test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

FLAGSHIPS: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times

thetaninethetanine Member Posts: 1,367 Arc User
FLAGSHIPS: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Message? YES.

The new flagships are a mixed bag for me. The FED ships are freaking awesome. Majestic, even.

The KDF Flagships are a bit too cumbersome for me.

The ROM Flagships seem to be the worst deal, for me especially, since my "main" player character is ROM. The Scimitar, to me, evokes a step backwards for the REPUBLIC. The Scimitar was a monster, a PREDATOR in the words of Picard. It seems to me that making the Scimitar the new ROM flagship should have made the Soverign the FED Flagship. My point here is the Scimitar is an ANACHRONISM.

That's a pretty harsh charge since this season is all about TIME: Travel, Events, History, Futures...

I feel like Cryptic did a fantastic job for the FED Flagship. OK for the KDF. And Badly for the ROM REPUBLIC.

How about you?​​
STAR TREK
lD8xc9e.png
«1

Comments

  • dareaudareau Member Posts: 2,390 Arc User
    Bypassing all the "cheap game logics" like the Scim was the only Republic Dreadnought when the declaration of "flagship status" was made, etc. etc. blather blather...

    Personally, I find the "T6" Romulan-ified Scimitar (ie, same "bat shape" with lots of foldy-wings but done up in "smooth" Romulan lines/bird motif vs. Bat) as the current "ultimate" expression of Reman ship design fused with Romulan aesthetics.

    Which is a central tenet of the Republic, right? One big happy (and equal) Republic instead of a domineering Empire?
    Detecting big-time "anti-old-school" bias here. NX? Lobi. TOS/TMP Connie? Super-promotion-box. (aka the two hardest ways to get ships) Excelsior & all 3 TNG "big hero" ships? C-Store. Please Equalize...

    To rob a line: [quote: Mariemaia Kushrenada] Forum Posting is much like an endless waltz. The three beats of war, peace and revolution continue on forever. However, opinions will change upon the reading of my post.[/quote]
  • vivenneanthonyvivenneanthony Member Posts: 1,278 Arc User
    thetanine wrote: »
    FLAGSHIPS: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Message? YES.

    The new flagships are a mixed bag for me. The FED ships are freaking awesome. Majestic, even.

    The KDF Flagships are a bit too cumbersome for me.

    The ROM Flagships seem to be the worst deal, for me especially, since my "main" player character is ROM. The Scimitar, to me, evokes a step backwards for the REPUBLIC. The Scimitar was a monster, a PREDATOR in the words of Picard. It seems to me that making the Scimitar the new ROM flagship should have made the Soverign the FED Flagship. My point here is the Scimitar is an ANACHRONISM.

    That's a pretty harsh charge since this season is all about TIME: Travel, Events, History, Futures...

    I feel like Cryptic did a fantastic job for the FED Flagship. OK for the KDF. And Badly for the ROM REPUBLIC.

    How about you?​​

    The T6 Scimitar just looks bad. It fits perfectly in a Batman Universe.

  • jade1280jade1280 Member Posts: 868 Arc User
    The romulans just wanna look big and tough that is all.
    So what if they are just lackeys to the federation now.
  • alexhurlbutalexhurlbut Member Posts: 292 Arc User
    dareau wrote: »
    Which is a central tenet of the Republic, right? One big happy (and equal) Republic instead of a domineering Empire?
    Not with those tholaron emitter tips and being able to use said ability from the T5 scimitar set.

  • jslynjslyn Member Posts: 1,790 Arc User
    The Romulans are not your friends. They are all smiles to your face when they want something, but a wise man would not turn his back on one. And that is why they are my favorite race.
  • This content has been removed.
  • eldritchxeldritchx Member Posts: 120 Arc User
    I think the Khopesh and Flambard look great. Not so sold on the Shamsir. I'd have been more than happy if they had made a more 'modern' design the flagship, like the Kara, and thus have had an excuse to stick Intel seats on the Scims instead, but it is what it is :p
  • This content has been removed.
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    jslyn wrote: »
    The Romulans are not your friends. They are all smiles to your face when they want something, but a wise man would not turn his back on one. And that is why they are my favorite race.

    Maybe if we were talking about the Romulans from the mainline movies and TV shows, because STO's Romulans are nothing at all like what you described. They are footrests for the Federation and Klingon Empire in STO, a very pale copy of the Federation on top of that.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • jslynjslyn Member Posts: 1,790 Arc User
    Maybe if we were talking about the Romulans from the mainline movies and TV shows, because STO's Romulans are nothing at all like what you described. They are footrests for the Federation and Klingon Empire in STO, a very pale copy of the Federation on top of that.


    Lies! They are merely awaiting for the proper time to strike!
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    edited March 2016
    thetanine wrote: »
    FLAGSHIPS: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Message? YES.

    The new flagships are a mixed bag for me. The FED ships are freaking awesome. Majestic, even.

    The KDF Flagships are a bit too cumbersome for me.

    The ROM Flagships seem to be the worst deal, for me especially, since my "main" player character is ROM. The Scimitar, to me, evokes a step backwards for the REPUBLIC. The Scimitar was a monster, a PREDATOR in the words of Picard. It seems to me that making the Scimitar the new ROM flagship should have made the Soverign the FED Flagship. My point here is the Scimitar is an ANACHRONISM.

    That's a pretty harsh charge since this season is all about TIME: Travel, Events, History, Futures...

    I feel like Cryptic did a fantastic job for the FED Flagship. OK for the KDF. And Badly for the ROM REPUBLIC.

    How about you?​​

    I'm a little bit different but my feelings on the Flagships?

    First, "cumbersome." NONE of the Flagships handle well. They never did even at T5, so people expecting anything vastly different from that should have known better. The Odyssey even before T6 faced superior handling Fed Cruisers that could hit just as hard and take as much punishment as they did. The same persisted for the Bortasqu' for the KDF. The Roms are so loaded with TAC heavy ships that the options are overflowing, but at least the Scimitar had insane hitting power and survivability to make up for the cumbersome handling.

    Odyssey
    The Fed Flagships look far better to me since I hated to no end the Odyssey skins. I loved the T5 Odyssey stats, console layout, BOFF seating, but the look was so terrible that I never put any time into the ships. The T6 ones look far better and are helped by the typical T6 improvements. My ranking of the Fed ones would be the TAC>SCI>ENG versions. The TAC one has a pretty balanced layout. The SCI one has the advantage of Sensor Analysis but it's held back with 2 TAC Consoles. Full-on ENG Cruisers are boring for me.

    The KDF & Rom Flagships however are where things get interesting, at least to me when you compare the Fed Flagships to them. Let's start with the Elephant in the room.

    Scimitar
    The T6 Scimitars. I like the general look of them but I'm not fond of the hollow forward hull. The rest of the new designs however look the part of the more recent Romulan designs in the game. Regardless of my quibble about the nose section of the T6 skins, I prefer the overall T6 skins way more over the T5 Scimitar / Scimitar variant skins. Let me make it plainly clear that I hate how the Scimitar looks, even in Nemesis. It's a plain brick with 2 slabs glued to it on the sides at 30 degree angles, then painted black, purple, or whatever. The Scimitar is one of the most uninspiring ship designs in the entirety of Star Trek, painted dark to hide the flaws, or to be more exact, the lack of detail.

    With the visuals out of the way, you cannot argue however about STATS. The T5U Scimitars have long had the reputation ingame for hitting like a truck, even with the advent of T6 ships and the T6 versions are improved on that. Period.

    The Scimitars, regardless of tier are the RRW's truly unique ship that nobody else can replicate. I equate this "uniqueness" to the KDF's unique ship, the Birds of Prey. Nobody has the same total package of what the BOP offers outside the KDF. For the Scimitar series, the uniqueness of a combo of Cruiser-like staying power and 8 weapon slots, Cmdr TAC stations, Battle Cloak, and the luxury of stuffing Full SRO BOFF layout as RRW. Nothing in the game replicates that, not in the C-Store, Lockbox, Event, or even Promo Pack ships.

    I prefer the raw power of the TAC version, but I know people swear by the SCI version, even back in the T5 days.

    Bortasqu'
    Visually? They're okay, I have no general issues with how they look. However, a number of the parts just don't line up right when you mix different ship components. For example, there is a very nasty, noticeable gap in the Gorkon nacelles if used on any other hull than the Gorkon's. The gap is immediately seen from the front and rear and you can see the insides of the wings. It's that bad. But again, the basic look I have no problem with but the parts do not mix well at all.

    Statistically? Only 2 versions are worthy of being mentioned. The TAC and SCI version, just as it did at the T5 versions.

    The TAC version makes it a Battlecruiser that has 5 TAC consoles. There is NO Crusier, Battlecruiser, Cruiser-styled Warbird anywhere in the game that has that feature.

    The SCI version is also a member of a very small club. Cruisers with Sensor Analysis. There are only 3 members of that club.
    SCI Odyssey (T5 & T6) 5 ENG, 4 SCI, 2 TAC Consoles
    Tal Shiar Adapted Battlecruiser (T5 only) 4 ENG, 4 SCI, 3 TAC Consoles
    SCI Bortasqu (T5 & T6) 4 ENG, 3 SCI, 4 TAC Consoles

    The SCI Bortasqu' has a very balanced Console layout and of the Cruiser family with Sensor Analysis, she is the only one with 4 TAC Consoles. Her 3 SCI Consoles is not that bad for the guys that like high TAC & SCI Console Slot Counts for their ships. Overall, she is a pretty special package and actually a worthy contender to the 5 TAC Bortasqu'.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • tousseautousseau Member Posts: 1,484 Arc User
    jslyn wrote: »
    The Romulans are not your friends. They are all smiles to your face when they want something, but a wise man would not turn his back on one. And that is why they are my favorite race.

    Maybe if we were talking about the Romulans from the mainline movies and TV shows, because STO's Romulans are nothing at all like what you described. They are footrests for the Federation and Klingon Empire in STO, a very pale copy of the Federation on top of that.

    Epohhs! Would you like an Epohh friend?
  • themadrigogsthemadrigogs Member Posts: 207 Arc User
    tousseau wrote: »
    jslyn wrote: »
    The Romulans are not your friends. They are all smiles to your face when they want something, but a wise man would not turn his back on one. And that is why they are my favorite race.

    Maybe if we were talking about the Romulans from the mainline movies and TV shows, because STO's Romulans are nothing at all like what you described. They are footrests for the Federation and Klingon Empire in STO, a very pale copy of the Federation on top of that.

    Epohhs! Would you like an Epohh friend?

    That doesn't bring up any questions in your mind? Every flag officer of both major powers having an irresistibly cute pet, provided at cost by their new Romulan friends, following them around wherever they go? Ok. I guess I agree -- Romulans have been neutered; TNG Romulans would be using ridiculously complicated espionage tactics, whereas STO Romulans are just nice, friendly people with no ulterior motives or shadowy schemes whatsoever.

    As for the flagships, I'm still not on board with the Romulans flying around with Thalaron reactors at all, but the visual changes to the Scimitar are a definite improvement over what they had before. The Nemesis version was worthy of the movie. Now it feels more like a genuine Romulan ship, at least.
  • warpangelwarpangel Member Posts: 9,427 Arc User
    As for the flagships, I'm still not on board with the Romulans flying around with Thalaron reactors at all, but the visual changes to the Scimitar are a definite improvement over what they had before. The Nemesis version was worthy of the movie. Now it feels more like a genuine Romulan ship, at least.

    Fortunately even us nice STO Romulans still don't care if the feddybears are "on board" with our weapons. B)
    jade1280 wrote: »
    The romulans just wanna look big and tough that is all.
    So what if they are just lackeys to the federation now.

    Don't kid yourself. Fed/KDF are the lackeys in this alliance. It's the Romulans who get access to allied facilities, fly allied ships, command allied personnel. Fed/KDF dudes get...to tag epohh's in our backyard.
  • gradiigradii Member Posts: 2,824 Arc User
    edited March 2016
    thetanine wrote: »
    FLAGSHIPS: The Best of Times and the Worst of Times: Message? YES.

    The new flagships are a mixed bag for me. The FED ships are freaking awesome. Majestic, even.

    The KDF Flagships are a bit too cumbersome for me.

    The ROM Flagships seem to be the worst deal, for me especially, since my "main" player character is ROM. The Scimitar, to me, evokes a step backwards for the REPUBLIC. The Scimitar was a monster, a PREDATOR in the words of Picard. It seems to me that making the Scimitar the new ROM flagship should have made the Soverign the FED Flagship. My point here is the Scimitar is an ANACHRONISM.

    That's a pretty harsh charge since this season is all about TIME: Travel, Events, History, Futures...

    I feel like Cryptic did a fantastic job for the FED Flagship. OK for the KDF. And Badly for the ROM REPUBLIC.

    How about you?​​

    The T6 Scimitar just looks bad. It fits perfectly in a Batman Universe.

    Batman scimitar... I actually approve. lol.
    Don't kid yourself. Fed/KDF are the lackeys in this alliance. It's the Romulans who get access to allied facilities, fly allied ships, command allied personnel. Fed/KDF dudes get...to tag epohh's in our backyard.


    Can I like.. quote you everywhere on this?

    "He shall be my finest warrior, this generic man who was forced upon me.
    Like a badass I shall make him look, and in the furnace of war I shall forge him.
    he shall be of iron will and steely sinew.
    In great armour I shall clad him and with the mightiest weapons he shall be armed.
    He will be untouched by plague or disease; no sickness shall blight him.
    He shall have such tactics, strategies and machines that no foe will best him in battle.
    He is my answer to cryptic logic, he is the Defender of my Romulan Crew.
    He is Tovan Khev... and he shall know no fear."
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    warpangel wrote: »
    Don't kid yourself. Fed/KDF are the lackeys in this alliance. It's the Romulans who get access to allied facilities, fly allied ships, command allied personnel. Fed/KDF dudes get...to tag epohh's in our backyard.

    Pfft. You have to let the little kids to come home somewhere, after all.

    Here's a good place to see where the Romulan Republic's standing is between the Klingon Empire and Federation. Go play "Surface Tension" mission. D'Tan starts going on about how the Romulan Republic can lead forays in the new Sphere. But Ambassador S'taass of the Klingon Empire immediately butts in and starts getting onto the Federation on an admission that the Federation TRIBBLE up with their actions (or more exactly, inaction) with the Undine threat years ago when the Klingons, under Chancellor Martok at the time, were trying to get them aboard on a joint effort. The conversation immediately went solely to the grown ups in this group, the true power holders.

    D'Tan simply had to wait it out and let true power sort things out.
    XzRTofz.gif
  • eldritchxeldritchx Member Posts: 120 Arc User
    As for the flagships, I'm still not on board with the Romulans flying around with Thalaron reactors at all, but the visual changes to the Scimitar are a definite improvement over what they had before. The Nemesis version was worthy of the movie. Now it feels more like a genuine Romulan ship, at least.

    If you switch to a regular Romulan bridge, you won't have the Thalaron reactor anymore :)

  • samt1996samt1996 Member Posts: 2,856 Arc User
    The new romulan Flagships look fantastic to me, much better than the scimitar. Most importantly they look "Romulan" which was the whole point.

    Art is subjective, fortunately you don't have to use the new skins so I fail to see the problem. KDF ships are always hideously ugly that's kind of the point, they are designed with only utilitarianism in mind.
  • thegrandnagus1thegrandnagus1 Member Posts: 5,166 Arc User
    I hate to say it, but I gave up flying my new Odysseys a few days after buying them. I love how they look, but they just don't *feel* fun to me. So, oh well.

    The-Grand-Nagus
    Join Date: Sep 2008

    og9Zoh0.jpg
  • gaevsprivsmangaevsprivsman Member Posts: 314 Arc User
    jslyn wrote: »
    Maybe if we were talking about the Romulans from the mainline movies and TV shows, because STO's Romulans are nothing at all like what you described. They are footrests for the Federation and Klingon Empire in STO, a very pale copy of the Federation on top of that.


    Lies! They are merely awaiting for the proper time to strike!

    I know i would never accept gifts from them...
  • warmaker001bwarmaker001b Member Posts: 9,205 Arc User
    I hate to say it, but I gave up flying my new Odysseys a few days after buying them. I love how they look, but they just don't *feel* fun to me. So, oh well.

    They're all solid ships, IMO.

    But if you're chasing stats for performance, except for the Scimitar with the Roms*, there are already better TAC Cruisers for the Feds and TAC Battlecruisers for the KDF at T6. Namely:
    Eclipse
    T6 Avenger
    Qib
    T6 Mogh
    ... Notice the patterns? ;)

    On top of that, the above ships, especially the Eclipse and Qib, have outstanding handling characteristics and fly so smoothly, quickly, while still hitting extremely hard. The one issue all the Flagships have in common is that they're sturdy but sluggish fliers.

    Even then, the Flagships offer merely another option for players to fly, especially if they liked what the T5 versions offered to begin with since the T6 ones are improved over them.

    * Scimitar for all intents and purposes is a massive Escort with 8 weapon slots and Battle Cloak. The Roms are absolutely loaded with excellent T6 Escorts like the Mogai but none of them have 8 weapon slots. The Mogai however can slot OSS3...
    XzRTofz.gif
  • thegrandnagus1thegrandnagus1 Member Posts: 5,166 Arc User
    edited March 2016
    I hate to say it, but I gave up flying my new Odysseys a few days after buying them. I love how they look, but they just don't *feel* fun to me. So, oh well.

    They're all solid ships, IMO.

    But if you're chasing stats for performance,

    I'm not a min/maxer, I just play for fun. And to me(key word), slow bulky ships aren't fun to fly. Again, to me(key word).

    The-Grand-Nagus
    Join Date: Sep 2008

    og9Zoh0.jpg
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • whisperorwhisperor Member Posts: 71 Arc User
    edited March 2016
    Okay, my Turn.

    FED: Very good looking, decent performance numbers and can take punishment while dishing it back out. I would like to see some changes....
    1. Increase the basic turn rate a little. Not a big deal actually as RCS accelerators, set bonuses and other modifiers help to offsets that issue, but still nice to have along with....
    2. Enable the use of Dual/Heavy Cannons on the vessels. They're suppose to be the baddest of the bad, being Flagships and all so it would make sense to maximize the wattage one can shoot down range in addition to whatever Torpedoes being used.
    3. Add Hangers for Carrier Pets. Since they suppose to be like Dreadnaughts/Super Capital ships, it would make sense that such vessels would have plenty of hanger space for shuttles and other small craft. Surely there would be enough room a small number of drones (Carrier Pets) to have around, just in case.
      Yes, I known that those with access to the original T5s' can get their hands on an Aquarius pet; but still....

      And finally...
    4. Streamline the Saucer Section of the Endeavor class. Overall, that Saucer looks to be the best out of all the T6 designs, right up until you get to the Bow; there, it makes the whole thing look like a chipped away arrowhead. The Bow needs to be either sharpened out or rounded out (preferably the former) so it looks more like a good (if not perfect) arrowhead as opposed to the current Broken Arrowhead look.

    KDF: I like the improvements in performance, especially given how inferior the original Bortasque was when compared to The Oddessy, it flew circles around it's KDF counterpart.
    However, the designs on the new Flagships are just...ugly. Then again, most KDF Capital ships are ugly (probably cause the Klingons are trying to make them more fortress like); at least the smaller and faster vessels look so much better. Still, it is a nice improvement over the original design, yet remain true to it's Klingon philosophy and heritage.
    Bottom line, not bad, not bad at all.....for a Klingon vessel.
    Oh, and some Hangers for Carrier Pets could help.

    ROM: The best Designs I've seen yet. A perfect mix of Romulan and Reman Architechure and Tech. And they already come with their own Carrier Pets too. NICE!!
    Even so, they're underpowered (as it is with all Romulan vessels) due to the inefficiency of their Singularity type Warp cores. Then again, Romulans are known for harnessing the otherwise waisted energy into unique powers and abilities that other factions can only dream about.
    The T6 Scimitar just looks bad. It fits perfectly in a Batman Universe.
    giphy.gif
    That got me imagining a Giant sized Batman Flying around some Space hub in a T6 Simitar like Batwing; if only I were an artist.... o:)
    Post edited by whisperor on
  • This content has been removed.
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,919 Arc User
    edited March 2016
    whisperor wrote: »
    Okay, my Turn.

    FED: Very good looking, decent performance numbers and can take punishment while dishing it back out. I would like to see some changes....
    1. Increase the basic turn rate a little. Not a big deal actually as RCS accelerators, set bonuses and other modifiers help to offsets that issue, but still nice to have along with....
    2. Enable the use of Dual/Heavy Cannons on the vessels. They're suppose to be the baddest of the bad, being Flagships and all so it would make sense to maximize the wattage one can shoot down range in addition to whatever Torpedoes being used.
    3. Add Hangers for Carrier Pets. Since they suppose to be like Dreadnaughts/Super Capital ships, it would make sense that such vessels would have plenty of hanger space for shuttles and other small craft. Surely there would be enough room a small number of drones (Carrier Pets) to have around, just in case.
      Yes, I known that those with access to the original T5s' can get their hands on an Aquarius pet; but still....

      And finally...
    4. Streamline the Saucer Section of the Endeavor class. Overall, that Saucer looks to be the best out of all the T6 designs, right up until you get to the Bow; there, it makes the whole thing look like a chipped away arrowhead. The Bow needs to be either sharpened out or rounded out (preferably the former) so it looks more like a good (if not perfect) arrowhead as opposed to the current Broken Arrowhead look.

    KDF: I like the improvements in performance, especially given how inferior the original Bortasque was when compared to The Oddessy, it flew circles around it's KDF counterpart.
    However, the designs on the new Flagships are just...ugly. Then again, most KDF Capital ships are ugly (probably cause the Klingons are trying to make them more fortress like); at least the smaller and faster vessels look so much better. Still, it is a nice improvement over the original design, yet remain true to it's Klingon philosophy and heritage.
    Bottom line, not bad, not bad at all.....for a Klingon vessel.
    Oh, and some Hangers for Carrier Pets could help.

    ROM: The best Designs I've seen yet. A perfect mix of Romulan and Reman Architechure and Tech. And they already come with their own Carrier Pets too. NICE!!
    Even so, they're underpowered (as it is with all Romulan vessels) due to the inefficiency of their Singularity type Warp cores. Then again, Romulans are known for harnessing the otherwise waisted energy into unique powers and abilities that other factions can only dream about.

    Ok, I had to read this post 3 times just to make sure you were really saying what I thought you were saying.

    If they did what you were asking for the Fed ships, it would completely invalidate any other ship. Every ship has to have strengths and weaknesses, it's what set the ships apart. What you're doing here is cherry picking the best of the best and asking for it all on one ship, that's simply not going to happen, nor should it. The Odyssey is the 'Flagship' because that's what class the Enterprise is, not because it's the 'be all end all' or the 'best ship' you can get. It should have trade offs like every other ship in the game.

    The Romulan part.. wow. The thought that Romulan ships are under powered is simply mind blowing. I honestly don't even know how to address that part. I will just take the high road here and say that I very strongly disagree.
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • whisperorwhisperor Member Posts: 71 Arc User
    edited March 2016
    Did you seriously say the Scimitars are underpowered?! What universe are you living in? And whatever you want to say about the design, they're still vastly oversized and no player ships should be that huge. It's ridiculous.​​

    The Romulan part.. wow. The thought that Romulan ships are under powered is simply mind blowing. I honestly don't even know how to address that part. I will just take the high road here and say that I very strongly disagree.

    Okay, maybe I should clarify something:
    Most ships have a base power level of 50 for their subsystem powers; that';s assuming the vessel has balanced power settings, (before skill, bonuses and other modifiers come into play). Romulan ships have a base power level of 40.
    Having said that, that missing 10 in each subsystem is being redirected towards empowering the so called Singularity abilities that have a great area affect in Space. that's what I was talking about. Think of it as a outsiders point of view if you will.
    If they did what you were asking for the Fed ships, it would completely invalidate any other ship. Every ship has to have strengths and weaknesses, it's what set the ships apart. What you're doing here is cherry picking the best of the best and asking for it all on one ship, that's simply not going to happen, nor should it. The Odyssey is the 'Flagship' because that's what class the Enterprise is, not because it's the 'be all end all' or the 'best ship' you can get. It should have trade offs like every other ship in the game.

    ....Yeah you're probably right. Although to be fair, they kind of did a "jack of all trades" vessels with the Command BattleCruisers.
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,919 Arc User
    whisperor wrote: »
    Okay, maybe I should clarify something:
    Most ships have a base power level of 50 for their subsystem powers; that';s assuming the vessel has balanced power settings, (before skill, bonuses and other modifiers come into play). Romulan ships have a base power level of 40.
    Having said that, that missing 10 in each subsystem is being redirected towards empowering the so called Singularity abilities that have a great area affect in Space. that's what I was talking about. Think of it as a outsiders point of view if you will.

    I get that, and at one point you were absolutely right. The thing is, there are now so many methods in this game to mitigate power costs that the Singularity is not a very big deal anymore. When you look at the trade off that Romulans get in exchange, things like Superior Romulan Operative BoFFs they come out way ahead. Especially in the case of the Scimitar that has the 5 forward weapons, commander tactical station, 5 tac consoles and a hangar bay. You get a lot when you consider that it's tradeoffs (Singularity and slow turn rate) can both be pretty easily mitigated.
    Yeah you're probably right. Although to be fair, they kind of did a "jack of all trades" vessels with the Command BattleCruisers.

    On the Fed sides, the Command Ships sacrifice the best cruiser command (Weapon Systems Efficiency) in exchange for it's lackluster hangar bay. It's minimal, but it's something. The Command Ships are pretty solid all around, that's for sure.
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.