test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Neverwinter Discussion › Player Feedback (PC)

Add a new bag slots

nanimal13nanimal13 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 2 Arc User
edited March 2017 in Player Feedback (PC)
Hi everyone,

I would like more bag slots, what do you think about it?
Personally I have all the time my bags full, I have to go at my bank or my mail few times by hour.

Add a new bag slots 108 votes

Yes, I want more bag slots
81% 88 votes
I don't know if there are enough bag slots
0% 1 vote
No, there are enough slots for bag slots
17% 19 votes
«1

Comments

  • greywyndgreywynd Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 7,154 Arc User
    Buy bigger bags.
    I'm not looking for forgiveness, and I'm way past asking permission. Earth just lost her best defender, so we're here to fight. And if you want to stand in our way, we'll fight you too.
  • iandarkswordiandarksword Member Posts: 978 Arc User
    Rework the way items are sorted now that the "Useful Items" tab exists, or create a separate "Enchantment/Refinement" tab. Too many items are simply "hitching a ride" waiting to be turned in, and varying binding stauses of refining stones/enchantment create bag clutter. Addressing the above issues would free up much needed bag space for most.
    "I don't know, I'm making it up as I go..."
    Featured Foundry Quest: Whispers of an Ancient Evil [v3] - NW-DQ4WKW6ZG
    Foundry Quest: Harper Chronicles: Blacklake - NW-DCPA4W2Q5
  • nameexpirednameexpired Member Posts: 1,282 Arc User
    They did choose to store the stuff from RD in your inventory bag rather than the useful items tab, you know? Maybe it was by accident!
    Imaginary Friends are the best friends you can have!
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • oldbaldyoneoldbaldyone Member Posts: 1,840 Arc User
    If they add bigger bags.....that will really upset peoplesince bags are bound to character.

    Adding bag slots for more bags, adding the ability to increase the size of a bag, or keep going with reducing the unecessary clutter in inventory would be welcome.
  • rickcase276rickcase276 Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,404 Arc User
    The ability to upgrade our current bags with either zen or ad would be the best option, I would think. Now I would prefer unlimited updating possibilities, but I know that would not be reasonable. But even if the max was between 50-75 per bag that would be better.
  • sobacsobac Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 442 Arc User
    edited March 2017
    Yeah, bag space... never not enough, lol :D As @oldbaldyone said above, since a few mods, bags are BtC, so buying a new, bigger one, will cost a lot and you will need to discard your old one :( Wish they just made them BtA, HAMSTER devs :s So, some sort of upgrading your actual bag seems nice, but i'd rather prefer a bigger stacks of everything that can be stacked :p And no more BtC RP, BtA is better in case they don't want us to sell our farmed RP with quarters, hoards, etc. Of course just adding a new slot will be very welcome.
  • callumf#9018 callumf
    callumf#9018
         Member Posts: 1,710 Arc User
    Simplifying the refinement process and amalgamating the various items used to upgrade enchantments and artifacts could have an overall beneficial outcome. And reduce the number of bag slots required. I like that idea a lot.
  • xxxhansolxxxxxxhansolxxx Member Posts: 104 Arc User
    @kreatyve

    Not quite sure about removing the thee type of artifacts ... They would probably remove the bonus we get when using feeders at the same time ...

    Making all bound Rp BtA rather than BtC would already be a huge step forward ...
  • kreatyvekreatyve Member, Neverwinter Moderator, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 10,545 Community Moderator
    xxxhansolxxx said:

    @kreatyve



    Not quite sure about removing the thee type of artifacts ... They would probably remove the bonus we get when using feeders at the same time ...



    Making all bound Rp BtA rather than BtC would already be a huge step forward ...

    Good point.
    My opinions are my own. I do not work for PWE or Cryptic. - Forum Rules - Protector's Enclave Discord - I play on Xbox
    Any of my comments not posted in orange are based on my own personal opinion and not official.
    Any messages written in orange are official moderation messages. Signature images are now fixed!
    kuI2v8l.png
  • oldbaldyoneoldbaldyone Member Posts: 1,840 Arc User
    Here is the easy fix: Make all stackable items stack to 999. Make all identical items stack....tired of having 2-3 separate stacks of Lesser Resonance Stones that are all Bound to Account but for some reason, won't stack.

    There are tons of other ideas to help inventory, no need to rehash again. As always, they will do it when they want to.
  • dupeksdupeks Member Posts: 1,789 Arc User
    More bag slots just takes the pressure off of the developers when it comes to considering impact to inventory when designing content.

    Given that we've gotten a useful items tab now, and different types of inventory, there is plenty to work with.

    The solution isn't to add more bag space, it's a concerted push towards more reasonable inventory requirements by way of content design.
  • pitshadepitshade Member Posts: 5,665 Arc User
    It seems likely that mod 11 was nearly complete before the 'Useful Items' tab was developed and that either there was no time to change or else that no one went back and considered it. In either case, hopefully people will keep up a (respectful) pressure to correct this issue. It is annoying now, but soon there will be a growing number of players who have finished witj the River District (please, no dailies in 11.5!) and will be faced with the dilemma of discard or save...
    "We have always been at war with Dread Vault" ~ Little Brother
  • nameexpirednameexpired Member Posts: 1,282 Arc User
    This discussion is rather pointless.
    They certainly have meetings to discuss the items they throw at us, why some boxes only stack to 5 etc.
    They want to keep us at the edge.
    They could easily change the starting bag from 30 to 60.
    I rather expect them to not introduce a 7th bag slot but a new bag with 42 (?) item slots and trow at the same time 18 new necessary items at us.
    It's the way they make money, no hard feelings on my side. One just should be aware of the idea behind it.
    You have to make the old stuff useless, e.g. GBoH was not BtC at the start for about 2 years, the plan to introduce the RBoH made it necessary to BtC the bag in order to maximize profit.
    Imaginary Friends are the best friends you can have!
  • beckylunaticbeckylunatic Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 14,231 Arc User
    dupeks said:

    More bag slots just takes the pressure off of the developers when it comes to considering impact to inventory when designing content.

    I am skeptical that this is an area where they are anything other than shameless, tbh.

    Guild Leader - The Lords of Light

    Neverwinter Census 2017

    All posts pending disapproval by Cecilia
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • silverkeltsilverkelt Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 4,235 Arc User
    ITS not just the shear amount of RP items.. its the bind status that cause tons of time filtering through them..

    I would say NO more bags until they can fix this..

    TWO types of RP.. BTA and UNbound..

    stop being sons of hamsters..

    We already 40-50% over our bag spaces AT all times..

    Even with this RP change.. we are always over..

  • silverkeltsilverkelt Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 4,235 Arc User
    also.. the poll is loaded.. its not that there is or is not enough bag slots.. its REALLY poor design causing most of the issue.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • wioefwioef Member Posts: 31 Arc User
    they should of added 24 lots into adventurer's knapsack while adding in 18 into adventurer's pack but why couldn't they not do as well 24 into order of the third eye while making us all happy
  • grogthemagnifgrogthemagnif Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 1,651 Arc User
    greywynd said:

    Buy bigger bags.

    Fine, How do I buy bigger Professions Resources and Professions Assets Bags???
  • strathkinstrathkin Member Posts: 1,798 Arc User
    sobac said:

    Yeah, bag space... never not enough, lol :D As @oldbaldyone said above, since a few mods, bags are BtC, so buying a new, bigger one, will cost a lot and you will need to discard your old one :( Wish they just made them BtA, HAMSTER devs :s So, some sort of upgrading your actual bag seems nice, but i'd rather prefer a bigger stacks of everything that can be stacked :p And no more BtC RP, BtA is better in case they don't want us to sell our farmed RP with quarters, hoards, etc. Of course just adding a new slot will be very welcome.

    Bag's should be bind to account so as you buy a bigger bag you can transfer them to new character or alternate who doesn't have all bag slots filled.
  • nameexpirednameexpired Member Posts: 1,282 Arc User
    edited March 2017
    silverkelt said:

    also.. the poll is loaded.. its not that there is or is not enough bag slots.. its REALLY poor design causing most of the issue.

    I don't thinks it's bad design. It may look like it, but in the end it's designed to entice you into buying another runic bag and trash (or rather try to trash) your GBoH.
    They could do so much things to ease our inventory problems but someone thinks that would not be good for the shareholders.

    Imaginary Friends are the best friends you can have!
  • nameexpirednameexpired Member Posts: 1,282 Arc User
    edited March 2017
    I mean, they just moved about 15 items to the "useful items" tab, just to throw at us the items from the new campaign.
    At least they modified the treasures to stack to 999 now. But the coffers still stack to 5 only. Coincident? And then there is the space I need for the maps if I don't want to run around all day and dig up the treasure immediately after I found the map. They could have put all these items into the useful items tab. They decided not to.
    Imaginary Friends are the best friends you can have!
  • mystar#5733 mystar
    mystar#5733
         Member Posts: 179 Arc User
    I'd like to be able to close bags with items in them to store in other bags or in the bank. It would be nice to be able to keep certain collections of gear based on the levels for the areas. It seems pointless to have a bag as an inventory item if it has to be empty. It'd be cool to have chests for something like this too. This is really the only thing I don't like about the game so far. I'm a packrat for items though....i'm sure after years of playing i would have relic bags full of enchantments, runstones, gear sets for areas i can swap out to go fight in other areas so i'm not one shotting them...and it would provide a way to keep those quest items that some players have to discard to make room.
  • strathkinstrathkin Member Posts: 1,798 Arc User
    edited March 2017
    One addition bag slot per character be very NICE, but it be far nicer if 'most' bag's were bind to account. :o That way if you bought a 12, 20, 24 slot bag you could swap them to new characters as larger bags were purchased.
  • rafaeldarafaelda Member, NW M9 Playtest Posts: 666 Arc User
    to be honest i would buy a companion like a pack horse (and run with no bonding runes) if was one with enoug bag space...

    More bag slots is a nice call since they would also sell a good bunch of bags after this release...
Sign In or Register to comment.