test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

The curious concept of Great Weapon Fighter tanking.

prometheusenprometheusen Member Posts: 63 Arc User
The beaten path never appealed to me in any area of life. I like to try things differently... if everyone is going offense, I'd like to see if I can make defense work. It's a different kind of entertainment...

The first character I ever created in Neverwinter was a Great Weapon Fighter, back during the launch. I still have that character today and he has gone through many iterations. Recently, I decided to REALLY try tanking. So I examined the most reasonable feats to select, which powers would best serve this cause, and what kind of attributes I should prioritize... To add some real flavor to this challenge, I also decided that I wanted my original avatar to still be PvP competent.

Well, long story short; it kinda worked... barely. Well, OK, that might be a little too optimistic...

On paper, it looks like a Great Weapon Fighter could tank; but the truth is, they really can't. Nothing remotely close to what a Guardian Fighter or Oathbound Paladin can. Here are some observations as to why it falls short (maybe this is also a health warning to other players that may consider the path of the tank GWF... be warned, it's unpleasant).

1. Aggro Maintenance - so this is actually a compound problem with #2 but I'll start by saying that even with a total investment in every feat there is for generating threat, the GWF can't seem to pull this off reliably. Is it because the Trickster Rogues and Control Wizards are simply generating too much damage that vetoes the threat of the GWF? Maybe... but I suspect it has a lot more to do with #2...

2. Controlled Crisis - the GWF is so easy to control until they activate Unstoppable.... Pushed, knocked down, stunned, slowed, you name it, the GWF is going to experience it... a lot. In comparison to the Guardian Fighter/Oathbound Paladin, it looks like GWFs spend as much time on the floor or standing stupefied as they do fighting. This also produces another problem in terms of survivability for the doleful tank-poser.

3. Shieldless, Dodgeless - Well, when you're surrounded by 10 monsters and the team is relying on you to make sure that you take the hits mostly in their place, you get to do that... for about 2 seconds. The lovely SHIFT key that is the guardian angel for Trickster Rogues, Control Wizards, Guardian Fighters, etc. Doesn't do HAMSTER for a GWF in a tanking capacity (actually I really don't think it does much for them in any capacity).

4. Semi-Thick Skin, Soft Paws - Given the devotion placed to the Sentinel feat tree, there isn't much room for a promise of damage. Going this route makes the GWF hit more than a Devoted Cleric; but that's about it... Oh and a lot less useful than a Devoted Cleric, heh.

Now, this is just a few notes... Despite all of this, when Unstoppable is active, for that 5 or so seconds, yes, it seems like maybe the GWF can tank after all... But it's quite infrequent and in order to generate as much Determination as possible, this limits room for useful encounter powers. Perhaps the Sentinel tree should be more about frequent or lengthier Unstoppable episodes; because it's worth mentioning again, when in Unstoppable, it addresses pretty much all 4 of those points in some way.

Comments

  • edited January 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • instynctiveinstynctive Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,885 Arc User
    This doesn't hold a candle to my healing/crowd control GWF.
    header.png
    "...I grab my wiener and charge!" - ironzerg79
  • edited January 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • pando83pando83 Member Posts: 2,564 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    Off-tank ability is underperforming and not really useful.
    The way i see it, dungeons should be designed after class balance so that a Sentinel GWF+CC class (CW or trapper) can do the protection job of a tank while providing the some DPS, as an alternative to a tank+full DPS combo.

    A sentinel should get a boost and work when mixed with a controller, with off-tanking and, for example, some damage reduction on the mobs he hits in AoE (buff wicked strike debuff through sentinel advanced feats).
    Post edited by pando83 on
  • This content has been removed.
  • pando83pando83 Member Posts: 2,564 Arc User
    That's why the proposal is a sentinel that can rush in a group of mobs, survive the damage and keep them in place with the help of a controller, while AoE debuffing their damage so that the whole group can rush in and DPS. You achieve that with specific feats to boost reaping strike, come and get it, daring shout. I corrected the above post, i meant wicked strike, not reaping strike debuff. Wicked strike AoE debuffs the damage of mobs a bit. Buff it on sentinel tree. Also: buff come and get it pull and decrease cooldown through sentinel feat. Allows the sentinel to keep mobs close in conjunction with a controller. Make daring shout be a party-wide buff. Bum. You have a much better off-tank that can be used together with a controller. Basically, a tank makes the mobs focus him and tanks the damage. A sentinel rushes in, survive the damage for a bit while debuffing the enemy damage and buffing a bit the party DR. Needs the help of a controller cause it's not a full tank.

    Can also give reaping strike a "pull" effect+ increased determination gain through sentinel tree.
  • ultradd#1718 ultradd Member Posts: 39 Arc User
    It should at least have respectable tanking most and foremost since you know.. It is the path for TANKing. This is one of the paths that get completely overlooked while discussing the balance of GWFS. As if this entire path doesn't even exist. If you watch Laz's video I'd say Destroyer is better than sent at tanking at higher ilevel. Which is hilarious imo :wink: .
  • This content has been removed.
  • snottysnotty Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 476 Arc User

    It should at least have respectable tanking most and foremost since you know.. It is the path for TANKing. This is one of the paths that get completely overlooked while discussing the balance of GWFS. As if this entire path doesn't even exist.

    For all purposes in the game, it doesn't. Just as the oppressor CW doesn't exist. I'm not saying it's right, but that is how it is and how it was specifically designed with the EE rework. Cryptic must want it this way, even if we do not.
    I have to disagree with this, all the classes got kicked in the nuts with the release of mod 6. They broke everything and have been very very very slowly fixing things but sadly feat trees isn't one of those things. Before mod 6 you could take even a crappy built toon into battle and complete most quests, admittedly, epic dungeons would be where you'd see just how bad your build really is.

    But with the release of mod 6 they ruined so much that almost every class has been reduced to 1 feat tree type of build with some minor variations. Pre mod 6, a well built GWF could tank and even solo Castle Never. Now you gotta dump a lot of money into GWF to do that. But as a GWF player, I see no reason for a GWF to need to tank, we have 2 tank classes now, do we really need 3?

    I really wish cryptic would take a break from pumping out these damn grind fest campaigns and just really work at making finally fixing feats and balancing the classes. I miss being able to play my HR as a pure archer.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • commanderdata002commanderdata002 Member Posts: 312 Arc User
    edited January 2016
    Love how big a mystery to glasscannon GWFs that their class can actually tank or kite bosses.
    It is an offtank character of course it can hold bosses. It gives no survivability to party yes. But there are other classes for that.
    Hint: with daring shout it can pull bosses from main tanks.

    I had to roll a GWF in mod2 because despite their boosting no GWF in my guild and my surrounding could give a acceptable kiting to Draco in CN and died 20 secs before it...
    stock and stone I can master, but there's a Wizard to manage here!
Sign In or Register to comment.