test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Time to address the elephant in the room...

2»

Comments

  • nyghomanyghoma Member Posts: 546 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    zahinder wrote: »

    Cryptic knows better from several years of STO Foundry. They have no excuses.

    This is the part that just floors me.
    tol-banner.png

    NW-DT4OV7EXH


    Every time they idiot-proof something...they make better idiots.
  • zovyazovya Member, Neverwinter Beta Users, Neverwinter Hero Users, Neverwinter Guardian Users, Neverwinter Knight of the Feywild Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I've coded many websites. Some were competition/voting websites. So I know it's not too hard to add a similar feature:

    When a vote comes from an IP that already voted, there are diminishing returns for each vote from that IP address. Sounds like an easy way to stop abusive bot voting.

    Sure you can spoof your IP.

    I had another system in place. More active accounts had a higher "weight" when voting in contrast to those who only logged in to vote for a particular node.

    Consider this too: The adjusted rating formula isn't known. So some of this may be included already. Who knows. If not, might be a good idea to include it.
  • koboldbard2koboldbard2 Banned Users Posts: 334 Bounty Hunter
    edited July 2013
    zovya wrote: »
    Consider this too: The adjusted rating formula isn't known.
    The devs posted the adjusted rating formula during Foundry beta. Problem is, it doesn't seem to work like that.
  • ovaltine74ovaltine74 Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    I wish they would do something about this. Part two of my quest is sitting half finished, but I have no desire to work on it with the state of things. I keep revisiting the forums in the hopes that they will one day get serious and revamp the current system. Until they do though I spend my time doing other things.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    NW-DMIME87F5
    Awaiting a serious response from the developers on the abuse of the review system by other authors.

    Video Preview
  • nyghomanyghoma Member Posts: 546 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    ovaltine74 wrote: »
    I wish they would do something about this. Part two of my quest is sitting half finished, but I have no desire to work on it with the state of things. I keep revisiting the forums in the hopes that they will one day get serious and revamp the current system. Until they do though I spend my time doing other things.

    Yeah, more then half the authors in our guild stopped using the foundry until Cryptic fixes its policies. Pretty sad.
    tol-banner.png

    NW-DT4OV7EXH


    Every time they idiot-proof something...they make better idiots.
  • wuhsinwuhsin Banned Users Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited July 2013
    How many of us have withdrawn our quests now?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Sign In or Register to comment.