test content
  • Games
  • Social
  • Arc News
  • Support
  • Zen
What is the Arc Client?
Install Arc
Forums > Home› Feedback› Federation Discussion

I quite like this ship...

rearllrearll Member Posts: 87 Arc User
edited August 2014 in Federation Discussion
As the title suggests, not why sure but I quite like this...

http://msfm.seryan.com/kevin_l/ussvalkyrie.htm
Post edited by rearll on

Comments

  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    rearll wrote: »
    As the title suggests, not why sure but I quite like this...

    http://msfm.seryan.com/kevin_l/ussvalkyrie.htm

    again we see a fan made ship that is tons better than what cryptic puts out for fed ships. FACEPALM
  • lianthelialianthelia Member Posts: 7,896 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    It's a Intrepid that wants to be a Nebula...personally I prefer the Nebula over this.
    Can't have a honest conversation because of a white knight with power
  • steaensteaen Member Posts: 646 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Does nothing for me, I'm afraid.
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited August 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • tucana66tucana66 Member Posts: 710 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    lianthelia wrote: »
    It's a Intrepid that wants to be a Nebula...personally I prefer the Nebula over this.
    I'll second that, lianthelia.

    About the Intrepid-class kitbash... Since the Intrepid-class (U.S.S. Voyager) is able to perform atmospheric landings, I wonder how this ship would perform. (And better or worse than a Yeager-class, assuming it could land...)

    Which makes me wonder if we'll be able to "land" our Intrepid-class ships in "Delta Rising"...

    Not that we currently have anywhere in-game to land them.
  • xegiduaxegidua Member Posts: 36 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I like it

    Constitution -> Miranda
    Galaxy -> Nebula
    Intrepid -> This (Valkyrie?)

    It's very Trek, and suits the basic idea of the kitbashed ships we've already seen both fan-made and in the series. IMO this would've made a great addition as a more tactical oriented Intrepid - it looks a little tougher

    Presumably Starfleet were already producing Intrepid saucers, why would they not re-use those for other types of ship?
  • yreodredyreodred Member Posts: 3,527 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    It would surely add some value, although it's not my cup of the TBH.
    "...'With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured...the first thought forbidden...the first freedom denied--chains us all irrevocably.' ... The first time any man's freedom is trodden on, we're all damaged. I fear that today--" - (TNG) Picard, quoting Judge Aaron Satie

    A tale of two Picards
    https://youtu.be/d-f3bscZa0E?t=105
    (also applies to Star Trek in general)
  • talonxvtalonxv Member Posts: 4,257 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Looks like a cross between a nebula and intrepid and not a good one either.
    afMSv4g.jpg
    Star Trek Battles member. Want to roll with a good group of people regardless of fleets and not have to worry about DPS while doing STFs? Come join the channel and join in the fun!

    http://forum.arcgames.com/startrekonline/discussion/1145998/star-trek-battles-channel-got-canon/p1
  • altechachanaltechachan Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Well, I have no problems with it... but it reminds me of the other kidbashes that Starfleet did when they were in desperate need for ships during WWII.

    One of those "well, the warp core/drive works, the phasers fire, the torpedo launchers activate, the shields go up, the sensors pass their tests, and no one died during the process" designs that they pushed up.

    Won't mind seeing it in-game but then again, not feeling that attracted to it.
    Member since November 2009... I think.
    (UFP) Ragnar
  • tenkaritenkari Member Posts: 2,906 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    I dont like the really weird placement of the impulse engines... which is that bulky support block between the nacelle struts and engineering hull? bad placement i think, knock out all your engines in one good volley.
  • ufpterrellufpterrell Member Posts: 736 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Yuck, sorry the way they've just stuck the panelling from the Denaube Runabout looks awful, if it was as little more streamlined to represent the styling of the chevron/engineering hull it would be ok.
    Terrell.png

    Looking for a dedicated Star Trek community? Visit www.ufplanets.com for details.
  • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Same here, looks like a cross between a Nebula, Intrepid and a Runabout. No thanks.
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited August 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • xigbargxigbarg Member Posts: 0 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    tenkari wrote: »
    I dont like the really weird placement of the impulse engines... which is that bulky support block between the nacelle struts and engineering hull? bad placement i think, knock out all your engines in one good volley.

    Wouldn't that include the Connie, Excelsior, most if not all "escorts", DSSV, ect?

    Anywho, I like it. Has a nice Star Trek/Star Wars vibe going for it.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
  • ddesjardinsddesjardins Member Posts: 3,056 Media Corps
    edited August 2014
    Ugly kit bash. Not interested.
  • truewarpertruewarper Member Posts: 930 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    Nice...Star Fleet needs this.
    rearll wrote: »
    As the title suggests, not why sure but I quite like this...

    http://msfm.seryan.com/kevin_l/ussvalkyrie.htm
    52611496918_3c42b8bab8.jpg
    Departing from Sol *Earth* by Carlos A Smith,on Flickr
    SPACE---The Last and Great Frontier. A 14th-year journey
    Vna res, una mens, unum cor et anima una. Cetera omnia, somnium est.
  • UnknownUnknown
    edited August 2014
    This content has been removed.
  • corelogikcorelogik Member Posts: 1,039 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    edalgo wrote: »
    Much much better than that God awful kitbash Yeager.

    True. When I first saw the Yeager, i threw up in my mouth a little. A starship trying to be a fighter. *yawn*
    "Go play with your DPS in the corner, I don't care how big it is." ~ Me
    "There... are... four... lights!" ~Jean Luc Picard
  • intu1tionintu1tion Member Posts: 6 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    the more I look at my fleet partol escort - the more I THINK that it is UPSIDE DOWN!
    http://fc08.deviantart.net/fs71/i/2014/230/5/c/corrected_design_flaw_by_psiandco-d7vr9cj.jpg
    Perhaps the fleet patrol escort really wants to be more like the bonaventure

    or...

    The enterprise:

    http://fc05.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2014/235/6/e/fleet_patrol_cruiser_by_psiandco-d7wb7kz.jpg
  • admiralq1732admiralq1732 Member Posts: 1,561 Arc User
    edited August 2014
    ddesjardins wrote: »
    Ugly kit bash. Not interested.

    in compariosn to craptic designs. this is a thing of beauty
Sign In or Register to comment.