test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Options

Duty officer editing, renaming and so on

I think it would be nice if we could rename our doffs, add a description, change the quotes that some of them have, edit their appearance and so on, maybe even promote them. Is this something you'd want to see added?
[4:46] [Combat {self}] Your Haymaker deals 23337 (9049) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother

[3/25 10:41][Combat (Self)]Your Haymaker deals 26187 (10692) Physical Damage(Critical) to Orinoco.

Duty officer editing, renaming and so on 47 votes

Yes to all
8%
lordgyormneme0kellmg96#5851karistasogare#3038 4 votes
No to all
80%
nightkenberginsduncanidaho11baddmoonrizineazziemeimeitoobloodyrizarabaturwhere2r1kodachikunopwstolemynamealexhaydenseriousdavecwal007mainacrashdragoncaptainkoltarmarkhawkmansistericrelicthief 38 votes
I want to see some of these features added (namely...)
2%
locutusofcactus 1 vote
Other
8%
arliekkossalazarrazeadmrenlarreckwarpangel 4 votes
«1

Comments

  • Options
    baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 10,326 Community Moderator
    No to all
    DOFFs are like trading cards. Most are not bound. Eventually one might want to sell/trade them. If people could change their names, it would be impossible to find a particular DOFF on the Exchange.
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • Options
    darkbladejkdarkbladejk Member Posts: 3,715 Community Moderator
    No to all
    i must agree with my cohort above, renaming doffs would make it nigh impossible to find certain doffs on the exchange. the only way this would remotely work is if the nickname of the doff reset back to the original name upon listing on the exchange.
    "Someone once told me that time was a predator that stalked us all our lives. I rather believe that time is a companion who goes with us on the journey and reminds us to cherish every moment, because it will never come again." - Jean Luc Picard in Star Trek Generations

    Star Trek Online volunteer Community Moderator
  • Options
    ashstorm1ashstorm1 Member Posts: 679 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    No to all
    No to all

    Agreed. Not only would it become a source of problem to search for specific DOFFs on the Exchange (and the search engine is already waaaay wonky enough, thank you!), but i also foresee people just abusing the renaming system for the sake of trolling and writing up stupid stuff for the quotes.
  • Options
    baddmoonrizinbaddmoonrizin Member Posts: 10,326 Community Moderator
    No to all
    ^And we already have some DOFFs with questionable names. :smirk:
    GrWzQke.png
    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator and Resident She-Wolf
    Community Moderators are Unpaid Volunteers and NOT Employees of Gearbox/Cryptic
    Views and Opinions May Not Reflect the Views and Opinions of Gearbox/Cryptic
    ----> Contact Customer Support <----
    Moderation Problems/Issues? Please contact the Community Manager
    Terms of Service / Community Rules and Policies / FCT
    Want the latest information on Star Trek Online?
    Facebook / Twitter / Twitch
  • Options
    warpangelwarpangel Member Posts: 9,427 Arc User
    Other
    Seems kinda pointless. Not like anyone can see your doffs. And it probably wouldn't work anyway. Doffs are items, might as well ask to rename a phaser rifle.
  • Options
    captainkoltarcaptainkoltar Member Posts: 896 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    No to all
    I'd rather not see Arthur C***monster III on the Exchange.

    Seriously though, I like the trading card style concept of DOFFs, so I'd rather see them stay as what you see is what you get.

    (Edited to PG-13. C'mon, guys. - BMR)
  • Options
    echattyechatty Member Posts: 5,914 Arc User
    No to all
    I really don't see the point, especially with a roster of over a hundred of them.

    As others have said, it would make it impossible to find a particular one on the exchange. Plus, like has been said, the renaming and quote reassigning can and will be abused.
    Now a LTS and loving it.
    Just because you spend money on this game, it does not entitle you to be a jerk if things don't go your way.
    I have come to the conclusion that I have a memory like Etch-A-Sketch. I shake my head and forget everything. :D
  • Options
    fleetcaptain5#1134 fleetcaptain5 Member Posts: 4,789 Arc User
    I hadn't thought about the trading.

    They could make it such that Doffs that are edited are automatically bound to your character though.
    [4:46] [Combat {self}] Your Haymaker deals 23337 (9049) Physical Damage(Critical) to Spawnmother

    [3/25 10:41][Combat (Self)]Your Haymaker deals 26187 (10692) Physical Damage(Critical) to Orinoco.
  • Options
    berginsbergins Member Posts: 3,453 Arc User
    No to all
    > @warpangel said:
    > ...might as well ask to rename a phaser rifle.

    Now this, this I want.
    "Logic is a little tweeting bird chirping in a meadow. Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell BAD." - Spock
  • Options
    admrenlarreckadmrenlarreck Member Posts: 2,041 Arc User
    Other
    I want the cost of the grinder lowered.
    fayhers_starfleet.jpg


    Fleet leader Nova Elite

    Fleet Leader House of Nova elite
    @ren_larreck
  • Options
    meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    No to all
    DOFFs are like trading cards. Most are not bound. Eventually one might want to sell/trade them. If people could change their names, it would be impossible to find a particular DOFF on the Exchange.


    ^^ Precisely why I voted 'No.' A mess would ensue.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • Options
    meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    edited June 2018
    No to all
    P.S. Slightly off-topic, but related nonetheless, they should FIX renaming of boffs first. You can rename them, but often their old names still pop up.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • Options
    leemwatsonleemwatson Member Posts: 5,345 Arc User
    No to all
    DOFFs are like trading cards. Most are not bound. Eventually one might want to sell/trade them. If people could change their names, it would be impossible to find a particular DOFF on the Exchange.

    Not to mention the extra database space that would be required to accommodate all of this. If you consider the thousands upon thousands that are all ready in existance, said database would be monumental!
    "You don't want to patrol!? You don't want to escort!? You don't want to defend the Federation's Starbases!? Then why are you flying my Starships!? If you were a Klingon you'd be killed on the spot, but lucky for you.....you WERE in Starfleet. Let's see how New Zealand Penal Colony suits you." Adm A. Necheyev.
  • Options
    meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    No to all
    leemwatson wrote: »
    DOFFs are like trading cards. Most are not bound. Eventually one might want to sell/trade them. If people could change their names, it would be impossible to find a particular DOFF on the Exchange.

    Not to mention the extra database space that would be required to accommodate all of this. If you consider the thousands upon thousands that are all ready in existance, said database would be monumental!


    Which suddenly reminds me, a Dev was once said all doffs are instances of the same. So, there's like only1 Zemok, which can't be customized, as then its customization would apply to everyone's Zemok.
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • Options
    wideningxgyrewideningxgyre Member Posts: 710 Arc User
    With the doffs, the biggest change I'd like to see is an added "protected" status so that I cannot accidentally donate or delete them.

    Related to that, I wish there were a way to "reserve" them for specific doff missions. As it is, it take me way too long to setup doff missions on my alts. It would take even longer if I tried to use anything but the recommended ones that populate the project. However, I realize too late that I needed a doff for something else and have to cancel the project or wait. But since projects change based on location and are refreshed, you often cannot wait.
  • Options
    kodachikunokodachikuno Member Posts: 6,020 Arc User1
    No to all
    dont think it would add enough to the game to be worth even 1/4 of the required development time to so drastically alter the DOFF system
  • Options
    salazarrazesalazarraze Member Posts: 3,794 Arc User
    Other
    Effectively my answer is no but I'll add the caveat that I wouldn't be against Cryptic adding a single character bound doff that you can do all this with.
    When you see "TRIBBLE" in my posts, it's because I manually typed "TRIBBLE" and censored myself.
  • Options
    warpangelwarpangel Member Posts: 9,427 Arc User
    Other
    leemwatson wrote: »
    DOFFs are like trading cards. Most are not bound. Eventually one might want to sell/trade them. If people could change their names, it would be impossible to find a particular DOFF on the Exchange.

    Not to mention the extra database space that would be required to accommodate all of this. If you consider the thousands upon thousands that are all ready in existance, said database would be monumental!
    Yes. Anything they did in this regard would almost certainly have to be done entirely clientside. Which would, incidentally, also fix the exchange search issue (any renames wouldn't pass on to other players at all).

    It's still not worth the dev time, though.
  • Options
    mneme0mneme0 Member Posts: 498 Arc User
    Yes to all
    Most are not bound.

    Since when? 80% of mine are bound and most of those are bound hard enough that I can't even give them to fleet projects and trade-ins.

  • Options
    markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,231 Arc User
    No to all
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    leemwatson wrote: »
    DOFFs are like trading cards. Most are not bound. Eventually one might want to sell/trade them. If people could change their names, it would be impossible to find a particular DOFF on the Exchange.

    Not to mention the extra database space that would be required to accommodate all of this. If you consider the thousands upon thousands that are all ready in existance, said database would be monumental!


    Which suddenly reminds me, a Dev was once said all doffs are instances of the same. So, there's like only1 Zemok, which can't be customized, as then its customization would apply to everyone's Zemok.
    Not exactly, your doff roster is basically a list of Doff ID#s. So each slot has a number to identify which doff occupies it. Any function that uses the doff basically just looks that doff number up in the doff database.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • Options
    meimeitoomeimeitoo Member Posts: 12,594 Arc User
    No to all
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    leemwatson wrote: »
    DOFFs are like trading cards. Most are not bound. Eventually one might want to sell/trade them. If people could change their names, it would be impossible to find a particular DOFF on the Exchange.

    Not to mention the extra database space that would be required to accommodate all of this. If you consider the thousands upon thousands that are all ready in existance, said database would be monumental!


    Which suddenly reminds me, a Dev was once said all doffs are instances of the same. So, there's like only1 Zemok, which can't be customized, as then its customization would apply to everyone's Zemok.
    Not exactly, your doff roster is basically a list of Doff ID#s. So each slot has a number to identify which doff occupies it. Any function that uses the doff basically just looks that doff number up in the doff database.


    Isn't that pretty much what I said, when I "said all doffs are instances of the same"? Like that Zemok, everyone is using the same one (= same ID, whatever). If changes could be made it to, such changes would affect everyone's Zemok. Aka, no one has 'private' instances of their doffs (with their own asset ID).
    3lsZz0w.jpg
  • Options
    bloodyrizbloodyriz Member Posts: 1,756 Arc User
    No to all
    Does anyone really spend so much time staring at their DOff roster that this would be something worth having?​​
    signature.png
    We come in peace, SHOOT TO KILL!
  • Options
    arabaturarabatur Member Posts: 408 Arc User
    No to all
    Doffs are just faceless minions for me, so no.
    Definitely not an Arc User.
  • Options
    markhawkmanmarkhawkman Member Posts: 35,231 Arc User
    No to all
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    meimeitoo wrote: »
    leemwatson wrote: »
    DOFFs are like trading cards. Most are not bound. Eventually one might want to sell/trade them. If people could change their names, it would be impossible to find a particular DOFF on the Exchange.
    Not to mention the extra database space that would be required to accommodate all of this. If you consider the thousands upon thousands that are all ready in existance, said database would be monumental!
    Which suddenly reminds me, a Dev was once said all doffs are instances of the same. So, there's like only1 Zemok, which can't be customized, as then its customization would apply to everyone's Zemok.
    Not exactly, your doff roster is basically a list of Doff ID#s. So each slot has a number to identify which doff occupies it. Any function that uses the doff basically just looks that doff number up in the doff database.
    Isn't that pretty much what I said, when I "said all doffs are instances of the same"? Like that Zemok, everyone is using the same one (= same ID, whatever). If changes could be made it to, such changes would affect everyone's Zemok. Aka, no one has 'private' instances of their doffs (with their own asset ID).
    Hmm maybe that's what you meant to say, but it's not entirely clear from what you actually said.
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    My character Tsin'xing
    Costume_marhawkman_Tsin%27xing_CC_Comic_Page_Blue_488916968.jpg
  • Options
    arliekkosarliekkos Member Posts: 208 Arc User
    Other
    I'd just like to not have to get KDF doffs when I want an all Romulan crew for the most part.
  • Options
    trennantrennan Member Posts: 2,839 Arc User
    edited July 2018
    No to all
    No thanks. I played Star Wars: Rebellion, I've had enough micromanaging for a few life times. Besides, I seldom rename my boffs, as it is.
    bloodyriz wrote: »
    Does anyone really spend so much time staring at their DOff roster that this would be something worth having?​​

    Umm about an hour per day, across like 10 characters. Then I'm only focused on key ones. Aside from KDF for the obvious reason there, contraband. Other than this, if a doff assignment doesn't have a 50+ dil pay out. Chances are, it's never getting done on any of my characters. Jem'hadar not included here, since the Commendation reward still need to be done. Once that's done, yeah, it'll be relegated to the same thing as the others on my alt and doff list.

    Edit: For tpyos, and this is prevent the forum langolears.
    Mm5NeXy.gif
  • Options
    pwstolemynamepwstolemyname Member Posts: 1,417 Arc User
    No to all
    Honestly I would love to see the whole doff system re-built from the ground up and improved. It would be grate if they made it meaningful and fun in some way. I don't simply mean give it better rewards, I have plenty of not fun things i do for rewards already.

    However with the currently underwhelming and unfun doff system, it really isn't a representation of your ships crew. It genuinely is just a trading card game. Being able to customize the cards would be of no interest to me. If the system were re-built, and worked like a genuine representation of crew it might be, but as is, no.

    Also, i know people will hate this, but i would like to see the effects of active doff powers removed. There are a lot of underperforming abilities in STO. Doff powers were used as an attempt to try and balance those powers and I don't really like the result.

    If a power is underperforming it should be balanced by changing or beefing up the power, not slapping a doff bandaid on it. All doffs have done is make it impossible to fix underperforming powers because if they ever are fixed now, the doff powers may make them over perform.

    Active doff effects should be limited to passive captain skill buffs, not tied to abilities. That way they can retain value without being an impediment to balancing out boff abilities.

    Just to be clear, implementing this (which i don't believe for a moment would actually happen) would be a massive nerf to me as I have way too much EC invested in my doffs, so I would loos a lot of value. But I still feel it would be good for the game.
Sign In or Register to comment.