily eligible! Could use more reviews. Largely complete.)
  • koboldsmell88koboldsmell88 Banned Users Posts: 196 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    I'm not punishing good authors.
    I'm asking them to prove themselves before they are given something.

    If they deserve to use dragons...
    They should prove it.

    So if you was coaching a softball team, you'd buy ice cream only for the kids who hit a home run, and exclude the others because they don't deserve it?
  • zerkovaplayerzerkovaplayer Member Posts: 51 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    I'm not punishing good authors.
    I'm asking them to prove themselves before they are given something.

    If they deserve to use dragons...
    They should prove it.
    I don't see why. The only way you can prove you know how to write a story involving dragons is by writing a story involving dragons. Catch-22 or go home, in other words.
    Foundry Quest: Breaking the Chain NW-DELOGH4IH
    (Daily eligible! Could use more reviews. Largely complete.)
  • zerkovaplayerzerkovaplayer Member Posts: 51 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    If they can make a good mission with a dragon...
    They can make a couple of other good ones first.

    If hoops prevent any horrible quests then it's mission accomplished IMO.
    Horrible quests are not the problem. Horrible quests will get horrible ratings. Exploit quests will get reported (hopefully) and gotten rid of.
    Foundry Quest: Breaking the Chain NW-DELOGH4IH
    (Daily eligible! Could use more reviews. Largely complete.)
  • koboldsmell88koboldsmell88 Banned Users Posts: 196 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    I don't see why. The only way you can prove you know how to write a story involving dragons is by writing a story involving dragons. Catch-22 or go home, in other words.

    He just wants to further promote an elitist attitude and divide the Foundry community into haves and have-nots. I'm disgusted. Every Foundry author should get the same opportunities.
  • zerkovaplayerzerkovaplayer Member Posts: 51 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    Badbotlimit said he wanted to save something like dragons for boss fights and group content. I'm going to go off on a limb and say it's because these should be special, interesting and challenging content.
    Well, so when are we going to be able to put in boss fights and group content in Foundry, then?
    Foundry Quest: Breaking the Chain NW-DELOGH4IH
    (Daily eligible! Could use more reviews. Largely complete.)
  • zahinderzahinder Member Posts: 897 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    I'm not punishing good authors.
    I'm asking them to prove they are good authors before they are given something truly iconic.

    If they deserve to use dragons...
    They should prove it.

    That would be a great idea. Moreover, I think all authors should be required to prove themselves before appearing on the Best tab, so we can weed out all those exploits and farms.

    Cryptic should hire, oh, 20 or so folks to play missions and vet them for quality. I think it'd improve listings a great deal.



    Anything less than that is not going to do anything useful.
    Campaign: The Fenwick Cycle NWS-DKR9GB7KH

    Wicks and Things: NW-DI4FMZRR4 : The Fenwick merchant family has lost a caravan! Can you help?

    Beggar's Hollow: NW-DR6YG4J2L : Someone, or something, has stolen away many of the Fenwicks' children! Can you find out what happened to them?

    Into the Fen Wood: NW-DL89DRG7B : Enter the heart of the forest. Can you discover the secret of the Fen Wood?
  • koboldsmell88koboldsmell88 Banned Users Posts: 196 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    zahinder wrote: »
    That would be a great idea. Moreover, I think all authors should be required to prove themselves before appearing on the Best tab, so we can weed out all those exploits and farms.

    Cryptic should hire, oh, 20 or so folks to play missions and vet them for quality. I think it'd improve listings a great deal.



    Anything less than that is not going to do anything useful.

    +1 to your passive-aggressive win.
  • zbkoldezbkolde Member Posts: 689 Arc User
    edited August 2013
    zahinder wrote: »
    That would be a great idea. Moreover, I think all authors should be required to prove themselves before appearing on the Best tab, so we can weed out all those exploits and farms.

    Cryptic should hire, oh, 20 or so folks to play missions and vet them for quality. I think it'd improve listings a great deal.



    Anything less than that is not going to do anything useful.

    Standing ovation.
  • ambisinisterrambisinisterr Member, Neverwinter Moderator Posts: 10,462 Community Moderator
    edited August 2013
    So if you was coaching a softball team, you'd buy ice cream only for the kids who hit a home run, and exclude the others because they don't deserve it?

    Does everybody on a sports team get paid the same amount?

    I don't see why. The only way you can prove you know how to write a story involving dragons is by writing a story involving dragons. Catch-22 or go home, in other words.

    You're half right. Each story is different, sure, and being a good author doesn't mean you will use a dragon well but a person's first quest shouldn't be 'look mom people can kill a dragon in my quest!'


    Content shouldn't be gated behind cash shops but there's no reason that authors shouldn't be expected to be familiar with the tools before they create more iconic or advanced content. This same concept could expand author detail limits, would you argue that's unfair then?
    Sadly if everybody gets the same stuff we end up with what we already have...a Foundry which is sorely lacking in some major areas.

    If people prove themselves accomplished there's no reason they shouldn't gain more advanced or exclusive features. I'm by no means saying make it impossible...
    But there is absolutely no reason to simply say 'here you go, do your worst' to every single person.

    You can call it elitism...
    But there's a handful of authors just in this thread I know darn well would do well with more features...features which can not be handed out to just anybody...and to me that includes dragons.
    I'd rather have a Foundry which can truly expand the game content rather than holding back good authors.
  • koboldbard2koboldbard2 Banned Users Posts: 334 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    Here's how you solve the problem of bad dragon quests:

    Don't play them.

    Problem solved.
  • koboldsmell88koboldsmell88 Banned Users Posts: 196 Bounty Hunter
    edited August 2013
    May Bahamut have mercy on your soul, Ambi. I pray to him the devs ignore your ... opinions.
Sign In or Register to comment.