test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

New things, that would be nice to see

mas134gluck123mas134gluck123 Member Posts: 302 Arc User
What would be nice to see in next months?

New things, that would be nice to see 69 votes

More TOS content (populate zone with contacts, doff chains, foundry content, social zones, new missions)
10% 7 votes
TOS-Related Factions (Add Zone expansion and add Klingons, Romulans and Gorns as playble)
0% 0 votes
First two options
20% 14 votes
New Faction, not related with TOS era (Cardassians, Terrans, Voths, RSE, etc,...)
20% 14 votes
Adding new Seasson
8% 6 votes
Improvement by fixing bugs
23% 16 votes
Something else
10% 7 votes
Add dominion-cardassian lockbox for PC
4% 3 votes
More content for consoles
2% 2 votes

Comments

  • storulesstorules Member Posts: 3,286 Arc User
    None of the above....LESS TOS content please​​
    tumblr_ncbngkt24X1ry46hlo1_400.gif
  • sevenofnine13141sevenofnine13141 Member Posts: 4,274 Arc User
    I say New Faction (Not Related to TOS)! Maybe the Cardassian Union or maybe something else? Personally, I'd like to see a Cardassian faction.
    6a68715ix1os.png
  • d0nomegad0nomega Member Posts: 202 Arc User
    As an Xbox player I'll have to be bias and say; add more content for consoles.

    Out of curiosity, I wonder if they'll ever add a new class? Is it possible?
  • This content has been removed.
  • cidjackcidjack Member Posts: 2,017 Arc User
    storules wrote: »
    None of the above....LESS TOS content please​​

    How about remove polls button?
    Armada: Multiplying fleet projects in need of dilithium by 13."
    95bced8038c91ec6f880d510e6fd302f366a776c4c5761e5f7931d491667a45e.jpgvia Imgflip Meme Generator
  • vegeta50024vegeta50024 Member Posts: 2,336 Arc User
    As it says in my sig, the game desperately needs a decent exploration system so we can have repeatable randomized content. This, more than anything else.

    The crafting system should also be revamped to incorporate a gathering/crafting style that would involve science officers and engineers (research/fabrication).

    An interaction system to allow us to communicate with npcs instead of just blowing up everything we see.

    The biggest problem with a feasible Exploration system is that you have to make it large enough so that it feels like you're exploring, and keep it from being too repetitive in nature.

    The crafting system has already been revamped, so it's not going to see another revamp anytime soon.

    We're dealing with an MMO here, so we're going to have to blow stuff up most of the time, especially when stuff is trying to bluw us up.


    TSC_Signature_Gen_4_-_Vegeta_Small.png
  • leemwatsonleemwatson Member Posts: 5,509 Arc User
    cidjack wrote: »
    storules wrote: »
    None of the above....LESS TOS content please​​

    How about remove polls button?

    Exactly. Polls are rampantly out of control and to make matters worse the same 'poll' subject reappears each week now. Sick of it all! Polls should only be posted by Moderators and Devs IMO. The biased opinion polls of general folk does not influence the direction of the game in any way, shape or fashion.
    "You don't want to patrol!? You don't want to escort!? You don't want to defend the Federation's Starbases!? Then why are you flying my Starships!? If you were a Klingon you'd be killed on the spot, but lucky for you.....you WERE in Starfleet. Let's see how New Zealand Penal Colony suits you." Adm A. Necheyev.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • roborobin96roborobin96 Member Posts: 107 Arc User
    Something else. Like expanding the Foundry with more stuff. No more TOS stuff, no more temporal stuff.
    I would've also voted for "new season" if I could, I want a STO version of the Typhon Pact (and with it, more Alpha Quadrant NPC factions).
    830px-Vesta_side.jpg

    Who's the prettiest of them all?
  • telbasta7386telbasta7386 Member Posts: 761 Arc User
    Catch the console version up first and fix all the glaring issues with it, please.

    I would really like to see a new faction, but we're very limited on what can still reasonably be added. I wonder, though, how well a mirror universe faction would work out? Playing as the terran empire, in a whole seperate mirror reality with different politics and alliances and technology, with the ability to go between the two universes at will?
  • bloodyrizbloodyriz Member Posts: 1,756 Arc User
    d0nomega wrote: »
    As an Xbox player I'll have to be bias and say; add more content for consoles.

    Out of curiosity, I wonder if they'll ever add a new class? Is it possible?

    Well considering that Tactical, Science, and Engineering are the only "classes" in the PC game too, I doubt it.​​
    signature.png
    We come in peace, SHOOT TO KILL!
  • trennantrennan Member Posts: 2,839 Arc User
    Fix the bugs and balancing issues before anything new gets added to the game.
    Mm5NeXy.gif
  • captkelly31#5645 captkelly31 Member Posts: 392 Arc User
    I voted on bugs too, but we could have more episodes about TOS becoming the film era, first contact with species like Saurians, Bolians, Bajorans, site's like Epsilon 9, Dr. Marcus's research station.

    Other than that, we could have events like a probe being discovered by either DS9 from somewhere inbetween the Alpha and Gamma quadrants, or the Jenolan sphere between the Delta and Gamma quadrants, causing us to explore those regions, and whichever sentient species sent the probe, mysterious ruins(said senders may have died off at some point), not to mention all the flora and fauna specimens.
  • wolfblack8705wolfblack8705 Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    I would like to see a borg faction I think that would be cool, theres not much borg content any everyone loves seeing the borg
  • alcyoneserenealcyoneserene Member Posts: 2,414 Arc User
    trennan wrote: »
    Fix the bugs and balancing issues before anything new gets added to the game.

    This pretty much.
    Y945Yzx.jpg
  • bonzodog01bonzodog01 Member Posts: 147 Arc User
    Hrm, how about going even further back and doing 22nd century ENT based content? An ENT storyline could be interesting....
    XBox One - NFV Rylon - T6 Kolasi Siege Destroyer
    British Imperial Armada
  • starkaosstarkaos Member Posts: 11,556 Arc User
    The only thing that won't be added in the next months is a new micro-faction. A new micro-faction might be introduced in 2018, but we will see. Except for new TOS content which might happen and new micro-factions, the other options will definitely happen. Cryptic might not fix the bug you want fixed or the amount you want fixed, but they will fix some bugs.
  • whisperorwhisperor Member Posts: 71 Arc User
    I would actually like to seem Cryptic make some upgrades to ship interiors. Not just sprucing things up cosmetically; but actually making them important in someways.
    For example: Captains Quarters should have a wardrobe within with the function of a....semi tailor (players will be able to modify their outfits but only with purchased/preowned materials; anything else must come from a true tailor).
    in addition, their are some ships limited to one bridge design and on interior. That needs to change to allow whatever bridge/interior a player deems fit.
    For example: that Aquarius Bridge form the Odyssey would really go well with the Chronos class Temporal Temporal Dreadnaught.
    I could go on but you get my point.
  • This content has been removed.
  • pobatti#7150 pobatti Member Posts: 43 Arc User
    With a new CBS owned show on the way next year, I'll take a leap and guess that in the near future we'll all be piloting orange chunky bizarrely triangular ships - if Discovery wasn't a one-off. Nontheless I'm certain Cryptic could design an entire family of ships in that general style as they've been known to do sometimes.
  • kapla5571kapla5571 Member Posts: 103 Arc User
    I want the Nacho cheese flavored Discovery Dorito ship along with a limit on how many polls can be created in a month by a single poster so like 1 a month. :)
  • steaensteaen Member Posts: 646 Arc User
    edited September 2016
    Time to move away from the TOS stuff and time travel stuff in general - let's focus on the time we're actually supposed to be in (2410) rather than hopping back and forward all over the place.
  • casualstocasualsto Member Posts: 672 Arc User
    storules wrote: »
    None of the above....LESS TOS content please​​


    steaen wrote: »
    Time to move away from the TOS stuff and time travel stuff in general - let's focus on the time we're actually supposed to be in (2410) rather than hopping back and forward all over the place.



    Yes. I personally find this TOS STO content abnoxious and I sincerely hope this era will be just a short stepping stone. The content STF-wise is horrifying and the only good thing that came out of that TOS singleplayer stuff is the kelvin timeline batleth (critdx3 melee weapon with interesting skin). And maybe some of the ships and the Temporal Specialization. But the TOS-era related content is ... distasteful to my Star Trek View.
  • This content has been removed.
  • pobatti#7150 pobatti Member Posts: 43 Arc User
    There's already so much revisiting of Kirk's era and time travel shenanigans that it's beginning to look like the devs really wanted to make a Doctor Who mmo. Yeah, time travel occurs in Star Trek, but it shouldn't be overused. Unless there are plans to have a fully exploreable 23rd Century that it's viable to remain in forever, I see no reason to continue going back there as there's no real benefit in adding more brief glimpses - there's more than enough of that.

    The same applies in the other direction too. A brief glimpse or hint of what's to come in the 31st Century is fine, but when timeships show up all the time they really start to lose their novelty and curiosity value.
  • This content has been removed.
  • solarwraithsolarwraith Member Posts: 191 Arc User
    coolbatman wrote: »
    twok phasers ftw!!!!!

    Those would be nice, especially the sound effects.
  • This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.