The manner in which ships have thinner pylons can be simply better and better structural integrity fields or it could also have something to do with more advanced construction materials. The more bulk added to the ship by armoring the pylons or nacelles, the more mass one has to counter with inertial dampers or increased…
No, I don't see your point. For one, Doug Drexler, never said anything to suggest that a nebula with one nacelle smaller than the other would some how be "impossible." He was talking about pylons looking "too thin" to support the nacelles which suggests that their technology must be incredibly advanced to use such thin…
To this, I must quote myself: Also, here is a link to a youtube video in which interested parties can hear Drexler's discussion of his opinion of spindly pylons when discussing his design of the Enterprise J, and how he envisions a future in which star trek ships might have bluetooth- like, "wireless" nacelles that aren't…
They are probably holding off the announcement until the artist has time to draw the full orthographic trendy said would be produced once the winner was selected. They may have that done by monday, at which point the process may continue.
I didn't expect one to win by a landslide, but as I expected, one took an early lead and kept it till the end. The voting should conclude tonight at midnight, probably pacific standard time.
a Science ships can get some pretty high DPS though through gravity wells and the like. I really hope this doesn't turn into a tac ship. Tactical has gotten rather boring for me, I have been having fun trying out different space magics through science. Though in the past I wanted plenty of tactical and often prefer ships…
That's probably the thing, the only way this new dry dock system is of any value, given most players are not at max ship slot limit, is if dry dock slots are dirt cheap. Otherwise one might as well get more ship slots. Alternatively they could just make lobi/fleet ships reclaimable from this point on but whatever, I guess…
On the klingon side, the voquv used to show up as a dreadnought when your health was low enough to call in support, so just because something is a carrier doesn't mean it can't be a dreadnought. Not to mention the fact that the jem'hadar and xindi carriers are both called "dreadnought carrier"
I agree that the command ships were a missed opportunity for a federation carrier, they have two hangar doors in the neck and are very bulky ships, but oh well, at least we're finally getting a federation built carrier. And I don't mind it taking less than typical federation design aesthetic. The defiant did when it…
Beta and delta aren't even remotely related, what on earth makes you think that delta's giant circular saucer-monohull could possibly fit with any part of beta? Gamma, sigma, and theta are all three from very different "design families." Beta and theta were close enough that they could easily kitbash, sigma and epsilon…
Alright, I surprised myself and voted omega. I was pretty sure I would vote alpha because it looks more like it follows the form of already established federation design more than omega. However, that also means it generally looks like one could have taken any other federation ship and just slapped some big bays in it to…
Yes, epsilon... my favorite semifinalist, why did you have to leave me?! T.T Indeed, for that matter all ally ships should get sucked into a gravity well/get energy drained by a tyken's rift, there's no logical reason we are immune to it, it's not like they function on certain frequencies like ship weapons and shields do…
You probably didn't think about Home-One because it's hangar bays no where near run pratcially the whole length of the ship like omega, it's hangar bay opening is small... like one of alpha's. Indeed, further evidence of rigging via perception manipulation.
I think it would be wonderful, but I highly doubt that due to carriers being an established thing with mostly set seating. I don't think it would be "OP" it would just be really unfair to all those other poor ships that are stuck with static seating and easily solidify it as the best carrier in the game, so probably…
It doesn't matter how many visible hangars the ship has, which technically the large hangars on omega appear to be split into three doors behind the force fields, so we could say it has 6 on the sides or 3 through-and-through hangars with one on the nose. Is it going to get more than two hangars just because it visually…
Slapping alpha's pod on there actually worked wonders for the aft view that was bothering me a bit. I imagine the reason they didn't let us "design like Frankenstein" is that we'd need interaction with the artist, moving things around and trying different things. Especially to do that by community vote I could see being a…
Hmm, I suspect my expectation was that the hybrid would essentially look like the epsilon with omega's super long hangar doors on it, lol. That aside, not bad, the top down in particular looks pretty decent, as well as the bottom up, From the other views, the epsilon's rugged angles and omega's organic curves don't seem to…
I wonder how many other people liked epsilon but voted omega just cause "it's gonna win and I wanna be on the winning team." Enough to TRIBBLE epsilon out of a win? I wonder.
Again, what is it with you and these "make this carrier a normal carrier" posts? Everyone else seems to be shooting for the moon wanting 4/3 weapons and 3-4 hangars and all that and here you are just demanding that this carrier be what it will obviously get by default for simply being a carrier. That device is nothing like…
I am not anticipating a close race there actually, if the history of these polls shows anything it's that generally one pulls pretty far ahead pretty early on and then that's that. Could they surprise me with a neck-in neck race? Possibly. But I'm expecting one to trounce the other rather quickly.
Frankly, I think that the specializations should have been universal skills that could have been stuck anywhere on any ship. The devs usually pick terrible boff seats to hybridize that require a massive sacrifice of one's engineering or science capability to use that specialization, and usually one can only use very low…
I zoomed in really close on omega's aft and it looks like it's actually got a vertical three stack of impulse engines that make that one trail, but I agree, I think it simply "looks" like it's not enough, though it is reminiscent of how the enterprise D was flying around on that one tiny impulse engine in the neck. Had it…
I know epsilon will probably lose, but I'm voting for it anyway because in this new art it is a truly glorious chunker and I love it. It really makes me wish we had seen all our contenders like this, particularly sigma. If sigma basically looked the same but a bit more traditional trek look than epsilon, it could have been…
I haven't seen trendy chime in on the matter, though it's been brought up. The timeline for the competition says "design," "build," "model." Well after the design phase it should go straight to modeling from what I understand, unless there's going to be some phase in which the selected design is tweaked a bit or something.…
You think ALPHA looks like a vacuum? I was thinking GAMMA looks like a vacuum just the other day but chose not to belittle it. Something about that triangular shape coming down the nose plus the lights of the hangars look perfect for seeing the dirt in your path and to make sure you don't suck up a tack or something.
That's odd... considering it looks more like the federation built, space faring carnival cruise ship than a sports car to me >> I went back to the alpha vs beta thread and found only one post on page 10 mentioning a sports car, and while they voted alpha, their post said they like sigma best as it looks like a hot sports…
If I am not mistaken, alpha's hangar doors are the white slots along the saucer rim just to the left and right of her deflector, she may also have another set of doors further back on the saucer where those other white slots are, but I'm not sure. Perhaps to take in from the side and launch from the front or vice versa.…