test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Overhaul the Iconic ships

2»

Comments

  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • nikeixnikeix Member Posts: 3,972 Arc User
    Just out of curiosity, is the mangled grammar in your sig image deliberate?

    That's how a Constitution class looks
    -or-
    That's what a Constitution class looks like
  • seaofsorrowsseaofsorrows Member Posts: 10,919 Arc User
    edited February 2016
    The time and effort that would be spent on this idea would be better used toward something relevant.

    As pointed out before, most people spend 10-20 minutes in these ships and get out of them as quickly as possible. Cryptic isn't going to put time and effort into something like this that won't make them any money.

    nikeix wrote: »
    Just out of curiosity, is the mangled grammar in your sig image deliberate?

    That's how a Constitution class looks
    -or-
    That's what a Constitution class looks like

    Thank you.

    [Modded]
    Post edited by jodarkrider on
    Insert witty signature line here.
  • enkemenenkemen Member Posts: 113 Arc User
    edited February 2016
    You will never get your wish, mate. No development money is going to be spent on re-detailing low-tier ships or redoing the interiors -- that much has been said before. Nor will there be an endgame Connie or Miranda.
    [Modded]

    Also, honestly, if tiny details like that matter that highly to you, it might be time to reevaluate your life focus.
    Post edited by jodarkrider on
  • This content has been removed.
  • edited February 2016
    This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • enkemenenkemen Member Posts: 113 Arc User
    First, it's not American English that you practice, it's just Bad English. Get better. Second, all of those iconic ships that got a revamp had endgame-level variants that the revamped parts could be used with -- and it has been stated that there will be no endgame Connie or Miranda.

    Call it BS or not, you are in the wrong. Enjoy your wishful thinking.
  • ridinginkridingink Member Posts: 51 Arc User
    edited February 2016
    The miranda for sure and conceivably any version of the connie in 2409/10 would be retrofitted and judging by how many miranda's we seen blow up in the Dominion War new constructions since, meaning they likely redid the ships to some extent without bothering with a completely new design.

    The only one they might redo, as someone already pointed out, is the Nebula since it wouldn't surprise me if it made its T6 version self into the fleet store as the T5 one exists currently. However the Nebula might not necessarily be shown incorrectly since as I understand it was a very quickly designed ship with multiple roles, hence the mission pod. It was just a cheap knock off of the Galaxy class as I understand, and hence likely to have deviations in design. And honestly I fly the ship. It meets my video game expectations of what it should look like and i'm happy with it.

    If I ever wanted anything to change it would be ship scale... some shuttlecraft are way, way, way to big compared to most ships.
    bb8ec35.png

  • ridinginkridingink Member Posts: 51 Arc User
    bjornfried wrote: »
    nikephorus wrote: »
    I wish they would have fixed the excelsior when they released it at T6. To my knowledge it's the only one they didn't clean up.

    You mean from those ships that where "graced" with aT6 Version?

    Many of the lower level ships are "refitted" as T5 or T6 ships within Fleet shipyards that people in Fleets can buy if their fleet is capable of "producing" them.
    bb8ec35.png

  • nikeixnikeix Member Posts: 3,972 Arc User
    bjornfried wrote: »
    nikeix wrote: »
    Just out of curiosity, is the mangled grammar in your sig image deliberate?

    That's how a Constitution class looks
    -or-
    That's what a Constitution class looks like
    Just out of curiosity, why do you care? Get lost.

    Because - despite your rampant hostility - I'd like for people to take you more seriously and fixing that little bit of text would help.

  • jodarkriderjodarkrider Member Posts: 2,097 Arc User
    Alright. That's enough hostility for now.
    /Closed
    [10:20] Your Lunge deals 4798 (2580) Physical Damage(Critical) to Tosk of Borg.

    Star Trek Online Volunteer Community Moderator
    "bIghojchugh DaneH, Dumev pagh. bIghojqangbe'chugh, DuQaHlaH pagh."
    "Learn lots. Don't judge. Laugh for no reason. Be nice. Seek happiness." ~Day[9] 
    "Your fun isn't wrong." ~LaughingTrendy

    Find me on Twitterverse - @jodarkrider

This discussion has been closed.