test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Imposible to play this game with GF's one rotating everyone

2

Comments

  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User

    HR and SW need massive boosts to burst damage and less or no DoTs. Making GWF have no defenses is not a way to solve the problem. You guys have experienced Icy and other max IL players and somehow think it is GWF that is immortal. We are not, trust me. It is insignias, Negation, Feytouched and a combo of all the toys together. The best solution would probably be to place Countless scars further up the Sentinel tree out of reach of Destroyer. That is the only thing that would not kill the class.

    i definitely agree on your last sentence but i kindly invite you answer question for questions my post.
    i got a strange idea on you and i m ready to make up my mind. Give me reasons.
  • edited July 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User

    No. GWF and DC should be tanky and GF and Pali should be tankiest. The other strikers are light armor and should not be tanky, they are glass cannon classes. Of course, Strikers should all do around the same amount of DPS with light armor classes doing slightly more due to being more squishy. But, no way should a light-armor class be able to face tank an armor class.

    @difiantone99 so you think gwf should be the less "striker" of all strikers right? i invite you again to give your feedback
  • This content has been removed.
  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User

    We pretty much always were til Mod 6. Ya, some BIS GWFs used the cheesy Intimidation build, but overall GWF was useless as a DD. So, no I do not want us to go back to that. But, I think the other strikers need a boost that does not capitalize on exploits like HR and SW do right now. They should all do roughly the same damage. The other classes will do more anyway due to Dread enchant, which is pretty bad on GWF.

    thats not a clear answer but at least is something.
    so lets talk of something i know better: archery hr and combat hr.
    if they dont need to have survability on par with a gwf but dont have any control, are they allowed to do more damage than a destroyer gwf?
    @defiantone99
  • edited July 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User
    edited July 2016

    It is my feeling Trapper needs to be nerfed to the ground just like Oppressor CW was. A control tree should not be a DPS tree. As far as DPS goes, Archery and Combat are not viable atm, so I will withhold judgment til I see them fixed and try them myself.

    my question was different: a striker with no defense comparable to a gwf should do more damage?

    and if you dont want to answer this question would you please compile a list of where each class should be for damage and survibility? for the sake of making this list clear to everyone reading lets avoid to include oppressor cws and trapper hrs.
    top damage is 100%, top survibaility is 100%. Please tell us what you think about where full striker classes should be.
    please be sure to list gwf destroyer, archery hr, combat hr, and sw as general class.

    @defiantone99
  • edited July 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User
    i can now cons

    It is not a good question considering all of the other strikers can be tanky. TRs have ITC, SWs have Soul Sparks and CWs have shield and a great dodge. There is little evidence, outside of subjective GWF haters that GWF is more tankier than them. Most posts I read say nobody dies in PVP unless ambushed by a GF or TR. There is even a video of an HR soloing ECC with no potions and standing in the fires on the ground. Lazalia had to use potions and stay out of the red.

    i can now consider my opinion confirmed, thanks for your time.
    dont bother editing posts, i quoted everything.
  • edited July 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User
    edited July 2016

    Haha. Who are you, the Popo? You gonna turn me in for speaking the truth?

    @difiantone99
    i just asked you a couple of questions and you avoided the answers. Because as is clear to everyone reading this post, you are biased.
    indeed you are not speaking the truth.
    you are just trying to fill your agenda.
    prove me im wrong again,

    would you please compile a list of where each class should be for damage and survibility? for the sake of making this list clear to everyone reading lets avoid to include oppressor cws and trapper hrs.
    top damage is 100%, top survibaility is 100%. Please tell us what you think about where full striker classes should be.
    please be sure to list gwf destroyer, archery hr, combat hr, and sw as general class.

    to help you i will list mine:

    SW DAMAGE 100% SURVIBILITY 30%
    HR ARCHER DAMAGE 90% SURVIABILITY 40%
    HR COMBAT DAMAGE 80% SURVILITY 50%
    TR DAMAGE 75% SURVIVABILITY 55%
    CW DAMAGE 73% SURVIBAILITY 58%
    DESTROYER GWF DAMAGE 70% SURVIVABILITY 60%

    and so on.

    now please list us yours


  • edited July 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User

    Of course I am biased. Are you not? Never said I was not. GWF has been nerfed and nerfed. So, go look elsewhere for sympathy and a member of the nerf gwf campaign.

    so here we are @defiantone99 is biased. No im not, i just want to have the goodies you currently have and complain about
  • edited July 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User

    I think you both need to lay off the nerf GWF talk. It is obvious you do not want what is best for the class and just want it to be useless and an easy kill.

    dude there are 2 pages right here proving you are biased behond belief, i dont think your talking is anymore necessary for the sake of balance
  • edited July 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User
    oh come just stop, at most i turned it into a defiantone99 rant.
    im happy with how gwfs perform, you just cant accept other classes to reach those levels. Yourself declared to be biased so much to not being able to make a simple list.

    People like you dont allow balance, hence its easier to bring your class to other classes levels which brings to balance anyways and in less steps.
  • This content has been removed.
  • rayrdanrayrdan Member Posts: 5,410 Arc User

    The thread is about how GFs overperform in mod9, not about HR SW or GWF... get the eff outta here and pick up on each elsewhere.

    we all now how gfs performs in mod 9 thanks. there is no need for self-congratulatory videos
  • bvirabvira Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 385 Arc User

    I think you both need to lay off the nerf GWF talk. It is obvious you do not want what is best for the class and just want it to be useless and an easy kill.

    No one wants GWFs to be an easy kill, people were just pointing out the observation that GWFs are borderline impossible to be killed by other striker classes 1v1-wise, which is fine but they shouldn't have this level of tankiness while having very high burst damage at the same time.

  • edited July 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • playasinnombreplayasinnombre Member Posts: 42 Arc User

    It is not a good question considering all of the other strikers can be tanky. TRs have ITC, SWs have Soul Sparks and CWs have shield and a great dodge. There is little evidence, outside of subjective GWF haters that GWF is more tankier than them. Most posts I read say nobody dies in PVP unless ambushed by a GF or TR. There is even a video of an HR soloing ECC with no potions and standing in the fires on the ground. Lazalia had to use potions and stay out of the red.

    Ugh... I would NOT describe the CW's as great dodgers. Maybe it's just me being laaag-tastic, but my CW ends up pausing for ~0.5 sec @ the end of teleport. Queue the death knell.

  • taitinhakkaajataitinhakkaaja Member Posts: 410 Arc User
    Sw's tanky, seriously? Somehow that tankiness don't show up on our KD ratio...
  • szejhuludpuchaczszejhuludpuchacz Member Posts: 306 Arc User

    Sw's tanky, seriously? Somehow that tankiness don't show up on our KD ratio...

    You are quite tanky at BiS levels, heals-ls are strong. Just easier to CC SW or burst with SE/GF one-two shot rotation.
    200_s.gif
  • bvirabvira Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 385 Arc User

    That is GWF. It has been that way since day one and always will be. GF is even worse and it is not even a Striker at all. Crying for nerfs will not change the fundamental basis of the class since it was created. So, let it go and quit trying to ruin the class.

    Don't even need to nerf GWFs, just need to give piercing dmg back to CWs and HRs and I'd love see who would be crying then.
  • edited July 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • schietindebuxschietindebux Member Posts: 4,292 Arc User
    Yes, we discussed it 1 million times and it will go on in the follwong 5 mods if nothing happens, so there is need for balance.
    Only a bunch of "no-brainer" will stick with this kind of PVP or the game at all if we do not get anything worth to stick with in endgame. PVE will never fill that big hole.
  • This content has been removed.
This discussion has been closed.