Comments
-
the problem is that they want very badly to incorporate the forum account with the pwe account, but dont seem to have anyone available (or permitted) to make it happen properly.
-
do pwe do that for the actual header, or to give the illusion they are self-hosting, or both? the frame is such a 1999 solution in any case. why arent pwe simply using php include and an A record in dns? thats like 'forum admin 101'
-
and once again they are fixing problems that dont exist while ignoring the bloody obvious.
-
click the magnifying glass
-
whats so sad is that they were there in the beginning! and they are obviously still playing with the style. just within the past couple of days they have removed the 'edited:' line above the sig that i had been using instead of the postbit edit. div.PostEdited { display: none; }
-
the beauty of the overzealous censor is that encourages creative writing :trollface:
-
all? i know there are fearmongers and luddites that have made cookies out to be the bane of the web, but they are actually useful! have you considered whitelisting the forum domains?
-
i guess he was wrong about moderation afterall...
-
its kinda hard to believe that people would willingly use these forums without asterelles enhancements
-
i certainly dont recall javascript hijacking my window and forcing it into a frame being on my wishlist.
-
i hate dark themes too. take the above advice and use this: https://github.com/asterpw/pwevanillaenhance its light and does things like aggressive sig management, inline pic resizing and whatnot to make the forum less 'geocities' with all the image-spam. we talk about pwevanillaenhance a lot on the last 20 pages or so…
-
i request you stop using superfluous !importants and resist inline styling.
-
lol ok then
-
why am i seeing posts from raiderz after having specifically hidden it?
-
thats better than 'u mad bro'.
-
good try, but i assure you i can troll you far better than you can troll me.
-
unless they arent actually trolls... that was the entire point i was making.
-
in what way is my 'anger' manifesting itself? i thought we were having a discussion. ...or was that merely an upscale 'u mad bro'?
-
i dont recall such a rule. what i do recall is scores of threads regarding direct competitors swtor and star citizen being uncensored, and the completely out of genre game that few cared about getting a grand censor, WoW. in any case, 'rules is rules' has never really addressed many 'whys'.
-
you think those games arent talked about regardless?
-
actual trolls know better than to think people suddenly wised up and stopped taking the bait. no, this is a silly and juvenile toy for the passive aggressive style of administration employed by somebody that isnt secure enough to own their decisions publicly. tachy, 'miserable users', etc arent legit moderation tools; they…
-
the politically correct vocabulary is, at its root, an attempt to shape thought by limiting the ways in which various ideas or people can be referred to. why do you expect those with an agenda to give up such an OP tool?
-
aka 'tachy goes to coventry' its a particularly juvenile form of forum moderation that puts users on global ignore.
-
in an attempt to ensure nobody can possibly be offended by anything posted on the board... introducing the 'corporate sheen'.
-
i reckon its comedy gold. some of the replies sent to argue their moderation :D so some guy looking for his fleetmates has your email address. are you really that spun out over it? i wish i had had a pm titled 'hey baby'. that could have been an epic read hey
-
its just infraction notifications, and based on the number of them and the reasons given for issuing them:* i am surprised i wasnt permabanned years ago. * it looks like the lions share of members have been infracted. so with that in mind... privacy? meh i was more worried about some of the super minor things people have…
