First of all take a look here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtBIsqU3uJA&feature=youtu.be .
It's very clear to who played GWF that this kind of DPS at level 60 it's doube++ the one you do single target.
...
One easy fix i suggest to GWF is to
make Power flat bonus, damage % from strength count double because it's a twohanded weapon. For example 2500 power is 100 flat damage, to a rogue it s much more valuable than to a GWF because the attack speed is higher. On the contrary 100 flat damage have a very little difference over GWF at-wills and lower attack speed.
...
_______EDIT________
Just to underline the very low effect of Power on GWF at wills and their absolutely undecent low damage here are few screenshots... Here i'm considering Sure Strike damage from tooltip (which is the real damage, tested on dummy) in two setups with different power stat. Sure Strike for most of GWF builds is the best single target At-Will power and it does a damage similar to Weapon Master's Strike (though this one is a better AOE). Sure Strike execution time is roughly 2 seconds and it's a 4 attacks combo on which last attack hits for double damage. But let's check the screenshots:
SET1 (with cat summoned):
SET2 (without cat summoned):
From one setup to another the amount of flat damage power gives is 159 on SET2 vs 179 on SET1, the difference is of 20 points of flat damage. The amount of "max" damage Sure Strike does is just barely affected: from set 1 to 2 the difference is of only 9 points of "max" damage. This means that in this case the Sure Strike ability only takes a rough 45% of the flat amount of power you have.
Known as
Zerkul on DDO forums
I]Ryumajin, Zavarthak, Leohands of Cannith[/I, look for me on YouTube.
Comments
+1
on top of that the combo is better.
but someone will say rogues are pure damage and have no CC, survavibility, mobility,...
Hedas 60 GWF.
Hrod 60 GF.
Alain Loreweaver 60 CW.
Dragon.
The producer said yesterday in a video that they know GWF has issues.
CC abilities? Control Wizards do better damage and a lot better CC: they're actually nuke wizards with control abilities.
Nice to know! Thanks very much.
He also said "when we look at pure data, in terms of leveling speed and potion usage over time, it seems strictly in line with other classes and where we want it to be, but the FEEL of it isnt coming across very well"
translation: working as intended, but we may make it look prettier
do you know where i can watch?
Hedas 60 GWF.
Hrod 60 GF.
Alain Loreweaver 60 CW.
Dragon.
I always wondered though: was it because the GWF might get much better with high levels? Now i know and they seriously need to increase the DPS of a GWF.
My halfling trickster is level 44 atm and I put any GWF to shame when I'm near them.
Yeah my rogue level 1 first at will you get crits for 4-7k a swing, 3-4k normal hits, very fast damage.
Its insane, while GWF or GF slower dps, much lower damage.
Shard: Mindflayer
Characters: Grim, Rune, Holy, Ruin - If the name isn't the @FearGXxD handle, it's not me!
7:42 is the start of the GWF topic
When your secondary is a "Striker" 3000 vs. 600 is not valid. It should be more like 3000 vs. 1800. The rogue should be still on top with pure Striker but someone taking their secondary role and focusing on it should be close behind the pure Striker.
I would like to hear something from a developer about why the tanking fighter class does more damage than the striker fighter class, that would be very interesting.
thank you.
/10 char.
Hedas 60 GWF.
Hrod 60 GF.
Alain Loreweaver 60 CW.
Dragon.
we are talking about lvl 60 here as you would know had you watched the video about TRs and read the original post.
Hedas 60 GWF.
Hrod 60 GF.
Alain Loreweaver 60 CW.
Dragon.
P.P.S. That would also make the name and description for Sure Strike more amazing. "The Fighter weapon swings make him more sure in the inpending victory for every hit the enemy suffers, making him do more and more dmg."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3I_Ds2ytz4o
Hedas 60 GWF.
Hrod 60 GF.
Alain Loreweaver 60 CW.
Dragon.
The only thing I regret about rolling a TR is that I should have rolled this class earlier, so that I didn't have to spend a lot of money on respec my GWF or to build my gear repeatedly for a difference.
I've always played rogue or assassin in other mmo but when I watched the NW GWF class trailer on Youtube, I thought **** it, it's so <font color="orange">HAMSTER</font>, forget about the rogue, finally a class with cool animation and can beat the hell out of other ppl at the same time. But, it's a trap!
Yeah I facepalmed when I listened to this.
They don't even understand what's happening in the slightest. There's just something wrong with the "feel" of the class obviously!
How can they be so out of touch with their own stuff? Makes me want to abandon the class.
yeah. im at 52 atm and everytime i see a TR/CW I cry myself to sleep
Hedas 60 GWF.
Hrod 60 GF.
Alain Loreweaver 60 CW.
Dragon.
Way to steal my forum avatar.
Occam's Razor makes the cutting clean.
No, no, they're right. It doesn't feel right when a big swing of a greatsword deals less damage per hit than stabbing something with a little knife. It doesn't feel right when a GWF gets kicked from any epic level group it joins. It doesn't feel right when the GWF can't perform its defined role properly.
It's all about the feels, apparently.
Part One: The Fell Cavern (looking for feedback!) NW-DTWX9RBQH
Hopefully more to come!
Merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily, Life is but a dream.
I'm not sure about this but do you really have lot of choices besides: Flourish & Indomitable Battle Strike as a GWF skill? I don't understand what you mean by wrong skills.
According to his screenshot 4k4 power is not considered as "incredibly low", inspect a TR and check how much is his power and the output dps he does.