Hey guys, sometime around 9-12 months ago somebody posted a comparison of Fireburst, Briartwine and Frostburn and the ACT results showed Fireburst did notably more damage than the other two.
I cannot for the life of me find that post - does anyone remember it, or better yet are they able to find it?
Thanks
Please Do Not Feed The Trolls
Xael De Armadeon: DC
Xane De Armadeon: CW
Zen De Armadeon: OP
Zohar De Armadeon: TR
Chrion De Armadeon: SW
Gosti Big Belly: GWF
Barney McRustbucket: GF
Lt. Thackeray: HR
Lucius De Armadeon: BD
Member of Casual Dailies - XBox 0
Comments
It's worth noting that this was before the updates to the proc rates (which happened about 6 months later) so it'd be really helpful if someone on PC was able to re-test them.
For the record, the difference between them was considerable; tested during EToS runs, the Frost & Briar did around 300-350k total damage whereas the Fireburst did around 2.2 million.
This was before the internal cooldowns on Fire & Frost were reduced so they'd do better now.
With the new meta (since then) of lower DR & more SoF instead of the Bubble, it's probable that the Briartwine would also do more damage as it reflects 5% of net damage received.
* edit - thanks @omgitszeph - I had typed this reply hours ago and forgot to hit the post button but thank you!
Xael De Armadeon: DC
Xane De Armadeon: CW
Zen De Armadeon: OP
Zohar De Armadeon: TR
Chrion De Armadeon: SW
Gosti Big Belly: GWF
Barney McRustbucket: GF
Lt. Thackeray: HR
Lucius De Armadeon: BD
Member of Casual Dailies - XBox
Xael De Armadeon: DC
Xane De Armadeon: CW
Zen De Armadeon: OP
Zohar De Armadeon: TR
Chrion De Armadeon: SW
Gosti Big Belly: GWF
Barney McRustbucket: GF
Lt. Thackeray: HR
Lucius De Armadeon: BD
Member of Casual Dailies - XBox