test content
Logo
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Howdy, Stranger!
dancingmists Arc User
Reactions
Comments
-
The burden of proof is on you. The burden of proof is on you. The burden of proof is on you. Your opinions on all three matters have been noted, yet they remain irrelevant when I have asked for formal arguments backed by evidence. Are you unable to provide anything but arbitrary declarations, baseless claims, and your own…
-
Was a weak Ad Hominem attempt the best you could muster? Please. You have been invited to present proper arguments backed by proper evidence. You have not done so. Are you unable to do so? More so, I will invite you now to provide proper arguments backed by proper evidence that shows beyond the shadow of a doubt that: 1.…
-
My argument was backed by the proper definition of Logic. The burden of proof is on you. What you want Logic to be is irrelevant to the topic of what Logic is. The proper definition was already given. The burden of proof is on you. Please demonstrate the way in which "all logic is flawed."
-
I have already shown a dictionary's definition of the word. The burden of proof is on you for any claim of "true meaning" you want to give. Barely any belief, opinion, value, or principle we hold is Logical. None of those you mentioned qualifies. I quote the begining of Wikipedia's article on the subject of logic: "Logic…
-
In theory there should be little difference. Star Trek writters were not well versed in Logic, regretfully. I am not going to turn this into a crack course in formal logic, regardless. I am sorry but you being delusional does not change the reality of the situation. Define "perfection" in a manner that requires no previous…
-
It seems to me you were thinking about "vulcan philosophy" or "vulcan cultural idiosyncrasies" instead. To try and speak of Logic in subjective terms is a contradiction. We are not Starfleet Officers in the Star Trek universe, we are players playing a videogame in which loot has a very real use. Generally speaking it would…
-
The statement is wrong: How logical it is depends entirely on previous assumptions that can't be demonstrated objective other than locally. By which I mean you should study Logic before discussing what is logical and what is not. Please indulge my curiosity, in which way is loot illogical?