test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Support› PC Gameplay Bug Reports

Heave Phaser Assault Platform not able to be equipped to Typhoon Temporal Battlecruiser

harkonen#1585 harkonen
harkonen#1585
 Member Posts: 16 Arc User
in PC Gameplay Bug Reports
The Heavy Phaser Assault Platform is supposed to be available for use on temporal battlecruisers (per console descriptors), but it can't be used on the Typhoon Temporal Battlecruiser. I'm hoping this is just a minor glitch with the release of the Typhoon.
lo4vegiqjvww.png
k2rcyjplcxt2.png

Comments

  • inferiorityinferiority Member Posts: 4,397 Arc User
    edited October 28
    There's a distinction to be made here based on the word "Temporal".
    The Paladin & Ranger classes are both "Temporal Battlecruisers" with a Temporal Spec, whereas the Typhoon is a regular "Battlecruiser" with Temporal Spec.
    Thus, WAI, the HPAP correctly cannot be equipped on the Typhoon.
    (If the Paladin & Ranger were to have the name of the Spec in the ship name, they'd become "Temporal Temporal Battlecruisers".)
    - - - - I n f e r i o r i t y - C o m p l e x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Everyone has a better name and Youtube Channel than me...  :/
  • harkonen#1585 harkonen
    harkonen#1585
         Member Posts: 16 Arc User
    edited October 28
    The Typhoon clearly says "Temporal Battlecruiser". I have the screenshot to prove it. The ship was promoted as being a temporal battlecruiser. Bait and switch isn't going to cut it.
    5zbxscvcpbeg.png
  • inferiorityinferiority Member Posts: 4,397 Arc User
    harkonen#1585 wrote: »
    The Typhoon clearly says "Temporal Battlecruiser". I have the screenshot to prove it.
    I know what it says and 'Temporal Battlecruiser', as per the Typhoon, is a Battlecruiser with the Temporal Spec.

    The Paladin, which this console comes from, is a full-and-proper "Temporal Battlecruiser" which also has the Temporal Spec but calling it a 'Temporal Temporal Battlecruiser' would be silly.
    - - - - I n f e r i o r i t y - C o m p l e x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Everyone has a better name and Youtube Channel than me...  :/
  • harkonen#1585 harkonen
    harkonen#1585
         Member Posts: 16 Arc User
    edited October 29
    That's just stupid. How they going to call something a temporal battlecruiser then say "oh well it's not actually what it says it is, it's just a regular battlecruiser with a temporal spec"? The smells of bait and switch. IIRC it was even promoted as being a temporal battlecruiser. They pull stupid stunts like that, and wonder why people are leaving the game.

  • inferiorityinferiority Member Posts: 4,397 Arc User
    harkonen#1585 wrote: »
    ...it's just a regular battlecruiser with a temporal spec"?
    Using the Spec and the ship type to form the name is what happens all over the game.

    The Typhoon is a Temporal Battlecruiser, but not a Temporal Battlecruiser

    Similarly, the Kuthar is a Pilot Escort but is not a Pilot Escort, and thus cannot equip the Pilot Escort consoles. (It can equip the Tier 5 Andorian Consoles, though.)

    Again, the Legendary Bortasqu' is a Command Battlecruiser, but is not a Command Battlecruiser, so cannot equip the Command Battlecruiser consoles.

    I have tried to help you understand the distinction and difference between the two types of ship despite the naming convention making them look the same, even though they are different. I have given you two other examples, but there's plenty more ships in the game with naming similarities such as those given above. This does not mean that consoles from one kind of ship should be equippable on others.
    - - - - I n f e r i o r i t y - C o m p l e x - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Everyone has a better name and Youtube Channel than me...  :/
Sign In or Register to comment.