test content
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc

Nimbus III

lordoffilinglordoffiling Member Posts: 33 Arc User
Nimbus III was the desert planet from Star Trek V: The Final Frontier.

... So, we're embracing Star Trek V as canon, are we? 0.0;
Post edited by lordoffiling on

Comments

  • hyplhypl Member Posts: 3,719 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Yes, so deal with it. :cool:
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Of course it's canon, why shouldn't it? And I go the extra mile and I say STV isn't as bad as people always say it is (most of them just repeat the same stuff over and over again anyway). It's by far not one of the best, but it's not so bad either (certainly not worse than III or VII or IX or X). It's main problem is that it wasn't finished and they decided to bring it into theatres anyway.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • jam3s1701jam3s1701 Member Posts: 1,825 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Star Trek V is canon lol...

    How can you say otherwise..

    JJ WELL. . . . . . that ones still open lol
    JtaDmwW.png
  • hevachhevach Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    No mention of Sybok and no discussion of God's need for a starship.

    You can selectively recognize bits and pieces of a story as canon without the rest. It's basically what Roddenberry did when he pruned down TOS and TAS to cover what was and wasn't accepted for TNG. He removed events and storylines from his accepted canon usually without removing the characters* or places involved.

    *-He did remove a few characters, though, like Sybok and Gary Seven, and copyright complications removed a couple others like the Kzinti. But for the most part everyone and everyplace remained canon while some of the things that happened to people in those places did not.
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    jam3s1701 wrote: »
    Star Trek V is canon lol...

    How can you say otherwise..

    JJ WELL. . . . . . that ones still open lol

    Not really. JJ Trek is just as canon as all the other films. But they had the decency to even put the disclaimer into the movie that all of it happens in a parallel universe and as such has no bearing on established canon. So JJ is only relevant to itself and othe films following this particular set of events.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • vawlkusvawlkus Member Posts: 348 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    hevach wrote: »
    No mention of Sybok and no discussion of God's need for a starship.

    You can selectively recognize bits and pieces of a story as canon without the rest. It's basically what Roddenberry did when he pruned down TOS and TAS to cover what was and wasn't accepted for TNG.

    Actually there's a book that covers who that was. One of the Q books, maybe Q Squared.
  • lordoffilinglordoffiling Member Posts: 33 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Don't tell anyone, but I actually liked ST:V in a lot of ways. I was good with a giant barrier of unknown origin at the center of the galaxy, I was fine with an incredibly powerful and dangerous entity with a god complex being imprisoned there. We've seen stuff like that plenty of times in Star Trek over the years.

    I did take issue with Sybok as Spock's half-brother. That isn't so much an error as it is just really dumb, though. I'll swallow that if you tell me I have to.

    My only real problem with ST:V was, how in the *hell* did they get from the outer rim of the galaxy to the center in, like, an hour and a half? That doesn't compute.
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    vawlkus wrote: »
    Actually there's a book that covers who that was. One of the Q books, maybe Q Squared.

    You dont even need a book, the film itself made quite clear that the being in ST V was not meant to be "god", it just claimed to be. If people still reason their disapproval of STV with it being the film featuring "god" they clearly just repeating stuff they heard ;)

    Now, STV has many points one can rightfully attack, don't get me wrong.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • variant37variant37 Member Posts: 867 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    vawlkus wrote: »
    Actually there's a book that covers who that was. One of the Q books, maybe Q Squared.

    Your statement made me curious so I went and looked this up on Memory Alpha. Talk about a convoluted backstory:

    "According to the non-canon Q Continuum series of novels by Greg Cox, the Sha Ka Ree entity was known as "The One," and was exiled to the center of the galaxy for causing a civil war centered around the premature destruction of the legendary Tkon Empire millennia before being rediscovered by Sybok and the crew of the Enterprise-A. He was an associate and contemporary of 0 (pronounced "Nil", as in nothing), the Beta XII-A entity, or (*) as 0 referred to it (used in type because its real name was apparently unpronounceable, or even incomprehensible, by Humans), and Gorgan in this endeavor.

    The One was referred to by 0 as the entity "who invented Monotheism." He was not originally of this plane and was summoned to this universe via the Guardian of Forever. After causing chaos among the Tkon Empire, he was subsequently defeated and his body destroyed by the combined efforts of Q2, the female Q, and the Q who became known as Quinn; only his head remained, and that was subsequently sealed away by the Q Continuum at the center of the galaxy until his repentance or the heat death of the universe – whichever came first – while 0 was sealed outside the galaxy by the galactic barrier for all eternity."
  • sarcasmdetectorsarcasmdetector Member Posts: 1,176 Media Corps
    edited February 2015

    My only real problem with ST:V was, how in the *hell* did they get from the outer rim of the galaxy to the center in, like, an hour and a half? That doesn't compute.

    By injected pure Handwavium into the warp core.
  • lordoffilinglordoffiling Member Posts: 33 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    variant37 wrote: »
    Your statement made me curious so I went and looked this up on Memory Alpha. Talk about a convoluted backstory:

    "According to the non-canon Q Continuum series of novels by Greg Cox, the Sha Ka Ree entity was known as "The One," and was exiled to the center of the galaxy for causing a civil war centered around the premature destruction of the legendary Tkon Empire millennia before being rediscovered by Sybok and the crew of the Enterprise-A. He was an associate and contemporary of 0 (pronounced "Nil", as in nothing), the Beta XII-A entity, or (*) as 0 referred to it (used in type because its real name was apparently unpronounceable, or even incomprehensible, by Humans), and Gorgan in this endeavor.

    The One was referred to by 0 as the entity "who invented Monotheism." He was not originally of this plane and was summoned to this universe via the Guardian of Forever. After causing chaos among the Tkon Empire, he was subsequently defeated and his body destroyed by the combined efforts of Q2, the female Q, and the Q who became known as Quinn; only his head remained, and that was subsequently sealed away by the Q Continuum at the center of the galaxy until his repentance or the heat death of the universe – whichever came first – while 0 was sealed outside the galaxy by the galactic barrier for all eternity."

    Pardon the expression, but that sounds like puke in written form. But then, I could never get into the Q books. The writing was full of... Well, nevermind, the point is I thank the heavens on a daily basis they're not canon.
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Pardon the expression, but that sounds like puke in written form. But then, I could never get into the Q books. The writing was full of... Well, nevermind, the point is I thank the heavens on a daily basis they're not canon.

    Agreed. That bit is worse than STV, Spock's Brain and Threshold combined XD
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • hevachhevach Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    It's not the worst the EU has to offer, but it's pretty high on my list of reasons why the "extended" universe actually contracts Star Trek. Just there you can see three formerly unrelated energy beings all being conflated with the Q. I could dig up more books that conflates the Q with the Preservers, the Preservers with the Whale Probe, V'ger with the Borg, and then the Borg with the Preservers, V'ger to the Temporal Cold War, and the Temporal Cold War to Gary Seven... and now in the space of a dozen or so novels we've contracted entire seasons of of diverse vastness to the actions of one character.
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    hevach wrote: »
    It's not the worst the EU has to offer, but it's pretty high on my list of reasons why the "extended" universe actually contracts Star Trek. Just there you can see three formerly unrelated energy beings all being conflated with the Q. I could dig up more books that conflates the Q with the Preservers, the Preservers with the Whale Probe, V'ger with the Borg, and then the Borg with the Preservers, V'ger to the Temporal Cold War, and the Temporal Cold War to Gary Seven... and now in the space of a dozen or so novels we've contracted entire seasons of of diverse vastness to the actions of one character.

    This is a great example of certain "creative streams" nowadays ruining franchises. People always demand connections between completely unrelated things and demand explanations of things that y their very nature would not require such and ultimately you ruined perfectly good stories forever. Luckily in case of novels you cans avely ignore them, not a single Trek novel is considered "in continuity" with anything on-screen. But if stuff like this happens on-screen in later installments of the franchise (see: Borg completely rewritten and ruined forever with FC/VOY) you can just curse and start to "fanon" it away for you.
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • variant37variant37 Member Posts: 867 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Pardon the expression, but that sounds like puke in written form.

    That's pretty much how I feel about all Star Trek EU novels, which IMHO are just bad fan-fiction in printed form.
  • edited February 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,460 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    variant37 wrote: »
    That's pretty much how I feel about all Star Trek EU novels, which IMHO are just bad fan-fiction in printed form.
    Some are quite well-written; I commend to your attention John M. Ford's The Final Reflection (pity his version of Klingons is non-canon, as I greatly prefer it to the Space Biker Vikings that we actually got) and Diane Duane's Rihannsu novels in particular.

    Unsurprisingly, the best ones tend to be written by those who are already established as SF writers. And the perceived need for more novels results in a lot of bad fanfic being published as "serious" Trek novels (Marshak and Culbreath, I'm looking at you).
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • edited February 2015
    This content has been removed.
  • bberge1701bberge1701 Member Posts: 726 Bug Hunter
    edited February 2015
    I want horses! Even if I can only use them on Nimbus III.

    I didn't think ST5 was that bad. My biggest problem with the movie was the retcon of Sybok being Spock's brother. I think it was an unnecessary complication that didn't really add anything to the story.
  • dakkalvar1dakkalvar1 Member Posts: 32 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Doesn't get more canon than a Star Trek Movie.....
  • jonsillsjonsills Member Posts: 10,460 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Hey, if we could eject movies from canon just for being bad, we wouldn't have Scimitars, either. Nemesis was every bit as bad as STV.
    Lorna-Wing-sig.png
  • variant37variant37 Member Posts: 867 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    jonsills wrote: »
    Hey, if we could eject movies from canon just for being bad, we wouldn't have Scimitars, either. Nemesis was every bit as bad as STV.

    We also got Donatra, the Mogai/Valdore and the Remans from Nemesis, so that movie definitely had some redeeming qualities despite being mostly unwatchable.
  • hevachhevach Member Posts: 2,777 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    If you cut out every scene where anybody opens their mouth and says a word that isn't a battle command, what's left of Nemesis is one of Trek's more intense and prolonged starship duels.

    This is basically the same redeeming quality as most disaster movies - no matter how unwatchable the two hour version is, the 15 minute version on Youtube is pretty awesome.
  • jaguarskxjaguarskx Member Posts: 5,945 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Nimbus III was the desert planet from Star Trek V: The Final Frontier.

    ... So, we're embracing Star Trek V as canon, are we? 0.0;

    All movies and TV episodes are considered cannon. I suppose this includes the animated series as well, but I have not seen any of those episodes.

    Anything published in printed format is considered "soft cannon". That includes novels, short stories and technical manuals.
  • angrytargangrytarg Member Posts: 11,008 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    variant37 wrote: »
    We also got Donatra, the Mogai/Valdore and the Remans from Nemesis, so that movie definitely had some redeeming qualities despite being mostly unwatchable.

    In what way are any of those things "redeeming qualities"? XD Matter of taste, I know, but the Remans are one of the most pointless and stupid things ever concieved in all Trekverse ("we need some ugly orcs for picard to shoot")
    lFC4bt2.gif
    ^ Memory Alpha.org is not canon. It's a open wiki with arbitrary rules. Only what can be cited from an episode is. ^
    "No. Men do not roar. Women roar. Then they hurl heavy objects... and claw at you." -Worf, son of Mogh
    "A filthy, mangy beast, but in its bony breast beat the heart of a warrior" - "faithful" (...) "but ever-ready to follow the call of the wild." - Martok, about a Targ
    "That pig smelled horrid. A sweet-sour, extremely pungent odor. I showered and showered, and it took me a week to get rid of it!" - Robert Justman, appreciating Emmy-Lou
  • gavinrunebladegavinruneblade Member Posts: 3,894 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    jaguarskx wrote: »
    All movies and TV episodes are considered cannon. I suppose this includes the animated series as well, but I have not seen any of those episodes.

    Anything published in printed format is considered "soft cannon". That includes novels, short stories and technical manuals.

    Correction: anything printed is not cannon.

    Soft cannon is a b.s. word made up by fans that want the things they like to sound more important than the things they don't like. It's someone saying " nil is bigger than zero but still smaller than .00000000000000000001".

    The animated series was removed from canon for a while and then put back, then CBS removed their page on what is and isn't canon. Nothing has changed since then.
  • vladdievladdie Member Posts: 117 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    Star Trek V wasn't bad. The only thing that ruined it was Shatners ego.
    Barihawk.jpg
  • variant37variant37 Member Posts: 867 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    angrytarg wrote: »
    In what way are any of those things "redeeming qualities"? XD Matter of taste, I know, but the Remans are one of the most pointless and stupid things ever concieved in all Trekverse ("we need some ugly orcs for picard to shoot")

    Redeeming qualities because -

    Donatra - Because now we get to fight her in Vortex!
    Mogai/Valdore - This is self-explanatory. One of the coolest ship designs in STO.
    Remans - Hey, HEY! Obisek would like a word with you regarding your feelings about the proud Reman people. I actually have a Reman female character because the females look like space vampires and that is awesome.

    If you'd like to discuss a Trek movie that has no redeeming qualities, we can talk about Insurrection.
  • vladdievladdie Member Posts: 117 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    The forced plot of Insurrection was so bad that Paramount found themselves siding with the So'na and asked the writers to add more scen s to make them look evil. Because at that point it was spac elves withholding the potential to save billions of lives just because they didn't want to inconvenience their tiny unviable civilization.
    Barihawk.jpg
  • adverberoadverbero Member Posts: 2,045 Arc User
    edited February 2015
    hevach wrote: »
    If you cut out every scene where anybody opens their mouth and says a word that isn't a battle command, what's left of Nemesis is one of Trek's more intense and prolonged starship duels.

    This is basically the same redeeming quality as most disaster movies - no matter how unwatchable the two hour version is, the 15 minute version on Youtube is pretty awesome.

    Haha, that sums it up pretty nicely
    solar_approach_by_chaos_sandwhich-d74kjft.png


    These are the Voyages on the STO forum, the final frontier. Our continuing mission: to explore Pretentious Posts, to seek out new Overreactions and Misinformation , to boldly experience Cynicism like no man has before.......
Sign In or Register to comment.