test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Howdy, Stranger!
Badges
Comments
-
In case it hasn't been mentioned yet (I didn't read all 7 pages): Disheartening Strike still (afaik) has reduced damage in PvP (it's mentioned in the tooltip still). Remove that. DoTs are already at a disadvantage in PvP, because of all the healing going on, so WKs don't need an additional disadvantage. If there were…
-
+1 to the suggestion of the OP
-
+1 to the suggestion of the OP
-
+1 to the suggestions of the OP You do realise that the normal version doesn't have a guaranteed purple mark drop, right? So if you run the normal version only, you statistically need more runs to "trade up" the desired marks. That's called a trade-off and sounds fair to me. What kind of argument is that?! Stuff changes…
-
+1 I was about to make a similar thread myself when I found this one.
-
That's too broad. Because there's such a divide right now it's harder than it should be to determine who knows how to build a toon on the most basic level (race, ability score, power choices, feats) and actually has skill in playing it. I can't tell you how often a toon of mine with lesser armor and weapon enchantment and…
-
After the suggestions of this thread have been implemented? Yes. In the current PvP? You seriously think a, say, Greater Negation compared to a Transcendent Negation is the source of more imbalance than i.e. 2 high-end GFs in one team, with one or even none in the other? Wow. Dota 2 isn't a MMORPG. I specified that.…
-
Hey there, I made a separate thread containing a suggestion for the content of the dungeon chests. Some feedback would be nice :)
-
+1 to the suggestions If the suggested changes were implemented, a gear gap from enchantments, artifacts and artifact equipment (although from those 3, the enchantments are the most expensive / farm heavy) would remain - is this what you mean by "gear gap"? Because the other stuff is pretty easy to get / farm. If this is…
-
That's great news :)
-
Still no fix. It's kinda amusing though sad at the same time that such an essential bug isn't even acknowledged yet. Neither in our complaints in last week's patch notes, nor this week's. No moderator or dev reacted to it at all. I mean, acknowledging it and fixing it are two different things, but if it's seemingly not…
-
Well, it's not only Borrowed Time that's broken, but yeah, it mostly gimps PvP SWs. I'm gonna quote myself from the preview server patch notes: Please, Soulbinder SWs need a fix for Borrowed Time. Something got seriously screwed up, since it's not working at all anymore. The mod 10 patchnotes stated: but Soul Sparks always…
-
That is very good to know - thanks. But how do you apply Lesser Curse in PvP? Do you use ACC? Or the Vengeful Curse feat in Temp?
-
I can imagine this bug comes from the change, that there is no more icon below your character icon showing the amount of Soul Sparks. The Soul Sparks are only shown now in the middle of the screen. Dust to Dust was changed accordingly and still works, but Borrowed Time does not. I linked this thread in the patch notes for…
-
Please, Soulbinder SWs need a fix for Borrowed Time. Something got seriously screwed up, since it's not working at all anymore. The mod 10 patchnotes stated: but Soul Sparks always healed you at the end of combat. That has nothing to do with Borrowed Time. And the tooltip wasn't changed. Something must've got mixed up.…
-
@amenar Please drop this change. It actually LOWERS the damage Hellish Rebuke does. It might come close to the effect without NPNM when you spam Hellish Rebuke, but that can't be the intention of this change. Just revert this change, please.
-
Echo chamber? The people trying to argue with you might be the same 5 names, but the people voting for the removal (public vote, you can see them) are far more. Even besides the vote / forum... If you ask PvP players in game about this stuff, most will tell you, just like this vote shows, that they are against them (ask…
-
My feedback. I agree with most of what's pointed out, but want to stress some important points. I love this idea. I guess most people wouldn't mind the change back to "WC becomes TC", if you can mark at least another target again, when your first target died. Limiting the number of markable targets to 1 during TC shouldn't…
-
Warlocks Curse empowered by TT, yes. The animation time of a Tyrannical Curse is longer than normal Warlocks Curse, that's what I meant. My quoted part from @treesclimber sounded like that to me, so I wanted clarification. Thanks for testing :)
-
Wait, what? The first encounter use on a TT marked target only applys Brutal Curses damage bonus once unless I cast that awfully long animation of a TT mark again after every encounter? :o
-
To clarify: When I say "complete a full flurry" I mean the actual flurry part of DF (8 hits, or something?), not the first 2, slow hits. So, I'm missing the mentioned feat ICS, because I thought: "if the stealth drain from at-wills is %-based, it doesn't matter if I have 20% more, or not" Without this feat, and not having…
-
Can you complete a full Flurry with LA? I'm exe, too, but I get like maybe 3/4 of the Flurry in stealth. Do you need Tenacious Consealment's stealth regen at rank 4 to get a full Flurry?
-
Thanks for your timing tip, but I mean I get put out of stealth after the FIRST BF already.
-
Certainly I am. Problem with that is, that if TT is still active after the end of battle, DTD does NOT fill AP (bug report, anyone?). And running with other trash destroyers like CW and especially GWFs, mostly the mobs die faster than my TT runs out... As far as I know, Fire set DOES fill AP regardless.
-
It's about 80%. I simply hate the fact that none of the new main- / offhands have lifesteal on it... For (close to) BiS players and / or players with the LS SH boon that might not be an issue. But for medium geared players who are interested in playing PvP it is (>20% LS is pretty much the goal to reach). It's hard enough…
-
Well, at least ONE player posted his opinion... :D Well, I thought 40% Tenacity DR, 30% DR from T.Negation and my normal DR of 10% would stack. But I just recently learned that Tenacity DR is on a different layer. And I think so is Negation. So forget about that :D And thanks for your opinion. I think after the respec…
-
I've been always wondering since Mod 6... Does the "LS part" of WB directly increase your LS chance during that time? Or does it increase the HoT you get for applying it?
-
I saw these formulas for calculating the effect of ArP in PvP a few times already, but never really understood them. I assume the 70% comes from 40% Tenacity + 30% T.Negation? If so, even my non-defense stacking SW has overall +10% DR from AC and Defense, so I think it's safe to say most players with T.Negation have 80% DR…
-
You, sir / ma'am, are my hero - thanks :)